Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G615 MP2

ARM Mali-G615 MP2

The ARM Mali-G615 MP2 is an integrated mid-range graphics unit for ARM SoCs, which was first used in the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 in the first quarter of 2024. It uses 2 of the 6 cores that can be implemented for the G615 architecture.

Like the faster G715 variant, the Mali-G615 is based on the 4th generation of the Valhall architecture and therefore also supports variable rate shading.

Mali-G615 Series

Mali-G615 MP6 compare 7
Mali-G615 MP2 2
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall 4th Gen
Pipelines2 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement30.05.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G615 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 73008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5253     avg: 5637     median: 5297.5 (22%)     max: 6353 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5187     avg: 5702     median: 5219 (13%)     max: 6698 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3129     avg: 3199     median: 3145 (2%)     max: 3729 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 842     avg: 862     median: 851 (1%)     max: 979 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 6.1     avg: 6.6     median: 6.5 (2%)     max: 7.4 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.9     median: 15 (3%)     max: 17 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 39.8     median: 40 (3%)     max: 44 fps
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 33.6     median: 33 (3%)     max: 37 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 54     avg: 56.8     median: 56 (1%)     max: 63 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 80     avg: 82.8     median: 82 (3%)     max: 89 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 113     avg: 115.8     median: 114.5 (1%)     max: 124 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 144072     avg: 146521     median: 146764 (12%)     max: 148112 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 52.75     avg: 55.7     median: 55.7 (1%)     max: 58.72 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2480     avg: 2515     median: 2501 (1%)     max: 2605 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2436     avg: 2496     median: 2499 (1%)     max: 2546 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.84     avg: 3.8     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.63 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
29.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
29.5 29.7 29.8 29.8 49 51.5 55 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
29 29.6 29.6 29.8 40 46 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
58.6 58.8 59.2 59.6 60 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
38.8 39.3 39.7 39.8 39.9 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
43.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal29.729.6
Genshin Impact3939.434
PUBG Mobile5939.840
Asphalt 9: Legends5143.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
3


2


2

1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 02. 09:57:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12734 +0.014s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 12734 +0.031s ... 0.07s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.262s ... 0.333s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.333s

#12 Got 32 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.34s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.34s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.343s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.377s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.38s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G615 MP2 graphics card

Less modular, but still exceptional - CMF Phone 2 Pro review

Less modular, but still exceptional - CMF Phone 2 Pro review

The low-cost offshoot of Nothing makes improvements in an important area and now also offers NFC. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also offers a lot of smartphone for its mo...
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | ARM Mali-G615 MP2 | 6.77" | 185 g
Motorola Razr 60

Flip phone for design enthusiasts and the budget-conscious - Motorola Razr 60 smartphone review

If you are looking for a comparatively inexpensive flip phone, you should take a look at the Motorola Razr 60. With its unusual concept, Pantone colors for the ...
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | ARM Mali-G615 MP2 | 6.90" | 188 g
Motorola Edge 60

The premium smartphone that's shifting the mid-range benchmark - Motorola Edge 60 review

Standard performance, but a 4000-nit display, extra-long battery life and a triple camera with 3x telephoto zoom: the Motorola Edge 60 sweeps lots of mid-range ...
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | ARM Mali-G615 MP2 | 6.67" | 179 g
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Has this mid-range phone gotten even better? Motorola Edge 60 Fusion review

Motorola wants to really show off again with its Edge 60 Fusion by installing WiFi 6 and a high-quality case in Pantone colors. The manufacturer has additionall...
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | ARM Mali-G615 MP2 | 6.67" | 178 g
Xiaomi Poco X7 (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Xiaomi Poco X7 smartphone review - Top display and great suitability for everyday use at a fair price

The Xiaomi Poco X7 proves you can get a very well-equipped smartphone for little money. Its case, display and battery life all get the thumbs up—and it even sup...
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | ARM Mali-G615 MP2 | 6.67" | 185.5 g

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G review – A feature-focused smartphone for bargain hunters

Motorola ThinkPhone 25: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.36", 0.2 kg
  Review » ThinkPhone 25 review - No Motorola smartphone is more secure and robust

CMF Phone 1: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » CMF Phone 1 review - Modular smartphone at an affordable price

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Edge 50 Neo smartphone review – Compact or a big display? This phone can do both.

Motorola Razr 50: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Razr 50 smartphone review – The most affordable flip phone gets a large second display

Oppo Reno12 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno12 Pro Smartphone Review: Light and slim is back

CMF Phone 2 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.77", 0.2 kg
  External Review » CMF Phone 2 Pro

Motorola Edge 60: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 60

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Blackview Active 10 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 10.95", 0 kg
  External Review » Blackview Active 10 Pro

Ulefone Armor 34 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.95"
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 34 Pro

Ulefone Armor 30 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.95", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 30 Pro

Vivo T4x: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T4x

Oukitel WP100 Titan: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.80", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP100 Titan

Oppo A5 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A5 Pro

Nubia Flip 2: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nubia Flip 2

Doogee V40: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.78", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V40

Realme 14 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 14 Pro

Xiaomi Poco X7: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco X7

Realme P1 Speed: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme P1 Speed

Motorola ThinkPhone 25: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.36", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola ThinkPhone 25

Vivo V40e: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.77", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V40e

Doogee V40 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.78", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V40 Pro

Realme Narzo 70 Turbo: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 70 Turbo

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G

Motorola Moto S50: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.36", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto S50

Vivo iQOO Z9s: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.77", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z9s

Realme 13+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 13+ 5G

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 50 Neo

Unihertz Jelly Max: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 5.05", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Unihertz Jelly Max

Nothing CMF Phone 1: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing CMF Phone 1

Motorola Razr 50: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Razr 50

Oppo Reno12 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno12 Pro

Oppo Reno12: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno12

CMF Phone 2 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.77", 0.2 kg
   » CMF Phone 2 Pro: Nothing squanders an opportunity

Motorola Razr 60: MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Motorola Razr 60: A solid flip phone despite certain shortcomings

   » Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs. Razr 60: What are the differences between the two flip phones?

Motorola Edge 60: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Motorola Edge 60: Strong contender in the €400 price range

CMF Phone 1: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing CMF Phone 2 with new camera setup spotted in leaked hands-on image on Reddit

Nothing CMF Phone 1: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing CMF Phone 2 with new camera setup spotted in leaked hands-on image on Reddit

Xiaomi Poco X7: MediaTek Dimensity 7300, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Xiaomi Poco X7: Solid everyday smartphone despite low price

Motorola Razr 50: MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, 6.90", 0.2 kg
   » The Motorola Razr 50 comes with a larger external display and a problem

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-07-10)