Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

CMF Phone 1 review - Modular smartphone at an affordable price

Customisation whizz.

The CMF Phone 1 by Nothing positions itself in the budget mid-range segment. In addition to having respectable hardware, the smartphone features a modular design, allowing for more personalisation. In this review, we’ll discuss where the phone excels and what can be improved.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zhiwei Zhuang) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict - Affordable yet customisable

The CMF Phone 1 is an impressive debut smartphone for Nothing’s sub-brand, particularly standing out with its unique design. While replaceable back panels are actually nothing new, the company has added more utility and options with the screw-on cover. The added Accessory Point not only enhances functionality but also grabs attention.

The CMF Phone 1 delivers solid system performance thanks to its snappy MediaTek SoC. Despite not being as bright as promised, the display still achieves excellent brightness levels.

Unfortunately, the device lacks NFC support. Nothing explains this is because the CMF smartphone was initially intended for the Indian market only. This shortcoming will likely be addressed with the release of the CMF Phone 2. We also wish the device had longer update support.

Despite boasting 5G capability, the CMF Phone 1 only supports the ageing Wi-Fi 5 standard. The integrated cameras are remarkably good for such a budget phone, but it doesn't have a second rear camera for taking photos. On the other hand, the CMF Phone 1 has superb battery life. 

Pros

+ bright 120Hz OLED
+ snappy system performance
+ replaceable back plate with screw hole for accessories
+ upgradable storage
+ good battery life

Cons

- battery not replaceable despite potential
- sluggish Wi-Fi
- effectively only has a single camera
- no NFC on board

Price and availability

In Germany, the CMF Phone 1 is currently available for as low as €179 from retailers like Amazon. For readers in the US, the 256 GB model can be had for US$289 from Amazon. Alternatively, you can check out CMF Phone 1's official product page for availability in your region.

Comparison with possible alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.8%
CMF Phone 1
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Anoowkoa [2 Pack for Nothing...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $4.99
Suttkue for CMF phone 1 scre...
List Price: 269€
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
Super AMOLED
2.
78.3%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
2. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $11.99
[2 Packs] Screen Protector f...
184 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1080
394 PPI
AMOLED
3.
85.8% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $289.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $345.00
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi R...
List Price: 399€
187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $2.99
ivoler 2 Pack Screen Protect...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED

The CMF Phone 1 is the first smartphone released by Nothing’s budget brand and was originally intended exclusively for the Indian market. However, the concept received so a positive response internationally that Nothing decided to bring the device to other countries as well.

Two variants of the phone are available: 8/128 GB (€239, or US$199) and 8/256 GB (€269, or US$289). The storage can also be expanded using an optional microSD card.

Specifications

CMF Phone 1
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitve touchscreen, 240Hz touch sampling rate, Super AMOLED, 960Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 238 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, Accelerometer, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 164 x 77 ( = 0.31 x 6.46 x 3.03 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33W Fast Charging, 5W reverse wired charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, EIS) portrait lens; Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, USB-C-cable, SIM ejector tool, Nothing OS 2.6, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V3/4 | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | Hybrid-SIM | IP52 | Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 1.47 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.29 W/kg , fanless
Weight
197 g ( = 6.95 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
269 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & features - Replaceable back cover with Accessory Point

The CMF Phone 1 features a modular design with a replaceable back panel, secured by four prominent screws rather than clips. The plate also has what Nothing calls an Accessory Point, a screw thread for attaching optional accessories, such as a lanyard, a foldable stand or a card case (€25, or US$25 each). The back cover comes in four colourways: Black, Blue, Orange and Light Green. Each additional cover costs €35 (US$35) and includes a corresponding tool, new screws, a card tray and an Accessory Point cover in a matching colour. Unfortunately, Nothing has missed the opportunity to also make the battery easily removable, as it is secured with additional adhesives, preventing convenient user access.

The back plate is made of plastic and isn't susceptible to collecting fingerprints. The Blue and Orange options also come with a vegan leather finish. The CMF Phone 1 has great build quality and feels decent in the hand, considering its price point. The gaps on the front are tight and even. The device doesn’t creak much when twisted and feels very sturdy. The physical buttons have a bit of play but are extremely smooth to press.

The phone is equipped with a hybrid slot that can hold either two Nano SIMs or a microSD and a SIM card. However, the slot isn’t the fastest of its kind. Additionally, there is no NFC on board.

Size comparison

164 mm / 6.46 in 77 mm / 3.03 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 197 g0.4343 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 74.3 mm / 2.93 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 187 g0.4123 lbs161.4 mm / 6.35 in 74.8 mm / 2.94 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 184 g0.4057 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +189%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s +53%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
19.14 MB/s
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.78 MB/s -49%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.2 (30.2-49.5)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø72.1 (33.5-83.5)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)

Connectivity and software - CMF Phone 1 with ac Wi-Fi and 5G

In an optimal scenario, the CMF Phone 1 can connect to a 5G mobile network. It covers a reasonably wide range of frequencies and shouldn’t have any issues establishing a mobile connection in Europe. Although the device maintained a stable connection to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router over Wi-Fi 5, the speeds weren’t especially impressive.

Voice quality on the CMF smartphone is decent. In quiet surroundings, transmitted voices sound quite natural, with only some slight echoing over the speakerphone. However, the noise cancellation is quite rudimentary. 

The CMF Phone 1 ships with Nothing OS 2.6 running on top of Android 14, the same overlay found on the Nothing Phone (2a). The company promises two major updates and three years of security patches, which is still satisfactory at this price point.

Biometric security is handled by an in-display optical fingerprint sensor, which can unlock the CMF Phone 1 rather quickly and reliably. You also have the option of using face unlock via the front camera, but this method is less secure and only works properly under good lighting conditions.

Unlike other smartphones from the company, Nothing hasn’t provided any sustainability information for the CMF Phone 1. The packaging has a laminated design but otherwise doesn’t use any plastic.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Oppo Reno12 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
922 (790min - 987max) MBit/s +128%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=122)
870 MBit/s +115%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +106%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
733 MBit/s +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
678 (544min - 711max) MBit/s +68%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
404 (203min - 418max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Oppo Reno12 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
880 (565min - 927max) MBit/s +131%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=120)
834 MBit/s +119%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
717 MBit/s +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
581 (491min - 618max) MBit/s +52%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
381 (362min - 387max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
CMF Phone 1 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø398 (203-418)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
CMF Phone 1 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø380 (362-387)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)

Cameras - Decent main shooter on the CMF Phone 1

Selfie taken with the CMF Phone 1
Selfie taken with the CMF Phone 1

Despite lacking autofocus, the CMF Phone 1’s front camera can still deliver respectable photos, as long as enough light is present.

The main shooter on the back offers up to 50MP and uses pixel binning. Nevertheless, it can also utilise the full resolution and even capture RAW images. Photos taken in daylight look great, characterised by a pleasing level of sharpness and good dynamics. There is a second rear lens, but it is a depth sensor for creating a bokeh effect. The phone doesn’t feature any ultrawide, optical zoom or macro camera and also lacks image stabilisation.

The main camera can capture videos at 4K/30 fps or 1080p/60 fps. That said, electronic image stabilisation only works at 1080p/30 fps. The front camera only offers Full HD resolution at 30 or 60 fps.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow-light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
4.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
ColorChecker CMF Phone 1: 4.88 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 9.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.6 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
48 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
36 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
ColorChecker CMF Phone 1: 31.72 ∆E min: 12.42 - max: 48.01 ∆E

Display - Bright OLED with 960Hz PWM dimming

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

When displaying a completely white image with the ambient light sensor enabled, the Super AMOLED screen on the CMF Phone 1 reached an exceptionally high peak brightness of over 1,200 cd/m², though this is significantly lower than the advertised 2,000 cd/m². The panel also maintained this brightness level during the APL18 measurement and HDR video playback. The peak brightness claimed by Nothing is probably only attainable with HDR photos.

The system can adjust the screen's refresh rate to either 60 or 120Hz. Alternatively, users can choose to fix it at 60Hz. Unlike many of its rivals, the CMF Phone 1 employs high-frequency PWM dimming. Although the frequency isn’t quite high enough to fully eliminate potential issues for sensitive individuals, it can at least alleviate these problems.

1179
cd/m²
1172
cd/m²
1189
cd/m²
1179
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²
1170
cd/m²
1191
cd/m²
1191
cd/m²
1208
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1208 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1183.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1169 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CMF Phone 1
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Oppo Reno12 Pro
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-19%
-13%
-17%
Brightness middle
1169
1192
2%
1205
3%
904
-23%
Brightness
1183
1209
2%
1177
-1%
912
-23%
Brightness Distribution
97
92
-5%
90
-7%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
1.8
-20%
1.51
-1%
2.1
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
4
-38%
4.07
-40%
2.8
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.9
-53%
2.5
-32%
2.2
-16%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.33 94%
2.175 101%
2.1 105%
CCT
6733 97%
6242 104%
6407 101%
6478 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.67 %
Secondary Frequency: 926 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum screen brightness
min.
25% screen brightness
25%
50% screen brightness
50%
75% screen brightness
75%
max manual screen brightness
100%
Greyscale (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Greyscale (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Colour (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Colour (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Colour space (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Colour space (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Saturation (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)
Saturation (Colour mode: Vivid, target gamut: DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.512 ms rise
↘ 0.5175 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7095 ms rise
↘ 0.7145 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance, emissions and battery life

The CMF Phone 1 is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 coupled with 8 GB of memory. This processor enables smooth system performance, whilst the integrated ARM Mali-G615 MP2 GPU allows for stutter-free gaming in most cases, though without ray tracing or high frame rates. 

During our testing, the phone’s surface temperatures remained unobjectionable throughout; the SoC didn’t throttle even under prolonged load. The mono speaker on the bottom chin delivers a pleasing sound profile that is remarkably good for the price.

With the screen set to 120Hz and 150 cd/m², the 5,000 mAh battery achieved a very impressive 18 hours of use during our Wi-Fi test. The battery can be charged at up to 33 watts.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=166, last 2 years)
1471 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points 0%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1027 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (541 - 1051, n=4)
909 Points -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
541 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=166, last 2 years)
4107 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points 0%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2948 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1906 - 2977, n=4)
2615 Points -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1906 Points -35%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=102, last 2 years)
1272280 Points +91%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
667282 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (598120 - 667282, n=3)
637351 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -10%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
598120 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
566071 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (11724 - 15116, n=3)
13158 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years)
13110 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
12633 Points +8%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
11724 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2093, n=161, last 2 years)
901 Points +27%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
707 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (390 - 707, n=2)
549 Points -22%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
390 Points -45%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (191 - 4619, n=35, last 2 years)
845 Points +57%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
539 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (521 - 540, n=3)
533 Points -1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
521 Points -3%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (192 - 32432, n=35, last 2 years)
4196 Points +217%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1322 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1051 - 1322, n=3)
1232 Points -7%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -20%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=35, last 2 years)
5989 Points +122%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2721 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (2697 - 2721, n=3)
2709 Points 0%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2697 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
37883 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
36010 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35379 Points +56%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
31742 Points +40%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (22739 - 31742, n=3)
26016 Points +14%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
22739 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
847 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
788 Points -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
850 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
835 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
800 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3135 Points 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3130 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3046 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points -11%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3123 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3052 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3039 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points -10%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 Points +1%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
346 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
352 Points +2%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
344 Points
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +5%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -15%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.5 fps 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -11%
CMF Phone 1Oppo Reno12 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
59%
-5%
-50%
42%
56%
Sequential Read 256KB
1024.12
1777.39
74%
946.8
-8%
529.32
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
535.66
1700.51
217%
808.2
51%
270
-50%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
117%
Random Read 4KB
294.28
228.05
-23%
239.2
-19%
244.24
-17%
Random Write 4KB
394.59
265.4
-33%
220.5
-44%
62.59
-84%
Max. Load
 42.7 °C
109 F
41.7 °C
107 F
37.3 °C
99 F
 
 42.8 °C
109 F
39.8 °C
104 F
37 °C
99 F
 
 42.1 °C
108 F
39.2 °C
103 F
35.5 °C
96 F
 
Maximum: 42.8 °C = 109 F
Average: 39.8 °C = 104 F
36.5 °C
98 F
39 °C
102 F
41.8 °C
107 F
35 °C
95 F
38.7 °C
102 F
39.7 °C
103 F
34.7 °C
94 F
37.5 °C
100 F
40.4 °C
105 F
Maximum: 41.8 °C = 107 F
Average: 38.1 °C = 101 F
Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96.1 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 %
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.9 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 %
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96.5 % -2%
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.11 (5.1-5.12)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5-5.11)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.6 (18.6-18.7)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.4 (18-18.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.6 (18.3-18.8)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø2.57 (2.53-2.62)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.232.22526.833.43123.635.34022.332.65027.538.96320.533.58020.736.110019.336.612515.73916013.650.320016.251.925015.555.431515.158.640010.966.25009.974.963012.171.680014.171.9100014.273.5125012.978.3160014.283.5200012.780.8250012.776.2315013.577.3400013.176.4500013.181.1630013.479.7800012.779.21000013.480.81250013.477.31600013.160.5SPL25.490.9N0.786.6median 13.4median 76.2Delta1.19.727.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCMF Phone 1Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
CMF Phone 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 130)
18h 24min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
CMF Phone 1
5000 mAh
1104 min
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
986 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
1002 min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
902 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

Besides offering superb value for money, the CMF Phone 1 stands out particularly with its unique customisation options.

CMF Phone 1 - 11/11/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
14 / 55 → 25%
Application Performance
60 / 85 → 71%
AI Performance
57%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
61%
Average
63%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
80%
Power Use
97.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
43.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 43.4%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > CMF Phone 1 review - Modular smartphone at an affordable price
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-11-12 (Update: 2024-11-13)