Notebookcheck Logo
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

ThinkPhone 25 review - No Motorola smartphone is more secure and robust

Big display, small size.

Motorola's compact ThinkPhone 25 puts security at the forefront. It does so through its very robust case and long-term software support including AI-based security functions. Is the Moto phone the perfect business phone? We'll find out for you.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Rugged Smartphone

Verdict on the ThinkPhone 25

The ThinkPad series from Lenovo has a long-standing tradition and has made a decisive contribution to the triumph of portable computers. Now the smartphone equivalent follows in its second generation—albeit at a significantly lower price. The ThinkPhone 25 is by no means a perfect business phone, but it does a lot right for a mid-range smartphone. Its case is not only super robust, but also feels comfortable to hold thanks to its aramid fiber back. Plus, it looks modern thanks to its narrow display bezels.

The biggest point of criticism of the current ThinkPhone generation is its weak Dimensity 7300. The business version of the Motorola Edge 50 Neo doesn't feel particularly powerful, although the MediaTek SoC is very stable.

PWM-sensitive users are also likely to be unhappy about its low-frequency screen flickering. A Poco F6, for example, offers much more eye-friendly PWM dimming in the mid-range segment—and noticeably more performance.

The ThinkPhone 25's limited storage is a bit of a shame: without the option to expand it, its 256 GB may not be enough for some business users, especially in the context of private and professional use.

Pros

+ robust case
+ sharp LTPO display
+ slim display bezels
+ 5 years of updates
+ good cameras
+ no throttling

Cons

- system lags
- poor location services
- SoC's performance is quite weak
- slow USB 2.0 port
- low-frequency PWM flickering
- missing transparency

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Lenovo ThinkPhone 25 by Motorola is not available to purchase in the USA. It has an MRSP of around $520.

You can find the predecessor model on Amazon for $399.99

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.2%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $9.29
Zeking [2+2 Pack for Motorol...
3. $17.99
Wireless Charger Stand Compa...
List Price: 499€
171 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.36"
2670x1220
462 PPI
p-OLED
2.
77.3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $9.99
CeiLarv 3 Pack for Motorola ...
List Price: 499€
171 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"
2670x1220
459 PPI
P-OLED
3.
81.9%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $482.00
List Price: 549€
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2400x1080
431 PPI
AMOLED
4.
87.4% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $449.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy A55 5G Dual S...
2. $3.99
Lesakit Samsung Galaxy A55 5...
3. $6.99
JETech Screen Protector for ...
List Price: 529€
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
82.2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $356.99
List Price: 500€
179 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

The ThinkPhone 25 by Motorola places its focus on security and robustness, with which the manufacturer aims to appeal to companies and business customers in particular.

However, the 2024 model isn't a true successor to the ThinkPhone, but rather a business version of the Motorola Edge 50 Neo—in other words, the ThinkPhone 25 is positioned in the mid-range segment. The Motorola phone only uses a MediaTek Dimensity 7300, which is also used in cheaper smartphones.

Motorola advertises numerous security features in combination with a high level of protection on its business phone. Otherwise, the ThinkPhone 25 has a comparatively small 6.36-inch pOLED display, making its dimensions quite compact.

The ThinkPhone 25's specifications

Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (ThinkPhone Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2670 x 1220 pixel 462 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, p-OLED, LTPO, 10 Bit, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 215 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, SAR-sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 154.1 x 71.2 ( = 0.32 x 6.07 x 2.8 in)
Battery
4310 mAh
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, Sony LYTIA) + 10 MPix (f/2.0, OIS, 3x optical, tele) + 13 MPix (f/2.2, ultrawide, marco)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, f/​2.4, Videos @2160p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, 68W-TurboPower charger, USB cable, info materials, SIM-Tool, headset, case, Moto UI, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM, GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo; Widevine L1, HDR: HDR10, HDR+, HLG, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
171 g ( = 6.03 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 87 g ( = 3.07 oz / 0.19 pounds)
Price
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Motorola phone is super robust

The ThinkPhone 25 aims to be a reliable companion more than anything. To this end, the Motorola phone not only features an IP68 certification, which provides protection against water and dust, but also complies with the MIL-STD-810H standard of the US Department of Defense, which was specially developed for military applications.

As a result, its case should be protected against environmental influences, such as extreme temperature ranges or temporary resistance to acidic liquids. Unlike an IP certification, which is subject to an ISO or DIN standard, MIL-STD-810 is not a standardized protection standard that allows manufacturers to adapt test methods to the corresponding product.

The back of the ThinkPhone 25 is made of aramid fibers, which give the Motorola phone a pleasant feel and hardly show any fingerprint marks. Although the ThinkPhone's aluminum frame has been replaced by plastic on the 2024 model, its build quality is still great.

Its display is protected by Gorilla Glass 7i—a further development of Gorilla Glass 5—which was specially designed for mid-range smartphones. Gorilla Glass 7i is said to have a longer lifespan and better resistance to drops and scratches compared to Gorilla Glass 5.

The bezels around the 6.36-inch OLED panel have been kept quite narrow. As a result, the ratio between the screen and the front of the device is very efficient for this price range, coming in at 89.9%. Subsequently, the dimensions of the ThinkPhone 25 are also nice and compact.

Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Size comparison

161.1 mm / 6.34 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 213 g0.4696 lbs160.5 mm / 6.32 in 74.4 mm / 2.93 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 179 g0.3946 lbs154.1 mm / 6.07 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 171 g0.377 lbs154.1 mm / 6.07 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 171 g0.377 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - Lenovo's smartphone communicates with the ThinkPad

There are only a few differences to the Motorola Edge 50 Neo when it comes to its connectivity, but there is (so far) only a small memory version of the Thinkphone 25 with 8 GB RAM. An option with 12 GB DDR4X and 512 GB uMCP is not available for the mid-range phone. NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, USB OTG and Miracast are also on board. Its slow USB standard (2.0), which doesn't support wired image output, sets it apart from the high-end faction. Unfortunately, there is no 3.5 mm jack plug and you can't expand its storage via an SD card slot.

As befits a business cell phone, the ThinkPhone 25 boasts a wide range of security features. The in-house ThinkShield mobile is designed to protect personal data from malware and provide management solutions for companies. In addition, protected folders can be secured with two-factor authentication if required. The firmware can also be maintained using Moto Software Control management and lost devices can be locked with Moto Safe.

The manufacturer advertises an interesting option for users of a ThinkPad or Motorola tablet. Via Smart Connect, the ThinkPhone 25 can be used as a webcam or as a mouse and keyboard. Plus, data can be shared and notifications can be displayed on the ThinkPad. However, the Motorola phone also works wirelessly with any other Windows laptop.

Left case side
Left case side
Right case side (buttons)
Right case side (buttons)
Bottom case side (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM card slot)
Bottom case side (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM card slot)
Top case side (microphone)
Top case side (microphone)

Software - The ThinkPhone 25 with long update support

According to Motorola, the mid-range smartphone is set to be supplied with operating system and security updates for five years.

At the time of testing, the ThinkPhone 25 was equipped with Android 14 and its latest security patches were from November 2024. The latter are to be rolled out at least every two months for the Edge 50 Neo, and they will even be supplied monthly on the ThinkPhone 25.

Even so, in the past, the reliability and speed of patch delivery haven't always been optimal for Lenovo phones.

Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review

Sustainability

Motorola hasn't provided any precise information on the materials used, their recycling rate or data on the smartphone's CO2 consumption over the course of its life cycle. The ThinkPhone 25's packaging appears to be plastic-free.

Communication and GNSS - The Motorola phone with 5G

In terms of connectivity, the ThinkPhone 25 is future-proof, even if it doesn't always rely on the very latest wireless standards. It supports Wi-Fi 6E including 6 GHz Wi-Fi, which resulted in stable transfer rates in combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router. However, its values for the 6 GHz channel were comparatively low.

For connecting to the web on the go, the Motorola phone supports access to the 5G network at best, but the ThinkPhone 25 also supports a wide range of frequencies for the LTE standard. Users will be well equipped in Germany, where this test was carried out, but connectivity should also not be an issue when traveling.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco F6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
897 (597min - 972max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
856 (450min - 907max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (295 - 1757, n=161)
825 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
762 (640min - 836max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
735 (671min - 791max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1828, n=183, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
939 (843min - 960max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
834 (780min - 855max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco F6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (800min - 849max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
823 (704min - 841max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=159)
822 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=183, last 2 years)
746 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (508 - 1945, n=91, last 2 years)
1355 MBit/s +46%
Xiaomi Poco F6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1331 (654min - 1470max) MBit/s +43%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (417 - 1902, n=26)
1191 MBit/s +28%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
928 (759min - 970max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
521 (418min - 644max) MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi Poco F6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1554 (1445min - 1607max) MBit/s +102%
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1870, n=91, last 2 years)
1402 MBit/s +82%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=26)
1251 MBit/s +63%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
769 (638min - 841max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
754 (611min - 828max) MBit/s -2%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (759-970)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø769 (638-841)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (640-836)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø939 (843-960)
Location services indoors
Location services indoors
Location services outdoors
Location services outdoors

In order to assess its tracking accuracy in practice, we took the ThinkPhone 25 with us on a short bike ride. We recorded the route in parallel with a Garmin Venu 2 for comparison purposes. Overall, we liked its tracking capabilities quite well, but its deviations on our test route became more frequent on closer inspection.

It only supports single-band GNSS and not all global satellite navigation systems are available. Its position is determined accurately outdoors, but the ThinkPhone 25 needs a certain amount of time before a satellite fix is achieved. Inside buildings, the mid-range phone doesn't allow its location to be determined.

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
ThinkPhone 25
ThinkPhone 25

Telefone functions and call quality - The ThinkPhone 25 supports eSIMs

Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review

The Motorola smartphone offers fully-fledged dual SIM support with two nano-SIM card slots for private and business calls.

It's also possible to integrate an eSIM into the system and use the VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling functions. Remote eSIM allocation and remote device management should additionally make the ThinkPhone 25 ideal for corporate customers.

Its call quality via the earpiece sounds good. During our test, the person on the other end of the line sounded clear and we were also clearly transmitted through the two microphones.

Cameras - The Lenovo phone with Sony technology

Selfie on the Thinkphone 25
Selfie on the Thinkphone 25

The ThinkPhone 25 has a 32-MPix lens on the front that even uses pixel binning. The resulting 8 MPix photos feature a neutrally balanced color depiction, and have lots of detail and a decent dynamic range. The front-facing camera can record video in UHD quality at best, which not every mid-range phone can do.

A Sony LYTIA 700C sensor with OIS is used on the back, which has been specially optimized for thin camera modules. The 1/1.56-inch image sensor has a resolution of 50 MPix and, in combination with an f/1.8 aperture, delivered very good results in our test shots—surprisingly good even when compared to the quality offered by an Apple iPhone 16 Pro. Sharpness and color balance are very good for a mid-range device and the ThinkPhone 25 retained some details even in the dark.

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
10x
10x
30x
30x
Macro
Macro

The Motorola cell phone's 10-MPix telephoto camera is also a special feature, as a 3x optical zoom isn't always a given in this price range. The optically stabilized photos look impressive up to a magnification of 5x and even with a 10x zoom, the photos are still fine. The telephoto sensor also has a positive effect on portrait shots, as a lens with a long focal length is available for this purpose.

However, those who like to take very wide-angle photos with their smartphone should steer clear of the ThinkPhone 25, as its 13 MPix ultra-wide-angle camera is clearly the weakest lens in the group. The photos don't look very sharp and have many image errors.

The same as on the front, videos can be recorded in 4K resolution and at a maximum of 30 fps. The image quality is okay and the camera's autofocus reacts reliably. You just need to decide which lens to use before each recording, as it isn't possible to switch between lenses while recording.

Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle
orginal image
click to load images

In controlled lighting conditions, we analyzed the 50-MPix main camera's color reproduction in comparison to the actual reference colors. In addition to the brightening that often occurs in smartphones, the ThinkPhone 25 hardly missed the mark when it came to colors. Larger deviations in the ColorChecker passport actually only occurred in the black balance.

ColorChecker
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola ThinkPhone 25: 4.71 ∆E min: 1.09 - max: 10.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola ThinkPhone 25: 46.31 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 85.54 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The ThinkPhone 25 with a power supply

The ThinkPhone 25's power supply
The ThinkPhone 25's power supply

A look inside the ThinkPhone 25's box is reminiscent of times gone by when manufacturers still attached great importance to a lavish scope of delivery: Lenovo equips its mid-range phone with a protective film, a USB cable, a protective cover and a matching 68-watt charger. Motorola even includes a headset with its ThinkPhone 25.

All of Motorola's phones are covered by a standard 12-month warranty in the United States. You can optionally take out a Moto Care insurance package for the ThinkPhone 25 for up to three years.

Input devices & operation - The Motorola smartphone with FaceUnlock

Thanks to its high refresh rate of a maximum of 120 Hz, the ThinkPhone 25 should run smoothly during everyday use and animations should look smooth. Unfortunately, this is only true in theory, as the Motorola phone often suffers stutters and delays during everyday use.

Inputs on the 6.36-inch display are implemented accurately right up to the corners of the touchscreen. The OLED panel also responds quickly to touch thanks to its sampling rate of up to 300 Hz.

The phone's optical fingerprint sensor—which unlocks the screen reliably—isn't the speediest on the market, but works fast enough for a mid-range phone and is quite reliable. You can also make use of less secure 2D facial recognition based on a FaceUnlock function using the front camera.

Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review
Thinkphone 25 smartphone review

Display - The ThinkPhone 25 with OLED

The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode each
The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green light-emitting diode each

The ThinkPhone 25's 6.36-inch OLED panel has a 1220p resolution—the manufacturer calls this SuperHD—with an aspect ratio of 20:9 and an impressive 462 PPI. The refresh rate can be dynamically adjusted. LTPO technology enables the Motorola phone to have a variable frequency of 1 to 120 Hz, which is still extremely rare in this price range.

Although the ThinkPhone 25 wasn't record-breakingly bright during our measurements, over 1,100 cd/m² with an activated ambient light sensor and displaying a pure white display is nonetheless very good for the mid-range segment. We measured up to 2,156 cd/m² when displaying bright and dark surfaces (APL18 pattern). This allows HDR content in movies and series to be reproduced vividly.

1088
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1113
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1125
cd/m²
1108
cd/m²
1104
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1102
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1125 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1109.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1125 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.95 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
106.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.099
CCT: 6336 K
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
p-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco F6
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
4%
19%
9%
-3%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1125
1246
11%
1518
35%
962
-14%
1031
-8%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1109
1235
11%
1466
32%
967
-13%
1028
-7%
Brightness Distribution (%)
97
98
1%
88
-9%
99
2%
96
-1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.95
1.8
8%
1.2
38%
1.6
18%
1.4
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.37
3.81
-13%
3.3
2%
2.6
23%
3.7
-10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.3
4%
2
17%
1.5
37%
2.9
-21%
Gamma
2.099 105%
2.191 100%
2.2 100%
2.13 103%
2.21 100%
CCT
6336 103%
6488 100%
6786 96%
6382 102%
6560 99%

* ... smaller is better

Due to the installed OLED technology, the phone uses PWM modulation to control the screen's brightness. Motorola has stated that its ThinkPhone 25 makes use of eye-friendly DC dimming, but there is no information on the frequency of this. We measured a fairly low 407 Hz with our oscilloscope. Motorola seems to be taking a different approach here than with its sister model, the Edge 50 Neo, where we measured over 1,600 Hz in our test.

Those who are sensitive to display flickering could very well experience discomfort due to its rather high amplitude deflection of over 24 percent. The greater this value deviates from 0 percent, the higher the probability that changes in the brightness control will be noticed negatively. The ThinkPhone 25's low base flickering (91 Hz) is probably due to BFI which is commonly used as burn-in protection.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 91 Hz
Amplitude: 24 %

The display backlight flickers at 91 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 91 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The ThinkPhone 25 gives users the option to adjust the display's calibration in the shape of three preset profiles and a white balance. Using the "Natural" profile, the colors are displayed very accurately. Grayscale deviations are then also small and we didn't note a color cast.

Color accuracy (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: P3)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: P3)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

The OLED panel's colors remain stable and vivid even at a flat viewing angle. Its brightness doesn't drop much, either. Outdoors, the ThinkPhone 25 benefits from its high brightness and leaves a great impression. Enough brightness reserves should also be available to cope with most lighting situations during the summer months. Reflections didn't limit readability whatsoever in our wintery conditions.

Performance - The ThinkPhone 25 with a MediaTek SoC

The ThinkPhone 25 comes with the same SoC from Mediatek as the Edge 50 Neo. However, the Dimensity 7300, which is manufactured using 4nm technology, isn't terribly fast for this price range. If you want, you can use up to 8 GB of the phone's internal storage as virtual RAM using RAM Boost.

In our benchmarks, the mid-range phone's performance wasn't very impressive. Even an Exynos 1480 inside the Galaxy A55 was more powerful than the ThinkPhone 25 in both the multi-core and single-core Geekbench tests.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1930 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)
1723 Points +63%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +10%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1054 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (541 - 1058, n=13)
1001 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)
5030 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4876 Points +57%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +12%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3098 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1906 - 3214, n=13)
2889 Points -7%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1479 Points +85%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2635, n=132, last 2 years)
1215 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +12%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
799 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (726 - 817, n=6)
794 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4557 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=132, last 2 years)
4180 Points +45%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (2741 - 3000, n=6)
2900 Points +1%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2878 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1508271 Points +126%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)
1446031 Points +117%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points +11%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
666675 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (598120 - 681899, n=9)
653724 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15834 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15547 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)
14720 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (11724 - 15834, n=12)
14264 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -27%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1127 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=132, last 2 years)
1122 Points +55%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +8%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
726 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (390 - 759, n=6)
667 Points -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8810 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14076, n=148, last 2 years)
7472 Points +56%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 5171, n=9)
4925 Points +3%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4783 Points
System
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13008 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)
11207 Points +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8694 - 10784, n=9)
9074 Points +4%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8743 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -10%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +103%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9774 Points +102%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)
8486 Points +75%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (4432 - 6590, n=9)
5546 Points +15%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4837 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -15%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
26226 Points +206%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
24928 Points +191%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points +120%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8564 - 8638, n=9)
8603 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8564 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -1%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1806 Points +24%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)
1675 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points +1%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1462 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1130 - 1462, n=9)
1388 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +6%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
27964 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (8087 - 27964, n=8)
22454 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19738 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15559 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -81%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27075 Points +86%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
14587 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (13579 - 14587, n=3)
14033 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1183 Points -92%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -96%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2786 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)
1868 Points -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (397 - 2786, n=5)
1797 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
445 Points -84%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1342 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)
1148 Points -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (136 - 1342, n=5)
849 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
123 Points -91%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
564 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)
508 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (137 - 564, n=5)
385 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
121 Points -79%

The Dimensity 7300 uses a Mali-G615 MP2 graphics unit, which performed somewhat weaker during our graphics tests compared to an Xclipse 530 or Mali-G715 MP7. Especially in the demanding high-tier GFXBench benchmarks, the GPU inside the Motorola smartphone landed in last place.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3004 Points +252%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3078 Points +255%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points +172%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points +7%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
867 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12149 Points +280%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points +25%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3201 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3159 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points +22%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3189 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3169 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5188 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5071 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1041 Points +197%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points +183%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
350 Points 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
350 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1080 Points +205%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points +181%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
354 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
336 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +34%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +25%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
464 fps +307%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps +227%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +18%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +90%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +29%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps +190%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +14%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +176%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +139%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +39%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps +211%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +113%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +22%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +200%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps +192%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +28%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps +200%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +9%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +233%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +228%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +50%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps +243%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +157%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +36%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +207%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +179%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +45%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +218%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +29%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22 fps +233%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps +20%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.6 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps -6%

The ThinkPhone 25 delivered decent results in the browser tests and performs well during everyday use. There are hardly any long delays when scrolling or accessing complex websites.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
210.192 Points +94%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)
152.8 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +21%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (Chrome 131)
108.545 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (60.2 - 138.5, n=7)
101.3 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -13%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)
14.3 runs/min +91%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
11.8 runs/min +58%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min +40%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5.6 - 8.86, n=8)
7.57 runs/min +1%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (Chrome 131)
7.48 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
183 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years)
144.8 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +7%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (Chrome 131)
118 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (56 - 120, n=8)
103.9 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
65175 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years)
48255 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points +10%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (Chrome 131)
37949 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (22739 - 40600, n=12)
34231 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1060 - 2154, n=8)
1307 ms * -5%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 (Chrome 131)
1243.4 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)
1188 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +19%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * +29%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
602.7 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

In terms of speed, the UFS storage inside the Motorola phone offers solid performance. However, its values are comparatively poor for the 3.1 standard, especially when reading. Still, this should be due less to the storage medium itself than to the limiting memory controller of the Dimensity 7300.

Motorola ThinkPhone 25Motorola Edge 50 NeoGoogle Pixel 8aSamsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Poco F6Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
-20%
9%
155%
31%
63%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
975.43
1023
5%
1509.65
55%
1688.53
73%
4103.79
321%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
856.48
964.6
13%
255.31
-70%
831.44
-3%
3143.04
267%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
287.4
331
15%
165.98
-42%
351.47
22%
312.22
9%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
308.11
384.1
25%
243.82
-21%
132.11
-57%
373.77
21%

Games - The Motorola phone manages 60 fps

In order to assess the installed Mali GPU's graphics power outside of our benchmark package, we took a look at two games from the PlayStore with our partner GameBench. We measured the exact frame rates for this and concluded that the ThinkPhone 25's performance is definitely suitable for gaming.

The demanding game Genshin Impact was displayed at an average of 55 fps with low graphics settings. And even with the graphics settings set to high, we noted an average of 45 frames per second, which is sufficient for a smooth gaming experience. PUBG Mobile could be run in low details at 60 fps. Unfortunately, the highest detail level (UHD) isn't enabled for the mid-range phone; in HD mode, we achieved a constant 40 fps.

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
PUBG mobile
PUBG mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone 25; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø54.5 (29-62)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø44.6 (34-53)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.4 (48-63)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)

Emissions - The Lenovo phone with stereo sound

The ThinkPhone 25 manages the surface temperatures of its case quite well. In our load scenario using the Burnout benchmark, we measured a moderate waste heat of a maximum of 46 degrees Celsius, but this didn't lead to the system's performance being throttled in the 3DMark stress tests.

Max. Load
 45.7 °C
114 F
40.5 °C
105 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
 46 °C
115 F
42.4 °C
108 F
37.8 °C
100 F
 
 45.9 °C
115 F
40.5 °C
105 F
37.8 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 46 °C = 115 F
Average: 41.7 °C = 107 F
35.2 °C
95 F
40.2 °C
104 F
40.3 °C
105 F
34.7 °C
94 F
41.6 °C
107 F
41.8 °C
107 F
35.6 °C
96 F
39.9 °C
104 F
43.9 °C
111 F
Maximum: 43.9 °C = 111 F
Average: 39.2 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.5 % -26%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -48%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.3 % -17%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -48%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.4 % -11%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -46%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.16 (5.15-5.18)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.2 (15.3-18.6)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.9 (18.9-19)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.2 (49.9-68)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (60.6-71.8)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø15.3 (14.4-17)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.59 (2.59-2.6)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.29 (6.99-7.91)

Speakers

The ThinkPhone 25 uses a dual speaker system with a really good stereo sound, even if the sound generator lacks a bit of depth. Our pink noise measurement revealed a slightly rising or falling frequency curve for the mids and highs. Overall, however, its linearity is very good for the mid-range segment.

You can output sound to external media either wired via the USB port or wirelessly via Bluetooth 5.3. The latter uses a wide range of codecs (SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX TWS, aptX Adaptive, LHDC V5, LDAC, LC3, Opus).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.943.22540.636.63134.831.34034.437.35037.835.46327.7278018.421.810021.23212524.440.216023.645.820022.450.725019.554.231519.85840014.457.650012.863.863014.268.580013.166.5100012.475.8125010.774.2160010.875.7200010.576.2250011.273.4315011.770.9400012.270.6500011.975.3630012.177.5800012.2791000012.176.21250011.873.21600011.467.4SPL2586.6N0.767.2median 12.2median 70.6Delta2.69.346.446.246.140.138.83540.736.645.34234.530.830.123.53034.531.240.524.544.821.448.119.653.919.757.518.459.918.662.821.266.623.270.121.175.616.576.417.17816.577.716.17816.576.516.776.317.178.717.169.31773.316.975.816.778.415.866.930.7881.571.8median 17.1median 71.82.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola ThinkPhone 25Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 50 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - The ThinkPhone 25 charges quickly

Power consumption

The ThinkPhone 25's battery has a 4,310 mAh capacity and can be charged either via USB-C at up to 68 watts or wirelessly at 15 watts. Using the Motorola 68-watt TurboPower charger, we needed around 45 minutes to fully charge the battery from zero during our test. However, you have to activate the charging boost option. As the mid-range phone is PD-capable (Power Delivery), standard power banks can also be used.

The phone's power consumption is exemplary. At around 5 watts, the ThinkPhone 25 consumes relatively little energy under load.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 3.1 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
4310 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-88%
-72%
-74%
-56%
-81%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.6
0.92
-53%
0.85
-42%
0.8
-33%
1.037 ?(0.6 - 1.4, n=10)
-73%
Idle Average * (Watt)
0.8
1.46
-83%
1.51
-89%
1.13
-41%
1.454 ?(0.8 - 2.03, n=10)
-82%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.1
1.65
-50%
1.71
-55%
1.17
-6%
1.747 ?(1.1 - 2.5, n=10)
-59%
Load Average * (Watt)
3.1
7.96
-157%
4.87
-57%
7.35
-137%
3.87 ?(2.9 - 5.6, n=8)
-25%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
5.4
10.74
-99%
11.73
-117%
13.76
-155%
7.58 ?(5.4 - 8.62, n=8)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.43 (0.751-3.05)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.15 (1.179-13.1)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.744 (0.61-1.097)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.978 (0.884-1.471)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.97 (2.47-3.07)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (9.93-12.6)
Motorola ThinkPhone 25 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.744 (0.61-1.097)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.978 (0.884-1.471)

Runtimes

The Motorola phone delivers really good runtimes for a compact smartphone. The best comparisons can be drawn at an adjusted display brightness (150 cd/m²). Here, the ThinkPhone 25 lasted for over 14 hours when surfing on Wi-Fi. During the endless video playback test without WiFi, it even managed over 26 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 31min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
14h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 24min
Motorola ThinkPhone 25
4310 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
4310 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh
Battery runtime
-4%
-7%
15%
12%
Reader / Idle (h)
28.5
30.1
6%
36.7
29%
H.264 (h)
26.7
18.9
-29%
25.2
-6%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
14.3
13.7
-4%
13.3
-7%
18
26%
16
12%
Load (h)
3.4
3.5
3%
3.7
9%

Notebookcheck total rating

If you can forgive the ThinkPhone 25 by Motorola for its performance deficits, then you'll get an interesting mid-range phone.

Motorola ThinkPhone 25 - 12/07/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 70%
Weight
92%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
13 / 55 → 24%
Application Performance
62 / 85 → 73%
AI Performance
58%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
77%
Average
66%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.2%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
68.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > ThinkPhone 25 review - No Motorola smartphone is more secure and robust
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-12-16 (Update: 2024-12-16)