Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 825

Qualcomm Adreno 825

The Qualcomm Adreno 825 is an integrated graphics adapter that debuted in April 2025. It has at least 768 unified shaders (more likely is a higher number, such as 1,024 or 1,280) but few specifics are known, as of this writing.

Adreno 800 Series

Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 829 compare @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 compare @ 1.05 GHz
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL 2.0, OpenCL 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
Man. Technology4 nm
Displays2 Displays (max.)
Date of Announcement02.04.2025
CPU in Adreno 825GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM87358 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1784     avg: 1805     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1847 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 17504     avg: 17778     median: 17885 (9%)     max: 17946 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4408     avg: 4466     median: 4490 (5%)     max: 4499 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 8264     avg: 8393     median: 8357 (4%)     max: 8557 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 16582     avg: 17486     median: 17486 (74%)     max: 18390 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 24714     avg: 26213     median: 26212.5 (65%)     max: 27711 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 31     avg: 33.7     median: 35 (13%)     max: 35 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 68     avg: 75.3     median: 79 (14%)     max: 79 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 174     avg: 195.7     median: 205 (15%)     max: 208 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 140.3     median: 142 (13%)     max: 143 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 237     avg: 248.3     median: 253 (5%)     max: 255 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 311     avg: 328     median: 332 (14%)     max: 341 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 570     avg: 582     median: 585 (5%)     max: 590 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 777835     avg: 815057     median: 833213 (58%)     max: 834122 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 246.88     avg: 255.1     median: 255.1 (6%)     max: 263.33 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13397     avg: 13546     median: 13546 (3%)     max: 13695 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 18628     avg: 18816     median: 18815.5 (5%)     max: 19003 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7     avg: 10.4     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
58.6 59.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
117.3 119.2 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.6 59.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.2 39.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
58.6 89 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact59.359
PUBG Mobile1186040
Asphalt 9: Legends5974
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 21. 10:47:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Mar 2026 05:30:18 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.014s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.012s ... 0.026s

#8 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.011s ... 0.036s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.276s ... 0.313s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.313s

#12 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.316s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.316s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.317s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.338s

#16 return log +0.307s ... 0.645s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 825 graphics card

Xiaomi Pad 8 review

Makes more expensive tablets practically superfluous - Xiaomi Pad 8 review

The Xiaomi Pad 8 is an affordable tablet, but it doesn't need to hide from the upper class: a fast processor, pen input, bright display, and metal unibody case give it a very high-quality look. Read our review to see how the Xiaomi Tab performs in detail.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 11.2", 485 g
Nothing Phone (3) in review

Nothing Phone (3) smartphone review: Top-class hardware combined with unrivaled design and secondary display

The Nothing Phone (3) makes a high-end claim. The price is certainly in line with this, as the new Nothing phone has become significantly more expensive than its predecessor at €799. However, as the review shows, you also get a strong overall package that presses all the important buttons and only just falls short of some flagship features.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 6.67", 218 g
Xiaomi Poco F7

Xiaomi Poco F7 smartphone review: Potential hit for bargain hunters

Another "flagship killer"? We believe the Xiaomi Poco F7 truly deserves its title. For less than 400 euros, the 6.83-inch device offers highlights such as a very bright AMOLED panel, a waterproof metal and glass casing, top-class performance, and a huge battery with 90-watt fast charging. Our test also shows which features Xiaomi has left out.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 6.83", 215.7 g

OnePlus Turbo 6 (Nord 6): Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Turbo 6 (Nord 6)

Honor 500: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 500

Xiaomi Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 11.20", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad 8

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Nothing Phone (3): Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nothing Phone (3)

Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

Xiaomi Poco F7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco F7

Nothing Phone (3): Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone ads to disappear following harsh criticism, at least partially

Xiaomi Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 11.20", 0.5 kg
   » Tablet bargain with caveats: Xiaomi Pad 8 can hit its limits in everyday use

Nothing Phone (3): Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Redefining "flagship": Verdict on the Nothing Phone (3)

Xiaomi Poco F7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.83", 0.2 kg
   » How to turn off ads on Xiaomi smartphones

   » Lots of premium features despite $400 price tag: Verdict on the Xiaomi Poco F7

Nothing Phone (3): Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Nothing Phone (3) gets camera upgrades and Glyph Matrix photos via software update

   » Nothing camera test: Cheaper Phone (3a) Pro gives 'flagship' Phone (3) a run for its money

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)