Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 825 vs Qualcomm Adreno 830

Qualcomm Adreno 825

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 825

The Qualcomm Adreno 825 is an integrated graphics adapter that debuted in April 2025. It has at least 768 unified shaders (more likely is a higher number, such as 1,024 or 1,280) but few specifics are known, as of this writing.

Qualcomm Adreno 830

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 830

The Qualcomm Adreno 830 is an integrated graphics unit in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC for smartphones. The graphics unit offers three slices with 1.1 GHz each. All slices can jointly access 12 MB L2 cache. This is a very large cache for smartphone GPUs.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 40% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 750). Initial benchmarks with Qualcomm's reference design show a clear lead over other smartphone GPUs such as the Adreno 750 or the Apple A18 Pro GPU.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 3nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 830
Adreno 800 Series
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 compare @ 1.05 GHz
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 compare @ 1.05 GHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5xLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL 2.0, OpenCL 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm3 nm
Displays2 Displays (max.)3 Displays (max.)
Date of Announcement02.04.2025 23.10.2024
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1100 (Boost) MHz
CacheL2: 12 MB
CPU in Adreno 825GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM87358 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 830GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy8 x 3530 MHz? MHz1100 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite8 x 3530 MHz? MHz1100 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1784     avg: 1805     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1847 Points
min: 1883     avg: 2397     median: 2418 (6%)     max: 2849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 17504     avg: 17778     median: 17885 (9%)     max: 17946 Points
min: 19436     avg: 24765     median: 25212.5 (13%)     max: 28053 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4408     avg: 4466     median: 4490 (5%)     max: 4499 Points
min: 4852     avg: 6286     median: 6529.5 (8%)     max: 7212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 8264     avg: 8393     median: 8357 (4%)     max: 8557 Points
min: 8386     avg: 11134     median: 11680 (5%)     max: 13244 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
min: 1120     avg: 1147     median: 1147 (6%)     max: 1174 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 16582     avg: 17486     median: 17486 (74%)     max: 18390 Points
min: 15607     avg: 19703     median: 19681 (83%)     max: 22303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 24714     avg: 26213     median: 26212.5 (65%)     max: 27711 Points
min: 30587     avg: 35293     median: 35444 (88%)     max: 40163 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 31     avg: 33.7     median: 35 (13%)     max: 35 fps
min: 26     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (17%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 68     avg: 75.3     median: 79 (14%)     max: 79 fps
min: 58     avg: 97.2     median: 100 (18%)     max: 118 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 174     avg: 195.7     median: 205 (15%)     max: 208 fps
min: 166     avg: 248.9     median: 259 (19%)     max: 332 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 140.3     median: 142 (13%)     max: 143 fps
min: 146     avg: 190.5     median: 189 (18%)     max: 217 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 237     avg: 248.3     median: 253 (5%)     max: 255 fps
min: 172     avg: 297.2     median: 298 (6%)     max: 365 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 311     avg: 328     median: 332 (14%)     max: 341 fps
min: 188     avg: 417.4     median: 427 (18%)     max: 521 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 825
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 570     avg: 582     median: 585 (5%)     max: 590 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 830
min: 537     avg: 708     median: 713.5 (6%)     max: 788 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 647545     avg: 823720     median: 823720 (82%)     max: 999894 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 777835     avg: 815057     median: 833213 (58%)     max: 834122 Points
min: 522538     avg: 1071460     median: 1105550 (76%)     max: 1250330 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 246.88     avg: 255.1     median: 255.1 (6%)     max: 263.33 fps
min: 336.73     avg: 346     median: 346.5 (9%)     max: 354.81 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13397     avg: 13546     median: 13546 (3%)     max: 13695 Points
min: 1581     avg: 17876     median: 18493 (5%)     max: 20535 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 18628     avg: 18816     median: 18815.5 (5%)     max: 19003 Points
min: 20591     avg: 24223     median: 24543 (6%)     max: 25984 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7     avg: 10.4     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt
min: 3.54     avg: 10.6     median: 9.3 (4%)     max: 19.3 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 825 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 830 → 131% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
Adreno 830:
59.8  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 830:
119.5 119.7 ~ 120 fps
high
Adreno 830:
119.7  fps
ultra
Adreno 830:
59.8 59.9 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 825:
59.3  fps
101%
Adreno 830:
59.4 59.6 59.8 59.8 59.9 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 825:
58.6 59.3 ~ 59 fps
98%
Adreno 830:
41 59.5 59.6 59.7 59.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 60.1 ~ 58 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 825:
117.3 119.2 ~ 118 fps
91%
Adreno 830:
59.4 89.4 90 90 90 115.1 117.9 118 118.1 118.4 119.1 119.1 119.1 120 120 ~ 107 fps
high
100%
Adreno 825:
59.6 59.7 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 830:
59.1 59.3 59.4 59.5 59.5 59.7 59.7 59.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 825:
39.2 39.8 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 830:
39.5 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 830:
120.3  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 830:
143.4  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 825:
59  fps
high
100%
Adreno 825:
58.6 89 ~ 74 fps
145%
Adreno 830:
107.1  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 825 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 830 → 106%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 830
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.8
League of Legends: Wild Rift120119.760
Genshin Impact59.3596058
PUBG Mobile11860401076040
World of Tanks Blitz120.3
Dead Trigger 2143.4
Asphalt 9: Legends5974107.1
Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 830
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1




3
2
3
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 21. 19:57:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12844 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766343454s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:52:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.018s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.006s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12844 +0s ... 0.036s

#11 got single benchmarks 12844 +0.033s ... 0.07s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.088s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.088s

#15 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.118s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.118s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.119s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.122s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.122s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)