Notebookcheck Logo
Oppo Pad 4 Pro with Snapdragon 8 Elite in review

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Review: Great price 13.2-inch tablet with stylus and Snapdragon 8 Elite

iPad Pro competitor at half the price.

The Oppo Pad 4 is a sister model to the OnePlus Pad 2 Pro and comes across a premium tablet with a strong price-performance ratio. With stylus support and the latest hardware, the Oppo Pad 4 tablet offers a complete package for less than €600 that is second to none. However, there is one aspect that makes us question the proposition.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Tablet

Verdict: Flagship Android tablet experience at a mid-range price

The new premium tablet from Oppo is a true multi-talent in a high-quality design. Thanks to its large 13.2-inch screen and the fast Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro has strong arguments for a purchase in the mid-range. It has little competition in this segment or rather, alternatives like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra and the iPad Pro 13 are placed in the high-end of the spectrum.

The LCD of the Oppo Pad 4 Pro has certain disadvantages compared to the OLED offerings from the competition in terms of contrast, but the PMW-free display and high resolution are definite positives; sensitive users in particular can thus use the Oppo tablet without hesitation. 

Furthermore, the power consumption is extremely low for a large tablet, even without an OLED display.

Given the Oppo tablet's price, there are few real points of criticism.

Nonetheless, there is one hardware deficiency that remains puzzling and one that could become quite frustrating in everyday use: the missing fingerprint sensor. During our time with the device, the existing Face Unlock function works rather poorly on the Pad 4 Pro and is also less secure compared to a conventional fingerprint sensor.

Also, the lack of 5G and GNSS capabilities and issues with palm recognition leave much to be desired.

Pros

+ fast SoC
+ bright, PWM-free 144 Hz panel
+ high pixel density
+ low energy consumption

Cons

- no fingerprint sensor
- no 5G and GNSS options
- no IP rating
- considerably heavy

Price and availability

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro has been released exclusively in China at this point. Prices start from ¥3,299 (approx. €400) for 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage.

At Trading Shenzhen, our rental partner, prices start at around €520 for the Oppo Pad 4 Pro. Similar to its counterpart, the OnePlus Pad 2 Pro, which has near-identical specification, a European launch seems likely given that the predecessors of both tablets were released globally.

However, Oppo has not yet confirmed when or at what price the tablets will be launched in Europe.

Amazon Logo
$11.99
YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Protector for OnePlus Pad 3/Pad 2 Pro/OPPO Pad 4 Pro 13.2inch Tempered Glass Film,Anti-Scratch,Easy Installation,9H Hardness
  • $14.99
    YANMONGI 2 Pack Screen Protector for OnePlus Pad Pad 3/2 Pro/OPPO Pad 4 Pro 13.2inch Tempered Glass Film,Anti-Scratch,Easy Installation,9H Hardness
  • $239.99
    14 inch Large Screen Tablet, Android 15 Tablet 16GB RAM 256GB ROM, 1920*1200 IPS FHD Display, Widevine L1, 10000mAh 18W Charging, Wi-Fi & Bluetooth, 4G LTE, with Stand Case & Stylus, 2-Year Protection

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro is positioned as a direct competitor to the Apple iPad Pro 13 and iPad Air 13. This is because the Pad 4 Pro features a flagship Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC, up to 16 GB RAM, and 512 GB storage in a form factor that is similar to the iPad Pro and iPad Air.

Unlike the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro uses a 7:5 aspect ratio for the display, which corresponds to that of an A4 sheet paper. 

Additionally, users have the option of converting the Pad 4 Pro to a work machine with the optional keyboard case with trackpad and a stylus.

Specifications of the Oppo Pad 4 Pro

Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
13.20 inch 7:5, 3392 x 2400 pixel 315 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LTPS LCD, 540 Hz touch rate, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 222 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color sensor, hall sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.97 x 289.6 x 209.6 ( = 0.24 x 11.4 x 8.25 in)
Battery
12140 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, AF, 4K@30FPS)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 8 Speaker, USB cable, Charger, Color OS 15, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
675 g ( = 23.81 oz / 1.49 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
587 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case: Glass-aluminum construction with thin edges

Color selection of the Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Color selection of the Oppo Pad 4 Pro

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro leaves a strong impression both visually and in terms of haptics, with a housing made of glass and aluminum.

The metal unibody construction ensures that the Pad 4 Pro can easily withstand slight twisting attempts. The matte surface conceals fingerprints very well. 

Unfortunately, this mid-range tablet lacks any special certification for dust or water resistance.

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro offers a large 13.2-inch display, but this size makes it difficult to hold it comfortably with one hand, especially since the Pad 4 Pro weighs almost 100 g more than the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2

With a thickness of just under 6 mm, the Pad 4 Pro is remarkably slim and exudes a premium feel.

Boasting a screen-to-body ratio of over 87%, the LTPS panel features very thin bezels for a tablet. 

For perspective, an iPad Air 13 only achieves an 86% screen-to-body ratio. 

That being said, Oppo has not made clear any information about the protective glass used.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android tablet. Image source: Marcus Herbrich
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android tablet. Image source: Marcus Herbrich
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android tablet. Image source: Marcus Herbrich
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android tablet. Image source: Marcus Herbrich
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android tablet. Image source: Marcus Herbrich

Size comparison

326.4 mm / 12.9 in 208.6 mm / 8.21 in 5.4 mm / 0.2126 in 718 g1.583 lbs290.9 mm / 11.5 in 188.3 mm / 7.41 in 6.69 mm / 0.2634 in 640 g1.411 lbs289.6 mm / 11.4 in 209.6 mm / 8.25 in 5.97 mm / 0.235 in 675 g1.488 lbs289.1 mm / 11.4 in 196.1 mm / 7.72 in 5.5 mm / 0.2165 in 580 g1.279 lbs280.6 mm / 11 in 214.9 mm / 8.46 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 616 g1.358 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features: Extra-large tablet with USB 3.2

Oppo delivers the Pad 4 Pro tablet with 8 GB, 12 GB, or 16 GB of RAM options along with 256 GB and 512 GB of internal storage. 

SKUs with lesser RAM sizes are specified with UFS 4.0 storage and LPDDR5x-4266 memory, while the 16 GB option uses the newer LPDDR5T-4800. 

Unfortunately, Oppo does not allow for storage expansion nor offers a 3.5 mm headphone jack with the Pad 4 Pro.

Befitting its price, the Pad 4 Pro features a fast USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C port. This port enables a theoretical data transfer rate of up to 5 GBit/s and can also be used as an output for display signals on external screens with the help of a DisplayPort adapter.

There are also three contact points on the back for connecting the 505 g Smart Touch Keyboard Case.

Top: Volume, microphone
Top: Volume, microphone
Bottom: (buttons, microphone)
Bottom: (buttons, microphone)
Left: Power, Loudspeakers
Left: Power, Loudspeakers
Right: Loudspeaker, USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C port, microphone, loudspeaker
Right: Loudspeaker, USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C port, microphone, loudspeaker

Software: ColorOS 15 based on Android 15 with seven years of updates

In true Oppo fashion, the underlying Android 15 OS is combined with the company's own ColorOS 15 user interface. Security patches during the testing period were up to date till April 2025. 

Questions remain about Oppo's plans for software support for the Chinese variant of the tablet, as the manufacturer does not yet officially the Pad 4 Pro in the Oppo Security Center.

The long-term software maintenance of the likes of a Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra with a seven-year update cadence is highly unlikely to be offered by Oppo for the Pad 4 Pro. The Chinese version is more likely to get four to five years of updates. 

If the Pad 4 Pro does get a European launch, it will be subject to new EU regulations, meaning that support can be expected until at least 2031.

It is worth mentioning about the Pad 4 Pro's compatibility with Apple devices like the MacBook Pro for sharing photos or files. With the O+ Connect app, the Pad 4 Pro also functions as an external multi-touch screen.

The Boundless View feature is particularly useful, allowing three apps to be used simultaneously across the display boundaries.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Homescreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Homescreen
App drawer
App drawer
Settings page
Settings page
Dock with app launcher
Dock with app launcher

Sustainability

Oppo definitely has some catching up to do when it comes to transparency on its sustainable goals. 

Unfortunately, there is no specific information on the number of recycled materials used. There is also no focus on user-repairability, and verifying this aspect is nearly impossible.

The packaging of the Pad 4 Pro does not use plastic and is printed with inks based on soybean oil. According to the company's sustainability report, 45% of the fibers used for the packaging are made from recycled materials.

Communication and GNSS: No 5G or navigation

Although the Pad 4 Pro supports the latest Wi-Fi 7 protocol, it does not support access to the fast 6 GHz frequency band for Wi-Fi transmission.

In combination with our reference Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, the Oppo tablet only connects in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, although a high speed is still possible with our Wi-Fi 6E router thanks to VHT160 in the 5 GHz frequency band. 

We measured receive rates of over 1,800 Mbps at the peak. However, we are well below this when transmitting.

The Pad 4 Pro does not have a GNSS module for determining the location, so the positioning can only be roughly estimated via known Wi-Fi networks. This premium tablet from Oppo does not feature a cellular module either.

Networking
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
941 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 1014) MBit/s ∼76%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1018 (min: 1003) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1598 (min: 1108) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
960 (min: 700) MBit/s ∼52%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1001 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1161 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
554 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
578 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1394 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼76%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1598 (1108-1731)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø960 (700-1188)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø878 (807-984)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1723 (1322-1804)

Cameras: Usable 13 MP shots in good lighting

Selfie with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Selfie with the Oppo Pad 4 Pro

The cameras on a large device like the Pad 4 Pro are rather secondary for most users, but the Oppo tablet still offers two reasonably usable cameras. 

The 8 MP front-facing camera delivers good image quality in daylight with decent sharpness, though there are occasional problems with the exposure.

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
8x (max)
8x (max)

A 13 MP sensor is present on the back that takes perfectly usable photos of subjects in bright light. However, on closer inspection, the photos show limited details and have a low dynamic range. 

Our color analysis under defined artificial light reveals very few major outliers (DeltaE > 10). 

Nevertheless, the Pad 4 Pro is well suited for scanning documents or digitizing notes for which there is a special mode in the camera app.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Camera app
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Camera app
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Camera app
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Camera app
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Camera settings

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light
ColorChecker
9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Pad 4 Pro: 9.72 ∆E min: 4.6 - max: 13.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Pad 4 Pro: 46.85 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 93.71 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty: 67 W adapter comes in the box

Oppo Pad 4 Pro: 67 W power adapter
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: 67 W power adapter

The scope of delivery includes a 67 W fast-charging power adapter, a USB Type-A to Type-C data and charging cable, and information material in Chinese. 

Our rental partner Trading Shenzhen additionally bundles in an EU adapter for the Chinese charger along with a USB OTG adapter.

Oppo offers the matching Pencil 2 Pro for about €100 and an optional keyboard cover for €130 as additional accessories for the Pad 4 Pro.

Our imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the tablet to a German shipping address.

Input devices and operation: Oppo cuts a few important corners

Touch inputs are implemented rapidly and accurately on the 13.2-inch LTPS panel with its 540 Hz sampling rate. However, the Pad 4 Pro's touchscreen scans possible touches only 120 times per second as standard. 

Thanks to the high 144 Hz refresh rate, animations on the ColorOS interface appear very smooth.

The 7:5 aspect ratio of the Pad 4 Pro is similar to that of a sheet of A4 paper and that of an iPad Air 13 than, for example, those of Galaxy Tabs from Samsung. 

The aspect ratio of the Pad 4 Pro thus offers a wider viewing area compared to conventional 16:9 panels, which is particularly advantageous for reading documents or surfing the Internet.

The Pad 4 Pro is compatible with Oppo's Pencil 2 Pro, which weighs around 15 g and is purportedly capable of distinguishing over 16,000 pressure levels. This enables handwritten notes and sketching with the Oppo tablet. 

The manufacturer's claimed latency of 2 ms ranks among the best in its class. Unfortunately, we did not receive a test sample of the Pencil 2 Pro to put these claims to test.

Notably, there is no vibration motor in this mid-range tablet. There is no fingerprint scanner either. We really cannot fathom understand why Oppo has cut corners here.

Biometric identification is possible only via face recognition using the front camera. The 2D face recognition did not really convince us in the test, even in good lighting conditions; other manufacturers tend to do this better. This method is also considered to be rather less secure than fingerprints.

Furthermore, the palm rejection feature needs to be optimized on the software side so that inputs with the stylus or finger are not blocked. This did not work reliably on the Pad 4 Pro at the time of testing.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Default keyboard
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Default keyboard - Split view
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Default keyboard in portrait orientation

Display: Bright 13.2-inch 144 Hz LTPS panel with no PWM

The LC display uses a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light-emitting diode.
The LC display uses a classic RGB sub-pixel matrix consisting of a red, a blue and a green light-emitting diode.

The Pad 4 Pro sports 13.2-inch LTPS panel that can adaptively reduce the frame rate from 144 Hz to 60 Hz. With a 3,392 x 2,400 resolution, the screen achieves a high pixel density of 315 PPI, which is above the 300 PPi "magic" limit. For comparison, an iPad Pro 13 only manages a 264 PPI pixel density.

Oppo claims a maximum brightness of 600 cd/m², which we can confirm on a pure white background. At an average picture level (APL) 18, the LCD achieved a high 903 cd/m² luminosity, which matches the advertised peak luminance of 900 nits. While not perfect for HDR content, the luminance is sufficient for a good viewing experience.

We could not detect any PWM flickering for the 12-bit panel in our measurement, which is a real advantage for users sensitive to screen flicker.

635
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
670
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 672 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 651.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 672 cd/m²
Contrast: 1461:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.18 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.396
CCT: 7070 K
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Flexible OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen
3%
3%
27%
-8%
Brightness middle
672
605
-10%
607
-10%
795
18%
726
8%
Brightness
652
603
-8%
576
-12%
791
21%
691
6%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
87
-6%
97
4%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.46
0.5
-9%
0.55
-20%
Contrast
1461
1214
-17%
1320
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.18
2.6
18%
1.52
52%
1.1
65%
4.67
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.84
5.4
-12%
3.5
28%
2.5
48%
5.6
-16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.6
27%
2.2
-0%
2.1
5%
1.8
18%
Gamma
2.396 92%
2.08 106%
2.197 100%
2.23 99%
2.249 98%
CCT
7070 92%
6405 101%
6929 94%
6822 95%
6382 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8342 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The settings for the display are extensive. In addition to various color profiles, the color temperature and color space can be adjusted as well.

Nevertheless, differences in individual colors are clearly visible even in the rather small sRGB color space. The black level of 0.46 cd/m² ensures a good contrast ratio of around 1:1,500 in everyday use.

Grayscale (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
ColorChecker (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
ColorChecker (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: Adobe RGB, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: Adobe RGB, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: P3, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: P3, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
2D Color Gamut (target color space: sRGB, profile: Pro)
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 4.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 10.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Viewing angles of the Oppo tablet are quite stable, with slight clouding only seen when the display is completely black — hardly noticeable in everyday use. 

The 144 Hz panel offers sufficient brightness reserves for outdoor use. However, reflections on the glass surface are still annoying.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Outdoor viewing
Oppo Pad 4 Pro: Outdoor viewing
Stable viewing angles
Stable viewing angles

Performance: Flagship Qualcomm SoC takes on the Apple M3

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro features the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, which is quite remarkable for the mid-range price segment. In contrast to the Oppo Find N5, the Pad 4 Pro does not use the 8 Elite with seven Oryon Gen 2 Performance cores but a cut-down variant with six cores.

In Geekbench tests, the Pad 4 Pro even outperforms a Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. The iPad Air 13 with an M3 chip does not come close to the Pad 4 Pro's single-core numbers. 

That being said, the Oppo table is quite weak in the AI tests and system benchmarks.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3188 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=22)
3034 Points -5%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2994 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2192 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1574 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=96, last 2 years)
1281 Points -60%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11752 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7784 - 10401, n=22)
9225 Points 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9218 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7327 Points -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
5159 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=96, last 2 years)
4083 Points -56%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2854581 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2340778 - 3015111, n=16)
2707247 Points -5%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2147386 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2033124 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1891925 Points -34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1087402 Points -62%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=60, last 2 years)
988477 Points -65%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14378 - 27169, n=19)
20518 Points +38%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16743 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
15804 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14862 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years)
11155 Points -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1064 - 2674, n=16)
1838 Points +57%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1431 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1367 Points +17%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1172 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1125 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)
857 Points -27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11721 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8155 - 14066, n=16)
11055 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10865 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8050 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 12211, n=67, last 2 years)
5075 Points -53%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16435 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=16)
15455 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15124 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12284 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
8179 Points -46%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7081 - 20572, n=16)
13035 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11132 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10000 Points -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
8600 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5878 Points -47%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35063 - 384996, n=16)
62851 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
56004 Points +32%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42342 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
20520 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
12644 Points -70%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2051 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2007 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1937 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=16)
1883 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1395 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74437 Points +315%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=14)
17502 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years)
12985 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12773 Points -29%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
55794 Points +4414%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=14)
23511 Points +1802%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years)
7310 Points +491%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1458 Points +18%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1236 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1109 Points -10%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8305 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3377 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=8, last 2 years)
1709 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
97.8 Points
Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12784 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 12784, n=13)
8302 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7341 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=15, last 2 years)
3056 Points -76%

The integrated Adreno 830 GPU is very powerful. In the demanding tier tests, it outperforms an Immortalis-G720 of the Tab S10 Ultra and a solid 44 fps is possible even with a high 4K resolution. 

The Adreno 830's performance is often more than 30% than an iPad Air 13 with the M3 chip despite the Apple tablet having to handle significantly fewer pixels.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5527 Points -17%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5145 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1757 Points -74%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
7031 Points +5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1796 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18628 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7178 Points -72%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11992 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
9843 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8402 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4769 Points -60%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11932 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
11435 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8498 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4808 Points -60%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2601 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
1938 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1917 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
935 Points -64%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
549 Points -79%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2517 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2060 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1920 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
948 Points -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
545 Points -78%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
809 fps +13%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
500 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
371 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
494 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
347 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps -47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
208 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -30%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
230 fps -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
142 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +55%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
57 fps +16%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
204 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
171 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +44%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
51 fps +13%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -9%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
71 fps -28%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +86%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps -17%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
205 fps -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps -34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -63%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps -2%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
32 fps -27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -66%

The Pad 4 Pro performs very well in browser speed tests and the benchmark results are also quite good. 

Websites open quickly in everyday use and can be scrolled through smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
307.6 Points +54%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
231.7 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 289, n=14)
211 Points +5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
200.378 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
183.971 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
180.698 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
131.3 Points -34%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
33.9 runs/min +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=13)
23.5 runs/min +42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +4%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
16.5 runs/min
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
16.4 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
14.8 runs/min -10%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=48, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
193 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=14)
179.4 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
173 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
121.5 Points -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
93681 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=19)
71058 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
71054 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points +22%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
56134 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years)
36364 Points -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=84, last 2 years)
3193 ms * -379%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
632.4 ms * +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)
625.7 ms * +6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=15)
532 ms * +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
322.8 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Pad 4 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
18%
-12%
-10%
8%
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
3801.54
3912.45
3%
1864.54
-51%
3868
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
3334.62
2963.58
-11%
1441.8
-57%
3047.6
-9%
2739 ?(555 - 3484, n=40)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
297.28
342.97
15%
305.89
3%
241.2
-19%
Random Write 4KB
335.89
554.76
65%
533.47
59%
290.9
-13%

Games: Big tablet = big gaming fun?

We take a closer look at the Pad 4 Pro's graphics prowess with current Android games apart from the benchmark package above. 

We use GameBench to determine the exact frame rates for two selected games from the Play Store.

High frame rate gaming beyond 100 fps is not possible with the Pad 4 Pro in PUBG Mobile

That the Snapdragon 8 Elite has plenty of horsepower is evident by the chip's performance in the demanding Genshin Impact

Here, the frame rate is highly constant in the highest graphics settings. However, frame rates higher than 60 fps are currently not possible in Android. 

According to Oppo, however, Pad 4 Pro can support 120 fps in certain games.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Oppo Pad 4 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.8 (85-91)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø60 (59-61)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (38-41)

Emissions: Oppo Pad 4 Pro stays pretty cool

Temperature

Thanks to the large surface area available for cooling, the resultant waste heat from the Snapdragon 8 Elite can be dissipated well. Apart from a hotspot area, the Pad 4 Pro maintains pleasant case temperatures of under 40 °C even after prolonged load thanks to its graphite and VC cooling.

That being said, a reduction in system performance due to the heat emissions is still evident in 3DMark stress tests. 

We determine a moderate throttling of around 20%. Still, the Pad 4 Pro achieves twice the frame rate of the Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus in the Wild Life stress test.

Max. Load
 39.1 °C
102 F
44.5 °C
112 F
35.9 °C
97 F
 
 35.8 °C
96 F
37.4 °C
99 F
32.8 °C
91 F
 
 32.9 °C
91 F
33.1 °C
92 F
32.9 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 44.5 °C = 112 F
Average: 36 °C = 97 F
35 °C
95 F
49.3 °C
121 F
41.8 °C
107 F
33.8 °C
93 F
36.9 °C
98 F
37.7 °C
100 F
32.4 °C
90 F
34.7 °C
94 F
33.4 °C
92 F
Maximum: 49.3 °C = 121 F
Average: 37.2 °C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.6 % +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % +15%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.4 % +11%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.2 % +21%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 % +15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.6 % +7%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.1 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.7 % 0%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33.4 (32.9-39.5)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø121.4 (119-143.7)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.4 (31.8-40)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17 (15.2-18.7)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1)
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Bottom
Surface temperatures: Bottom

Speakers

One of the strengths of the large Oppo tablet is space for a great audio system with a total of four speakers, with two tweeters and two woofers on each side. 

Despite this arrangement, our pink noise measurement shows that the mids are too strong. Bass is perceivable, but other flagship tablets offer more depth to the sound.

A wired headphone solution is possible via the USB Type-C port, while Bluetooth 5.4 serves wireless audio connections. 

The Pad 4 Pro supports a wide range of Bluetooth audio codecs, including SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, and LHDC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.352.12541.741.33132.233403335.25036.540.16323.933.18019.741.410020.747.51251953.21602156.120019.861.525018.462.331519.56540018.563.450019.371.263023.276.280023.876.9100021.176.6125018.977.3160020.775.2200020.772.3250017.871.1315017.567.6400018.164.3500023.271.5630020.275.1800023.671.41000017.8681250018.866.51600018.468.7SPL32.985.5N1.866.4median 19.5median 68.7Delta1.54.644.24338.738.437.735.138.933.837.237.125.526.819.527.918.742.520.452.618.858.818.164.415.666.815.76814.767.216.269.820.171.119.176.518.378.815.379.913.578.213.674.612.773.71367.212.46712.570.512.374.512.576.412.576.812.466.911.872.527.187.30.973.2median 14.7median 71.12.64.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Pad 4 ProLenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy management: Low power consumption with decent battery life

Power consumption

Despite the slim housing, the Oppo Pad 4 Pro sports a large 12,140 mAh battery. The battery can be charged with a maximum of 67 W; wireless charging is not supported. 

Charging the Pad 4 Pro takes around 1.5 hours with the right power adapter.

The power consumption is remarkably low for a tablet this size. At less than 2 W when idle, the power draws are on par with less efficient smartphones

Even under load, the Pad 4 Pro draws significantly less power than the competition with OLED panels.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 11.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-119%
-168%
-81%
-32%
-2%
-56%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
3.34
-123%
2.1
-40%
3.74
-149%
1.5
-0%
1.049 ?(0.49 - 3.8, n=19)
30%
Idle Average *
1.8
5
-178%
8.3
-361%
4.24
-136%
1.8
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
5.11
-132%
8.5
-286%
4.34
-97%
2.3
-5%
1.852 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=19)
16%
Load Average *
5.8
12.77
-120%
11.9
-105%
6.94
-20%
11.1
-91%
8.86 ?(5.8 - 13, n=15)
-53%
Load Maximum *
11.4
15.94
-40%
16.9
-48%
11.8
-4%
18.5
-62%
12.5 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=15)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.09 (3.65-11.4)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.79 (2.1-16.8)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.8-11.4)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.8 (12.6-16.9)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

Battery life

With display brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m², the Pad 4 Pro shows impressive endurance, lasting almost 18 hours in our Wi-Fi test and 21.5 hours of continuous video playback — very good for a tablet of its size.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 136)
17h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 52min
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
5050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-46%
-25%
-49%
-30%
Reader / Idle
2589
935
-64%
1529
-41%
1422
-45%
H.264
1287
721
-44%
829
-36%
998
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1077
585
-46%
794
-26%
552
-49%
768
-29%
Load
292
207
-29%
298
2%
219
-25%

Notebookcheck's impressions of the Oppo Pad 4 Pro

The Oppo Pad 4 Pro is an excellent LCD alternative to the OLED competition that offers a flagship SoC for significantly lower price.

Oppo Pad 4 Pro - 05/25/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 83%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
51 / 65 → 78%
Application Performance
74 / 92 → 80%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 93%
Camera
63 / 90 → 70%
Average
66%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
35%
Packaging
70%
Power Use
95.3%
Repairability
31%
Software Updates
63.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.1%

Potential competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Prote...
2. $14.99
YANMONGI 2 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $239.99
14 inch Large Screen Tablet,...
List Price: 587€
675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"
3392x2400
315 PPI
LTPS LCD
2.
87.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,189.93
SAMSUNG - Galaxy Tab S10 Ult...
2. $849.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus...
3. $809.98
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra...
List Price: 1339€
718 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash14.60"
2960x1848
239 PPI
AMOLED 2X
3.
87.4%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3 ⎘
Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon: $699.00
List Price: 949€
616 g128 GB NVMe12.90"
2732x2048
265 PPI
IPS
4.
85.4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin T92 ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $93.99
Keyboard Case for Huawei Mat...
2. $28.98
Puccy Privacy Screen Protect...
3. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
List Price: 1199€
580 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.20"
2880x1920
262 PPI
Flexible OLED
5.
86.4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $599.00
Lenovo - Yoga Tab Plus - 12....
2. $14.95
ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $246.00
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
List Price: 799€
640 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Oppo Pad 4 Pro Review: Great price 13.2-inch tablet with stylus and Snapdragon 8 Elite
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-06- 2 (Update: 2025-06- 9)