Notebookcheck Logo
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)

The world's thinnest smartphone's battery life is hard to believe - Oppo Find N5 review

Not a OnePlus Open 2.

The Oppo Find N5 is the world's thinnest foldable smartphone, but despite its slim design, it comes with a few limitations. The foldable phone features a Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, a periscope camera, and an extra-large battery. Is Oppo already highlighting what the Galaxy Z Fold 7 can't offer?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Foldable Touchscreen Smartphone

Oppo Find N5 verdict

With its Find N3 successor, Oppo has succeeded in creating a near-perfect adaptation of a classic smartphone thanks to its slim and lightweight design. Added to this is the significant advantage of having an 8.12-inch screen with you at all times. The Find N5 is not only the world's thinnest foldable phone, but thanks to Oppo's "anti-aging treatment," it's also wrinkle (crease) free, like no other foldable phone.

In addition to this outstanding user experience, Oppo has also packed in a wealth of powerful hardware. The 7-core version of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while nominally weaker than the standard version, still manages to offer high-level performance. Stylus support, great speakers, and bright displays can also be found on the Find N5's plus side. Despite the weight reduction compared to its predecessor, Oppo has also managed to significantly increase the battery capacity, and the result is excellent battery life that almost outclasses the competition.

Due to the design, buyers will undoubtedly have to accept some limitations compared to the high-end competition. The cameras aren't top-notch, and the high throttling is anything but perfect. We also miss the 6 GHz Wi-Fi band and transparency in the choice of materials. The Find N2's form factor is more usable in everyday life, and this is something we would also welcome for the next generation of the Oppo foldable device to give it a unique selling point.

Pros

+ light & thin
+ waterproof case
+ bright OLED panels
+ no annoying display crease
+ long battery life
+ high-level performance ...

Cons

- ... with high-level throttling
- limitations with the CN version (no eSIM, ...)
- can only be imported

Price and availability

The global version of the Oppo Find N5 has 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB of flash storage and is available for approximately $1,789. Prices for our Chinese version of the Oppo phone start at $1,594 at Trading Shenzhen. To the best of our current knowledge, the global variant will not be launched in Europe either.

With its Find N5, Oppo takes over from the Honor Magic V3 as the world's thinnest foldable phone. But, in addition to the extremely slim case, it also offers exciting features: The Oppo phone has an 8.12-inch display and uses a 5,600 mAh battery, which means that the energy storage device stores almost 30 percent more power than the battery found in the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

Performance and photo quality are also promising thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and a Hasselblad triple camera with a periscope telephoto lens. Unlike its predecessor, the Find N5 will not be released in Europe as a OnePlus Open 2.

Oppo Find N5 specifications

Oppo Find N5 (Find N Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2, 7 Core version
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
8.12 inch 9.9:9, 2480 x 2248 pixel 412 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, outer Screen: 6.62-inch, 2.616 x 1.140, 120 Hz, Oppo pen support, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 458 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 4.21 x 160.87 x 146.58 ( = 0.17 x 6.33 x 5.77 in)
Battery
5600 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.89, OIS, videos @2160p/​60fps); 50 MPix (f/​2.7, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens) + 8 MPix (f/​2.2, OIS, wide-angle lens)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/​2.4, videos @2160p/​30fps, front camera); 8 MPix (f/​2.4, inner camera)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, case, Color OS, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/​B1C/​B2a), Galileo (E1/​E5a), QZSS (L1/​L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
229 g ( = 8.08 oz / 0.5 pounds), Power Supply: 106 g ( = 3.74 oz / 0.23 pounds)
Price
1577 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Oppo smartphone is unbelievably thin

Oppo Find N5 choice of colors
Oppo Find N5 choice of colors

With a case thickness of just 4.2 millimeters, the Find N5 is the thinnest phone on the foldable market. At 8.9 millimeters when folded, the Oppo phone is barely thicker than a conventional smartphone. The same applies to the weight, as Oppo slimmed down its XXL foldable device to 229 grams, making it barely heavier than an Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max at 227 grams. This has been achieved, among other things, by using a newly developed titanium hinge.

The titanium flexion hinge feels robust in everyday situations and has a nice rigidity. Its durability is certified by TÜV Rheinland. In addition to its beautiful design and narrow display bezels, the Find N5 is also waterproof, comes with IPX9 certification, and exudes a premium feel. The Find N5 also features the alert slider button typical of OnePlus smartphones, which can be used to mute notifications.

While the display on the front is protected by classic nanocrystal glass, the inner panel comes with a Schott UTG special glass, which has a top layer made of a specially developed anti-shock elastomer material.

Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review (image source Marcus Herbrich)

Size comparison

160.87 mm / 6.33 in 146.58 mm / 5.77 in 4.21 mm / 0.1657 in 229 g0.505 lbs159.4 mm / 6.28 in 143.3 mm / 5.64 in 4.6 mm / 0.1811 in 226 g0.4982 lbs156.6 mm / 6.17 in 145.3 mm / 5.72 in 4.35 mm / 0.1713 in 226 g0.4982 lbs155.2 mm / 6.11 in 150.2 mm / 5.91 in 5.1 mm / 0.2008 in 257 g0.567 lbs153.4 mm / 6.04 in 143.1 mm / 5.63 in 5.9 mm / 0.2323 in 239 g0.527 lbs153.5 mm / 6.04 in 132.6 mm / 5.22 in 5.6 mm / 0.2205 in 239 g0.527 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - The Find N5 has a USB port

Overall, the Chinese manufacturer's foldable device offers an excellent feature set, which includes Bluetooth 5.4, USB OTG, an IR blaster, Miracast, and near-field communication. According to Oppo, the NFC chip encrypts the collected AI and user data, which is protected from data theft by an additional security chip. The fast USB 3.2 port also supports wired image output.

Compatibility with iOS and iPadOS devices is also worth mentioning, allowing seamless sharing of photos, videos, and files. With the "O+ Connect" app, the Find N5 also functions as a keyboard, trackpad, and external multi-touch screen.

Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker, microphone, SIM slot)
Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker, microphone, SIM slot)
Right-hand case side (buttons: volume, on/off, alert slider)
Right-hand case side (buttons: volume, on/off, alert slider)
Top case side (microphone, IR blaster, speaker)
Top case side (microphone, IR blaster, speaker)
Top case side (hinge)
Top case side (hinge)

Software - The foldable phone comes with Android 15

The Find N5 comes with Android 15 and is complemented by the company's ColorOS 15. According to the manufacturer, the foldable phone will receive five years of security updates, but Oppo hasn't disclosed how many Android upgrades you can expect. Update support is, therefore, satisfactory, but Samsung and Google have shown that longer updates are possible.

Of course, AI is also a must-have with ColorOS. Version 15 includes a new AI search and numerous AI functions, such as AI call summaries and AI photo editing. The very useful "Boundless View" feature, which allows three apps to be used simultaneously beyond the display's boundaries, is also on board. Other manufacturers should take immediate inspiration from this.

Oppo Find N5 smartphone review
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review

Sustainability

The Find N5's packaging is plastic-free and printed using soybean-based inks. According to the manufacturer's sustainability report, 45 percent of the fibers used in the packaging originate from recycled materials. We found no information regarding the use of recycled materials for the foldable device itself. User repairability is also not a priority and is difficult to verify. In terms of transparency, Oppo has a lot of catching up to do.

Communication and GNSS - The Oppo Find N5 has WiFi 7

Irrespective of whether you choose the Chinese or global version, the Oppo foldable is well-equipped in terms of wireless bands and can be used without any compromises in German-speaking countries. For Wi-Fi connections, the Find N5 offers the best of the best with the current Wi-Fi 7 standard, but our CN version unfortunately doesn't use the 6 GHz channel to establish a connection. Therefore, we only used the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands with our Wi-Fi 6E reference router.

The transfer speeds with the Asus ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 weren't truly consistent, but we measured a peak of almost 1,800 Mbps when receiving data. However, the Find N5 is significantly slower when sending data.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Oppo Find N3
Wi-Fi 7
1495 (709min - 1727max) MBit/s +119%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1806, n=59)
1015 MBit/s +49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Wi-Fi 7
969 (909min - 998max) MBit/s +42%
Honor Magic V3
Wi-Fi 7
919 (808min - 971max) MBit/s +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=191, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s +5%
Oppo Find N5
Wi-Fi 7
682 (502min, 506.93P1 - 851max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Wi-Fi 7
632 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
531 (263min - 608max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Oppo Find N3
Wi-Fi 7
1733 (1600min - 1830max) MBit/s +11%
Oppo Find N5
Wi-Fi 7
1562 (1218min, 1249.03P1 - 1772max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=59)
1014 MBit/s -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Wi-Fi 7
893 (418min - 933max) MBit/s -43%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Wi-Fi 7
892 MBit/s -43%
Honor Magic V3
Wi-Fi 7
771 (387min - 800max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
761 (683min - 800max) MBit/s -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=189, last 2 years)
705 MBit/s -55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Wi-Fi 7
1845 (924min - 1886max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=45)
1536 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
770 (402min - 836max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Wi-Fi 7
632 (569min - 679max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Wi-Fi 7
1843 (1524min - 1885max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=45)
1510 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1365 (1221min - 1406max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Wi-Fi 7
892 (720min - 981max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (569-679)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (720-981)
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø682 (502-851)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø632 (569-679)
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1562 (1218-1772)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø892 (720-981)
Positioning indoors
Positioning indoors
Positioning outdoors
Positioning outdoors

On a bike ride, we compared the Find N5's tracking performance to the Garmin Venu 2. Positioning with the Oppo phone is done using dual-band GNSS and is accurate to within about 3 meters. The total distance measured is very similar to the Garmin smartwatch, and only minor deviations are noticeable in the detailed route.

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Oppo Find N5
Oppo Find N5

Telephone functions and voice quality - A foldable smartphone with dual SIM

Oppo Find N5 smartphone review
Oppo Find N5 smartphone review

Those who opt for the global version of the Find N5 have the option of integrating an eSIM into the system. However, the Chinese version of Color OS doesn't offer this feature. However, dual SIM is onboard, and Wi-Fi calling and VoLTE are also supported.

The call quality through the earpiece is very satisfactory, although our conversation partners sometimes sounded a bit muffled.

Cameras - The Oppo phone sports Hasselblad branding

Despite its ultra-thin design, Oppo has equipped each of the Find N5's Hasselblad-branded triple camera lenses with optical image stabilization. However, compromises have still had to be made with a foldable device. For example, the 1/1.56-inch format found in the 50 MP main camera's sensor is quite small, but this doesn't affect photo quality in daylight. Especially when you consider that the predecessor featured a larger sensor, the step up to the Sony LYT700 isn't ideal. But even in the dark, the Oppo phone still manages to preserve plenty of detail in the Find N5's images with a low noise level.

A selfie with the main camera
A selfie with the main camera
A selfie with the inner camera
A selfie with the inner camera
A selfie with the front camera
A selfie with the front camera

The periscope camera has a high-resolution 50 MP sensor and also delivers good results in sufficient light. With a lossless magnification of 3x, it also enables telephoto macro shots. The 8 MP lens for ultra-wide-angle photos falls somewhat short, with its pronounced blurring and some image artefacts in the test shots.

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
6x
10x
120x (max)

While the Find N5's main camera enables 10-bit videos, including Dolby Vision and detailed recordings at a resolution of up to 4K and 60 frames per second, changing subjects during a video is only possible without HDR at 4K30.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angleLow light
orginal image
click to load images

Under controlled lighting conditions, we analyzed the main camera's color reproduction compared to the actual reference colors. The 50 MP lens in the ColorChecker passport revealed overexposure, especially in bright colors. We identified the Find N5 to have some outliers in color fidelity (>10).

ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 7.56 ∆E min: 2.3 - max: 12.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
59.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N5: 41.22 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 67.44 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Oppo Find N5 comes with a charger

The Find N5 charger
The Find N5 charger

Our Chinese version comes with an 80-watt, fast-charging power adapter, a data/charging cable (USB-C to USB-A), a SIM pin, a quick-start guide, and a protective case. A plastic film is also installed on both screens, and a protective case is included. Our device lender, Trading Shenzhen, has also added to the included extras with an EU adapter for the charger and a USB OTG adapter.

Our imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. Trading Shenzhen offers the option of shipping the smartphone to a German address in the event of a warranty claim.

Input devices and operation - The foldable phone uses Face Unlock

The two OLED touchscreens have a sampling rate of up to 240 Hz and respond quickly to finger inputs. Animations are also displayed smoothly, thanks to the 120 Hz panels, and the Oppo Pen is also supported on both panels. Oppo also offers Samsung's Flex mode, an extended display option when folded, for its foldable phone.

The Find N5 can be used like a traditional smartphone thanks to its 20.7:9 aspect ratio external screen. With its large 8.12-inch panel, the foldable phone also offers plenty of room for multitasking. However, before purchasing, potential buyers should be aware that the large screen is less suitable when using an app due to its unusual aspect ratio.

A fingerprint sensor is integrated into the power button. It's positioned somewhat high but unlocks the Oppo phone very reliably. A rather insecure 2D facial recognition system using the 8 MPix cameras can also be used.

Display - Oppo has opted for OLED panels

Both OLED displays use an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green LED each
Both OLED displays use an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green LED each

The Find N5's foldable, dual-shielded flexible display has a resolution of 412 PPI and a diagonal of 8.12 inches, giving the Oppo phone slightly more screen real estate than its competitors. Furthermore, the inner panel appears virtually wrinkle-free since we were unable to detect any noticeable crease in everyday use. The manufacturer also touts its foldable phone as possessing a "Minimized Crease" certification from TÜV Rheinland.

In our measurements, the 120 Hz LTPO panel achieved a peak brightness of 2,026 cd/m²² (APL18). To protect your eyes when viewing the flickering OLED panel, Oppo uses high-frequency PWM dimming (2,160 Hz) when the screen brightness is below 70 nits. Using the oscilloscope, the Find N5 flickers at 120 Hz at higher brightness, increasing the frequency to 240 Hz as the brightness increases.

Inner display brightness

1189
cd/m²
1156
cd/m²
1167
cd/m²
1202
cd/m²
1240
cd/m²
1198
cd/m²
1126
cd/m²
1154
cd/m²
1178
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 (inner display)
Maximum: 1240 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1178.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1240 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.239
Oppo Find N5
AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
OLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8"
Honor Magic V3
OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"
Oppo Find N3
OLED, 2440x2268, 7.8"
Screen
19%
10%
-44%
10%
3%
Brightness middle
1240
1793
45%
1396
13%
1111
-10%
1019
-18%
1283
3%
Brightness
1179
1599
36%
1387
18%
1120
-5%
1032
-12%
1290
9%
Brightness Distribution
91
66
-27%
89
-2%
99
9%
95
4%
98
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.36
0.9
34%
1.7
-25%
3.42
-151%
1
26%
1.5
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.06
3.1
-1%
2.5
18%
5.92
-93%
2.2
28%
3.4
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.7
29%
1.5
37%
2.7
-13%
1.7
29%
2
17%
Gamma
2.239 98%
2.19 100%
2.16 102%
2.206 100%
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
CCT
6353 102%
6714 97%
6495 100%
7081 92%
6473 100%
6435 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 18 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8500 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

A series of measurements using fixed levels of zoom and various brightness settings.

We tested the color calibration using the Calman analysis software and a photo spectrometer. While the Natural profile uses DCI P3, the Find N5 uses the smaller sRGB color space in the Pro profile. The latter delivered the best color fidelity in our measurements, and the deviations are clearly within the target range (<3).

Color accuracy (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color accuracy (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: P3) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: P3) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Gray scales (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Gray scales (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color saturation (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display
Color saturation (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - inner display

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 1.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Regardless of the panel used, the Oppo phone made an excellent impression outdoors, although the plastic film on the main display was noticeably reflective. Viewing angle stability, however, is very good, and the drop in brightness is minimal.

Outer display

The secondary display uses a 6.62-inch AMOLED panel and has a similar peak brightness of 2,198 cd/m² (APL18). Just like the main screen, the refresh rate varies between 1 and 120 Hz, thanks to LTPO technology. With a resolution of 2,616 x 1,140 pixels, the outer screen has a pixel density of 431 PPI.

Outer display brightness

1324
cd/m²
1322
cd/m²
1305
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
1358
cd/m²
1348
cd/m²
1299
cd/m²
1309
cd/m²
1328
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1327.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1358 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Color accuracy (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Color accuracy (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: Adobe RGB) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: Adobe RGB) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: P3) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: P3) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Color space (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Gray scales (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Gray scales (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Color saturation (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display
Color saturation (profile: Pro target color space: sRGB) - outer display

Performance - A foldable phone with a Qualcomm SoC

The Find N5 is the first foldable smartphone with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, However, only the version with five performance cores is used here instead of six. This means that Qualcomm is likely to also include faulty chips that have defects in one core during production and market them at a lower price.

However, this does not affect everyday performance; the Oppo phone still offers sufficient performance reserves even when using multiple apps simultaneously. However, the benchmarks appear somewhat different. The missing core is particularly evident in the Geekbench multi-core test, and the NPU could also be compromised, given the poor results in Geekbench AI.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=15)
3013 Points +4%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2888 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2239 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2184 Points -24%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2170 Points -25%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1359 Points -53%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1982 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=202, last 2 years)
1546 Points -46%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1534 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8154 - 10401, n=15)
9267 Points +12%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
8243 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6894 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6794 Points -18%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6279 Points -24%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4882 Points -41%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4987 Points -40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4536 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=202, last 2 years)
4401 Points -47%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2099 - 2258, n=7)
2187 Points +4%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2099 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1689 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1651 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1374 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=168, last 2 years)
1082 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (6384 - 8816, n=7)
7441 Points +10%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6765 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
5899 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5898 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3874 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=168, last 2 years)
3647 Points -46%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2340778 - 3015111, n=12)
2668458 Points +14%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2340778 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1934541 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1685774 Points -28%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1607165 Points -31%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1390723 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=133, last 2 years)
1328327 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1322101 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14984 - 27169, n=13)
21807 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18026 Points +20%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17917 Points +20%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16056 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16234 Points +8%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14984 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13789 Points -8%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
12938 Points -14%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
11562 Points -23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8334 - 14066, n=11)
11222 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10120 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9555 Points +2%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9347 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8400 Points -10%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8283 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7637 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=161, last 2 years)
6764 Points -28%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=11)
15754 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15087 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14552 Points +25%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
12736 Points +9%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11637 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11279 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=161, last 2 years)
10583 Points -9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8038 Points -31%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7263 - 20572, n=11)
13721 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11938 Points +38%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10626 Points +23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10023 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9073 Points +5%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
8647 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=161, last 2 years)
7461 Points -14%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7426 Points -14%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 51041, n=11)
41677 Points +3%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
40383 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
34612 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
32352 Points -20%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32334 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
30845 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
21728 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
19339 Points -52%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1993 Points +9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1983 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1882 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=11)
1843 Points +1%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1823 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1717 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)
1604 Points -12%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1077 Points -41%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36048 Points +214%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)
17965 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17834 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
17812 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=10)
17541 Points +53%
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15837 Points +38%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12651 Points +10%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11465 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
213849 Points +27073%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=10)
32360 Points +4012%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27234 Points +3360%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
24087 Points +2961%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1434 Points +82%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
963 Points +22%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
787 Points
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=37, last 2 years)
1743 Points +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (594 - 1708, n=10)
1197 Points +100%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1126 Points +88%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
598 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=37, last 2 years)
1047 Points +295%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (265 - 734, n=10)
526 Points +98%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
492 Points +86%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
265 Points
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (287 - 738, n=10)
538 Points +87%
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
491 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=38, last 2 years)
436 Points +52%
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
287 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
3199 Points
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3092 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points
Score V6
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11267 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 12578, n=10)
6990 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=40, last 2 years)
4543 Points -60%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1168 Points -90%

Qualcomm has not provided any further details regarding either the Adreno 830's number of shaders or the clock speeds in the 7-core variant. Based on the Find N5's offscreen scores in GFXBench, it can be assumed that the GPU is also subject to limitations. Compared to other smartphones with this graphics chip, the Oppo phone is sometimes 20 percent less powerful. The main display was also used for the onscreen values.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5955 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4693 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4411 Points -26%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4341 Points -27%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3628 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2602 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6089 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4626 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4021 Points -34%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2584 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25231 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18997 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18726 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16021 Points -37%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13998 Points -45%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points -63%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9657 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7402 Points -23%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7362 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7290 Points -25%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9565 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7694 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7487 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7345 Points -23%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2007 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1511 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1503 Points -25%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1280 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1043 Points -48%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1987 Points
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1633 Points -18%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1549 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1457 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
665 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
503 fps -24%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
488 fps -27%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
437 fps -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
423 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +95%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
375 fps +21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
355 fps +14%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
346 fps +11%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
311 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps -4%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +85%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +43%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps -18%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
225 fps -22%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
196 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +12%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -2%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps -19%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps -32%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -4%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -14%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -21%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +30%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
174 fps -21%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
173 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -40%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -51%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -8%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps -13%
Oppo Find N3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -47%

The Find N5's browser speed leaves nothing to be desired in everyday use with websites loading quickly and scrolling smoothly. However, the foldable phone delivered weak results in browser benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=12)
224 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
172.212 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
155.837 Points +5%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
147.767 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
135.1 Points -9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
117.483 Points -20%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
87.027 Points -41%
Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)
64.069 Points -57%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
62.738 Points -58%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)
362 runs/min +48%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
308 runs/min +26%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
244 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
237 runs/min -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
182 runs/min -25%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
164.2 runs/min -33%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
115 runs/min -53%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=10)
25 runs/min +63%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
16.5 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
15.7 runs/min +3%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
15.3 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
14.9 runs/min -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=91, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min -16%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
6.53 runs/min -57%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
211 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
189 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=10)
187.2 Points +19%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
157 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=162, last 2 years)
125.9 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
112 Points -29%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
69 Points -56%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
28 Points -82%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 95506, n=13)
79526 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
66754 Points +46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
62374 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
50938 Points +12%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
45665 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
42443 Points -7%
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
27245 Points -40%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
21928 Points -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
2065.6 ms * -136%
Oppo Find N3 (Chrome 120)
1762.4 ms * -102%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years)
1439 ms * -65%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)
873.45 ms *
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
710.4 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
554.57 ms * +37%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 (Chrome 129)
545.6 ms * +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=11)
511 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

When it comes to storage, the Find N5 impresses with its high throughput rates. The Oppo phone possesses the UFS 4.0 standard and delivers very good read and write speeds.

Oppo Find N5Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Honor Magic V3Oppo Find N3Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-26%
-14%
23%
27%
15%
20%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
3437.47
1827.6
-47%
4115.34
20%
3984.91
16%
3825.59
11%
3098.47
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3251.98
1126.34
-65%
2083.25
-36%
3073.45
-5%
3393.12
4%
2863.35
-12%
Random Read 4KB
269.51
263.31
-2%
398.01
48%
369.73
37%
365.48
36%
351.92
31%
Random Write 4KB
339.32
376.94
11%
45.73
-87%
485.32
43%
527.68
56%
505.81
49%

Games - The Oppo Find N5 can only hit 90fps

We analyzed the performance of the installed Adreno GPU by also taking a closer look at current Android games beyond the benchmark package. With our partner, GameBench, we determined the exact frame rates for two games from the Play Store as examples. To achieve this, we used the larger internal screen.

It is, without question, fun to play games using the large OLED panel, but gamers should probably give the Find N5 a body swerve. Firstly, HFR gaming above 100fps isn't possible, and secondly, the Oppo phone throttles the frame rate very quickly and significantly in demanding games such as Genshin Impact.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG mobile
PUBG mobile
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Oppo Find N5; Genshin Impact: Ø40.6 (34-60)
Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.1 (85-90)
Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (43-60)
Oppo Find N5; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (34-41)

Emissions - The Oppo smartphone has a hot spot

Temperature

A reduction in system performance due to the Find N5's dissipated heat was evident in the 3DMark stress tests. We measured a throttling of approximately 50 percent. The case's surface temperatures were very heterogeneous in our load scenario using the Burnout benchmark but remained at a non-critical level even in the hot spot area.

Max. Load
 47.9 °C
118 F
43.1 °C
110 F
39.7 °C
103 F
 
 37.8 °C
100 F
36.6 °C
98 F
30.8 °C
87 F
 
 30 °C
86 F
29.8 °C
86 F
29.6 °C
85 F
 
Maximum: 47.9 °C = 118 F
Average: 36.1 °C = 97 F
35.5 °C
96 F
39.6 °C
103 F
41.2 °C
106 F
33 °C
91 F
38 °C
100 F
45.4 °C
114 F
28.2 °C
83 F
28.3 °C
83 F
30.3 °C
87 F
Maximum: 45.4 °C = 114 F
Average: 35.5 °C = 96 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19.5 °C = 67 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.7 % +40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +20%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.2 % +6%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.1 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 % -4%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % +42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.5 % +41%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.5 % +8%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 % +3%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.7 % +22%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % +1%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.2 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.3 % -14%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.5 % +42%
Honor Magic V3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 % +23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.5 % +21%
Oppo Find N5
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.3 %
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 % -5%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.4 (19.1-35.1)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.5 (17-30.4)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø87.1 (72.8-129.9)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø58.5 (52.4-97.2)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.8 (18.7-32.7)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.4 (14-28.3)
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (9.05-15.5)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.15 (7.05-12.7)

Speakers

Headphones can be connected via a USB port. Anyone who prefers using Bluetooth for wireless playback can choose from a wide range of codecs

The Oppo smartphone's stereo speakers offer very good sound, even if the super-high frequencies lack depth. However, the speakers produce very decent depth with a touch of bass.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.743.62546.241.23139.632.4403530.85037.933.96326.525.68022.123.210025.334.812524.7451602451.520020.453.725015.855.131517.959.340014.95750017.659.363025.567.680017.765.2100017.468125015.371160016.270.1200014.871.525001668315017.861.640001665500022.169630021.671.8800026.166.81000020.456.91250020.460.11600020.959.5SPL32.280.3N1.647.9median 17.9median 61.6Delta3.1737.639.624.730.72421.924.624.932.135222416.426.42638.419.84715.657.614.661.911.1668.264.811.5649.970.48.469.210.2711172.913.473.212.171.41270.612.373.512.472.11370.413.165.913.865.313.767.11470.413.762.112.843.224.782.80.658.3median 12.8median 67.11.55.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find N5Oppo Find N3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find N5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - The Oppo Find N5 charges quickly

Power consumption

Despite its extremely slim case, Oppo has significantly increased its N3 successor's battery capacity to 5,600 mAh. The battery can be charged at a maximum of 80 watts, and wireless charging is supported up to 50 watts. With the appropriate power adapter, the charging process takes just under 50 minutes.

We measured the power consumption using the large main screen. At 1.4 watts, the energy consumption is relatively low for an XXL foldable phone, especially when running idle.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 7.2 / 12.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find N5
5600 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
4650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
5100 mAh
Honor Magic V3
5150 mAh
Oppo Find N3
4805 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-57%
-15%
-22%
10%
-19%
4%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.28
-42%
0.83
8%
1.5
-67%
1.12
-24%
1.16
-29%
0.805 ?(0.49 - 1.11, n=12)
11%
Idle Average *
1.4
2.99
-114%
1.3
7%
1.9
-36%
1.58
-13%
1.8
-29%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
3.32
-75%
1.44
24%
2.6
-37%
1.66
13%
1.84
3%
1.411 ?(0.94 - 2.1, n=12)
26%
Load Average *
7.2
7.25
-1%
13.57
-88%
5.8
19%
5.9
18%
10.98
-53%
9.15 ?(6.7 - 13, n=10)
-27%
Load Maximum *
12.8
19.46
-52%
16.03
-25%
11.2
12%
5.94
54%
11.1
13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.936-14.7)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.76 (0.831-5.43)
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.64 (6.86-11.6)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.67 (5.26-11.2)
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.06 (0.858-1.877)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.775 (1.53-2.66)

Battery runtime

With its 8.12-inch display and an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m², the Find N5's stamina is extremely good for a foldable - almost 22 hours in our Wi-Fi test. This is an area where the foldable competition lags behind, with the Honor Magic V3 falling short of the Oppo phone by over 8 hours, With continuous video playback, it even kept going for 15 hours. With the smaller external panel, the Find N5 could add a few more hours to this total, which would put us into record-breaking territory.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 41min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
21h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
31h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 45min
Oppo Find N5
5600 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
4650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
4400 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
5100 mAh
Honor Magic V3
5150 mAh
Oppo Find N3
4805 mAh
Battery Runtime
-33%
-30%
-18%
-32%
-34%
Reader / Idle
2201
2067
-6%
1692
-23%
H.264
1913
1421
-26%
1043
-45%
WiFi v1.3
1306
879
-33%
913
-30%
968
-26%
830
-36%
861
-34%
Load
285
244
-14%
223
-22%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Oppo Find N5 is a lightweight, comfortable, and incredibly thin mini tablet despite having the dimensions of a normal smartphone.

Oppo Find N5 - 03/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
73 / 75 → 97%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
91%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
72 / 85 → 85%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
83%
Average
69%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
45%
Software Updates
78.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87%
Oppo Find N5
Oppo Find N5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.96
Kepuch Screen Protector Comp...
2. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
3. $6.07
FZZSZS (3-Pack for Oppo Find...
List Price: 1577€
229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.12"
2480x2248
412 PPI
AMOLED
2.
84.4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $24.82
Ferilinso 2 Pack Screen Prot...
2. $9.99
YEYEBF Screen Protector for ...
3. $1,099.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
List Price: 1899€
257 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.00"
2152x2076
374 PPI
OLED LTPO
3.
86.1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $36.98
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold 6 S Pe...
2. $15.48
Z Fold6 S Pen Replacement fo...
3. $41.75
DearHot 15W Qi Wireless Car ...
List Price: 2119€
239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"
2160x1856
375 PPI
AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2
4.
85.3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $31.99
JSAUX Cup Holder Universal M...
2. $9.90
MOOISVS [2Pack for Xiaomi Mi...
3. $25.59
xuenair Z Fold 6 5 4 3 2 Car...
List Price: 1250€
226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.98"
2488x2224
418 PPI
AMOLED LPTO
5.
86.3%
Honor Magic V3
Honor Magic V3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.99
MOOISVS [2+2Pack for Honor M...
2. $21.95
IPG For HONOR Magic V3 FULL ...
3. $9.99
MOOISVS 2+2pack for Honor Ma...
List Price: 2000€
226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"
2344x2156
402 PPI
OLED
6.
88.3% v7 (old)
Oppo Find N3
Oppo Find N3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.95
IPG for Oppo Find N3 Flip Sm...
2. $20.68
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $17.90
Kainevy for Oppo Find N3 Cas...
List Price: 1800€
239 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash7.82"
2440x2268
426 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 5 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The world's thinnest smartphone's battery life is hard to believe - Oppo Find N5 review
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-03-30 (Update: 2025-03-30)