Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12

ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12

The ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 (MC12) is a high-end GPU for smartphones and tablets, which was used for the first time in this form in the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 in this form.

It uses 12 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the latest 5th generation GPU architecture (successor to valhall). According to ARM, it offers 15 percent higher performance than the previous generation with the same number of cores and can access 40 percent more memory bandwidth.

In our test of the Dimensity 9300 in the Vivo X100 Pro, the GPU can outperform the older Immortalis-G715 MP11 but remains behind an Adreno 750.

The Immortalis-G720 GPUs support Variable Rate Shading (VRS), Deferred Vertex Shading (DVS) and hardware-based ray tracing. The GPU is manufactured in 4 nanometers.

Immortalis-G720 Series

Immortalis-G720 MP12 12
Immortalis-G720 MP7 compare 7
CodenameKrake
Architecture5th Gen
Pipelines12 - unified
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.2, ASTC, AFBC
Date of Announcement29.05.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Immortalis-G720 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
18733 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
27796 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15904     avg: 16854     median: 16919.5 (71%)     max: 17674 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 22189     avg: 25517     median: 25277 (63%)     max: 29325 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 13588     avg: 17328     median: 18352 (9%)     max: 18628 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3866     avg: 5079     median: 5289 (6%)     max: 5527 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 37.4     median: 35 (13%)     max: 43 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 72     avg: 82.6     median: 83 (15%)     max: 94 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 176     avg: 201.2     median: 198 (15%)     max: 236 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 144.4     median: 144 (14%)     max: 153 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 201     avg: 234.2     median: 231 (5%)     max: 269 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 221     avg: 299.4     median: 261 (11%)     max: 478 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 738     avg: 787     median: 791 (6%)     max: 831 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
644667 Points (64%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 672407     avg: 814428     median: 841482 (67%)     max: 866486 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 178.3     avg: 217.8     median: 229 (6%)     max: 246.01 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 12163     avg: 13755     median: 14675 (4%)     max: 15025 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 13826     avg: 15108     median: 15598 (4%)     max: 15920 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 11.7     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (5%)     max: 15.9 Watt
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.9 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
56 58 59 59.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
90 111.9 112 119 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
40 59.6 60 60 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.8 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 71 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
58.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact605958
PUBG Mobile1085540
Dead Trigger 266
Asphalt 9: Legends58.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2

1


2
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 29. 17:27:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:39:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.08s ... 0.082s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.082s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.082s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12335 +0.025s ... 0.107s

#8 got single benchmarks 12335 +0.085s ... 0.192s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.414s ... 0.605s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.605s

#12 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.613s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.613s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.616s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.037s ... 0.653s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.657s

Notebook reviews with ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 graphics card

Realme GT 7 review

realme GT 7 Smartphone Review: Killer value with lots of AI features in the upper mid-range

The realme GT 7 aims to impress with its high performance, smart AI features, powerful 7,000 mAh battery, and an extremely bright display. We find out how well ...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 6.78" | 206 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review - The biggest Android tablet now relies on MediaTek

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review - The biggest Android tablet now relies on MediaTek

This year, Samsung has predominantly finetuned its largest premium tablet. Its motto is faster and longer. In this review, you can find out why the Galaxy Tab S...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 14.60" | 718 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck review

The AI tablet has a display problem - Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Plus review

According to Samsung, the Galaxy Tab S10+ is a tablet that was developed specially for AI functions. However, the manufacturer is breaking new ground with its c...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 12.40" | 571 g
Xiaomi 14T Pro smartphone review by Notebookcheck

Xiaomi 14T Pro smartphone review: Amazing value, amazing screen brightness

Xiaomi sees its 14T Pro as a high-end smartphone for less than 800 Euros (~$867). In our test, the Xiaomi smartphone, which is equipped with Leica cameras, show...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 6.67" | 209 g
Vivo X100 Pro review - Impressive premium smartphone with Zeiss camera

Vivo X100 Pro review - Impressive premium smartphone with Zeiss camera

The Vivo X100 Pro wants to score points in the test with its many high-end specifications, waterproof case, large battery, bright LTPO display, and first-class ...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 6.78" | 221 g

Vivo T4 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T4 Ultra

Realme GT 7: Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme GT 7

Vivo S20 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S20 Pro

Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+

Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra

Xiaomi 14T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 14T Pro

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Pad2 Pro: unknown, 13.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Pad2 Pro

Vivo IQOO Neo9s Pro: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo IQOO Neo9s Pro

Vivo Pad3 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300, 13.00", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad3 Pro

Oppo Find X7: MediaTek Dimensity 9300, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X7

Vivo X100 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X100 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Plus: Sidelined?

Xiaomi 14T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 14T Pro verdict: High-class smartphone with flagship vibes

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Tab S9 Ultra: MediaTek tramples Qualcomm — efficiency questions loom

Xiaomi 14T Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi 14T and Xiaomi 14T Pro: Surcharge for Pro model not worth it according to DxOMark camera analysis

Vivo X100 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro: Better camera and V4 AI chip teased, X100 and X90 Pro to come with camera feature of the Vivo X100 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10: First indications of the launch of at least two iPad Pro competitors with Galaxy S25

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10: First indications of the launch of at least two iPad Pro competitors with Galaxy S25

Vivo X100 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 9300, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X100 Ultra expected to offer promising Zeiss telephoto camera specs with new, large 200 MP Samsung sensor

   » Leica vs Zeiss vs Fuji: Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Vivo X100 Pro compete with new Fujifilm X100VI camera star

   » X100 Pro vs iPhone 15 Pro Max: Vivo tops flagship phone battery comparison but Apple is the real winner

   » Vivo X100 Pro: Update eliminates the biggest flaw of the Zeiss camera flagship compared to Galaxy S24 and the like

   » First Samsung 200 megapixel telephoto camera in the Vivo X100 Pro+ to offer 200x zoom

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-02-21)