Notebookcheck Logo

Vivo X100 Pro review - Impressive premium smartphone with Zeiss camera

No small cores. The Vivo X100 Pro wants to score points in the test with its many high-end specifications, waterproof case, large battery, bright LTPO display, and first-class camera. Read the test to find out whether it succeeds and whether there is a downside.

The Vivo X100 Pro is the successor of the X90 Pro and has been improved in several areas. As expected, the new SoC ensures better performance, the display is brighter, the camera setup has been notably revised and the Vivo smartphone can rely on much larger energy reserves.

Best of all, it no longer has to be imported as it is also available within the EU. Our test explains the differences between the global and imported versions and why the X100 Pro is a strong alternative.

Vivo X100 Pro (X100 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 8 x 2 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720, dedicated V3-ISP
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, or 16GB
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Schott Xensation up Glass, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 256GB / 512GB / 1TB, 491 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.05 x 164.05 x 75.28 ( = 0.36 x 6.46 x 2.96 in)
Battery
21.01 Wh, 2700 mAh Lithium-Ion, 7.78 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23mm) + 50MP (4.3x optical zoom, f/2.5, 100mm) + 50MP (f/2.0, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, Funtouch OS 14, 36 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), SBAS, QZSS, NavIC; Bluetooh Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless, waterproof
Weight
221 g ( = 7.8 oz / 0.49 pounds), Power Supply: 168 g ( = 5.93 oz / 0.37 pounds)
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
03/2024
Vivo X100 Pro
Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12
221 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
86.8 %
02/2024
Nubia Z60 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
246 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
91.1 %
12/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU
221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.1 %
02/2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
214.9 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260

Case - Matte back for the Vivo X100 Pro

The Vivo X100 Pro is nominally available in the colors Startrail Blue, Sunset Orange, and Asteroid Black, but only the black version is currently available in Europe. Its back is no longer made of artificial leather, which is reserved for the orange model, but has a rough surface that is not specified in more detail. This is absolutely unsusceptible to fingerprints.

The striking camera hump is framed by highly polished stainless steel and covered with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. Despite the imposing design, the Vivo smartphone is not too top-heavy and sits comfortably in the hand. Vivo does not provide more details on the front glass, but this is protected by an additional film ex works.

The workmanship of the X100 Pro is very good. The high-gloss aluminum frame gives the smartphone a high-quality feel and can withstand twisting attempts without making a sound. The gaps are tight and even.

The X100 Pro is rounded off with IP68 certification, which means it is dustproof and waterproof.

(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

164.1 mm / 6.46 inch 74.5 mm / 2.93 inch 9.3 mm / 0.3661 inch 214.9 g0.4738 lbs164.05 mm / 6.46 inch 75.28 mm / 2.96 inch 9.05 mm / 0.3563 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs163.98 mm / 6.46 inch 76.35 mm / 3.01 inch 8.78 mm / 0.3457 inch 246 g0.542 lbs162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 213 g0.4696 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 76.7 mm / 3.02 inch 8.25 mm / 0.3248 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Vivo smartphone with USB 3.2

The Vivo X100 Pro offers a fast USB 3.2 interface (Gen. 1, copy test: 270.18 MB/s), which also supports OTG. However, this must first be activated in the settings and then the connection of peripheral devices and external data carriers is possible. These can be formatted with FAT, FAT32, exFAT or NTFS. However, wired image output is not supported.

An IR transmitter, which can be used to control air conditioning systems, multimedia devices, or cameras, for example, is also on board. The equipment is rounded off by Bluetooth 5.4 and NFC.

Top: microphone, IR blaster (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Top: microphone, IR blaster (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Left: (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Left: (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Right: Volume, Power (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Right: Volume, Power (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Bottom: speaker, USB, microphone, SIM (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Bottom: speaker, USB, microphone, SIM (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Software - X100 Pro with different UIs

The Vivo X100 Pro will be delivered with the newer OriginOS 4 in China, while the global version (also in Europe) will continue to use Funtouch OS 14. Both are based on Android 14; there will be no general switch to OriginOS. This looks much more modern and also comes with numerous Vivo apps and the V-Appstore, whereas in Europe these are completely replaced by Google apps and the Play Store. However, the latter can also be installed via the V-Appstore.

A major disadvantage of the China version is the numerous pre-installed Chinese apps and services. Notifications from Google services are also limited to three apps, and many functions and services are not translated. On the other hand, feature updates are rolled out much faster, and there is now also a wide choice of UI languages.

Vivo promises both security patches and major updates for three years, which is not particularly long in this price segment. However, the former are rolled out monthly.

Funtouch OS 14

OriginOS 4

Communication and GNSS - Wi-Fi 7 and good positioning

The Vivo X100 Pro supports a wide range of frequencies and should be able to connect to the mobile network anywhere in the world. The connection quality is good in a metropolitan environment.

The X100 Pro nominally supports Wi-Fi 7 with all three bands, but the smartphone was unable to establish a 6 GHz connection to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router in the test. We will check this again after the next update.

The transmission speed in the 5 GHz network is significantly higher than with the X90 Pro but is still too low for the standard.

The Bluetooth connection does not shine with an outstanding range in the test. After around nine meters, the connection to paired headphones (1More EVO Earbuds, LDAC) simply disconnects. For comparison, with the Galaxy S23 Ultra as a base, a few meters more are possible.

Networking
Vivo X100 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
929 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 772) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1822 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 1798) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼80%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
969 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 477) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1680 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1761 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼96%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼73%
Vivo X90 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1787 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
229 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
653 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
689 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1549 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1376 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼75%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1822 (1665-1937)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1069-1581)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1835 (1798-1853)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1304-1676)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (862-945)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (870-916)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (772-967)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (333-944)
GPS test: outdoors
outdoors
GPS test: indoors
indoors

Indoors the phone cannot establish a GNSS connection with airplane mode activated, although numerous satellites are displayed. The satellite fix is only possible with an active data connection, but it is then also very accurate.

We compare the X100 Pro with the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch on a bike ride. The smartphone doesn't track the route quite as accurately and sometimes goes off track. However, this should not be a problem for navigation tasks.

GNSS test: Circumnavigation of the lake
GNSS test: Circumnavigation of the lake
GNSS test: Turning point
GNSS test: Turning point
GNSS test: Summary
GNSS test: Summary

Phone functions and voice quality

The X100 Pro is a dual SIM smartphone and can accommodate two nanoSIM cards or an eSIM instead of the second SIM. Both Wi-Fi calls and VoLTE are supported.

The voice quality is good when held to the ear, and minor background noise is reliably filtered. The Vivo smartphone reaches its limits in loud noise.

Cameras - Vivo X100 Pro with 3 x 50 MPix

Selfie with the Vivo X100 Pro
Selfie with the Vivo X100 Pro

The front camera still has a resolution of 32 MP, but with f/2.0 it nominally catches more light than the predecessor (f/2.5). Despite the fixed focus, it can take impressive selfies. It can record videos in Ultra HD with up to 60 FPS.

With three powerful 50 MPix sensors on the back, the Vivo X100 Pro makes quite an impression on the spec sheet. The main sensor is once again a one-inch Sony IMX989. The ultra-wide angle now has a much higher resolution and delivers impressive images, even if the software smoothes some contours a little too much. The telephoto lens now uses a 4.3x magnification (100 mm) and can also be used as a macro. A maximum of 100x digital zoom is possible. Photos are still really good even at longer focal lengths (up to approx. 230 mm). This is certainly also due to the new generation of Zeiss T-coating, which prevents reflections on the lenses. In addition, with the V3 chipset, there is once again a dedicated ISP.

In general, the triple camera delivers good images with an appealing dynamic range. In low light, however, the noise reduction is quite aggressive and swallows up some details. The European version has a slightly different color balance than the Chinese version, especially for skin tones. A Pro mode is also on board, which offers extensive setting options and also allows shooting in RAW and Super RAW.

Videos are recorded in 8k (30 FPS), Ultra HD (up to 60 FPS), or Full HD (up to 240 FPS) at best. A mode with an increased bit rate is also available, which doubles this to 48 MBit/s.

Vivo X100 Pro (Global Version)Vivo X100 Pro (China Version)
Vivo X100 Pro (Global Version)
Vivo X100 Pro (China Version)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
5.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X100 Pro: 8.68 ∆E min: 3.94 - max: 13.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
21 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X100 Pro: 20.9 ∆E min: 11.13 - max: 30.53 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - 120-watt power supply included

The Vivo X100 Pro comes with a comparatively extensive scope of delivery, which includes a modular 120-watt power supply unit, a USB-C cable, a SIM pin, a black silicone protective case, and the usual paperwork. The power supply can also be used for other devices such as laptops but is then limited to 65 watts. Vivo does not offer any optional accessories.

The warranty varies greatly depending on the region. While the imported Chinese version only offers 12 months, the Czech version has 24 months, and in Austria, it is a whopping 36 months. Vivo Europe has confirmed that warranty claims for models purchased abroad can also be processed in Germany, as the service team is still available despite the patent dispute with Nokia (which we covered).

Input devices & operation - Optical fingerprint in the X100 Pro

The capacitive touchscreen of the Vivo X100 Pro is covered with a protective film ex-works. Its gliding properties are really good, but the glass underneath is even more slippery.

The linear vibration motor (x-axis) provides crisp and responsive haptic feedback. An optical fingerprint sensor in the display is available for biometric security, while less secure face recognition via the front camera is also possible.

Display - Almost 3,000 cd/m² with the Vivo X100 Pro

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The AMOLED display of the Vivo X100 Pro is identical to that of its predecessor in terms of dimensions and resolution. It is an LTPO panel that can dynamically adjust the refresh rate between 1 and 120 Hz.

The brightness has been significantly improved, and the display of the X100 Pro now achieves an average of 1,360 cd/m² in a pure white display with the ambient light sensor activated. Vivo trumps this already very good value again with an even distribution of light and dark areas (APL18) and then achieves 1,866 cd/m² in the center of the screen, and we even measured 2,974 cd/m² during HDR playback.

Vivo uses PWM dimming with up to 2,160 Hz to make the OLED's flickering more eye-friendly. However, we can only measure 369 Hz at minimum brightness (1st image from the top), which can certainly cause discomfort for sensitive users. The frequency only increases when the brightness is raised further (at 15%, 1,851 Hz, picture 3). Then, however, we can also detect low-frequency flickering with a high amplitude of only 120 Hz. We can rule out temporal dithering as the cause. This is probably due to black frame insertion (BFI), which is used to reduce motion blur.

1317
cd/m²
1417
cd/m²
1475
cd/m²
1245
cd/m²
1392
cd/m²
1425
cd/m²
1234
cd/m²
1358
cd/m²
1374
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1475 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1359.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 1392 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Vivo X100 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70
Nubia Z60 Ultra
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70
Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Screen
-56%
-107%
-54%
-45%
Brightness middle
1392
1510
8%
1003
-28%
1102
-21%
1018
-27%
Brightness
1360
1467
8%
1001
-26%
1102
-19%
1026
-25%
Brightness Distribution
84
92
10%
96
14%
98
17%
93
11%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.6
1.1
-83%
1.7
-183%
1.1
-83%
0.9
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.3
3.8
-192%
3.6
-177%
3.1
-138%
2.2
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.7
-89%
3.1
-244%
1.6
-78%
1.9
-111%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.26 97%
CCT
6540 99%
6670 97%
6257 104%
6555 99%
6473 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 369 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 369 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 369 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17770 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The color reproduction of AMOLED displays, which we checked with the Calman analysis software, is excellent if the Pro mode is activated in the settings. The display is visibly cooler in the default settings.

Grayscale (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color mode: Pro mode, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5905 ms rise
↘ 0.575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3075 ms rise
↘ 0.303 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

The Vivo X100 Pro is perfectly prepared for outdoor use thanks to its enormous brightness reserves. Only the surface reflections can be annoying here.

The viewing angles of the Vivo smartphone are very good. No color changes are visible, and the brightness is hardly reduced, but we can see a slight rainbow shimmer at certain viewing angles.

Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Vivo relies on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300

The Vivo X100 Pro is powered by the Dimensity 9300 with a generous 16 GB LPDDR5x RAM. The top-of-the-line SoC from MediaTek focuses fully on performance and does not use energy-efficient cores but rather low-clocked Cortex-A720 cores for such tasks.

In the Geekbench single-core test, a well-cooled Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is still three to six percent faster, but in the multi-core test, the Dimensity 9300 flexes its muscles and takes the lead in the comparison field. The SoC also delivers strong performance in the AI and system benchmarks.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1702 Points +6%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1604 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1604 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=211, last 2 years)
914 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
6681 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
6681 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6543 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=211, last 2 years)
3005 Points -55%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +33%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2268 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2207 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2207 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1970 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=112, last 2 years)
1373 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
7408 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
7408 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points -2%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7004 Points -5%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
5386 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=112, last 2 years)
3804 Points -49%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2103436 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2038807 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2038807 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=53, last 2 years)
1245321 Points -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1484501 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1484501 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=146, last 2 years)
748379 Points -50%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18445 Points +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
14573 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
14573 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)
11860 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -19%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -33%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +8%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1331 Points +2%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1301 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1301 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)
843 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11438 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
11438 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10966 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=161, last 2 years)
5883 Points -49%
System
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15863 Points +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
12477 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
12477 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=161, last 2 years)
9825 Points -21%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -22%
Memory
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
12306 Points +9%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11309 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
11309 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=161, last 2 years)
6394 Points -43%
Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
58651 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
58651 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
34538 Points -41%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
14727 Points -75%
Web
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points +4%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2068 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2068 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=161, last 2 years)
1511 Points -27%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -59%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
66541 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
66541 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21632 Points -67%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17407 Points -74%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
49660 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
49660 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=107, last 2 years)
17669 Points -64%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1623 Points -97%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -98%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
3410 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
3410 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (378 - 3410, n=8, last 2 years)
894 Points -74%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
473 Points -86%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1247 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1247 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1141 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (509 - 1342, n=8, last 2 years)
1129 Points -9%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1257 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (978 - 1478, n=8, last 2 years)
1185 Points +21%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
978 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
978 Points 0%

The integrated GPU accompanying the Dimensity 9300 is an ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, which also supports hardware-based ray tracing.

The performance offered is very high and should meet all requirements. However, especially with the modern Vulkan-based benchmarks and ray tracing, the Adreno 750 is significantly faster.

Nevertheless, the X100 Pro delivers very good and stable performance in games. We were only denied the Ultra HD setting in PUGB Mobile, and in HD mode the frame rate reached 40 FPS.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5248 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5175 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -26%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5211 Points +8%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4817 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19641 Points +12%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17613 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -13%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8582 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7922 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -47%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17516 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -43%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8758 Points +10%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7975 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6106 Points -23%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6026 Points -24%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8720 Points +11%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7845 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6478 Points -17%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5870 Points -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
546 fps -31%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
363 fps +31%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
277 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps +11%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
251 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -55%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +9%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
148 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -26%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -27%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps +13%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -27%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -22%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
229 fps +16%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -41%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -51%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -24%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -52%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +47%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
197.49 Points +14%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Chrome 121)
69.161 Points -60%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
173.403 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
173.4 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=167, last 2 years)
108.3 Points -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -39%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +90%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
234 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
234 runs/min 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
215 runs/min -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=151, last 2 years)
110.8 runs/min -53%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -74%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
183 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
183 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
161 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
101 Points -45%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -64%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +53%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
199 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
199 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=115, last 2 years)
136.7 Points -31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -35%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
82 Points -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +29%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
68315 Points +2%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
66656 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
66656 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years)
33583 Points -50%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -165%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=167, last 2 years)
1546 ms * -121%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -20%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
698.2 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
698 ms * -0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
646.8 ms * +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Vivo X100 ProGoogle Pixel 8 ProNubia Z60 UltraVivo X90 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-71%
2%
-18%
-13%
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
3986.41
1501.13
-62%
3926.73
-1%
3866.75
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
3461.77
257.28
-93%
3518.47
2%
2643.38
-24%
3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19)
-12%
Random Read 4KB
450.24
156.16
-65%
477.73
6%
367.89
-18%
Random Write 4KB
709.25
258.92
-63%
701.13
-1%
521.43
-26%

FPS in games

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø58.3 (50-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.9 (40-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.6 (53-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.6 (29-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø88.8 (19-90)
Vivo X100 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø40 (33-41)

Emissions - Heavy throttling of the Dimensity 9300 under load

Temperature

As expected, the Vivo X100 Pro remains pleasantly cool at idle, although the surface temperatures climb up to 47.5 °C in places under constant load, but this is harmless and should only rarely be reached in everyday use.

In the 3DMark stress tests, the SoC throttles heavily and works much slower in the long run.

Max. Load
 46.4 °C
116 F
46.2 °C
115 F
44.1 °C
111 F
 
 47.5 °C
118 F
47.5 °C
118 F
45.5 °C
114 F
 
 46.4 °C
116 F
47 °C
117 F
45.3 °C
114 F
 
Maximum: 47.5 °C = 118 F
Average: 46.2 °C = 115 F
42.7 °C
109 F
45.1 °C
113 F
42.3 °C
108 F
44.3 °C
112 F
44.3 °C
112 F
40.6 °C
105 F
42.1 °C
108 F
42.3 °C
108 F
44.6 °C
112 F
Maximum: 45.1 °C = 113 F
Average: 43.1 °C = 110 F
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 20.3 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +51%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +51%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +42%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.3 % +29%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +38%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.3 % +29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % +10%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 % +118%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % +72%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.4 %
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø20.4 (17-28.6)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.4 (11-14.5)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.6 (23.9-31.3)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø65.4 (49.5-95)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (40.7-51.6)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.6 (75.1-111.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.6 (9.55-24.9)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.5 (24.4-29.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (14.1-21.3)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø88.2 (73.7-104)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø47.9 (43.4-53.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.9 (15.3-27.8)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27.9 (25.8-29.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)

Speaker

The Vivo X100 Pro's two speakers deliver a very pleasant sound at medium volume; at maximum volume, the treble dominates, and distortion also occurs.

Alternatively, wired speakers or headphones can be connected via USB. Wireless Bluetooth with a wide range of audio codec support is also available.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.636.22525.9343123.4334027.330.65036.237.86325.430.48016.636.310016.934.712514.746.616013.156.620015.154.725014.354.631511.656.64001054.95009.165.763011.1698009.171.9100011.875.712501578.4160011.377.920001279250012.381.4315012.782.8400012.679.3500013.174.8630013.474.9800013.572.61000013.568.11250013.6701600013.664SPL24.790N0.677.2median 13.1median 71.9Delta1.310.438.440.931.222.725.125.929.926.632.133.523.128.323.631.422.437.416.848.716.559.313.459.814.158.612.956.21358.311.763.211.668.312.972.313.374.813.174.612.47512.678.312.577.312.480.112.780.613.181.813.578.513.670.313.46813.671.813.4612589.40.677.3median 13.1median 71.81.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X100 ProGoogle Pixel 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X100 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - More power for the Vivo X100 Pro

Power consumption

The power consumption of the Vivo smartphone is exemplary at idle. As expected, it requires significantly more power under load, but even this is kept within limits and seems to be capped by Vivo at 11.8 watts, as both components are throttled by almost 50 percent under full load on the CPU and GPU.

The X100 Pro can be charged with up to 100 watts, and up to 50 watts are possible wirelessly. Reverse wireless charging is also supported.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.46 / 0.92 / 0.95 Watt
Load midlight 11.72 / 11.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Nubia Z60 Ultra
6000 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-57%
-30%
-57%
0%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.46
0.63
-37%
0.69
-50%
0.5
-9%
0.9
-96%
0.46 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
0.92
1.47
-60%
1.52
-65%
1.97
-114%
2.32
-152%
0.92 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
0.95
1.55
-63%
1.6
-68%
1.99
-109%
2.39
-152%
0.95 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
11.72
8.45
28%
14.73
-26%
3.36
71%
3.64
69%
11.7 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
11.79
8.63
27%
20.82
-77%
10.43
12%
6.53
45%
11.8 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.17 (0.094-11.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (0.838-8.49)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.627 (0.53-1.356)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)