Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T628 MP6

ARM Mali-T628 MP6

The ARM Mali-T628 MP6 is an integrated graphics solution that launched in Samsung’s smartphone and tablet SoC Exynos 5420 Octa in autumn 2013. Besides OpenGL ES 3.0, the GPU also supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. The Mali-T628 can be scaled from 1 up to 8 clusters/cores depending on the requirements.

The MP6 version, which is used by Samsung, has six clusters with a clock of up to 533 or 600 MHz (equals 122 GFLOPS). Depending on the 3D application, the performance is just slightly behind the Qualcomm Adreno 330 (Snapdragon 800) and the PowerVR G6430 (Apple A7), which makes the Mali-T628 to one of the fastest GPUs for tablets/smartphones in 2013. Even very demanding Android games are smooth in high resolutions (maximum resolution: 2560x1600 pixels). 

The energy consumption is also comparatively high because of the good performance. Despite the 28 nm manufacturing process, SoCs with the Mali-T628 like the Exynos 5420 can usually be found in large high-end smartphones or tablets. The more recent 20 nm Exynos 5430, however, offers a somewhat higher efficiency.

Mali-T600 Series

Mali-T628 MP6 6 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T628 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T604 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.53 GHz
Mali-T624 compare 4
CodenameMidgard (2nd Generation)
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.0
FeaturesOpenGL ES 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, 4xFSAA, 16xFSAA
Date of Announcement25.09.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T628 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa8 x 1800 MHz? MHz600 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9258 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 600 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 13283     avg: 14729     median: 13791 (1%)     max: 18360 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 8289     avg: 8990     median: 8577 (1%)     max: 11367 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 5.5     avg: 7.6     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 13.6 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 22.8     avg: 24.5     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 31.2 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 36.55     avg: 36.6     median: 36.7 (61%)     max: 36.68 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 7512     avg: 7729     median: 7828 (18%)     max: 7846 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 17697     avg: 17731     median: 17718 (39%)     max: 17779 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 59.1     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (89%)     max: 60.7 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3901     avg: 4099     median: 4146.5 (1%)     max: 4202 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2159     avg: 2181     median: 2182 (3%)     max: 2202 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3116     avg: 3535     median: 3423 (74%)     max: 4502 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 11. 04:08:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:04:42 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5069 +0.019s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 5069 +0.014s ... 0.059s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.216s ... 0.275s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.275s

#12 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.277s

#13 return log +0.128s ... 0.405s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-T628 MP6 graphics card

Samsung Galaxy Alpha SM-G850F Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy Alpha SM-G850F Smartphone Review

Alpha leader. Samsung only used plastic even for its premium line in the past. This is now different, and it launches its Galaxy Alpha smartphone with an aluminum bezel. The phone places a claim on the smartphone crown with its strong components, but that still belongs to its company brother - Galaxy S5.
Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 4.7", 115 g
Huawei Ascend Mate 7 Phablet Review

Huawei Ascend Mate 7 Phablet Review

Apple challenger. Buyers looking for an alternative that has roughly the same size as the iPhone 6 and (only) want to spend about 500 Euros (~$635) should certainly look closer at the new, elegant, and swift Huawei phablet. Are its screen, casing, performance, and the stylish UI 3.0 a challenge for Apple's much pricier newcomer?
HiSilicon Kirin 925, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 6", 185 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 Tablet Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 Tablet Review

Stunning screen. Samsung also relies on a high-resolution, Super AMOLED screen in its Galaxy Tab S 8.4. It is the tablet's absolute highlight. The in-house processor is good, but cannot compete with current high-end SoCs. Otherwise, the equipment is state-of-the-art and even includes LTE. Only better speakers and NFC would be appreciated.
Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 8.4", 301 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Tablet Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Tablet Review

Brilliant star. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 relies on an in-house South Korean processor, which is why it slightly lags behind the Note 10.1 in terms of performance. Battery life shows some flaws, which are however still in a very good range. The star of the Tab S is clearly the display, which can entirely convince.
Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 10.5", 470 g
Double-Review Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Tablet

Double-Review Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Tablet

Spoiled for choice. The latest edition of the 10.1-inch tablet from the Galaxy line is available in two SoC versions. The LTE version sports the Snapdragon 800, and the in-house octa-core is installed in the Wi-Fi-only version. We tested how both devices fare in the following report.
Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, ARM Mali-T628 MP6, 10.1", 469 g

Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 12.20", 0.8 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Tablet

HP Slate 7 VoiceTab Ultra: HiSilicon Kirin 925, 7.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HP Slate 7 VoiceTab Ultra

Huawei Ascend Mate 7: HiSilicon Kirin 925, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Ascend Mate 7

Samsung Galaxy Alpha: Samsung Exynos 5430 Octa, 4.70", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Alpha

Samsung Chromebook XE503C32-K01US: unknown, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Samsung Chromebook XE503C32-K01US

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 10.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5

Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 8.40", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4

Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 12.20", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 12.20", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 WiFi-Version: Samsung Exynos 5420 Octa, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)