Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

Mali-T800 Series

Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2
technology16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T830 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6598 x 2360 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
min. - max.700 - 900 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 5376     avg: 10021     median: 11147 (1%)     max: 11713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 465     avg: 594     median: 598 (3%)     max: 721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 387     avg: 504     median: 509 (1%)     max: 618 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 297     avg: 398.3     median: 404 (2%)     max: 483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 241     avg: 327.9     median: 333 (1%)     max: 401 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 2.7     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4.5 (0%)     max: 5.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 4.6     avg: 7.1     median: 7.9 (0%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 12     avg: 16.7     median: 18.5 (0%)     max: 20 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 15988     avg: 16554     median: 16613 (37%)     max: 17001 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3565     avg: 3703     median: 3639 (4%)     max: 3967 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1076     avg: 1184     median: 1160.5 (2%)     max: 1339 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
med.
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
31 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
26 31 31 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 35 49 51 52 56 57 58 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
16 18 22 22 22 23 25 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile13
Arena of Valor3129
Dead Trigger 240
Asphalt 8: Airborne3024
Real Racing 326
Subway Surfers58
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


2
2

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 22:07:37

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Mar 2024 05:38:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7310 +0.015s ... 0.061s

#7 got single benchmarks 7310 +0.046s ... 0.107s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.295s ... 0.402s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.402s

#11 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.417s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.417s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.42s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.082s ... 0.501s

#15 return log +0.042s ... 0.543s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Tablet Review

Huawei has equipped the MediaPad M5 lite with four speakers, certified by harman/kardon. Buyers will receive a fancy-looking mid-range tablet with LTE support. ...
HiSilicon Kirin 659 | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | 10.10" | 475 g
Huawei MediaPad T5

Huawei MediaPad T5 (10.1-inch, LTE) Tablet Review

Made from high-quality material, Huawei's 10-inch MediaPad T5 is equipped with an FHD display and a powerful quad-core CPU. Find out what you can expect of a ta...
HiSilicon Kirin 659 | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | 10.10" | 460 g
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone Review

Night and Day. With the Galaxy A6 (2018), Samsung brings a chic-looking, mid-range smartphone to the market, which scores major points with its 5.6-inch Super ...
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | 5.60" | 162 g
Huawei P20 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei P20 Lite Smartphone Review

Mid-range P20 The Huawei P20 Lite is overshadowed by its big brothers and its competition is also well positioned at this price-performance ratio. Our review sh...
HiSilicon Kirin 659 | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | 5.84" | 145 g
Honor 9 Lite Smartphone Review

Honor 9 Lite Smartphone Review

Smarter. The Honor 9 Lite is not a bad buy at $290. Its SoC belongs to the upper mid-range and its other specifications are promising as well. In addition, the ...
HiSilicon Kirin 659 | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | 5.65" | 149 g

Huawei P smart: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P Smart Smartphone Review

Huawei Honor 7X: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 7X Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 8.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Tablet Review

Huawei Mate 10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.90", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Mate 10 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei Nova 2: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei Nova 2 Smartphone Review

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P10 Lite Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.70", 0.1 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) Smartphone Review

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 6X Smartphone Review

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P8 Lite 2017 Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) Tablet Review

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 5C Smartphone Review

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P9 Lite Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A2 Core: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A2 Core

Samsung Galaxy M10: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 6.22", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M10

Huawei Mate SE: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate SE

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Huawei MediaPad T5 10: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MediaPad T5 10

Huawei Y9: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y9

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 G611F: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 G611F

Huawei Nova 3e: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.84", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 3e

Huawei P20 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.84", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P20 Lite

Huawei P smart: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P smart

Honor 9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 9 Lite

Huawei P10 Selfie: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei P10 Selfie

Honor 7X: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 7X

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 8.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2

Huawei Mate 10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Honor 9N (9i): HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 9i

Huawei Nova 2i: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.90", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2i

Samsung Galaxy J7 Nxt 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Nxt 2017

Huawei Nova 2 Plus: unknown, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2 Plus

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 Pro SM-P580: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.10", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 Pro SM-P580

Huawei Nova 2: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)

Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro 2017

Huawei Nova Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Lite

Huawei GR5 2017 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017 Pro

Honor 8 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 8 Lite

Huawei P9 Lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite 2017

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P10 Lite

Huawei GR5 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P8 lite 2017

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.70", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 2017

Samsung Galaxy On NXT: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy On NXT

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 6X

Samsung Galaxy J7 Metal (2016): Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Metal (2016)

Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime

Samsung Galaxy Tab A6 10.1" SM-T580: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A6 10.1" SM-T580

Huawei GR5 Mini: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 Mini

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime

Honor 7 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 7 Lite

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 T580N: unknown, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 T580N

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 5C

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 2016

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.20", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ARM Mali-T830 MP2 - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-07-19)