Notebookcheck

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ManufacturerARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 650 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP2
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed *600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
technology16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6558 x 2100 MHz900 MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6508 x 2000 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.700 - 900 MHz? - ? MHz

Benchmarks

GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
0%
100%
min: 4.6     avg: 6.8 (1%)     median: 7.5 (1%)     max: 9.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
0%
100%
min: 4.5     avg: 7.6 (3%)     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.8 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
0%
100%
min: 8323     avg: 8329 (19%)     median: 8329 (19%)     max: 8335 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
0%
100%
min: 15988     avg: 16141.5 (36%)     median: 16141.5 (36%)     max: 16295 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 245     avg: 279.2 (7%)     median: 273.5 (7%)     max: 333 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 305     avg: 584.7 (16%)     median: 365 (10%)     max: 1762 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 402     avg: 455 (8%)     median: 477 (8%)     max: 509 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 475     avg: 521 (11%)     median: 488 (10%)     max: 598 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
0%
100%
min: 6151     avg: 9864.8 (2%)     median: 11147 (2%)     max: 11353 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
0%
100%
min: 1238     avg: 1288.5 (39%)     median: 1288.5 (39%)     max: 1339 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
0%
100%
min: 3684     avg: 3825.5 (37%)     median: 3825.5 (37%)     max: 3967 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
29 30 30 35 49 51 52 57 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high
22 23 25 25 26 27 28 30 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 5C Smartphone Review

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 6X Smartphone Review

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P10 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P8 Lite 2017 Smartphone Review

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P9 Lite Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.7", 0.1 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) Tablet Review

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 5C

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 6X

Honor 7 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 7 Lite

Honor 8 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 8 Lite

Huawei GR5 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017

Huawei GR5 2017 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017 Pro

Huawei GR5 Mini: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 Mini

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P10 Lite

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P8 lite 2017

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite

Huawei P9 Lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite 2017

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.7", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 2017

Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 2016

Samsung Galaxy J7 Metal (2016): Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Metal (2016)

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime

Samsung Galaxy On NXT: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy On NXT

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 T580N: unknown, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 T580N

Samsung Galaxy Tab A6 10.1" SM-T580: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A6 10.1" SM-T580

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1
Class 2
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce MX150
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Class 4
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 5
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 6
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ARM Mali-T830 MP2 - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-07-19)