Notebookcheck

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ManufacturerARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 (compare) 12 @ 650 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP4 (compare) 4 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T860 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T830 MP3 (compare) 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP1 (compare) 1
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
technology16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6598 x 2360 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.700 - 900 MHz? - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 5376     avg: 10021.4     median: 11147 (2%)     max: 11713 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 465     avg: 593.9     median: 598 (4%)     max: 721 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 387     avg: 504.3     median: 509 (2%)     max: 618 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 297     avg: 398.3     median: 404 (8%)     max: 483 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 241     avg: 327.9     median: 333 (4%)     max: 401 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 4.6     avg: 7.1     median: 7.9 (0%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 4.5     avg: 8.4     median: 8.5 (0%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - High Tier Onscreen
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.7 fps
GFXBench - High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.1 fps
GFXBench - Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.7 (5%)     max: 2.7 fps
GFXBench - Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
min: 1.8     avg: 2.7     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
min: 1.7     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (0%)     max: 4 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 8323     avg: 8545.3     median: 8542 (19%)     max: 8774 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 15988     avg: 16553.8     median: 16613 (37%)     max: 17001 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3565     avg: 3702.5     median: 3639 (20%)     max: 3967 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1076     avg: 1184     median: 1160.5 (21%)     max: 1339 Points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med.
13 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low
31 fps 31 fps ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra
26 fps 31 fps 31 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high
29 30 30 30 30 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps 35 49 51 52 56 57 58 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low
29 29 fps 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high
16 18 22 22 22 23 25 25 26 27 28 28 29 fps 30 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
high
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 5C Smartphone Review

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 6X Smartphone Review

Honor 9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  Review » Honor 9 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei Honor 7X: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 7X Smartphone Review

Huawei Mate 10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.9", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Mate 10 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Tablet Review

Huawei MediaPad T5 10: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MediaPad T5 (10.1-inch, LTE) Tablet Review

Huawei Nova 2: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei Nova 2 Smartphone Review

Huawei P smart: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P Smart Smartphone Review

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P10 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei P20 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.84", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P20 Lite Smartphone Review

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P8 Lite 2017 Smartphone Review

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei P9 Lite Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.7", 0.1 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.6", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) Smartphone Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) Tablet Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 8", 0.5 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Tablet Review

Honor 5C: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 5C

Honor 6X: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 6X

Honor 7 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 7 Lite

Honor 7X: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 7X

Honor 8 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 8 Lite

Honor 9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 9 Lite

Honor 9N (9i): HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.9", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 9i

Huawei GR5 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017

Huawei GR5 2017 Pro: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 2017 Pro

Huawei GR5 Mini: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei GR5 Mini

Huawei Mate 10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.9", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate 10 Lite

Huawei Mate SE: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Mate SE

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Huawei MediaPad T5 10: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 10.1", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MediaPad T5 10

Huawei Nova 2: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2

Huawei Nova 2 Plus: unknown, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2 Plus

Huawei Nova 2i: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.9", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 2i

Huawei Nova 3e: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.84", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 3e

Huawei Nova Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Lite

Huawei P smart: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.65", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P smart

Huawei P10 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 658, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P10 Lite

Huawei P10 Selfie: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.5", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei P10 Selfie

Huawei P20 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.84", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P20 Lite

Huawei P8 lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P8 lite 2017

Huawei P9 Lite: HiSilicon Kirin 650, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite

Huawei P9 Lite 2017: HiSilicon Kirin 655, 5.2", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei P9 Lite 2017

Huawei Y9: HiSilicon Kirin 659, 5.93", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y9

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 4.7", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A3 2017

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.6", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5.2", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)

Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, 5", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime

<