Huawei P8 lite 2017
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 52 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P8 lite 2017
Flagship lite 2.0. Huawei's P8 lite was actually the slimmed down version of Huawei's second-last flagship phone. Nevertheless, it has now been reworked with a new design, Full HD panel, and many other improvements. Our report reveals whether the P8 lite (2017) is a good deal.
Source: Toptenreviews
Archive.org versionUltimately, while the P8 Lite is a very capable and affordable smartphone (even more so since we first reviewed it, in the latter case), it’s hard to fully recommend when less flawed alternatives exist. If you want the very best battery life, choose the Lenovo P2; if you want the best all-rounder with the best camera, the Moto G4 is the one for you.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak
Archive.org versionWhile Android 7 phones are still in the minority this offering from Huawei has it. Until last year Huawei was a name I had not heard of. A huge launch brought the P9 to the world’s attention and although this was launched much later this is the latest version of the P8.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: What Mobile
Archive.org versionThe Huawei P8 may be an old phone by today’s standards, but that doesn’t seem to stop Huawei from releasing an updated 2017 Lite variant for consumers. The last Lite variant was released in 2015, around the same time as the flagship P8 was unleashed. Carrying slimmed down hardware and a more affordable price-tag, this cut-down flagship looks to offer mid-tier performance on a budget. It brings an updated design more akin to the Honor 8 that will no doubt appeal to the fashion concious. With the lower tier now incredibly cramped and full of competition, does it have what it takes to stand out? Let’s find out…
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionThe P8 Lite is a decent mid-range phone. If picking one up on Vodafone for £150, it actually offers superb value. Its attractive built quality and decent battery life make it an excellent choice. However, if you’ve found a handset online from another retailer that’s priced closer to £200, consider the Motorola Moto G4 or Lenovo P2 instead; the Moto G4 has a better camera and the Lenovo P2 superior battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu
Archive.org versionHuawei P8 Lite 2017 Review: Huawei’s first affordable phone of the year is a revamped version of the P8 Lite, and for just £185 in the UK it’s a seriously strong rival to similar budget blowers. Here’s our full Huawei P8 Lite 2017 review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18

Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 51% display: 82% mobility: 39% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 89% features: 72% display: 85% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbase
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit - 3/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Newesc
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 77% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Pplware
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: High autonomy; nice design; good price. Negative: Weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Geek 4 You
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Ridble
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Megapk
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 91% features: 82%
Source: Tutto App Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 86% features: 77% display: 86% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 78% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Notebook Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; good price; long battery life. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Tech Different
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: High autonomy; nice performance; fast fingerprint reader. Negative: Unsupport fast charge; only 16GB Rom.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; nice display; decent hardware; good cameras; long battery life. Negative: Unsupport quick charge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2017
Source: Tecno Cino
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design. Negative: Short battery life; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive design. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design. Negative: Poor display; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design. Negative: Low autonomy; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: All About Phones
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design. Negative: Poor display; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: 01Net
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Pleasant design; beautiful screen. Negative: Internal memory too low.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: Product Test
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; flexible fingerprint sensor; high performance. Negative: Low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; good price; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/08/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2: Integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets with two clusters (MP2) supporting OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 655: ARM-based octa-core-SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A83 cores with 4x max 1.7 power saving cores and 4x max 2.1 GHz performance cores).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.