Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 23 scores (from 44 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Source: Know Your Mobile

Really quite an impressive low-cost smartphone with a lot of bang for your buck. Arguably one of the best budget handsets on the market thanks to Samsung's mastery of Super AMOLED display technology and some sterling battery performance, both of which put it ahead of rivals such as the Moto G, while in other areas it's quite comparable with that very capable handset. The trade-off, however, is that the Moto G does get stock Android and timely updates, while Samsung's Galaxy J5 has TouchWiz on-top and requires a bit of extra fettling between software versions.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro

The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile

Best in class of the budget Android category; you will struggle to find battery and display performance this good anywhere else at this price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: It Pro

The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews

With better performance and a longer battery life, Samsung’s updated Galaxy J5 is a low-cost marvel android 7.0 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) brings many improvements compared to its successful predecessor and this makes it more than accomplished model. First of all, the device comes with an entirely metal design which is not always seen in this price range. There is a fingerprint sensor built in the hardware Home button. It is quite surprising that we don’t find a USB Type-C port but this is a drawback which can be ignored.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: It Pro

The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung's alphabet soup is making less and less sense. Here we have the Galaxy J5 (2017) that's got a premium metal build, a frugal 14nm chipset, an excellent Super AMOLED display, and Samsung's latest software. How is that lower midrange?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Phone World

Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro has 4G supported device with some mid-range features. The device is especially for Samsung lovers because other device lovers will have some issue with its price which is a little bit expensive compared to other smartphones.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phone Arena

It has one of the best interfaces around: sleek and modern-looking, it has Samsung’s excellent apps, and it has a very solid battery life. But its camera and, most importantly, performance are underwhelming. The phone often feels stuttery and the camera lacks in detail and speed. And we know the terrible state of Android updates for phones like the J5 (2017). In such a fiercely competitive market, the J5 (2017) does too little to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 92%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 82%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Blick

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2017
Rating: price: 80% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Good price; metal case; nice design; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Media Trends

Positive: Impressive design; excellent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget

Positive: Excellent display. Negative: Weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2017
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Geek

Positive: Nice design; metal case; long battery life; fast fingerprint sensor; good selfie camera. Negative: Poor display; Mediocre speakers; no notification LED; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Source: Pplware

Positive: Great built quality; nice display; decent cameras; good hardware. Negative: Short battery life; relatively high price.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: 4G News

Positive: Solid workmanship; stylish design; excellent cameras; good connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 60% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 69% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 85%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good price. Negative: Low performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% mobility: 100%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Premium design; good built quality; excellent display; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Poor display; average performance; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Solid workmanship; support both dual sim and microSD slot; good selfie camera; decent hardware; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: No notification light; no optical image stabilization; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2017
Source: Yamobi

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; nice display; support LTE; fast fingerprint sensor; good connectivity; long battery life. Negative: No Always On Display Mode; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: CZC

Positive: Metal case; solid workmanship; excellent display; good cameras; nice performance. Negative: No full HD mode.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Long battery life; modern design; support memory card slot. Negative: Average performance; poor display; poor cameras; weak hardware; relatively high price; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful hardware; high autonomy; good price; metal case; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Positive: Attractive design; metal case; fast fingerprint sensor; nice display; high autonomy; decent hardware; good cooling system; nice cameras. Negative: No USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Positive: Nice display; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2: Integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets with two clusters (MP2) supporting OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
7870 Octa: Exynos 7 Soc with eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and manufactured in a 14-nm process. Includes the GPU ARM Mali T830-MP1 as well as a dual-channel memory controller (LPDDR3-1866).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Samsung: Samsung Group is the largest South Korean conglomerate and was founded in 1938. Samsung Group employed 489,000 people in 2014 and is one of the world's largest companies in terms of revenue and market strength. The name Samsung means "Three Stars" in Korean and represents the three sons of the company's founder. The company was founded in 1938 as a grocery store. With its subsidiary Samsung Electronics, founded in 1969, Samsung took up the production of electrotechnical items, focusing on consumer electronics and household appliances at an early stage. Other branches in which the large corporation is active include mechanical engineering, automobiles (Hyundai), insurance, wholesale, real estate and leisure. Samsung manufactures a wide range of electronic products, including smartphones, televisions, home appliances and semiconductors. The company's Galaxy line of smartphones is one of the most popular in the world. Samsung is also a major player in the semiconductor industry, making memory chips and processors for many other electronics manufacturers.
77.3%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.