Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 is a high-end desktop graphics card utilizing the GB202 chip based on the Blackwell architecture. The model offers 170 SMs out of 192 (21,760 CUDA cores), and 32 GB GDDR7 graphics memory with a 512-bit memory bus (1,792 GB/s). The base clock of the GPU (reference model) is specified at 2.01 GHz, while the boost clock can reach 2.41 GHz. RTX 5090 offers 170 RT cores (+42 cores compared to the previous RTX 4090) and 680 5th Gen. Tensor cores.  

Architecture

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 features a new Tensor (5th Gen) and RT-cores (4th Gen), with 3352 AI TOPS and 318 TFLOPS respectively. Blackwell architecture is the first to feature the new DLSS 4 Multi Frame generation, which, thanks to enhanced AI capabilities can generate more frames per second while using less memory and delivering better picture quality. Nvidia also improved the performance and output quality of DLSS, Frame Generation, and Ray Reconstruction features (also available for the previous RTX 4000 series). Additionally, the new models now support Reflex 2 low latency mode with Frame Warp.

Performance

Thanks to the new Tensor and RT-cores, as well as a massive bump in CUDA cores, the card is promised (by Nvidia) to offer as much as 2x better performance compared to the previous RTX 4090 (thanks to the new DLSS 4 MFG feature). The RTX 5090 is expected to be the fastest graphics card of 2025 and, presumably will deliver good performance even at 8K.

According to our own benchmarks, the RTX 5090 is 27% faster than the previous RTX 4090 in applications and games (without accounting for RT and DLSS). With the Ray Tracing (Cyberpunk 2077 2.1, DLSS Transformer), gaming performance can be 25% higher compared to the previous flagship model, and DLSS Frame Generation (2x) can deliver even 28% higher FPS. Thanks to the MFG 4x mode the frame counter can be even 2x-4x higher.  

Power consumption

According to Nvidia, the GB202 chip is manufactured using the modern 4N FinFET process at TSMC and is specified with a TGP (Total Graphics Power) of 575 Watt (175W higher than RTX 4090). Nvidia now also specifies maximum GPU temperature, which is stated at 90 ℃ for RTX 5090. The model also requires at least 1000 W PSU.

GeForce RTX 5000 Desktop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 21760 @ 2.01 - 2.41 GHz512 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 compare 10752 @ 2.3 - 2.62 GHz256 Bit @ 30000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti compare 8960 @ 2.3 - 2.45 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 compare 6144 @ 2.33 - 2.51 GHz192 Bit
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti compare 4608 @ 2.41 - 2.57 GHz128 Bit
GeForce RTX 5060 compare 3840 @ 2.28 - 2.5 GHz128 Bit
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines21760 - unified
TMUs680
ROPs176
Raytracing Cores170
Tensor / AI Cores680
Core Speed2010 - 2410 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance104.88 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL2: 98 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory32 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth1792 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4
Transistor Count92.2 Billion
Die Size 750 mm²
technology5 nm
PCIe5.0
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Features4K at 480Hz or 8K at 120Hz with DSC DLSS 4: Super Resolution, DLAA, Ray Reconstruction, Frame Generation, Multi Frame Generation NVIDIA Reflex 2: Low Latency Mode, Frame Warp
Date of Announcement07.01.2025
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
33.3 pt (100%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 37015     avg: 37250     median: 37197 (99%)     max: 37592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 42108     avg: 46337     median: 47047.5 (96%)     max: 49144 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 856762     avg: 871500     median: 871500 (88%)     max: 886238 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 733875     avg: 769381     median: 769381 (90%)     max: 804887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 103050     avg: 103915     median: 103915 (98%)     max: 104780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 368928     avg: 385093     median: 385092 (95%)     max: 401257 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 45218     avg: 56863     median: 57997.5 (88%)     max: 66237 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 61563     avg: 87149     median: 89073 (82%)     max: 108886 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 848958     avg: 855194     median: 855194 (95%)     max: 861430 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 90799     avg: 91152     median: 91151.5 (86%)     max: 91504 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 227113     avg: 228764     median: 228764 (88%)     max: 230414 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 82394     avg: 82518     median: 82518 (100%)     max: 82642 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 128846     avg: 129772     median: 129772 (99%)     max: 130697 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 81906     avg: 117285     median: 117284 (34%)     max: 152663 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 76106     avg: 126421     median: 126420 (69%)     max: 176735 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 85958     avg: 86188     median: 86188 (94%)     max: 86418 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 67224     avg: 67248     median: 67247.5 (88%)     max: 67271 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 256.4     avg: 281.4     median: 292.5 (89%)     max: 295.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
8 Seconds (1%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
5 Seconds (2%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
112 fps (28%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
31 fps (5%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
574 fps (100%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
262 fps (67%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
314 fps (86%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
107 fps (96%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
118 fps (47%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
282 fps (47%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
663 fps (100%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
173 fps (46%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
56.5 fps (6%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
587 fps (100%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
201 fps (34%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
722 fps (82%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
168 fps (54%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
612 fps (89%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
432 fps (48%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
639 fps (100%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
55.5 fps (7%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
94.4 fps (26%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
897 fps (96%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
615 fps (100%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
139 fps (48%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
176 fps (86%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
378 fps (100%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
417 fps (100%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 47     avg: 48.1     median: 47.5 (5%)     max: 49.8 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 47.1     avg: 49.7     median: 50.7 (33%)     max: 51.2 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 680     avg: 687     median: 684 (98%)     max: 697 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 91.9     avg: 200     median: 196 (28%)     max: 312 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 135     avg: 138.7     median: 136 (61%)     max: 145 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 109     avg: 110.3     median: 110 (72%)     max: 112 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 274     avg: 287.7     median: 292 (98%)     max: 297 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 3908     avg: 3913     median: 3913 (96%)     max: 3918 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 546     avg: 548     median: 548 (100%)     max: 550 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
383833 points (100%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
401724 points (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 13711     avg: 14222     median: 14232 (51%)     max: 14722 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 31806     avg: 32437     median: 32044 (56%)     max: 33461 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 115468     avg: 118610     median: 119944 (100%)     max: 120417 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 708     avg: 725     median: 725 (98%)     max: 743 Watt
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 631     avg: 654     median: 638 (89%)     max: 692 Watt
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.4942     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (47%)     max: 0.578 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 629     avg: 632     median: 632 (80%)     max: 636 Watt
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.2928     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.3664 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
ultra 1920x1080
122.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.1  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
129.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
204
ultra 1920x1080
171.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
137.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
89  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
119.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
165.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered

2025
ultra 1920x1080
95.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
139  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
85 88 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64 67 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
84 86 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
101 103 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
162
153
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
135
127
high 1920x1080
412  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
381  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
205  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
161.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
151.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.9 130 130.6 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
105.4 114.6 116.3 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
81.5 82.8 84.4 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
98 102.8 104.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
125.8 127.7 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
297  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
214 221 ~ 218 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
170.4 176 ~ 173 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
110.7 112.1 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
140.7 151.5 ~ 146 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
200 215 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
248  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
199.4 211 227 ~ 212 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
176.5 178.6 191.4 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
123.9 128 132.7 ~ 128 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
142.2
143.5
159.1
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
96.6
95.8
110
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
high 1920x1080
126.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
111.3 116.1 127.9 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.5 106.2 112.7 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
76 77.8 79.5 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
154.9 157.2 158.8 ~ 157 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
198.8 204 214 ~ 206 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
227  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
215 218 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
196 196 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
145 151 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
148 154 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
202 204 ~ 203 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
161.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
164.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
143.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
91.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
119.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
155.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
387  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
362  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
300  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
192.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
267  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
362  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
184.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
172.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
132  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
87.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
113.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
162.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS FG 2560x1440
270
Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS FG 3840x2160
184.4
ultra 1920x1080
141.1 141.5 ~ 141 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
137.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
130.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
136.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
139.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
104.8 105.5 111.6 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
100.2 101.9 107.9 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160 cinem.
78.2 78.4 79.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160 cinem.
103.1 103.5 103.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
103.2 103.5 108.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
154.3
160.5
155.2
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 3840x2160 cinem.
107.9
111.4
109.9
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG 4x, RR 3840x2160 cinem.
202
203
203
high 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102 104 105 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
85 87 88 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
57 58 59 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
85 89 90 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
107 110 111 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
95
99
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
145
152
112
ultra 1920x1080
382  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
277  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
157.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
high 1920x1080
512  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
214 286 288 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
211 215 222 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
120.9 123.2 124.4 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
187.2 190.3 195.4 ~ 191 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
191.1  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
214 258 288 ~ 253 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
216  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
227  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
189  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
132  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
157.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
211  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
335  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
303  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
267  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
161.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
242  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
190.2 192 197 ~ 193 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
144.6 145 152 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
83.3 85 86 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
131.8 134 138 ~ 135 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
218  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
211  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
173.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
196.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
174 210 210 ~ 198 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
150 157 160 ~ 156 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
88.7 92 94.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
140.6 146.4 146.8 ~ 145 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
126.5
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
47.2
47.3
49.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
43.1
44.6
43.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
75.2
76.6
76.7
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
132.3
133.6
134.6
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
244
242
241
ultra 1920x1080
194.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
156.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
96.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
150.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
317.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
298.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
217.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
198 230 239 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
195 203 206 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
147 148 150 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
180 183 186 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
272  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
272  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
257  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
183 184.6 220 246 ~ 208 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
175.4 181.7 205 216 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
108.6 108.6 111.7 112.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
173.9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
182.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
139.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
58.2
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
233
184.2
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
34.2
33.4
32.8
33.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
62.6
65.7
58.4
65.3
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
114.4
116.7
110.9
117.8
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
209
216
201.7
215
high 1920x1080
347  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
240 338 343 ~ 307 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
240 277 281 ~ 266 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
166.9 172 188.5 ~ 176 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
238 245 248 ~ 244 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
ultra 1920x1080
400  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
373  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
323  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
187.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
186  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
149.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Very High Raytracing TAA 1920x1080
150.5
Very High Preset + Very High Raytracing + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
187.4
ultra 1920x1080
339  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
316  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
233  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Returnal

Returnal

2023
ultra 1920x1080
239  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
202  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
139  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
212
Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing 3840x2160
110
ultra 1920x1080
136.9 166.3 169.1 ~ 157 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
134.6 160.4 163.7 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
100.6 102.3 108.6 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
116.9 136.1 138.9 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing High TAA 1920x1080
67.6
59.2
66.6
Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing High TAA 3840x2160
66.1
58.2
Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing + DLSS4 Quality + FG 4x High TAA 3840x2160
269
219
267
ultra 1920x1080
311  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
224  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
132.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
332.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
287 289.2 ~ 288 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
239 243.3 ~ 241 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
161 163.1 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
145.2
ultra 1920x1080
289  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
278  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
216  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
ultra 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
194.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
113.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
ultra 1920x1080
254 254 ~ 254 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
246 248 ~ 247 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
184.8 190.9 ~ 188 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
207
206
ultra 1920x1080
186  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
189.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
168  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
ultra 1920x1080
135.6 158.2 ~ 147 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
131.4 151.4 ~ 141 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
141.6 143.4 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
256  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
216  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
207  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
202  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
166.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
159
ultra 1920x1080
287 387 ~ 337 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
285 356 ~ 321 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
236.4 239 ~ 238 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
ultra 1920x1080
309  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
304  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
231  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
241  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
225  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
159.3 189.6 197 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
132.2 159.4 163 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
235  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
236  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
234 236 ~ 235 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
234 236 ~ 235 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
198.8 201 ~ 200 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
356 364.4 ~ 360 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
322 330.5 ~ 326 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
308 317.3 ~ 313 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
213 287 291.8 ~ 264 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
201 273 278.7 ~ 251 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
342 358 369 ~ 356 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
314 327 328 ~ 323 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
367 386 388 ~ 380 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
235
225
235
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25122.880.140.1
Doom: The Dark Ages171.8137.589
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered95.475.949.7
Assassin's Creed Shadows150139127998766
Civilization 7412381205
Monster Hunter Wilds161.7151.612411283
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2297218173111
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle248212182128
Stalker 2126.611810778
Call of Duty Black Ops 6227217196148
Until Dawn161.8164.3143.991.1
God of War Ragnarök387362300192.7
Final Fantasy XVI184.8172.813287.6
Space Marine 2141137.4130.6
Star Wars Outlaws10710379
Black Myth: Wukong1601048758
Once Human382277157.2
F1 24512263216123
Horizon Forbidden West227222189132
Alone in the Dark335303267161.3
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora19314785
EA Sports WRC218211173.6
Alan Wake 219815692
Lords of the Fallen194.2156.396.4
Total War Pharaoh317.7298.7217.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage222201148
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty272272257208195110
Baldur's Gate 3347307266176
Lies of P400373222
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart187.1186149.1
Company of Heroes 3339316233
Returnal239202139
Hogwarts Legacy157153104
Dead Space Remake311224132.1
The Callisto Protocol332.3288241162
Need for Speed Unbound289278216
F1 22209194.3113.3
Far Cry 6254247188
Borderlands 3186189.9168
Anno 1800147141143
Far Cry New Dawn265256216
Metro Exodus207202166.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider337321238
Far Cry 5309304231
X-Plane 11.11241225182152
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark235236235235200
Dota 2 Reborn360326313264251
The Witcher 3356323380
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



6



6



20


5
39


7
39

3
14
31

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 01. 22:59:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:34:46 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.024s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12931 +0.021s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 12931 +0.015s ... 0.06s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.818s ... 0.878s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.878s

#12 Got 367 rows for game benchmarks. +0.071s ... 0.949s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.949s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 0.974s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.386s ... 1.36s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 1.366s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 graphics card

Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid review: Zotac's flagship GPU vs. Nvidia's Founders Edition

Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid review: Zotac's flagship GPU vs. Nvidia's Founders Edition

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Solid delivers top-tier performance with Blackwell architecture. This test compares it to the reference model in terms of spee...
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | 2.3 kg
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition in review

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Review: The desktop GPU performance beast that eclipses everything!

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 marks the next step in the world of high-end graphics cards. With the latest Blackwell architecture, increased performance and innov...
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | 1.8 kg

Asus ProArt RTX 5090: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, 0.00"
   » Asus launches gold-plated RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition GPU starting at $7,000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 0.00", 1.8 kg
   » Asus launches gold-plated RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition GPU starting at $7,000

   » Asus launches gold-plated RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition GPU starting at $7,000

NVIDIA Zotac GeForce RTX 5090 Solid: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 0.00", 2.3 kg
   » Asus launches gold-plated RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition GPU starting at $7,000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 0.00", 1.8 kg
   » Juggernaut RTX 5090-based system crushes GPU Compute benchmark even before support patch is released

   » CyberPowerPC to protect customers from Nvidia's mistake by ensuring RTX 50 GPUs with full ROPs in gaming PCs

   » Overpowered GeForce RTX 5090D takes huge lead over RTX 4090 in benchmark chart and doubles DirectX 12 test result

   » Abysmal RTX 5070 launch stock appears on horizon as latest leak points to possible supply shortage

   » Strange GeForce RTX 50-series benchmark issues solved but new problem for gamers arises

   » GeForce RTX 5090 drops below RTX 4090 in high-end graphics card benchmark chart

   » Nvidia takes page out of Ferrari's book to manage RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 stock issues

   » Disappointing RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5070 leak claims "VERY limited" stock for former and 10-20% gain for latter

   » GeForce RTX 5090 fails to topple RTX 4090 in GPU compute benchmark while RTX 5080 struggles against RTX 4070 Ti

   » AMD RX 9070 and 9070 XT launch date leaks: Team Red appears ready to derail RTX 5070/Ti release less than a month later

   » RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 generational benchmark performance gains comparatively eclipsed by GeForce 40 series in PassMark

   » Serious RTX 5090 and RTX 5090D driver issues reportedly turn GPUs into expensive paperweights

   » GeForce RTX 5090 sells for extraordinary 193% markup in the US as Japanese consumers face similar reseller predicament

   » Leaked RTX 5080 Time Spy Graphics score shows small lead vs RX 7900 XTX and 15% improvement vs RTX 4080 Super

   » RTX 5080 and other GeForce 50 series board MSRPs supposedly to blame for hefty AIB prices

   » RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090 tested at same power level: RTX 50 flagship shows efficiency downgrade vs previous gen

   » RTX 5090 for $2,799, RTX 5080 for $1,899: Prices for custom Blackwell graphics cards leak

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-03-18)