Lords of the Fallen review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

Demanding Souls-like game. Following Lies of P, Lords of the Fallen is the second game released in a short space of time that is hugely reminiscent of FromSoftware games. We have taken a closer look at how hardware-hungry the new release is.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Daisy Dickson), Published 10/17/2023 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

Test laptops

We currently run our gaming benchmarks with these laptops. Clicking on the photos will take you to the respective manufacturer's website. All other test systems (tower PCs, mini PCs, ...) are listed at the end of the article.

Tech

Similar to Lies of P, Lords of the Fallen is also based on Unreal Engine. Even from medium detail levels onwards, the action role-playing game magics great (but not outstanding) visuals onto your screen, whether it be through textures, effects or levels of detail. As well-known from Souls-like games, this release features quite a dense and rather gloomy atmosphere, too. Stylistically, the developers have also taken a leaf out of FromSoftware's book - although Lords of the Fallen clearly features its own accents, such as its switchable parallel or second world.

Its movement and combat system also needn't hide behind the competition, even though some keys are assigned a little unfortunately if you are playing the game using a mouse and keyboard. With regard to its menu, we actually like Lords of The Fallen's one more at times than, for example, Elden Ring's.

From a technical standpoint, the game benefits from quite a few modern features. Aside from AMD's FSR, Nvidia's DLSS is also supported, however, the developers have taken Frame Generation out of the game for the time being due to (crashing) issues. Apart from that, the display menu contains controls for resolution/resolution scaling, picture mode, V-Sync, FPS limit (with an unlimited option) and display calibration. Should you wish to do so, you can additionally activate V-Sync and HDR.

The graphics menu isn't bad, either. Here, you can find four presets that have an effect on about 10 detail settings. Thankfully, changes are put into place without having to restart the game. Aside from the time it takes for the game to boot up, its loading times are okay. We "only" suffered two crashes during the course of our test, which is still acceptable. Its size of around 32 GB is actually very moderate for a game released in 2023.

Benchmarks

We used the area after the first boss flight for our speed measurements. We recorded a set route for about 30 seconds using the tool CapFrameX. With an average frame rate of 40 FPS, we would definitely class Lords of the Fallen as playable.

Results

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

As mentioned at the start, this game is very demanding when it comes to the graphics card. You can completely forget trying to play the game using iGPUs. Even the Radeon 680M fails at 1,280 x 720 pixels and minimum details. For Full HD, you will need at least a mid-range component. High details are provided much better by a Radeon RX 6800S onwards (even better GeForce RTX 4050) and maximum details can be achieved by a GeForce RTX 4060 or RTX 3070 Ti onwards (even better RTX 4070 or RTX 3080 Ti).

Lords of the Fallen
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	169.5 (89^min, 102.2^P0.1, 126.8^P1) fps ∼100% 129.1 (26.2^min, 91.1^P0.1, 108.8^P1) fps ∼100% 94.7 (68.6^min, 73.2^P0.1, 83.4^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	154.4 (71.9^min, 88.9^P0.1, 113.6^P1) fps ∼91% 112.6 (48.6^min, 65.7^P0.1, 88.8^P1) fps ∼87% 79.9 (50.8^min, 57^P0.1, 67.2^P1) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	144.7 (27.5^min, 67.8^P0.1, 103.9^P1) fps ∼85% 106.3 (30^min, 48.1^P0.1, 82.2^P1) fps ∼82% 75.9 (26^min, 32.9^P0.1, 59.6^P1) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	121.6 (54.2^min, 64.8^P0.1, 85.8^P1) fps ∼72% 91.2 (28.1^min, 30.6^P0.1, 69.2^P1) fps ∼71% 65.8 (25.1^min, 28.7^P0.1, 53.7^P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	89.5 (19.4^min, 52.6^P0.1, 64.4^P1) fps ∼53% 64.2 (47.8^min, 48.5^P0.1, 53.5^P1) fps ∼50% 45 (27.4^min, 28.6^P0.1, 38.3^P1) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	85.1 (29.5^min, 44.1^P0.1, 67.9^P1) fps ∼50% 62.6 (32.7^min, 35.7^P0.1, 51.2^P1) fps ∼48% 44.3 (23^min, 24.5^P0.1, 37.8^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	76.6 (32.9^min, 39.2^P0.1, 51.5^P1) fps ∼45% 56.4 (30.4^min, 35^P0.1, 41.1^P1) fps ∼44% 39.4 (19.3^min, 23.5^P0.1, 26.6^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	73.9 (49.8^min, 51.4^P0.1, 57.9^P1) fps ∼44% 53.9 (38.7^min, 41.3^P0.1, 45.1^P1) fps ∼42% 38.1 (29.9^min, 30.3^P0.1, 32.6^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	62.9 (46.3^min, 48.5^P0.1, 52.6^P1) fps ∼37% 45.9 (35.9^min, 36.2^P0.1, 38^P1) fps ∼36% 32.1 (20.6^min, 21^P0.1, 27^P1) fps ∼34%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	70.8 (44.3^min, 51.7^P0.1, 55.2^P1) fps ∼100% 55.6 (38.2^min, 41.5^P0.1, 44.7^P1) fps ∼33% 38.1 (29.8^min, 30.1^P0.1, 31.7^P1) fps ∼30% 26.8 (22.8^min, 22.9^P0.1, 23.5^P1) fps ∼28%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	33.6 (12.6^min, 15.6^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps ∼47% 26.5 (9.23^min, 10.9^P0.1, 22.4^P1) fps ∼16% 17.2 (10.5^min, 12.3^P0.1, 14.8^P1) fps ∼13% 11.7 (6.99^min, 7.43^P0.1, 10.1^P1) fps ∼12%
AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	24.3 (15.9^min, 17.1^P0.1, 18.7^P1) fps ∼34% 18.3 (14.3^min, 14.4^P0.1, 14.8^P1) fps ∼11% 12.3 (10^min, 10.1^P0.1, 10.5^P1) fps ∼10% 8.65 (7.52^min, 7.52^P0.1, 7.67^P1) fps ∼9%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

You will need a current high-end model in order to play the game on a QHD display using the ultra preset. Only a GeForce RTX 4080 (Mobile) or better manages over 40 FPS.

Lords of the Fallen
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	67.5 (52.3^min, 55.2^P0.1, 60.1^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	56.1 (42.4^min, 43^P0.1, 48.5^P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	51.9 (21.8^min, 24.2^P0.1, 35.3^P1) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	45.9 (24.3^min, 31.1^P0.1, 39.5^P1) fps ∼68%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	31.5 (23.3^min, 25.4^P0.1, 27.2^P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	29.8 (19.3^min, 20.3^P0.1, 25^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	27 (20.8^min, 21.9^P0.1, 23.2^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	25.7 (13.9^min, 17.8^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	21.2 (10.2^min, 11.6^P0.1, 18.1^P1) fps ∼31%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	7.28 (6.08^min, 6.12^P0.1, 6.35^P1) fps ∼11%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

All available laptop chips currently have a hard time running the game with a mixture of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels and maximum detail settings. Even the GeForce RTX 4090 can't even come close to achieving playable frame rates. When it comes to desktop systems, an RTX 4080 or better would do a decent job. Its laptop counterpart at least produces solid results when DLSS is enabled (our benchmarks were run using the quality setting). In general, we can say that DLSS makes a very good impression in Lords of the Fallen when it comes to performance gains.

Lords of the Fallen
3840x2160 Ultra Preset 3840x2160 Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	37 (28.5^min, 29^P0.1, 32.1^P1) fps ∼100% 67.3 (55.1^min, 56.5^P0.1, 60.4^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	29.7 (24.5^min, 24.7^P0.1, 26.3^P1) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	29.1 (15.4^min, 15.8^P0.1, 21^P1) fps ∼79% 49.9 (0.878^min, 1.651^P0.1, 23.2^P1) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	23.9 (19.3^min, 19.9^P0.1, 21.2^P1) fps ∼65% 44.6 (30.5^min, 31.8^P0.1, 37.9^P1) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	16.5 (13.5^min, 13.6^P0.1, 14.6^P1) fps ∼45% 30.8 (18.9^min, 19.9^P0.1, 25.9^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	14.6 (5.26^min, 6.37^P0.1, 11.3^P1) fps ∼39% 29.1 (17^min, 21^P0.1, 24.4^P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	11.7 (6.39^min, 6.77^P0.1, 9.95^P1) fps ∼32% 25.2 (21.6^min, 21.6^P0.1, 22.1^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	10.9 (5.48^min, 6.13^P0.1, 8.73^P1) fps ∼29% 26.8 (16.9^min, 17.1^P0.1, 21.4^P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	8.9 (6.87^min, 6.89^P0.1, 7.67^P1) fps ∼24% 20.4 (14.8^min, 15.8^P0.1, 17.6^P1) fps ∼30%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	3.4 (2.21^min, 2.26^P0.1, 2.79^P1) fps ∼9%

Please note

Since gaming tests are very time-consuming and often restricted by installation or activation limits, we can only provide you with a part of the benchmarks upon publication of the articles. Further graphics cards will be added later.

Overview

All test systems

Laptop	Graphics card	Processor	RAM
XMG Neo 17 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Focus 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @140 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-12900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Acer Predator Helios 300	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti @150 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-12700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	AMD Radeon RX 6800S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2 x 16 GB DDR5

Tower PC	Graphics card	Processor	RAM
Custom I / Asus ROG Strix Z790-F / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5
Custom II	Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X (8 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 7600 (8 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (16 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6800 (16 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	2 x 16 GB DDR5

Mini PC	Graphics card	Processor	RAM
Minisforum NUCXi7	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @125 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum HX99G	AMD Radeon RX 6600M @100 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673	Intel Arc A730M	Intel Core i7-12650H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum UM790 Pro	AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 32 GB DDR5

4K monitors	Operating system	Nvidia driver	AMD driver
Gigabyte M32U	Windows 11	ForceWare 537.58	Adrenalin 23.10.1

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 615 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 215 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Originally from Scotland, I grew up and lived in Germany until I completed my high school qualifications before moving back to Scotland to complete my university studies. Growing up bilingual led me to form a close relationship with the English and German languages, often working in the fields of teaching and translation. Most of my childhood was shaped by playing around on new consoles, computers and gadgets and getting to grips with the new craze of the internet and smartphones. This interest has stayed with me well into adulthood. Nowadays, I live in Glasgow and work as a freelance translator and digital media coordinator. I have been translating for Notebookcheck since early 2023.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Lords of the Fallen review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2023-10-17 (Update: 2023-10-17)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra Preset	4K 3840x2160 Ultra Preset	3840x2160 Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality
2	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	171.25ⁿ²	164.5ⁿ²	151.4ⁿ²	119.05ⁿ²	91.25ⁿ²	54.3ⁿ²	90.9ⁿ²
3	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	222	190.5	143.1	103.4	72.5	39.1
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super	202.5ⁿ²	173.1ⁿ²	135.9ⁿ²	102.85ⁿ²	73.8ⁿ²	40.3ⁿ²	72.9ⁿ²
5	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		169.5	129.1	94.7	67.5	37	67.3
8	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		154.4	112.6	79.9	56.1	29.7
11	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	172.2	143.6	100.8	71.6	50	25.4
12	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		144.7	96.8ⁿ²	70.05ⁿ²	47.45ⁿ²	29.1	49.9
14	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	148.9	124.3	96.6	66.8	51.4	28.4	51.5
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		121.6	91.2	65.8	45.9	23.9	44.6
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB		117.6	87.9	63.9	45.8	25.7
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	128.2	108.8	75.5	50.2	35	18.1
31	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	135	113.8	79.4	56	37.1	19.2
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	110.7	98.7	71.8	51.1	35.3	18.9	35.5
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	129.2	108.9	83.2	57.2	40	20.7	39.3
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		89.5	64.2	45	31.5	16.5	30.8
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.9	84.6ⁿ²	63ⁿ²	45.1ⁿ²	29.45ⁿ²	14.6	29.1
40	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070		97.4	71.5	50.3	35	18.9
41	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	114	94.5	66.7	46.8	30.9	15.6
43	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	109.6	89.4	63	43.8	29.3	14.7
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Lords of the Fallen
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU				92.3
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	109.6	91.9	67.7	46.7	31.8	16.8	31.9
46	Intel Arc A770	100.4	89.8	73.1	59.4	50.4	35.1
48	AMD Radeon RX 7600	98	80.8	55	38.1	25.1	12.3
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		76.6	56.4	39.4	27	10.9	26.8
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	80	66.4ⁿ³	48.2ⁿ³	33.2ⁿ³	24.95ⁿ²	11.7	25.2
58	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	86.8	72	50.6	33.8	22.3	11
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	68	68.1	65.2	53.9	54.6	34	26.1
64	AMD Radeon RX 6800S	70.8	55.6	38.1	26.8
65*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	83.3	69.5	53.7ⁿ²	38.75ⁿ²	26.35ⁿ²	4.6
66	Intel Arc A750	63.2	55.4	46.4	35.2	25.7	10.1
76	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	65.4	55.5	42.2	29.7	20.5	10.9
80	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	83.2	69.6	51.5	35.7	24.1	11	24.2
84	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	77	63.6	43.4	30.7	20.4	10.2
91	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		61.3	41.3	28.6	18.8	9.74
97	Intel Arc A580	59.4	57.2	51.3	43.9	31.2	17.2
98	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	73.9	62.3	44.9	30.7	20.6	10.4	20.7
100	AMD Radeon RX 6600	68.8	56.6	39.6	26.9	17.5	8.6
104	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	67.5	56.3	38.6	26.8	17.6	8.7
106	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	66.4	56	38.7	26.5	17	7.64
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Lords of the Fallen
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
134	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	62.2	52.5	35.6	25	16.3	7.6
142	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	55.4	44.8		21.3	13.1	5.3
143	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	29	21.1	14.4	9.8
144	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	45.9	37.8	24.9	17.1	11.3	4.9
145	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		58.5ⁿ²	42.25ⁿ²	29.7ⁿ²	21.2	8.9	20.4
148*	Intel Arc A730M	46.2ⁿ²	40.35ⁿ²	34.4ⁿ²	29.6ⁿ²		3.51
152	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	51	41.3	30.3	20.2
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	50.8	40.7	29.5	19.7	13	4.9
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	45.6	34.4	24.1	15.8	8.7
167	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	44.7	37.2	30.2	26.1
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	34.7	28.7	20.6	11.1
189	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	37.6	30.3	18.6	12.7
198	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	19.2	15.4	10.9
202	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	31	25.4	18.3	12
203	Intel Arc A380	24.9	25.1	21.5	17.5
222*	Intel Arc A310	22.7	22.2	18.4	14
223*	Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU	20.2	18	16.3	14.2
225*	Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU	17.1	11.7	11.4	10.8
241*	AMD Radeon 780M	28.8ⁿ²	23.45ⁿ²	15.45ⁿ²	11.7	8.32ⁿ²	3.4
249	AMD Radeon 680M	24.3	18.3	12.3	8.65
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Lords of the Fallen
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
317	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	7.68
431*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	19	12	9.73
511*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	8.97

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.