Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a dedicated mid range graphics card for laptops based on the Turing architecture. It uses the same TU117 chip as the desktop version but for the mobile GPU all 1024 shaders are enabled. Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. 

There are two packages of the GTX 1650Ti, the GB4D-128 with a 128 Bit memory bus and a TGP of 50 Watt and the GB4B-256 with a 256 Bit memory bus and a TGP of 55 Watt (compatible with the faster RTX cards). The clock rates seem to be identical for both versions, therefore, the 256 Bit version should be faster.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 Ti for laptops is specified at 50 - 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 5 - 25 Watt higher than the GTX 1650. The power efficient Max-Q variant of the GTX 1650 Ti is rated at 35 Watt TGP.

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Core Speed1350 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
technology12 nm
PCIe3.0
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
13.9 pt (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3738     avg: 3907     median: 3826 (12%)     max: 4201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3554     avg: 3682     median: 3609.5 (10%)     max: 3904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20269     avg: 28454     median: 28177 (30%)     max: 33407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 34971     avg: 59364     median: 65163 (22%)     max: 70377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8780     avg: 9206     median: 9139.5 (16%)     max: 9800 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9691     avg: 10082     median: 9881.5 (14%)     max: 10733 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12192     avg: 13097     median: 13072.5 (19%)     max: 14125 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12865     avg: 13515     median: 13266 (12%)     max: 14415 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 95.4     avg: 125.7     median: 129.3 (33%)     max: 152 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 78     avg: 89.9     median: 93 (20%)     max: 99.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3915     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (59%)     max: 0.491 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Vampire Bloodhunt

Vampire Bloodhunt

2022
low 1920x1080
171.6 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.9 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.5 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
247 fps
Ghostwire Tokyo

Ghostwire Tokyo

2022
low 1920x1080
66.4 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.6 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.2 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.5 fps  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.9 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
132.5 fps
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
84.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
162 fps
low 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
5.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.4 fps
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
52.2 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.1 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.2 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.6 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
62.2 fps
low 1920x1080
149  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.5  fps    + Compare