Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a dedicated mid range graphics card for laptops based on the Turing architecture. It uses the same TU117 chip as the desktop version but for the mobile GPU all 1024 shaders are enabled. Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. 

There are two packages of the GTX 1650Ti, the GB4D-128 with a 128 Bit memory bus and a TGP of 50 Watt and the GB4B-256 with a 256 Bit memory bus and a TGP of 55 Watt (compatible with the faster RTX cards). The clock rates seem to be identical for both versions, therefore, the 256 Bit version should be faster.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 Ti for laptops is specified at 50 - 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 5 - 25 Watt higher than the GTX 1650. The power efficient Max-Q variant of the GTX 1650 Ti is rated at 35 Watt TGP.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1350 - 1485 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G62
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1350 - 1485 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.04.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
24.4 pt (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3748     avg: 3893     median: 3801 (22%)     max: 4131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3576     avg: 3676     median: 3601 (19%)     max: 3841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8780     avg: 9198     median: 9222 (30%)     max: 9710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9691     avg: 10054     median: 9930 (23%)     max: 10663 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12461     avg: 13036     median: 12865 (33%)     max: 14000 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 78     avg: 89.9     median: 93 (20%)     max: 99.1 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
149.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
44.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
71.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
103.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
144  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
122 128.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.9 63.4 65.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.5 40.8 43.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3 30.5 32.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare