Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI Laptop Review: Gaming Multimedia Hybrid
The VivoBook series is home to Asus' mid-range multimedia laptops or Ultrabooks designed to be a step down from the pricier flagship ZenBook series. In this case, our VivoBook 15 K571LI is a higher-end model in the family targeting performance users who aren't ready to spend hundreds of dollars more on the HP Envy 15, MacBook Pro 15, or Dell XPS 15. This particular system offers many of the same performance features including Core H-series CPUs and GeForce GTX-level GPUs without breaking the bank.
Our test unit today comes fully equipped courtesy of Computer Upgrade King for approximately $1100 to $1200 USD retail. Lesser SKUs without our Core i7 CPU, 120 Hz 1080p display, 1 TB SSD, and 40 GB of RAM are also available.
More Asus reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News Writer (Romania based)
Details here
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2020 | Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.7 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
79.7 % v6 (old) | 08 / 2019 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.8 kg | 19.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
The VivoBook 15 K571 series uses a different chassis design than the VivoBook 15 F512 series in order to accommodate the faster processor options. Chassis rigidity remains about the same as it's still mostly plastic. Both the base and lid will bend more easily to pressure when compared to the HP Pavilion Gaming series while being slightly more rigid than the Lenovo Legion Y540 series. It's decent for a $1000 system so long as users aren't expecting Razer, MacBook, or ZenBook metal materials.
Chassis size and weight are larger than many other multimedia laptops including the HP Envy, ZenBook 15, or Lenovo IdeaPad S540 due in part to its more powerful CPU and GPU options. It sits in between more traditional Ultrabooks and entry-level gaming laptops like the MSI GP65 or TUF A15 series to be relatively compact considering the performance.
Connectivity
Though the system integrates a good selection of ports, keep in mind that they are tightly packed and therefore not very friendly toward thicker cables. We attempted to connect an external monitor via USB-C but it was unsuccessful.
SD Card Reader
Transfer rates are slow at just under 20 MB/s. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes almost a full minute.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.
Webcam
Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by six screws with two of those hidden underneath the rear rubber feet. Users have direct access to the main battery, SODIMM slot, WLAN module, and both storage bays.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. The standard one-year limited warranty applies while individual components installed by CUKUSA are covered for three years.
Input Devices
Keyboard
Typing on the backlit keyboard is comfortable with its satisfactory key feedback and shallow travel. We still prefer the firmer and deeper keys of the HP Envy, Spectre, MSI SteelSeries or Lenovo ThinkPad T series, but such laptops also cost a lot more. If you rely on the arrow keys and NumPad keys, however, then you'd be better off with a USB keyboard since these integrated keys are spongier and smaller than the main QWERTY keys.
Touchpad
The smooth clickpad (10.5 x 7.5 cm) is smaller than the one on the HP Envy 15 (12.5 x 7.5 cm). It works well enough for basic cursor control with just the right amount of sticking when gliding at slow speeds, but the integrated mouse buttons could have been firmer. Drag and drop actions are made difficult because the cursor will sometimes jump or freeze in place when two or more fingers are on the surface. Its multi-touch recognition could definitely be better in this regard.
Display
The Panda LM156LF IPS panel here is similar to the ones found on the ROG Strix G GL531GV, TUF FX505DY, ROG Strix G15 G512LI, or Acer Nitro 5 AN515. It's notable for its 120 Hz native refresh rate for ultra-smooth cursor control and movement, but its colors and response times are inferior to other high refresh rate displays from LG or BOE. Expect ghosting to be more noticeable and colors to not be as vibrant when compared to other laptops in this price range.
Asus does offer a display option with wider color coverage, but it will be limited to a refresh rate of 60 Hz unlike our 120 Hz panel here. Users will have to choose one or the other with no options for both.
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 263.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1015:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 Panda LM156LF-GL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr Samsung SDC4145, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G LG Display LP156WFC SPD1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T BOE CQ NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 109% | -16% | 52% | 54% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.2 | 88.5 120% | 33.78 -16% | 65 62% | 66.8 66% | 37.31 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.4 | 100 66% | 50.8 -16% | 86.2 43% | 86.5 43% | 56.2 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.56 | 99.9 140% | 34.9 -16% | 62.9 51% | 63.2 52% | 38.55 -7% |
Response Times | 93% | -16% | -46% | -60% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 0.8 ? 97% | 36 ? -27% | 45 ? -58% | 49.6 ? -75% | 28.4 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 2.7 ? 89% | 25 ? -4% | 32 ? -33% | 34.8 ? -45% | 27.2 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 242.7 ? | 202 ? | ||||
Screen | 45% | 6% | 28% | 25% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 263.9 | 374.3 42% | 248 -6% | 299 13% | 299 13% | 253.6 -4% |
Brightness | 246 | 379 54% | 238 -3% | 280 14% | 278 13% | 227 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 87 0% | 84 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.23 12% | 0.21 19% | 0.25 4% | 0.27 -4% | |
Contrast | 1015 | 1078 6% | 1424 40% | 1196 18% | 939 -7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.56 | 5.47 2% | 5.05 9% | 4.76 14% | 4.32 22% | 6.05 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.11 | 8.22 49% | 14.34 11% | 9 44% | 9.3 42% | 14.03 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.3 | 4.61 -7% | 4.76 -11% | 2.58 40% | 4.97 -16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 2.3 60% | 1.37 76% | 3.53 39% | 4.21 27% | 3.2 45% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.39 92% | 2 110% |
CCT | 7828 83% | 6340 103% | 6592 99% | 7228 90% | 6799 96% | 6820 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.2 | 87.8 130% | 32 -16% | 56 47% | 57 49% | 35.5 -7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.1 | 100 66% | 51 -15% | 86 43% | 86 43% | 55.6 -7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 82% /
65% | -9% /
-1% | 11% /
23% | 6% /
20% | -5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space is limited to just 60 percent and 38 percent of sRGB and AdobeRGB, respectively, to be indicative of an inexpensive panel. Most Ultrabooks in this price range offer >95 percent sRGB coverage for deeper and more accurate colors.
The display is not well calibrated out of the box with an overly cool color temperature and a relatively high grayscale deltaE value of 5.8. These shortcomings improve noticeably after calibrating the panel ourselves, but colors still become increasingly inaccurate at higher saturation levels due to the limited color space mentioned above.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility is average at best because of the insufficient 250-nit backlight and inevitable ambient glare. ZenBooks and especially the Dell XPS 15 or MacBook Pro 15 will have brighter displays.
Performance
The Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, and 120 Hz display are the defining features of the VivoBook 15 K571 series. While such components are common on entry-level gaming laptops, general-purpose performance users can also appreciate the hardware especially for those who desire something faster than the usual Core U-series or integrated graphics solutions.
Both soldered and removable RAM are present much like on some Asus ROG laptops. 4 GB or 8 GB comes soldered depending on the configuration alongside a single SODIMM slot supporting up to 32 GB for a combined maximum of 40 GB.
Optimus comes standard for automatic graphics switching. Our unit was set to High Performance mode prior to running any performance benchmarks below.
Processor
CPU performance is disappointing at about 15 to 20 percent slower than the average laptop in our database equipped with the same Core i7-10750H CPU. This deficit is enough to put our Asus below the last generation Core i7-9750H that the Core i7-10750H is supposed to supplant. Turbo Boost potential is also poor as shown by our CineBench R15 xT loop results below. Nonetheless, multi-thread performance will still be about 20 percent faster than the lesser Core i5-10300H option.
See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10750H for more technical information and benchmarks.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4090 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5343 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4837 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K60 video playback is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The system supports one M.2 2280 SSD and a second 2.5-inch SATA III drive which sits underneath the right palm rest. CUKUSA has configured our unit with a 1 TB Mushkin Helix MKNSSDHL1TB-08 NVMe SSD, but different drives are likely if purchased from other retailers. The Mushkin SSD is a mid-range NVMe drive with sequential read and write rates of 2110 MB/s and 1700 MB/s, respectively, to be in line with other budget to mid-range multimedia laptops like the Acer Aspire 5. Costlier laptops like Asus' own ZenBook series tend to ship with the faster Samsung PM981 drive instead.
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -5% | 31% | 63% | 119% | -0% | |
Seq Read | 1323 | 1005 -24% | 1405 6% | 2643 100% | 2642 100% | 398.9 -70% |
Seq Write | 1572 | 436.8 -72% | 953 -39% | 1533 -2% | 2433 55% | 884 -44% |
4K Read | 38.09 | 51.5 35% | 54 42% | 49.12 29% | 58 52% | 34.54 -9% |
4K Write | 127.4 | 88 -31% | 93 -27% | 134.7 6% | 145.3 14% | 82.1 -36% |
4K-64 Read | 812 | 517 -36% | 959 18% | 1028 27% | 1431 76% | 647 -20% |
4K-64 Write | 276 | 839 204% | 772 180% | 1353 390% | 1753 535% | 985 257% |
Access Time Read * | 0.035 | 0.088 -151% | 0.051 -46% | 0.033 6% | 0.072 -106% | 0.072 -106% |
Access Time Write * | 0.411 | 0.151 63% | 0.044 89% | 0.028 93% | 0.027 93% | 0.047 89% |
Score Read | 983 | 669 -32% | 1153 17% | 1342 37% | 1753 78% | 721 -27% |
Score Write | 561 | 970 73% | 961 71% | 1641 193% | 2142 282% | 1155 106% |
Score Total | 2066 | 1972 -5% | 2695 30% | 3622 75% | 4790 132% | 2279 10% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2846 | 1173 -59% | 2226 -22% | 862 -70% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 728 | 769 6% | 506 -30% | 457 -37% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1610 | 1045 -35% | 1230 -24% | 902 -44% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -5% | -27% | 15% | 11% | -43% | |
Write 4K | 169.7 | 100.2 -41% | 100.4 -41% | 138.1 -19% | 170.7 1% | 105.9 -38% |
Read 4K | 53.2 | 112.8 112% | 47.16 -11% | 45.89 -14% | 49.51 -7% | 36.56 -31% |
Write Seq | 1679 | 537 -68% | 993 -41% | 2147 28% | 1156 -31% | 1165 -31% |
Read Seq | 1698 | 1270 -25% | 1176 -31% | 2188 29% | 1136 -33% | 423.2 -75% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.7 | 480.6 7% | 354.7 -21% | 427.8 -5% | 420.5 -7% | 332.1 -26% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 577 | 364.9 -37% | 473 -18% | 404 -30% | 527 -9% | 229.3 -60% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1657 | 1224 -26% | 1034 -38% | 2396 45% | 2984 80% | 1460 -12% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1851 | 2635 42% | 1635 -12% | 3454 87% | 3550 92% | 472.5 -74% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-5% | 2% /
7% | 39% /
45% | 65% /
74% | -22% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti straddles the line between a multimedia GPU and a full-fledged gaming GPU. Overall performance is most similar to the mobile GTX 1060 especially when running DX12 titles. Graphics performance is where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the same GPU option.
See our dedicated page on the mobile GTX 1650 Ti for more technical information and benchmarks.
3DMark 11 Performance | 12523 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29531 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8903 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3801 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |