Dell G5 15 5590 Laptop Review: Price/Performance King and Problem Child

While Alienware devices belong to the high-end sector, Dell's G series was created with more price-conscious gamers in mind.
The G5 15 5590-PCNJJ, which is equipped with a Core i5-9300H and a GeForce GTX 1650 and is available for around 1,000 Euros (~$1,112), is a particularly exciting offer. It comes with 8 GB of DDR4-RAM (2x 4 GB in dual-channel mode) and a 128 GB SSD combined with a 1 TB HDD. The package is rounded-off by a matte IPS display with 1920x1080 pixels.
Competitors of the G5 15 5590 include other budget gaming laptops, which are or recently have been on our top 10 list. Aside from the HP Omen 15, there is also the Acer Nitro 5 (the GTX 1650 version of which can be purchased for around 1,000 Euros or ~$1,112). At close to 1,400 Euros (~$1,557), the GTX 1660 Ti competitors Lenovo Legion Y540-15 and HP Gaming Pavilion 15 are slightly more expensive.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.6 % | 10/2019 | Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.7 kg | 23.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.5 % | 07/2019 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.5 % | 05/2019 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.9 % | 08/2019 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % | 08/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Case
The G5's budget nature is quite apparent. Although the chassis is visually pleasing at first glance and able to shine with a white exterior in our case, a closer look reveals some flaws. Our test model suffered from loud creaking, which of course detracts from the overall good impression, even though it only occurs when opening or closing the lid and when twisting the chassis.
Speaking of twisting: We would describe the case's rigidity as average. While the base unit does not yield even under higher pressure, the lid could be slightly more rigid still. That said, the same could be said for almost any laptop.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
In terms of materials, Dell has chosen a combination of metal (top) and plastic (bottom & cover), matching the expectations for this price class. We were not quite satisfied with the hinges, however. When opening the lid, the base unit moves along for the first few centimeters. One-handed opening is possible regardless.
In terms of weight, its 2.7 kg makes it heavier than the competition (2.2 to 2.4 kg). Although the G5 comes with a slim-bezel design, its 364 x 273 mm footprint is also larger than that of competing devices (see size comparison). The laptop has an average height of 24 mm.
Connectivity
The port selection is solid compared to what the competition offers. Dell equips the G5 with four USB ports in total (3x Type-A 3.0 + 1x Type-C 3.1 Gen2 with DisplayPort support), an RJ45 LAN port, an audio jack, an HDMI output and a Noble lock port. The installed card reader cannot be taken for granted anymore either. While it lacks a Thunderbolt 3 port for a truly well-rounded port selection, the former is absent on most budget gaming laptops.
The port layout, as usual, is a matter of taste. Due to the vents on the sides, some ports are relatively close to the front, which may impair movements of an external mouse.
SD Card Reader
The SD card reader does not exactly offer first-class performance. 25-26 MB/s for sequential read and write speeds, respectively, when transferring pictures are only on USB 2.0 level and far below the transfer rates of the competition, which tend to at least come close to the speed of an external USB 3.0 hard drive.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=84, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
We have no complaints in terms of Wi-Fi performance on the other hand. 676 Mb/s in our data transmission and 691 Mb/s in our data reception test (1 m between the device and our reference router Linksys EA8500) is a very good result that places the 15-inch device above many other laptops in our comparison. At least on our test device, Dell installs the popular Intel wireless AC module 9560.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng |
Software
Compared to the Alienware counterpart, the command center software lacks several features. While the library tab takes care of any installed games, the Fusion tab allows for system monitoring, changing the power profile and adjusting the sound settings. All of our tests have been performed using the default factory settings.
Maintenance
Maintenance on the G5 15 5590 is rather simple. While a convenient maintenance hatch is not available, removing the bottom panel (nine Philips screws + a couple of clips) is far from an impossible task and can be performed even by a layman. On the inside of the case, users have access to all of the important components. This includes the RAM slots, Wi-Fi module, battery, M.2 slot of the SSD and the 2.5-inch drive bay of the HDD. The cooling solution consists of two fans and numerous, light blue-colored heatpipes, which connect the soldered CPU and GPU.
Warranty
The warranty period of the "retail version" is only 12 months.
Input Devices
Keyboard
In the era of mechanical keyboards, this keyboard will struggle to impress anyone. Dell has chosen a classic chiclet model with relatively short travel that did moderately well in our test. Aside from the tiny arrow keys, the keys are decently sized despite the inclusion of a dedicated num pad. The typing experience is relatively crisp, however this also includes the audible feedback (the G5 is not necessarily the best choice for quiet environments).
As usual, numerous convenient shortcuts can be accessed by using the Fn key and the F-key row (volume, display brightness, media controls, wireless, etc.). Fancy RGB effects are not included. The G5 "only" comes with a white keyboard backlight, most likely to save on costs. The backlight has two levels.
Touchpad
At 10.5 x 8 cm, the touchpad is fairly large for a 15-inch laptop. Whether the slightly roughened surface is to your liking is a matter of personal preference. While it gives the mouse substitute a good haptic feedback, the gliding properties suffer in return. There is also some room for improvement in terms of the precision. In our experience, the touchpad is not 100% reliable.
By contrast, we noticed nothing unusual in terms of gesture support (zooming in and scrolling with two fingers). The audible feedback of left and right clicks, on the other hand, is particularly noisy. Key clatter is fairly loud in spite of the otherwise solid construction.
Display
Since this is an entry-level version of the Dell G5, users cannot expect a high-end display. Apart from a good black value (0.22 cd/m²) and a good contrast ratio (1,064:1), the display properties of the Full HD panel are relatively disappointing.
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 234 cd/m²
Contrast: 1064:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.52 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale 5.33 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
96.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.86
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -52% | -52% | -20% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 83.1 | 38.37 -54% | 37.97 -54% | 64.2 -23% | 63.6 -23% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 57.6 -42% | 57 -43% | 95.1 -5% | 91.7 -8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.8 | 39.69 -59% | 39.23 -59% | 65.8 -32% | 65.2 -33% |
Response Times | 9% | 12% | 66% | 71% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 40 ? 17% | 42 ? 12% | 16.4 ? 66% | 8.8 ? 82% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 29.6 ? 1% | 26.8 ? 11% | 10.4 ? 65% | 12 ? 60% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -2% | 9% | 38% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 234 | 251 7% | 238 2% | 345 47% | 299 28% |
Brightness | 216 | 232 7% | 226 5% | 324 50% | 290 34% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 76 -13% | 83 -5% | 86 -1% | 89 2% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.17 23% | 0.27 -23% | 0.42 -91% | 0.29 -32% |
Contrast | 1064 | 1476 39% | 881 -17% | 821 -23% | 1031 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.52 | 6.2 5% | 4.11 37% | 1.3 80% | 3.7 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.58 | 18.6 -76% | 6.89 35% | 2.8 74% | 7 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.56 | 4.8 -35% | 3.76 -6% | 1.1 69% | 2 44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 4.2 21% | 1.78 67% | 1.2 77% | 4.1 23% |
Gamma | 2.86 77% | 2.32 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.31 95% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 5983 109% | 7454 87% | 6311 103% | 6476 100% | 7166 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 36.5 1% | 36 0% | 60.5 68% | 59.3 65% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 57.4 1% | 57 0% | 94.9 66% | 91.5 61% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-10% | -10% /
-2% | 28% /
30% | 26% /
24% |
* ... smaller is better
The luminosity of only 216 cd/m² on average is poor. While several competitors also fail to achieve significantly better results in this discipline, at least 250 cd/m² should be a given even on a budget laptop.
The narrow color space is another weak spot of the display. 57% of the sRGB color space and 36% of the AdobeRGB standard translates to a pale image. Unsurprisingly, the 15-inch laptop does not achieve a convincing result when it comes to color accuracy either. Luckily, our calibration addresses this directly and fixes the shortcomings (our ICC file is linked above, next to the image for distribution of brightness).
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19210 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
The inclusion of the Core i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650, and 8 GB of RAM position the G5 15 5590 as a mid-range device that tries to appeal to casual gamers. Since the storage solution and RAM can be swapped, larger/faster drives and more RAM can be installed without too much effort.
Processor
The Core i5-9300H is a four-core model from Intel's latest Coffee Lake generation. The 14-nm chip is rated for a TDP of 45 watts and is able to process up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. While it has a base clock of 2.4 GHz, Turbo Boost allows for much higher clock speeds.
One of the biggest weaknesses of the G5 is the CPU's clock speed behavior. Whereas the 9300H achieves a fairly good Turbo Boost performance under pure CPU load (see Cinebench loop), reaching 3.1 to 4.1 GHz, the processor tends to throttle when simultaneous GPU stress comes into play.
In many of the 3D applications we tested, the individual cores throttle down to a mere 900 MHz, which - particularly on a gaming laptop - is not supposed to happen and makes us question Dell's quality control.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=244, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=243, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
System Performance
The system performance of the G5 15 5590-PCNJJ ranks below those of its competitors. With only 4,615 points, it comes in last among the devices in our comparison. Subjectively, the system also feels slower than many other gaming laptops. The main problem is the sluggish SSD, as we will see in a moment. Due to this, both the boot process and installations require more patience than usual.
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ |
Storage Solution
The operating system (Windows 10 Home 64-bit) runs on a 128 GB M.2 SSD. Surprisingly, Dell has not opted for a 2280 module and instead uses an extremely short 2230 model, the Toshiba KBG30ZMS128G. While its read speeds are on par with other SSDs, the write speeds leave much to be desired. Sequential write speeds of 133 MB/s (according CrystalDiskMark) are closer to those of an HDD than a solid state drive and this will negatively impact your experience in many cases.
Dell may want to upgrade to a faster model, in order to be able to keep up with the competition. The fact that the installed 1 TB HDD (Toshiba MQ04ABF100) achieves better results in some benchmarks further illustrates this point.
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ KBG30ZMS128G | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 502% | 314% | 316% | 489% | |
Write 4K | 65.3 | 112.1 72% | 109.1 67% | 100 53% | 158.8 143% |
Read 4K | 29.71 | 42.01 41% | 42.05 42% | 31.39 6% | 29.11 -2% |
Write Seq | 128.8 | 1964 1425% | 1457 1031% | 1308 916% | 1584 1130% |
Read Seq | 859 | 2065 140% | 1421 65% | 1083 26% | 1694 97% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 95.8 | 318.2 232% | 287.8 200% | 362.9 279% | 536 459% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 197.6 | 406.7 106% | 317.9 61% | 425.7 115% | 363.9 84% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 132.5 | 2534 1812% | 1455 998% | 1411 965% | 2536 1814% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1208 | 3438 185% | 1739 44% | 3240 168% | 3458 186% |
GPU Performance
The mid-range GPU GeForce GTX 1650 Nvidia released earlier this year offers a good price/performance ratio - at least within the realm of laptop GPUs.
3DMark 11 Performance | 11926 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 96370 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25549 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8059 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3616 points | |
Help |
The DirectX 12-capable 12-nm chip from Nvidia's Turing generation houses 1,024 shader units and has access to 4 GB of GDDR5 memory (128-bit interface). Thanks to GPU Boost overclocking, which is applied automatically and works similarly to Intel's Turbo Boost, the base clock of 1,395 MHz is regularly exceeded by a significant margin during gaming. In our The Witcher 3 test, we recorded around 1,635 MHz. Almost 1,710 MHz in Unigine's Heaven 4.0 benchmark is similarly impressive. During the GPU-Z render test, the clock rate even climbed up to 1,905 MHz.
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=242, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=242, last 2 years) | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 |
In terms of the 3DMark 11 and 3DMark 13 results, the Dell G5's GPU performance falls into a similar category as the competition. In our long-term test of The Witcher 3 (around one hour at maximum settings and 1920x1080 pixels), there were no sudden spikes or drops in performance, which hints at an adequate cooling solution, at least from the GPU side of things.