Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1660Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance is similar to the old GTX 1070 (laptop) but at a reduced TGP of 80 Watt (versus 115 Watt). Compared to the desktop GTX 1660 Ti, the clock speeds are reduced (3% lower base, 10% lower boost).

In April 2020 Nvidia refreshed the GTX 1660 Ti with the new codename N18E-G0-A1 with similar specs and pin compatible to the refreshed RTX chips (e.g., RTX 2070 Super Mobile).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

The power consumption of the 1660Ti for latops is specified at 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 20 Watt higher than the efficient (and slower) Max-Q variant of the 1660 Ti. The TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (compare) 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (compare) 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (compare) 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) (compare) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q (compare) 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (compare) 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G0
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
Transistor Count6600 Million
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
38.3 pt (40%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 5406     avg: 5713.5     median: 5697 (464%)     max: 6065 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 5335     avg: 5624.2     median: 5636.5 (519%)     max: 5931 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 412820     avg: 417691.8     median: 416379 (194%)     max: 423220 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 129343     avg: 204017.6     median: 149231 (100%)     max: 316086 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 29390     avg: 34162.7     median: 35033 (190%)     max: 37206 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 70315     avg: 95276.5     median: 97189 (316%)     max: 103428 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 12263     avg: 13138.8     median: 13016 (309%)     max: 14050 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 14186     avg: 14765.6     median: 14735.5 (343%)     max: 15482 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 129020     avg: 199463.5     median: 170512 (86%)     max: 359516 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 15912     avg: 17164.1     median: 17277 (262%)     max: 18245 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 18610     avg: 19913.9     median: 19924 (310%)     max: 20940 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
250.7 fps (234%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
143.9 fps (240%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
2416 Samples/s (158%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
4827 Samples/s (310%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
10148 Points (285%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
154 Watt (44%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 126     avg: 139.6     median: 134.1 (148%)     max: 158.9 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1545     avg: 1665     median: 1650 (133%)     max: 1815 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom Eternal

Doom Eternal

2020
low 1280x720
197  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
166  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75.3 78.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5 52.1 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.2 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
94.7 104 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.9 91.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.7 82.9 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9 93 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.7 86.2 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.4 70.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
179  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99 109 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.1 103 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.9 84.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
37.8
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
192  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116 119 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.5 94.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61.7 64.1 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79 84 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70 76 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
255  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
192 249 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
181 241 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
179 237 ~ 208 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
219  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
138  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
131  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.7 96 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.7 64.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.6 48.6 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
210  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69.2 72.3 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.7 52.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
18.2
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
181 193 210 230 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
141 144 154 157 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121 122 131 141 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91 92 93 99 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
202.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
162.7 175.1 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.6 83.3 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.5 69.9 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.9 68.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
94.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.6 105 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.2 70.4 75.9 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 35.9 39.6 54 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
98 104 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78 81 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57