Farming Simulator 19 Laptop and Desktop Benchmarks

Room for improvement.

As expected, the 2019 edition of the popular and successful Farming Simulator has stormed the sales charts this winter. Read on to find out how well Farming Simulator 19 runs on different systems and what hardware is required to run the game smoothly at different resolutions and graphics levels.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Alex Alderson), Published 12/03/2018 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...

Technology

Although the graphics have improved since Farming Simulator 17, the engine that underpins Farming Simulator 19 has its shortcomings. Starting with the positives, the in-game vehicles have been lovingly designed in detail with sharp textures. Moreover, the game has an abundance of bushes, grasses and trees, which help to recreate a countryside atmosphere. However, the population density is sparse besides a few cars and trucks, and little happens in the game outside of what the player does. Adding pedestrians or roaming wildlife would have helped to create the feeling of a living world.

Furthermore, the developers also need to improve the shadows, which often move around erratically. The game has draw distance issues too. Farming Simulator 19 generally has long draw distances, but distant objects blur into a mess, which undermines the impressiveness of being able to see so far.

Speaking of details, Farming Simulator 19 has dozens of graphics settings just like its predecessors. The extended graphics menu has 20 settings with which players can tinker. There are options for image quality, resolution, scaling, image mode, brightness, field of view, V-Sync and the size of the HUD. There are also numerous presets that forgo the need to spend hours tweaking the game’s visuals. All graphics changes require rebooting the game, which thankfully does not take too long to do.

The different graphics presets make Farming Simulator 19 look noticeably different as demonstrated by the screenshots below, unlike in some other games. The main differences between presets are the quality of shadows and the degree of texture sharpness. The game scales well across different graphics settings, but the game is GPU heavy, so its performance depends largely on the GPU on which the game is running. The importance of other components like the CPU and RAM is secondary.

The game will probably only keep those who like to play Farming Simulator games interested as there is no real campaign, which is a complaint that we have had with past editions of Farming Simulator too. Moreover, the interface remains outdated, while the controls are frustratingly complicated and are poorly distributed. Also, the game will only currently run at a maximum of 2560x1440 (UHD) on external monitors even if they support 4K. Oddly, we could set the resolution to 4K on a laptop display.

Farming Simulator 19 has a 5 GB download size and takes up 10 GB of storage at the time of writing, which is economic by today’s standards. Most modern triple-A games tend to require at least 50 GB of free disk space.

Benchmarks

The game has a 60 FPS frame-rate lock by default but tweaking a few game files can disable it. If you would like the option of playing Farming Simulator 19 at more than 60 FPS, first navigate to the Documents folder in Windows and open the game.xml file using Notepad.

Then look for ‘<controls>false</controls>’ without quote marks under ‘<development>’ and change it to ‘<controls>true</controls>’. The alteration will add a frame-rate lock switch, which can be cycled by pressing F3.

The benchmark sequence that we conducted in Farming Simulator 19 is largely the same as the one we did in Farming Simulator 17. We loaded the Ravenport map and started by running from a farmhouse to a New Holland TX 32 combine harvester. We then drove the machine along a cornfield in a straight line for around 30 seconds until we reached a small hill. Harvesting is one of the more graphically demanding tasks in the game, so the sequence is a good representation of how well different GPUs and systems will handle Farming Simulator 19. An average of 40 FPS and above in the benchmark should be high enough for a smooth gaming experience generally.

▶ load Youtube video

Results

HD (1280x720)

Farming Simulator 19 is no performance hog despite having higher system requirements than its predecessors. The game runs comfortably on an Intel HD Graphics 630 with graphics set to the low preset and at 1280x720.

Farming Simulator 19
1280x720 Low Preset
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	146.4 (129^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1070	313 (268^min) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, i9-9900K Desktop-PC	311 (265^min) fps ∼82%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1080	307 (264^min) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), i9-9900K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060	305 (267^min) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK Alienware 17 R4	174 (155^min) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ Acer Predator Triton 700	167 (142^min) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE	161 (146^min) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	156 (141^min) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6820HK MSI GT62VR	149 (134^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ Asus G752VY	140 (126^min) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ MSI GS60 6QE	133 (118^min) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, i7-7700HQ MSI GL72 7QF	133 (123^min) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ Asus GL753VD	127 (115^min) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ MSI GE72 965M Ti	117.3 (103^min) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	146 (108^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ MSI GP62 2QD	60 (58^min) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	59.2 (49^min) fps ∼16%
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	65 (51^min) fps ∼17%
Intel HD Graphics 630, i7-7700HQ MSI PL62	59.2 (47^min) fps ∼16%

FHD (1920x1080)

We would recommend playing the game on a dedicated GPU if you want playable frame rates at 1080p though. The Intel HD Graphics 630 averages just 21.3 FPS on the medium preset, but the GeForce GTX 960M is powerful enough to play the game comfortably at these settings and even on the high preset. We would suggest using a GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop) if you want to play the game at the highest preset at 1080p as the GeForce GTX 960M averages only 31.4 FPS.

Farming Simulator 19
1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Very High Preset
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	120.5 (106^min) fps ∼43% 107.9 (94^min) fps ∼43% 99.2 (87^min) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), i7-7740X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	144 (123^min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1080	237 (197^min) fps ∼85% 191 (161^min) fps ∼76% 165 (145^min) fps ∼75%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1070	231 (197^min) fps ∼83% 185 (165^min) fps ∼74% 144 (125^min) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK Alienware 17 R4	141 (124^min) fps ∼50% 121 (107^min) fps ∼48% 112 (101^min) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, i9-9900K Desktop-PC	210 (189^min) fps ∼75% 135 (118^min) fps ∼54% 102 (86^min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), i9-9900K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060	204 (183^min) fps ∼73% 132 (117^min) fps ∼53% 102 (87^min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ Acer Predator Triton 700	130 (119^min) fps ∼46% 114 (102^min) fps ∼45% 102 (93^min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	121 (110^min) fps ∼43% 107 (96^min) fps ∼43% 94.8 (86^min) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6820HK MSI GT62VR	120 (104^min) fps ∼43% 103 (94^min) fps ∼41% 87.2 (78^min) fps ∼40%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), i7-7740X i7-7740X Asus X299 Prime	56.4 (42^min) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ Asus G752VY	116 (100^min) fps ∼41% 92.8 (79^min) fps ∼37% 72.5 (63^min) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE	118 (109^min) fps ∼42% 77.3 (68^min) fps ∼31% 59.3 (50^min) fps ∼27%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), i7-7740X XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB, Asus X299 Prime	52.6 (40^min) fps ∼21% 27.3 (21^min) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ MSI GS60 6QE	104 (95^min) fps ∼37% 77.6 (68^min) fps ∼31% 58.1 (48^min) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ Asus GL753VD	94 (84^min) fps ∼34% 59.5 (52^min) fps ∼24% 43.1 (36^min) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ MSI GE72 965M Ti	94.9 (84^min) fps ∼34% 67.4 (56^min) fps ∼27% 49.1 (39^min) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, i7-7700HQ MSI GL72 7QF	68.4 (58^min) fps ∼24% 43.3 (37^min) fps ∼17% 31.4 (26^min) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	61 (49^min) fps ∼22% 35.1 (28^min) fps ∼14% 26.7 (21^min) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ MSI GP62 2QD	30.8 (26^min) fps ∼11% 19 (10^min) fps ∼8% 13.6 (8^min) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	21.6 (17^min) fps ∼8% 12.4 (1^min) fps ∼5%
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	24.7 (18^min) fps ∼9% 12.9 (9^min) fps ∼5%
Intel HD Graphics 630, i7-7700HQ MSI PL62	21.3 (18^min) fps ∼8% 10.7 (2^min) fps ∼4% 6.8 (1^min) fps ∼3%

QHD (2560x1440) & UHD (3840x2160)

Farming Simulator 19 is only playable at resolutions higher than 1080p on high-end GPUs. The game needs at least a GeForce GTX 970M to run smoothly on the highest preset at 2560x1440, while we would recommend using a GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) or better if you want to play at 3840x2160 on the same graphics preset.

Farming Simulator 19
2560x1440 Very High Preset 3840x2160 Very High Preset
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal, TR 1950X NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	89.1 (74^min) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), i7-7740X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	85 (69^min) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1080	123 (102^min) fps ∼54% 66.7 (55^min) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK Alienware 17 R4	110 (95^min) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), i9-9900K MSI GeForce GTX 1070	102 (86^min) fps ∼45% 57 (46^min) fps ∼29%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ Acer Predator Triton 700	97 (84^min) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	87.2 (79^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), i9-9900K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060	68 (57^min) fps ∼30% 36.4 (30^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, i9-9900K Desktop-PC	68.8 (57^min) fps ∼30% 35.9 (29^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6820HK MSI GT62VR	62.2 (54^min) fps ∼28%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), i7-7740X i7-7740X Asus X299 Prime	38.3 (30^min) fps ∼17% 20.2 (15^min) fps ∼10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ Asus G752VY	50.4 (41^min) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ MSI GS60 6QE	39.8 (33^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE	38.9 (32^min) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ Asus GL753VD	29 (24^min) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, i7-7700HQ MSI GL72 7QF	20.6 (16^min) fps ∼9%

Overview

Test Systems

Device	Graphics Card	Processor	RAM	OS
Desktop-PC I	MSI GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) MSI GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700K	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
Desktop-PC II	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB GDDR5X) ASUS GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5) XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM) Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5) Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5) MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-4790K	2 x 4 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64-Bit
Alienware 17 R4	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)	Intel Core i7-7820HK	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
Acer Triton 700	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (8 GB GDDR5X)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
ASUS G752VS	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GT62VR	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6820HK	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GE72	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
ASUS GL753VD	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GL62	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
ASUS G752VY	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (4 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GS60	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (3 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GE72	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GL72	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI PE60	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 4 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI PL62	NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI CX72	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI GP62	NVIDIA GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1 x 8 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64-Bit
MSI CX61	NVIDIA GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3)	Intel Celeron 2970M	1 x 8 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64-Bit
ASUS N551ZU	AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)	AMD FX-7600P	2 x 4 GB DDR3	Windows 10 64-Bit

4K Monitor	NVIDIA driver	AMD driver
2 x ASUS PB287Q, Philips 328P6VJEB	ForceWare 416.94	Adrenalin 18.11.1

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Sebastian Jentsch - Managing Editor Consumer Laptops - 1751 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2010

Computers always had an important place in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, especially in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a division of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became self-employed in 2010 and took the next logical step in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.

contact me via: Xing

Translator: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11975 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat.

contact me via: @aldersonaj, Bluesky

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Farming Simulator 19 Laptop and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2018-12- 3 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Very High Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Very High Preset	4K 3840x2160 Very High Preset
43	NVIDIA Titan RTX	198	157	131	125		112
55	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	244.5ⁿ²	183.5ⁿ²	159ⁿ²	145.5ⁿ²	145.5ⁿ²	107ⁿ²
69	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	191	151	122	117	122	85
74	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	192	141	134	124	123	83
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		194	156ⁿ²	142ⁿ²	131
91	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)				144		85
92	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	146.4	120.5	107.9	99.2		89.1
96	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	221ⁿ²	172.5ⁿ²	145.5ⁿ²	136ⁿ²	125ⁿ²	76.85ⁿ²
99	AMD Radeon VII	180	166	121	111		51.1
100	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	191	147	125	116	93	53.2
101	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	194ⁿ²	154.3ⁿ²	134.55ⁿ²	123.35ⁿ²	120.2ⁿ²	71.5ⁿ²
110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)	307	237	191	165	123	66.7
115	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	217.5ⁿ²	164ⁿ²	142ⁿ²	130.5ⁿ²	114.5ⁿ²	66ⁿ²
121	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	154	124	101	94	87	46.2
125	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		194	162	141	104
127	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		152.5ⁿ²	135.5ⁿ²	126ⁿ²	110ⁿ²
128	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	191.1	147.9	132.7	122.4		54.9
132	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	189.7	140.6	118.7	100		41.5
133	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	174	141	121	112	110
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 19
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
144*	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		145	126	117.05ⁿ²	83
145	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	174	132	116	99	71	39.1
151	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		189	151	120	84
153	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)	313	231	185	144	102	54ⁿ²
156	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	167	130	114	102	97
158	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	156	121	107	94.8	87.2
161	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	191	147	130	119	88	37.9
162	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	237	176	154	123	88	47.5
175	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		182	145	113	77.8	41.1
180	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti				133		52.2
181	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	242	190	153	116	80	41.9
182	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	214.4	167.6	110.4	89.6
191	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	311	210	135	102	68.8	35.9
202	AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)	194.2	149.5	115.5	69		23
203	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)	192.8	153.8	109.3	60.2		21.3
208	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)	305	204	132	102	68	36.4
209	AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)	171	131	102	56.1	37.6	19.9
212	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)				56.4	38.3	20.2
213	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	172.3ⁿ²	133.45ⁿ²	112.45ⁿ²	92.2ⁿ²	62.2
217	AMD Radeon RX 5500M				70	49.1	32.8
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 19
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
230	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	186	150	103	76	51.9	26.8
231	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		157	98.4	74.3	47.6
243*	NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	182.4	106.7	86.3	66.5
252*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q		136	84	60.6	40.7
269	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	140	116	92.8	72.5	50.4
270	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	142.9	101.6	88.6	57.1		21.3
282	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	162.05ⁿ²	121.4ⁿ²	78.2ⁿ²	59.7ⁿ²	38.9
283	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)				60		20.3
288	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	133	104	77.6	58.1	39.8
296*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	193.6	128.7	80.5	61		22
298	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870	160.3	115.9	68.4	37.1	25.5	12.2
304	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)				52.3
305	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	130.1ⁿ²	97.15ⁿ²	67.7ⁿ²	49.2ⁿ²	29
311*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	183.8	104.8	64.7	46.6	31.5	15.5
327	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)			52.6	27.3
330	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	117.3	94.9	67.4	49.1
331	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	86.4	69.3	47.4	27
346	Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics	138		50.8	36.1
349	AMD Radeon Pro 560X			47.7	23.5
353	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	144.7	80.3	46	29.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 19
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
354	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	175.35ⁿ²	85.25ⁿ²	50.85ⁿ²	36.8ⁿ²
355	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	133	68.4	43.3	31.4	20.6
369	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	175.9	66.6	39.3	29.4		9
371	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	163	63.4	38.6
372	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	164	62.2	37.5	28.3
373	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	146	61	35.1	26.7
398	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	122.1	58.5	35.9	26.5
402*	AMD Radeon 540X	108.6	49.7	27	13.6
409*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	125.8	64.2	36.6	15.7
424*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	92.9ⁿ³	58ⁿ³	32.6ⁿ³	19.7ⁿ²
470	NVIDIA GeForce MX230	122.3	48.6	23.8	17.6
482	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	104	58.8	35	18.4
504	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	103.65ⁿ²	48.9ⁿ²	27.8ⁿ²	14
505	NVIDIA GeForce 940M	60	30.8	19	13.6
507	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	83.9	31	17.8	12.7
556	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	74.5
558	AMD Radeon 530	53.8	21.6	10.6
560*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	116.3	57.5	31.8	16.9
564*	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	80.9	30.7	17.5	12.3
613	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	59.2	21.6	12.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Farming Simulator 19
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
631*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	79.1	43.1	20	9.9
632*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	107.4	45	25.5	9.8
634	Intel UHD Graphics 630	71.1	23.9	11.3
637	Intel HD Graphics 630	59.2	21.3	10.7	6.8
643	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	30.7
644	Intel UHD Graphics 620	64ⁿ⁵	23.3ⁿ⁵	12.9ⁿ³	12.9
717	AMD Radeon R5 M255	63.4	24.5
718*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	72.6	25.9	12.4
725	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	45.3	14.7
733	AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	39	14
746	Intel HD Graphics 4600	32.1
748	Intel HD Graphics 5500	44.6
780	Intel UHD Graphics 615	42.1	15.8
826	Intel HD Graphics 610	33.3	13
827	Intel HD Graphics 4400	28.8	10.3
875	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	32.4	11.7
877	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	20.3
940	Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)	14.1

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.