Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon R5 M255

The AMD Radeon R5 M255 is an entry-level DirectX 12 graphics card for laptops, which is based on the Sun GPU (GCN architecture). The core is clocked at up to 940 MHz and the DDR3 graphics memory runs at 1000 MHz (64-bit interface).

Architecture

Compared to the Mars chip (e.g. HD 8570M), Sun offers less hardware units. The GPU integrates 320 shaders, 20 TMUs and 4 ROPs and is therefore located in the low-end segment.

Performance

The performance of the Radeon R5 M255 is similar to the HD 8500M series, e.g. the HD 8570M. Due to a slightly higher core clock, the M255 beats the R5 M230. Overall, the GPU performs a bit better than a GeForce 820M and beats Intels HD Graphics 4600. Current and demanding games of 2014 will run fluently only in low resolutions and detail settings.

The 320 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 5 compute units). Compared to old TeraScale 2 chips, the GCN-based architecture offers improved performance in this framework.

Features

The R5 series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the R5 M255 can directly support multiple monitors using Eyefinity technology.

Other features of the R5 series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. PowerTune allows automatic overclocking and underclocking of the graphics card as long as the GPU is within its TDP limit. For example, the chip may be underclocked when running FurMark and OCCT, but will overclock in certain games.

Power Consumption

The power consumption should be similar to slower models of the HD 8500M or 8600M series. As a result, the R5 M255 is suited for 13-inch notebooks or larger.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R5 M200 Series
Radeon R5 M255 320 @ 940 MHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon R5 M240 (compare) 320 @ 1030 MHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon R5 M230 (compare) 320 @ 855 MHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
CodenameTopaz Pro / Sun
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed940 MHz
Memory Speed1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesPCI Express 3.0 x8, App Acceleration, PowerPlay, PowerTune, ZeroCore, Enduro, Eyefinity, Mantle
Date of Announcement01.05.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/US/PRODUCTS/NOTEBOOK/...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.4 pt (6%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) -73%
...
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) -6%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X -6%
AMD Radeon R5 M335 -5%
AMD Radeon R5 M430 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8730M -2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M -1%
Intel HD Graphics 615 -1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) -1%
AMD Radeon R5 M255
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M 0%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 1%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) 2%
AMD Radeon R5 M230 3%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) 3%
AMD Radeon HD 7610M 3%
AMD Radeon R7 M260 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M340 4%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) 1697%
0%
100%
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 4606     avg: 4880     median: 4859 (7%)     max: 5169 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 5936     avg: 6043     median: 6053 (3%)     max: 6164 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 973     avg: 982     median: 980 (3%)     max: 994 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1068     avg: 1078     median: 1080.5 (3%)     max: 1084 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 34939     avg: 42701     median: 44076.5 (6%)     max: 47713 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 1866     avg: 1952     median: 1907 (5%)     max: 2173 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1717     avg: 1831     median: 1784 (3%)     max: 2080 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
18.7 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
16.9 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
22.6 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
159 Samples/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
292 Samples/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
1073 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom Eternal

Doom Eternal

2020
low 1280x720
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hunt Showdown

Hunt Showdown

2020
low 1280x720
17.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Escape from Tarkov

Escape from Tarkov

2020
low 1280x720
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order

Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order

2019
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed Heat

Need for Speed Heat

2019
low 1280x720
17.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019

2019
low 1280x720
18.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

Ghost Recon Breakpoint

2019
low 1280x720
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
17.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
16.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
32  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
23.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
25.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division 2

The Division 2

2019
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt Rally 2.0

Dirt Rally 2.0

2019
low 1280x720
47.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
low 1280x720
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

2019
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

2018
low 1280x720
16.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Darksiders III

Darksiders III

2018
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Battlefield V

Battlefield V

2018
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Farming Simulator 19

Farming Simulator 19

2018
low 1280x720
63.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fallout 76

Fallout 76

2018
low 1280x720
17.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Duty Black Ops 4

Call of Duty Black Ops 4

2018
low 1280x720
16.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey

Assassin´s Creed Odyssey

2018
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

2018
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
36.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Monster Hunter World

Monster Hunter World

2018
low 1280x720
14.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew 2

The Crew 2

2018
low 1280x720
23.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
22.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

2018
low 1280x720
18.2  fps    + Compare