Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics

The AMD Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics is the combination of a integrated AMD Radeon HD 8450G APU processor graphics card and a dedicated entry level AMD Radeon HD 8570M graphics card in CrossFire combination. It is called AMD Dual Graphics or asymmetric CrossFire and uses AFR (Alternate Frame Rendering) to render different frames on the two graphic cores. Therefore the combination also suffers from micro stuttering (different spaces between two images lead to stuttering altough the framerate is high enough for fluent gaming with only one GPU).

The performance of the Dual Graphics solution depends greatly on the driver support for the used games. In some games the performance may even degrade by 10-15% compared to using only the dedicated graphics card. Therefore, due to the micro stuttering and performance problems, Dual Graphics may impose more problems than bring performance gains. Overall, most games of 2013 will only run fluently in low settings.

The features like PureVideo HD (UVD3) or OpenCL support are similar to the two graphics cards.

As both graphics cards are rendering frames, the power consumption is clearly higher than using only one GPU.

Radeon HD 8500M Series

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics compare 768 @ 0.72 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon HD 8590M compare 384 @ 0.62 GHz64 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 576 @ 0.72 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon HD 8570M compare 384 @ 0.65 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon HD 8550M compare 384 @ 0.7 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
ArchitectureTerascale 3 / GCN
Pipelines576 - unified
Core Speed720 / 650 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.2
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.03.2012

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.2 pt (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
24.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
16.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
43.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
43.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
10.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
55.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
38.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
45.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
6
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
20.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
27.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
19.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
31.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
108  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
76  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
44.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Company of Heroes 27.8
GRID 224.114.7
Metro: Last Light8.7
BioShock Infinite28.219
Tomb Raider32.818.6
Crysis 3159.9
Dead Space 3522721.6
Assassin´s Creed III6.8
Hitman: Absolution9.48.1
Call of Duty: Black Ops 225.222.915.2
Need for Speed: Most Wanted19.911.7
Medal of Honor: Warfighter16.613.7
Fifa 1343.432.228.9
F1 20121612
Counter-Strike: GO43.133.226.6
Sleeping Dogs24.813
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier10.45.8
Max Payne 39.49.2
Dirt Showdown19.911.7
Diablo III47.637.630.1
Risen 2: Dark Waters10.314.411.9
Mass Effect 330.821.9
Alan Wake1811.5
Anno 207055.42616.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim18.415.8
CoD: Modern Warfare 335.823.819.3
Battlefield 311.1
Deus Ex Human Revolution38.826.1
Total War: Shogun 245.216.7
Civilization 520.6
Mafia 21513.8
Metro 203327.619.2
Battlefield: Bad Company 229.525.723.2
Resident Evil 531.318.8
Trackmania Nations Forever10830.1
World of Warcraft7644.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
22
11
2
24
4

11
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:38:06

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4845 +0.03s ... 0.081s

#7 got single benchmarks 4845 +0.007s ... 0.088s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.434s ... 0.522s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.522s

#11 Got 76 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.531s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.531s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.558s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.764s ... 1.322s

#15 return log +0.05s ... 1.372s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-09- 5)