Notebookcheck

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

The ATI Mobilty Radon HD 4670 from AMD is a DirectX 10.1 middle-class notebook graphics adapter. Technically it is a higher clocked Mobility Radeon HD 4650. The 4670 was later renamed to Mobility Radeon HD 565v and succeeded by the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (DX 11 Support and a higher shader count but lower clocked).

The gaming performance of the GPU lies between the desktop HD 4650 and 4670. Therefore, most DirectX 9 games (like Call of Duty 4, F.E.A.R., or Unreal Tournament 3) should be playable in high details (in 1024x768). Demanding DX10 games from 2008 like Crysis run only in medium details fluently. Compared to Nvidia graphics cards, the performance should be on par with a GeForce GT 335M (lower synthetic scores but equal gaming performance).

The Mobility HD 4670 is based on the RV730 chip and features 320 stream processors (64 5-dimensional shader cores). These cores do the graphic work of the shader- and pixel pipelines of older GPUs. The stream processors are also called ALUs and are grouped in five-way VLIW units. Each of the five instructions of a VLIW bundle has to be independent from the others and therefore the performance depends on the optimization of the driver.

A speciality of the Radeon HD 4600 Series is the possibility to use ordinary DDR2 and DDR3 graphic memory (as a cheaper alternative to GDDR3). However, cards that use that kind of memory will be slower than others equipped with GDDR RAM.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 includes the Avivo HD called video technology including an onboard soundchip for 7.1 sound output over HDMI or DisplayPort and the 2nd generation UVD (Unified Video Decoder). This UVD 2 supports full bitstream decoding of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC and VC-1 streams. In addition to this, it also supports dual video stream decoding and Picture-in Picture mode which makes the UVD full BD-Live compliant. Simplified, the Avivo HD technology handles all video tasks and enables the GPU to decode HD videos.

AMD published a current consumtion of about 28-30 Watt for the HD 4670. Still it is unclear if this value represents the chip alone or the whole mxm board including the memory (which would include about 5 Watt). Nevertheless, the battery runtime should be compareable to a laptop with GeForce 9600M GT / GT 130M graphics adapter.

Compared to the desktop ATI Radeon HD 4670, the mobile counterpart features a slower chip and memory clock (675/800 versus 775/900-1000) and therefore performs somewhere between a desktop 4650 and 4670.

ManufacturerATI
Mobility Radeon HD 4600 Series
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 320 @ 675 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 (compare) 320 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameM96-XT
ArchitectureTerascale 1
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistor Count514 Million
technology55 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.0, PCI-E 2.0 x16, Powerplay, DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600, HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio), 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI, 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement09.01.2009
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/products/MobilityRade...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 23519     avg: 24975     median: 24975 (26%)     max: 26431 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 21623     avg: 22295     median: 22295 (12%)     max: 22967 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 11778     avg: 12613.5     median: 12613.5 (27%)     max: 13449 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 +
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
5.7 Points (84%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
5.9 Points (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010
low 1024x768
56.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
CoD Modern Warfare 2

CoD Modern Warfare 2

2009
low 800x600
119.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
35.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
43.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
77 86.9 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
19 24.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
235  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
74  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
104.2 118.7 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
62.4 78.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
51.6 52.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
91  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
77.3 90.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
36.2 41.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
48  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
35.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
29.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
52.5 55.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
30.8 41.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
26 29.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1366x768
46.8
Medium 1366x768
36.3
High 1366x768
23.5
Very High 1024x768
17.9
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
59.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.9  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1366x768
53.2
Medium 1366x768
33.1
High 1366x768
19.4
Very High 1024x768
14.9
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
141.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
127  fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
65  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare