Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

The ATI Mobilty Radeon HD 4650 from AMD is a DirectX 10.1 middle-class notebook graphics adapter. Technically it is a slower clocked Mobility Radeon HD 4670. The successor of the HD 4650 is the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 with DirectX 11 support and improved performance. Later the HD 4650 was also introduced as Mobility Radeon HD 5165.

The gaming performance of the GPU lies a bit below the HD 4670. Most DirectX 9 games (like Call of Duty 4, F.E.A.R., or Unreal Tournament 3) should be playable in medium to high details (in 1024x768). Demanding DX10 games from 2008 like Crysis run only in low-medium details fluently.

The Mobility HD 4650 is based on the RV730 chip and features 320 stream processors (64 5-dimensional shader cores). These cores do the graphic work of the shader- and pixel pipelines of older GPUs. The stream processors are also called ALUs and are grouped in five-way VLIW units. Each of the five instructions of a VLIW bundle has to be independent from the others and therefore the performance depends on the optimization of the driver.

A speciality of the Radeon HD 4600 Series is the possibility to use ordinary DDR2 and DDR3 graphic memory (as a cheaper alternative to GDDR3). However, cards that use that kind of memory will be slower than others equipped with GDDR RAM.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 includes the Avivo HD called video technology including an onboard soundchip for 7.1 sound output over HDMI or DisplayPort and the 2nd generation UVD (Unified Video Decoder). This UVD 2 supports full bitstream decoding of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC and VC-1 streams. In addition to this, it also supports dual video stream decoding and Picture-in Picture mode which makes the UVD full BD-Live compliant. Simplified, the Avivo HD technology handles all video tasks and enables the GPU to decode HD videos.

AMD published a current consumtion of about 15-25 Watt for the HD 4650. Still it is unclear if this value represents the chip alone or the whole mxm board including the memory (which would include about 5 Watt).

Compared to the desktop ATI Radeon HD 4650, the mobile counterpart features a slower chip and memory clock (575/800 versus 600/1000) and therefore performs a bit slower than the desktop 4650.

Mobility Radeon HD 4600 Series

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 compare 320 @ 0.68 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 4650 320 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameM96
ArchitectureTerascale 1
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption35 Watt
Transistor Count514 Million
technology55 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.0, PCI-E 2.0 x16, Powerplay, DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600, HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio), 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI, 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement09.01.2009
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2262     avg: 2456     median: 2412.5 (1%)     max: 2727 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 19803     avg: 26922     median: 26779 (28%)     max: 33488 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15500     avg: 18845     median: 18851 (10%)     max: 21712 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 10565     avg: 12609     median: 12781 (14%)     max: 14360 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 6050     avg: 6280     median: 6213 (8%)     max: 6643 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5569     avg: 6244     median: 6207 (8%)     max: 7149 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 6658     avg: 7109     median: 7120 (9%)     max: 7539 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
min: 6301     avg: 6683     median: 6683 (9%)     max: 7065 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3667     avg: 5085     median: 4973.5 (4%)     max: 6720 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
109 119.4 134 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
32 41 92 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
64.4 72 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29.8 66 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
40 48.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
28 30.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
53.5 63.4 97 104 118 126 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
15.8 18.5 20.1 21.3 21.9 27 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
med. 1024x768
102.3  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
58.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
71.7 103.6 128 160.4 307 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
58 60 60 61.5 62.6 68.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
40 40 41.6 43.3 47 53 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
43.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
90  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
78.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
61.8 63.7 66.5 77.5 98 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
38.5 45.6 52 57 59.9 65.4 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
32.8 34 36.6 38.2 43 46.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
95 123.9 130 212.8 238.3 282.5 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
53.5 62.8 65 66.5 82 90.8 92 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
34.7 36 41 45 50.5 51.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
36.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
41 48.6 63.8 67.5 72 83 87.2 91 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
33 39 41.5 42 44.5 47 50.9 61 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
25.5 26 26.2 26.6 27.2 27.3 28 28 34.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
High 800x600
33.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
48.8
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
40.3
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
52.5
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
32.8
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
18
Low 1366x768
43.6
Medium 1366x768
33.9
High 1366x768
20.7
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
51 57.1 64.2 81.5 82 84 95.4 98 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29.3 33.7 36 36 36.4 38.5 43.7 52 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19.2 20 20.3 20.5 21.3 21.6 22 26 32.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
36.1
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
55.7
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
45.6
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
25.3
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x1024
14.2
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
27
Low 1366x768
48.8
Medium 1366x768
28.6
High 1366x768
17
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
64  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19 33 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
21.7 22.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
143 248 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
8 30 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 29 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
91.2 261 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
60.1 64.9 93.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
23 24.3 30.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
285  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
191.1  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
196  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
193.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
159  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
604 608 650 ~ 621 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
CoD Modern Warfare 2121553516.1
Risen684821
Need for Speed Shift442921
Anno 14049421
Sims 3102.358.8
F.E.A.R. 21546244
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto43.828.95
Left 4 Dead9078.4
Racedriver: GRID745338
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare1807343
Supreme Commander - FA Bench46.4936.8
Crysis - GPU Benchmark694528
Crysis - CPU Benchmark773823
World in Conflict - Benchmark6426
Call of Juarez Benchmark22
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion66
F.E.A.R.1961919
World of Warcraft1767326
Counter-Strike Source285
Doom 3191.1196193.3159
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo621
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
6
6
3
6
5
1
8
6
2
3
2


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 13:12:24

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1076 +0.013s ... 0.063s

#7 got single benchmarks 1076 +0.071s ... 0.134s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.434s ... 0.568s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.568s

#11 Got 170 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.58s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.58s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.59s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.435s ... 1.025s

#15 return log +0.037s ... 1.063s

Gaming Performance

In our review of the Compal HLB2 barebone, we tested the integrated HD 4650 that is clocked with fast 600/800 MHz with different games. Warning - slower clocked 4650 gpus in other notebooks should perform much worse.

Crysis: 1024x768, high: 32 fps -> playable
GTA 4: 800x600, min: 46 fps -> fully playable
Call of Duty 4: 1280x1024, high: 30 fps -> playable with stuttering
Racedriver GRID: 1280x1024, high, 2xAA: 40 fps -> fully playable
F.E.A.R. 2: 1024x768, medium, 2xAA: 50 fps -> fully playable

COD4
COD4
Fear2
Fear2
Grid
Grid

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 graphics card

 

Review Dell Studio 1747 Notebook

Twenty-One or "Seventeen and Four". Those who choose Dell's Studio range, expect design, quality and of course computing power for multimedia and middle class g...
Intel Core i7-720QM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | 17.30" | 3.4 kg
 

Review Sony Vaio VGN-FW51MF Notebook

Rich in Minerals. Magnesium isn't only healthy as a trace element and helps against aching muscles but is also a good building material for notebooks - as a met...
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | 16.40" | 2.9 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire 5940G Notebook

Of Mirrors and Vane Persons... "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who in the land is fairest of all..." – well, vanity wasn't only an issue in the time of the Brother...
Intel Core i7-720QM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | 15.60" | 3.2 kg
 

Review Toshiba Satellite P300-212 Notebook

Flood of Models. Toshiba expands its range of 17" Satellite P300 Series notebooks again and again. Amoung others one will find the P300-212 Model, equiped with ...
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | 17.00" | 3.4 kg
 

Review HP Pavilion dv6-1211sg Notebook

Bread and Games. HP knows what the people want? A good graphic card combined with an acceptable processor in a case with loads of connections. Of course, this p...
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | 15.60" | 2.9 kg

Samsung R522: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Samsung R522-Aura Notebook

Toshiba Satellite A500-15H: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 16.00", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba A500-15H Multimedia Notebook

Asus M60VP: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Review Asus M60VP Notebook

SCHENKER MG6: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review mySN MG6 Notebook (Compal HLB2)

Compal KHLB2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Compal KHLB2 Notebook

Packard Bell EasyNote LJ71: AMD Athlon II M320, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote LJ71

Fujitsu LifeBook AH530-P61: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook AH530-P61

HP Pavilion dv6-2120eg: AMD Athlon II M320, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-2120eg

HP Pavilion dv6-2005AX: AMD Turion II M500, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-2005AX

Sony Vaio VGNFW54M: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGNFW54M

HP Pavilion dv7-2273cl: Intel Core 2 Duo T6600, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2273cl

Sony Vaio VGN-FW56SR/H: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 16.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW56SR/H

Toshiba Satellite Pro L500-1D6: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro L500-1D6

Toshiba Satellite L555-10R: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L555-10R

Sony Vaio VGN-FW51ZF/H: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW51ZF/H

Toshiba Satellite L555-10N: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L555-10N

Toshiba Satellite L350-24U: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300, 17.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L350-24U

Dell Studio 1747: Intel Core i7-720QM, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 1747

Toshiba Satellite A500-12W: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A500-12W

Sony Vaio VGN-FW560F/T: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW560F/T

Acer Aspire 5940G-724G50BN: Intel Core i7-720QM, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5940G-724G50BN

Sony Vaio VGN-FW51MF: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW51MF

Acer Aspire 5940G-KAQB0: Intel Core i7-720QM, 15.60", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5940G-KAQB0

Mesh Edge15 TT: Intel Core 2 Duo T6500, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Mesh Computers Edge15 TT

Sony Vaio VGN-NW280F: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 15.50", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-NW280F

HP Pavilion dv7-2270us: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2270us

Ibuypower Battalion 101 CZ-10: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Ibuypower Battalion 101 CZ-10

HP Pavilion dv6-1360us: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-1360us

Cyberpower Xplorer X6-7900: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Cyberpower Xplorer X6-7900

Asus N81Vp-D2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600, 14.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus N81Vp-D2

HP Pavilion dv6-1211sg: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-1211sg

HP Pavilion dv7-2160ef: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2160ef

Toshiba Satellite L500-164: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L500-164

Toshiba Satellite A500-15H: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 16.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A500-15H

Sony Vaio VGN-FW46M: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW46M

Asus X5BTP: AMD Athlon X2 QL-62, 15.60", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus X5BTP

Toshiba Satellite A500-14H : Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A500-14H

HP Pavilion dv7-2142eg: Intel Core 2 Duo T6500, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2142eg

Toshiba Satellite A500-11U: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A500-11U

BTO Notebooks P.Book 15C29A: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » BTO Notebooks P.Book 15C29A

Toshiba Satellite P505-S8945: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 18.40", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P505-S8945

HP Pavilion dv7-2180us: Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2180us

HP Pavilion dv7-2173cl: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2173cl

HP Pavilion dv6-1253cl: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-1253cl

HP Pavilion dv7-2170us: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2170us

Asus M60VP: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus M60VP

Toshiba Satellite P300-212 : Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 17.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P300-212

Sony Vaio VGN-FW41: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 16.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW41

HP Pavilion dv7-2185DX: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2185DX

Sony Vaio VGN-FW480J/T: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW480J/T

HP Pavilion dv7-2070eg: AMD Turion X2 RM-75, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2070eg

HP Pavilion dv7-2005eg: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-2005eg

SCHENKER MG6: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Schenker mySN MG6

Compal KHLB2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Compal KHLB2

Asus N81Vp: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 14.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus N81Vp

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter