, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



The Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M is a high performance laptop graphics card based on the GT215 core. Compared to the older GTS 260M, the GTS 360 features only a higher clock speed.

The GT215 architecture supports DirectX 10.1 and OpenGL 2.1 and features 96 shader cores, similar to the 9800M GT.  The memory bus of the GTS 360M, however, is only 128 bit wide. To compensate, the GPU supports faster GDDR5 VRAM. Therefore, overall performance is significantly faster compared to models with slower DDR3 VRAM.

Similar to the GeForce 9800M GT, the GTS 360M features 96 stream processors that do the graphics work of the former dedicated pixel- and vertex-shaders. The unified shaders of Nvidia are 1-dimensional (AMD has 5-dimensional shaders which lead to the higher number of shaders). The shaders of the GT215 core are based on the GTX 200 desktop architecture and are therefore improved compared to the G92 based cards (e.g., 9800M GT).

The GeForce GPU also supports CUDADirectX ComputeOpenCL, and PhysX to use the shaders for other tasks than rendering images (for example, encoding videos or calculating physics of a game or mathematical tasks). For these special tasks, the GPU can be noticeably faster than current CPUs.

The mobile graphics card has a built in video decoder called PureVideo HD with VP4. The Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports the full decoding of H.264, VC-1, and now also MPEG-4 ASP (e.g. DivX or XviD). MPEG-1 is still not supported, but the decoding of this codec is quite trivial on a CPU.

In conjunction with an Nvidia integrated graphics (e.g. 9400M), the GTS 360M supports Hybrid-SLI in the form of HybridPower. HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technique for switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. Up to now, the user had to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later, HybridPower was succeeded by Optimus, which can automatically switch between GPUs directly through drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported by the GTS 360M as the SLI combination with the integrated GPU would provide no significant performance boosts.

The performance of the mid- to high-class GeForce GTS 360M should be slightly above the GTS 260M because of the higher clock speed. Demanding DirectX 10 games like Crysis should run fluently in medium to high details and lower resolutions. Older or less demanding games should run in high detail settings and high resolutions fluently. More details about the gaming performance can be found in our benchmarks below.

Depending on the type of graphics memory used (GDDR5 or GDDR3), the performance of the GTS 360M may differ. The maximum clock rate can also differ according to the used graphics RAM. For models equipped with GDDR5 VRAM, the maximum supported clock rate is 2000 MHz.

The power consumption should be similar to the slightly slower clocked GTS 260M, which is rated at 38 Watt TDP. Therefore, the GTS 360M is intended for larger laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

GeForce GTS 300M Series
GeForce GTS 360M 96 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GTS 350M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 1600 MHz
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed575 MHz
Shader Speed1325 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistor Count727 Million
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX, SLI, Powermizer 8.0, MXM 3.0 Type-B
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement07.01.2010
Information360 GFlops
Link to Manufacturer Page


3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4386     avg: 4516     median: 4569 (4%)     max: 4594 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06
min: 10622     avg: 10817     median: 10817 (20%)     max: 11012 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
42.2 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
32.1 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
17.9 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
52 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.2 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1024x768
61.3 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.1 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.


med. 1024x768
45.7 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.4 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.2 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

med. 1024x768
63.2 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.1 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

med. 1024x768
80.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
50.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

low 1024x768
122.6 fps  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
39.1 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

med. 1024x768
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
38.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

med. 1024x768
60.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
log 23. 18:32:01

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:11:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1598 +0.013s ... 0.06s

#7 got single benchmarks 1598 +0.011s ... 0.071s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.118s ... 0.189s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.189s

#11 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.193s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.193s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.194s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.11s ... 0.303s

#15 return log +0.053s ... 0.356s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M graphics card

Toshiba Qosmio X500-121: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.6 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Qosmio X500-121 Notebook

Asus G51Jx-X1: Intel Core i7-720QM, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G51Jx-X1

Asus G51JX-X3: Intel Core i5-430M, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G51JX-X3

Asus G60JX: Intel Core i5-430M, 16.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G60JX

Asus G60JX-JX154V: Intel Core i5-520M, 16.00", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G60JX-JX154V

Toshiba Qosmio X500-116: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-116

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11D: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11D

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11g : Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.9 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11g

Toshiba Qosmio X500-11X: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-11X

Toshiba Qosmio X500-121: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-121

Toshiba Qosmio X500-128: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-128

Toshiba Qosmio X500-12N: Intel Core i7-740QM, 18.40", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-12N

Toshiba Qosmio X500-14W: Intel Core i7-740QM, 18.40", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X500-14W

Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q890: Intel Core i7-740QM, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X505-Q890

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Radeon RX 6600M *

Class 2

Class 3