Notebookcheck

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

The Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake with 32 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Ice Lake SoCs (10th generation core 10xxG1) for laptops. It is the slowest GPU version in the Ice Lake U series and offers only 32 of the 64 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks). It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). The clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch it looks like all models have a 300 MHz base clock and only differ in the boost clock (1050 - 1100 MHz). Another difference is the TDP as it can be configured from 12 - 25 Watt in the 15 Watt U-models and maybe even higher in the 25 Watt models that will come later.

The performance should above the old Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Gen. 9.5) that was e.g. found in Whiskey Lake processors (thanks to the higher core count and improved architecture). Most likely the G1 graphics wont reach the performance of the old Iris Plus 640 that offered more cores and 64 MB eDRAM. Therefore, only a few new AAA games can be played fluently with the UHD Graphics G1.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Ice Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

ManufacturerIntel
Gen. 11 Series
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
CodenameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines32 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR4
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement28.05.2019
CPU in UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-1035G14 x 1000 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i5-1034G14 x 800 MHz, 15 W300 MHz? MHz
Intel Core i3-1005G12 x 1200 MHz, 15 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core i3-1000G12 x 1100 MHz, 9 W300 MHz900 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz900 - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.8 pt (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 7888     avg: 9235     median: 9050.5 (12%)     max: 11119 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 9346     avg: 11136     median: 11225.5 (6%)     max: 12698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1161     avg: 1450     median: 1455.5 (4%)     max: 1673 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1255     avg: 1538     median: 1550 (4%)     max: 1755 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2167     avg: 2512     median: 2458 (6%)     max: 2875 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1963     avg: 2283     median: 2280 (4%)     max: 2578 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1152x864 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
52.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
17.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
16.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
36 43 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13 15 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
8.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
14  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare