AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

The AMD Radeon R5 is an integrated DirectX 12 graphics card found in some AMD Beema and Carrizo-L APUs (for example, the A8-6410 or A8-7410). It offers 128 shader cores across two Compute Units and based on the GCN architecture. Clock speeds can be up to 850 MHz. The graphics card does not have dedicated VRAM and will access main system memory (single-channel DDR3L-1866).

Using its UVD (Unified Video Decoder), the GPU can support the CPU when decoding videos up to 4K. In addition, the chip integrates a specialized video encoder called VCE. Video streams can output via VGA, DVI, HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2 to up to two external monitors.

The performance of the Radeon R5 is slightly above a Radeon HD 7470M or the Intel HD Graphics 4200. Typically, only older or less demanding games like FIFA will run fluently.

Manufacturer

AMD

Radeon R Series

Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	128 @ 0.85 GHz	64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Beema)	128 @ 0.8 GHz	64 Bit
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)	128 @ 0.35 - 0.69 GHz	64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)	128 @ 0.3 - 0.6 GHz	64 Bit
Radeon R6 (Mullins)	128 @ 0.5 GHz	64 Bit

Codename

Beema

Architecture

GCN 1.1

Pipelines

128 - unified

Core Speed

850 (Boost) MHz

Memory Bus Width

64 Bit

Shared Memory

yes

DirectX

DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0

technology

28 nm

Date of Announcement

29.04.2014

CPU in Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)		GPU Base Speed	GPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A8-7410	4 x 2200 MHz, 12 - 25 W	300 MHz	850 MHz
AMD A8-6410	4 x 2000 MHz, 15 W	? MHz	800 MHz
min. - max.		300 - ? MHz	800 - 850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy

3.5 pt (4%)

AMD Radeon HD 8180 -61%

...

AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 -11%

Intel HD Graphics 4200 -10%

AMD Radeon HD 7620G -10%

Intel HD Graphics 5300 -9%

AMD Radeon HD 8400 -9%

Intel HD Graphics 505 -6%

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) -4%

AMD Radeon HD 7500G 0%

AMD Radeon HD 8610G 0%

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

AMD Radeon R5 (Kaveri) 2%

NVIDIA GeForce 910M 2%

Intel HD Graphics 4400 4%

AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 4%

AMD Radeon HD 7480D 5%

AMD Radeon HD 7550M 7%

Intel UHD Graphics 610 10%

AMD Radeon HD 8450G 12%

Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) 15%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 2629%

100%

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

36807 Points (6%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

min: 2071 avg: 2757 median: 2882 (4%) max: 3024 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics

min: 3225 avg: 3352 median: 3317 (2%) max: 3479 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score

min: 480 avg: 503 median: 510 (1%) max: 522 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics

min: 515 avg: 538 median: 539 (1%) max: 560 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics

min: 35815 avg: 36863 median: 36890 (5%) max: 38840 Points

+ 7 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score

min: 815 avg: 849 median: 831 (2%) max: 970 Points

+ 9 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU

min: 744 avg: 777 median: 764 (1%) max: 899 Points

+ 9 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

AMD Radeon HD 6250 -78%

...

AMD Radeon HD 7600G -10%

Intel UHD Graphics 605 -9%

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) -7%

AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M -4%

AMD Radeon HD 7550M -3%

Intel HD Graphics 4400 -3%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M -3%

AMD Radeon HD 7610M -3%

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

Qualcomm Adreno 540 2%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M 3%

AMD Radeon HD 7570M 6%

AMD FirePro M2000 8%

Intel HD Graphics 510 9%

AMD Radeon HD 8470D 10%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 10%

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) 11%

Intel HD Graphics 610 12%

...

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 7509%

100%

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +

3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +

3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +

Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high

9.7 fps (2%)

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications - Hide comparison chart

AMD Radeon HD 7310 -94%

...

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) -14%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v -10%

AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics -9%

Intel HD Graphics 505 -8%

Intel UHD Graphics 605 -7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M -7%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M -6%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX -4%

Intel HD Graphics 4000 -1%

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

AMD Radeon HD 7560D 1%

AMD Radeon HD 8550G 1%

AMD FirePro M2000 2%

AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 3%

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 4%

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 4%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M 4%

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) 6%

AMD Radeon HD 6550D 8%

...

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 5385%

100%

Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +

Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +

Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +

GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen

104 fps (19%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD

52 fps (87%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +

GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU

88 Samples/s (1%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU

149 Samples/s (0%)

+ 1 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result

min: 445 avg: 495 median: 494.5 (1%) max: 544 points

+ 2 benchmarks and specifications + Show comparison chart

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ghost Recon Breakpoint

2019

3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Borderlands 3

2019

7.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Control

2019

7.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

F1 2019

2019

9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019

7.6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Anno 1800

2019

8.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

The Division 2

2019

6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Dirt Rally 2.0

2019

18.2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Anthem

2019

2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Metro Exodus

2019

4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Apex Legends

2019

7.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Just Cause 4

2018

7.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Darksiders III

2018

11.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Battlefield V

2018

5.4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Farming Simulator 19

2018

20.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Fallout 76

2018

7.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Hitman 2

2018

5.2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Call of Duty Black Ops 4

2018

7.6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Assassin´s Creed Odyssey

2018

7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Forza Horizon 4

2018

10 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

FIFA 19

2018

28.5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

F1 2018

2018

12 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Monster Hunter World

2018

7.4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

The Crew 2

2018

8.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Far Cry 5

2018

7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

World of Tanks enCore

2018

56.7 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

X-Plane 11.11

2018

7.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

2018

8.6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018

5.5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Fortnite

2018

16.2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Star Wars Battlefront 2

2017

6.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Need for Speed Payback

2017

8.4 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

ELEX

2017

9.5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

2017

11 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

F1 2017

2017

15 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

2017

11.2 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Team Fortress 2

2017

23 fps + Compare

22 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Dirt 4

2017

23.4 fps + Compare

13.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Rocket League

2017

29 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Prey

2017

13.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III

2017

9.6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

8.8 fps + Compare

2.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For Honor

2017

14.5 fps + Compare

4.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Resident Evil 7

2017

19.8 fps + Compare

11.9 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Dishonored 2

2016

7.1 fps + Compare

5.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Titanfall 2

2016

17.6 fps + Compare

14.7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Farming Simulator 17

2016

41.5 fps + Compare

28.3 fps + Compare

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Battlefield 1

2016

13.2 fps + Compare

9.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Civilization VI

2016

18.3 fps + Compare

7 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Deus Ex Mankind Divided

2016

7.7 fps + Compare

5.6 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Mirror's Edge Catalyst

2016

10.5 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Overwatch

2016

20.4 fps + Compare

17.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Doom

2016

9.3 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

Hitman 2016

2016

7.2 fps + Compare

4.1 fps + Compare

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

The Division

2016

12.3 fps + Compare

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
HP Pavilion 17-f050ng	A8-6410	4 GB	800 MHz		36807

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		2071
HP Pavilion 17-f050ng	A8-6410	4 GB	800 MHz		2489
HP Pavilion 13-a093na x360	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		2865
HP 15-g005ng	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		2882
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	A6-7310	4 GB	850 / 1600 MHz		2942
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P (Carrizo-L)	A8-7410	8 GB			3024
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L	A8-7410	8 GB	847 / 800 MHz		3024

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
HP Pavilion 17-f050ng	A8-6410	4 GB	800 MHz		3225
HP Pavilion 13-a093na x360	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		3267
HP 15-g005ng	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		3291
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		3317
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	A6-7310	4 GB	850 / 1600 MHz		3407
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P (Carrizo-L)	A8-7410	8 GB			3479
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L	A8-7410	8 GB	847 / 800 MHz		3479

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	A6-7310	4 GB	850 / 1600 MHz		480
HP Pavilion 13-a093na x360	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		484
HP Pavilion 17-f050ng	A8-6410	4 GB	800 MHz		485
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		510
HP 15-g005ng	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		517
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P (Carrizo-L)	A8-7410	8 GB			522
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L	A8-7410	8 GB	847 / 800 MHz		522

Model	CPU	Memory	Core / Memory	GPU Memory	Value
HP Pavilion 13-a093na x360	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		515
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	A6-7310	4 GB	850 / 1600 MHz		523
HP Pavilion 17-f050ng	A8-6410	4 GB	800 MHz		524
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		539
HP 15-g005ng	A8-6410	8 GB	800 MHz		548
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P (Carrizo-L)	A8-7410	8 GB			560
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L	A8-7410	8 GB	847 / 800 MHz		560