Notebookcheck

Farming Simulator 17 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser (translated by Ed Tittel), 11/17/2016

Let's get cracking! A word to the wise at the big gaming companies, where they routinely spend millions and put casts of thousands to work developing high-end games. Alongside all those big boys -- like Battlefield, FIFA, and Assassin's Creed -- Germans also delight in playing on a farming simulator. Here's a look at what's up with the latest version, as shown in this benchmark report.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

For the original German article, see here.

Gaming Environment

We resisted the impulse for a long, long while, but after dozens of Community e-mails we simply couldn't avoid our responsibilities any more. The Farming Simulator (Landswirtschafts-Simulator in German) has been enthusiastically adopted by a sizable fan base, that includes not just hobby farmers, but also ordinary people in search of a simple, idyllic and engaging gaming experience.

And yes, after your humble author spend a few hours messing around with mowing, manure and feeding the pigs, he truly did begin to understand the undying fascination that dedicated virtual farmers seem to love. We found it particularly clever that the game let us tune into various radio stations to provide a soundtrack for our agricultural pursuits. Thus, for example, you can pick a hip-hop channel, and cruise to the pulsing base of Jay-Z as you drive around in your tractor. It may sound pretty crazy, but it's actually quite amusing.

Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17

Technically speaking, the 17th edition of this game is a little underwhelming. Even at the highest level of detail, graphics look a little fuzzy, whether rendering characters or textures. Only the farming equipment is very sharp, almost lovingly detailed when rendered. Game physics vary between good and curiously bad, as when the Bulldog trailers take to the air behind your tractor (if hauled through a confined space of your own making). But this, too, has its own curious charm and gives the game an occasional dash of slapstick humor.

All in all the overall graphics are workmanlike, though in some situations (such as when rendering tall grass in a sunset scene) you'll see lots of atmospheric effects. That adjective -- atmospheric -- carries over into much of this game. But newbies need not worry too much about jumping late to this game. Although this is the 17th version, they'll find that its tutorials do a half-way decent job of helping them understand and manipulate its many game elements. It's our frank opinion that game navigation and most of the menus could easily be made more user-friendly and attractive. The limitations of a small developer organization clearly make themselves felt in the areas of game controls and infrastructure.

Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17

The options menu offers a wide range of choices to manage. Along with the general settings, you'll find 11 additional features beyond resolution to dig into. Among others, they include such things as HUD scaling, the visual field, brightness, image mode, and vertical synch. The most important of these is the "Hardware Profile" item, which establishes overall graphics quality via settings for Low, Medium, High, and Very High. Those who want to get under the game's hood and mess with its innards will enjoy working with the expanded graphics menus. There, you'll find nearly 20 options to manage the PC runtime environment that supports completely unique tuning and customization.

That sad, we have to take issue with some of the game's restrictions. Settings many only be altered in the main menu, but when you select Very High graphics quality, you can't see all the controls on screen. This includes anisotropic texture filtering, something that hardly impacts modern PC performance nowadays. Edge smoothing is handled using MSAA settings. While this control really helps how other games looks and play, the farming simulator is inclined to flickering when displaying game objects (particularly trees and bushes). Over time, this becomes disturbing. In addition, loading times could be faster -- at least, when reading from a hard disk.

Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17
Farming Simulator 17

By contrast, with about 4 GB to download and a 7 GB disk footprint, the game is delightfully compact. As compared to other modern games, this is far less than the typical 30-plus GB you'll find. The retail version of the game comes on a DVD, but surprisingly does not have to be tied to a specific online account. Its straightforward activation requires only entering the product key over the Internet. Our testing was based on the 35 Euro and presumably identical Steam version.

Benchmark

We measured the frame rate using the FRAPS tool for the game map entry named "Goldcrest Valley." As you can see in the accompanying video we captured, this features a sprint from one of its four walls out to the Case IH 1660 Axial-Flow harvester combine, and a drive with this bright-red mechanical monster around the field. Because of the graphics effects involved (dust, flying straw, and more) this graphic sequence provides an effective "worst case scenario" for putting the game through its paces. If you can get this scene to benchmark at 35 fps or better, your system can handle anything the game might ever throw your way.

Tip: to run the game at 60 fps or faster, you must not only deactivate vertical synchronization, you will also have to monkey around with the game.xml file (usually resides in C:UsersxxxDocumentsmy gamesFarmingSimulator2017). After you open that file in a Windows text editor (like Notepad) you need only change the item therein that reads <controls>false</controls> to <controls>true</controls> instead. After that, if you hit the F3 key during gameplay, it will be locked into 60-fps mode until you restart the game, or until you make another settings change.

Results

Owners of older or weaker notebook PC seldom find reasons for joy when playing state-of-the-art games. It doesn't matter if you're playing Mafia 3, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, Mirror's Edge Catalyst or The Division: low-end graphics cards like an HD Graphics 4600 or the GeForce GT 720M are overwhelmed, even at low detail settings and a modest resolution of only 1280 x 720. Farming Simulator 17 is a different kettle of fish. You can play satisfactorily at medium detail settings and a resolution of 1366 x 768 on an HD Graphics 4600 GPU.

Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Very High
Very High
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Very High
Very High

Quality journalism is paid by advertising. We show the least amount of ads possible. Adblock users see more ads. Please, switch off ad blockers.

To achieve a tolerable gaming experience at 1920 x 1080 resolution with Medium presets, your rig should include nothing a real gaming GPU (a GeForce 920M or better). Somewhat more capable models like the GeForce 940M can handle the High preset. But for a combination of Full HD and the Very High preset, you'd want something at least at the level of a GeForce GTX 950M or GTX 860M.

If you want to turn the Farming Simulator at higher 3K - 4K resolutions (3840 x 2160) and the Very High presets, you'll need something like a GeForce GTX 880M or a GTX 965M for fluid gameplay. A close look at the Bechmark Table also makes it clear that the CPU can become a limiting factor on systems with leading-edge/bleeding-edge GPUs.

Farming Simulator 17
    3840x2160 High Preset AA:2xMS AF:2x     1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:4xMS AF:4x     1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS AF:2x     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1366x768 Medium Preset     1280x720 Low Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
126 (min: 117) fps ∼48%
233 (min: 224) fps ∼93%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
Asus G752VS
142 (min: 113) fps ∼54%
188 (min: 173) fps ∼75%
198 (min: 181) fps ∼80%
214 (min: 185) fps ∼80%
215 (min: 206) fps ∼80%
249 (min: 238) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 4790K
Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC
117 fps ∼45%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury, 4790K
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro
103 (min: 95) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K
Desktop PC
106 (min: 82) fps ∼40%
196 (min: 168) fps ∼78%
246 (min: 232) fps ∼99%
268 (min: 258) fps ∼100%
269 (min: 258) fps ∼100%
311 (min: 290) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
Desktop PC
103 (min: 78) fps ∼39%
199 (min: 172) fps ∼80%
248 (min: 226) fps ∼100%
267 (min: 257) fps ∼100%
268 (min: 257) fps ∼100%
308 (min: 291) fps ∼99%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference
73 (min: 45) fps ∼28%
77 (min: 72) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, 4790K
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 970 Desktop PC
76 (min: 69) fps ∼29%
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), 4790K
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
67.8 (min: 63) fps ∼26%
72 (min: 66) fps ∼29%
AMD Radeon R9 290X, 4790K
Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Tri-X OC
95 (min: 89) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
73.4 (min: 56) fps ∼28%
113 (min: 78) fps ∼45%
143 (min: 132) fps ∼58%
146 (min: 133) fps ∼54%
163 (min: 147) fps ∼61%
183 (min: 166) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
55.8 (min: 44) fps ∼21%
89.2 (min: 50) fps ∼36%
121 (min: 78) fps ∼49%
147 (min: 138) fps ∼55%
158 (min: 148) fps ∼59%
186 (min: 178) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
44 (min: 31) fps ∼17%
81.8 (min: 65) fps ∼33%
118 (min: 105) fps ∼48%
146 (min: 131) fps ∼54%
159 (min: 151) fps ∼59%
185 (min: 167) fps ∼59%
AMD Radeon R7 370, 4790K
MSI Gaming R7 370 2GB
45.1 (min: 42) fps ∼17%
53.5 (min: 49) fps ∼21%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
33.2 (min: 30) fps ∼13%
37.6 (min: 34) fps ∼15%
106 (min: 100) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
MSI GE72 965M Ti
36.9 (min: 33) fps ∼14%
82 (min: 75) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
33.6 (min: 22) fps ∼13%
63.9 (min: 50) fps ∼26%
105 (min: 82) fps ∼42%
139 (min: 123) fps ∼52%
161 (min: 142) fps ∼60%
185 (min: 179) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ
Schenker XMG A505
28.3 (min: 13) fps ∼11%
60.1 (min: 45) fps ∼24%
87.2 (min: 72) fps ∼35%
131 (min: 114) fps ∼49%
165 (min: 150) fps ∼61%
191 (min: 175) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
21.6 (min: 14) fps ∼8%
42 (min: 30) fps ∼17%
72 (min: 56) fps ∼29%
106 (min: 92) fps ∼40%
150 (min: 141) fps ∼56%
185 (min: 170) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
MSI PE60 2QD
18 (min: 15) fps ∼7%
42.8 (min: 38) fps ∼17%
65.4 (min: 59) fps ∼26%
155 (min: 147) fps ∼58%
185 (min: 179) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ
MSI CX72 6QD
22.2 (min: 20) fps ∼9%
33.5 (min: 31) fps ∼14%
86 (min: 81) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ
MSI GP62 2QD
21.8 (min: 19) fps ∼9%
34.3 (min: 31) fps ∼14%
80 (min: 76) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD
14.2 (min: 13) fps ∼6%
24.6 (min: 23) fps ∼10%
59.7 (min: 55) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M
MSI CX61-i572M
10.9 fps ∼4%
18.3 fps ∼7%
46 fps ∼17%
69.9 fps ∼22%
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
8 (min: 6) fps ∼3%
11 (min: 9) fps ∼4%
25.1 (min: 20) fps ∼9%
37.9 (min: 30) fps ∼14%
69.3 (min: 58) fps ∼22%

Overview

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Farming Simulator 17
 Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
low
1280x720
Low Preset
med.
1366x768
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
2xAF 2xMSAA
ultra
1920x1080
Very High Preset
4xAF 4xMSAA
4k
3840x2160
High Preset
2xAF 2xMSAA
 1NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
238
189.522
 2NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
220
193
179
162
179
 6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
60
160
 9NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
80
 13NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
233
126
 14NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
195
126
 15NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
249
215
198
188
142
 18NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
117
 22AMD Radeon R9 Fury
103
 24NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
311
269
246
196
106
 25AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)
184.1
152.1
141.3
90.2
89.6
 30NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)
308
268
248
199
103
 32AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)
77
73
 33NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
209.3
179.6
1623
144.54
 41NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
76
 46AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
72
67.8
 51AMD Radeon R9 290X
95
 58NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
183
163
143
113
73.4
 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
169.8
148.5
127.32
116.52
59.7
Pos      Model                                     Farming Simulator 17
lowmed.highultra4k
 66NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
113
51.1
 67NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
186
158
121
89.2
55.8
 78NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
103
46.3
 79NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
74
37.4
 83AMD Radeon R7 370
53.5
45.1
 85NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
185
159
118
81.8
44
 95AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
106
37.6
33.2
 98NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
82
36.9
 100NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
185
161
105
63.9
33.6
 102AMD Radeon HD 8970M
190
158
124
54
 114AMD Radeon Pro 460
235.5
92.3
34.7
 116NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
191
165
87.2
60.1
28.3
 123AMD Radeon Pro 555
70.2
26
22.6
 124AMD Radeon Pro 455
71.7
25.8
22.8
 125NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
234.22
174.452
83.42
56.552
17.852
 126NVIDIA GeForce MX150
193.2
150.9
73.9
51.852
22.7
 135NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
185
150
72
42
21.6
 143NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
185
155
65.4
42.8
18
 144AMD Radeon Pro 450
63.4
24.7
 223NVIDIA GeForce MX130
127
108.6
47.8
32.9
Pos      Model                                     Farming Simulator 17
lowmed.highultra4k
 224NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
129.13
83.656
35.45
23.95
 226*AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
102.5
80.3
37.3
15.6
 227NVIDIA GeForce 940M
80
34.3
21.8
 228NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
133.8
85.1
34.6
23.8
 232AMD Radeon R7 M445
64.2
42.9
16.9
10
 243*AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
63.2
47.5
22
 244AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
70
27.3
 248Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
36.8
19.9
 249NVIDIA GeForce 930M
121.2
77.2
31.1
 250*Intel Iris Graphics 550
93
34.7
20.8
 254Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
121
91
31.6
17.8
 255NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
135.7
87.3
36.7
23.8
 256Intel Iris Graphics 540
112
76
30.6
19.1
 287NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
83
50.9
22.6
 291*AMD Radeon R7 M460
95.8
62.6
24
10
 294AMD Radeon R7 M360
71.6
58.6
22.7
9.7
 296NVIDIA GeForce 920M
59.7
24.6
14.2
 300AMD Radeon R7 M440
69.7
59.3
21.1
 308AMD Radeon 520
70.8
47.1
18.3
7.6
 311Intel UHD Graphics 630
93
66
26.52
13.652
Pos      Model                                     Farming Simulator 17
lowmed.highultra4k
 312Intel HD Graphics 630
106
65
23.6
13
 314Intel HD Graphics 530
90
57
20.7
12.1
5.8
 317AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
60.3
38.4
 318Intel UHD Graphics 620
764
48.46
255
11.32
 319Intel HD Graphics 620
59.856
44.158
17.26
11.652
 351Intel HD Graphics 5600
45.5
18.1
 377AMD Radeon HD 8650G
68.2
46.4
 382NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
40.3
182
 387AMD Radeon R5 M430
66.1
43
17.3
 388AMD Radeon R5 M255
93.8
59.9
23.4
10
 393Intel HD Graphics 520
68.32
45.952
20.352
12
 394Intel Iris Graphics 6100
63.6
48.8
21
 395NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
69.9
46
18.3
10.9
 396AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
53.4
36.1
 407Intel HD Graphics 6000
58.152
32.7
18.9
 415Intel HD Graphics 4600
70.22
42.452
14.952
9.552
 417Intel HD Graphics 5500
60.7
 424*Intel HD Graphics 615
70.2
45.1
 465Intel HD Graphics 515
48
24.1
10.1
 466Intel HD Graphics 4400
49.3
27.1
8.2
Pos      Model                                     Farming Simulator 17
lowmed.highultra4k
 467*Intel HD Graphics 610
66.1
41.1
 468*Intel HD Graphics 510
70.6
41.3
 508Intel HD Graphics 4000
43
25.1
 512AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
38
24.8
 516AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
41.5
28.3
 519AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
43.5
26.4
 569Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
24.452
21.3
 571Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
20.9
5.8
 575AMD Radeon HD 7420G
42.4
26.6
 580Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
38.6
21.6
6.3
 601Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
22.6
 619Intel HD Graphics 3000
22.1
13.2
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test Systems

Desktop-PCs Platform I Platform II
Mainboard Asus Z170-A Asus Z97-Deluxe
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (Skylake) Intel Core i7-4790K (Haswell)
Graphics card Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)
Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5)
XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM)
Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5)
Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5)
MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
RAM 2x 8 GB DDR4-2133 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB)
Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OCZ Trion 150 SSD (960 GB)
Intel SSD 530 (240 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Schenker Notebooks Schenker W504 Schenker XMG A505 Schenker S413
Mainboard Intel HM87 Intel HM87 Intel HM87
Processor Intel Core i7-4700MQ (Haswell) Intel Core i7-4720HQ (Haswell) Intel Core i7-4750HQ (Haswell)
Graphics card Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB GDDR5)
GTX 970M (6 GB GDDR5)
GTX 880M (8 GB GDDR5)
GTX 870M (6 GB GDDR5)
GTX 860M Kepler (4 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
RAM 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 2x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB) Micron M600 SSD (128 GB)
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HDD (1.000 GB)
Intel SSD
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
MSI Notebooks MSI GE72 MSI PE60 MSI GP62 MSI CX61 MSI CX61
Mainboard Intel HM170 Intel HM170 Intel HM86 Intel HM86 Intel HM86
Processor Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake) Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell) Intel Celeron 2970M (Haswell) Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)
Graphics card Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 2016 (2 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3) Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3) Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB DDR3)
RAM 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133 2x 4 GB DDR4-2133 1x 8 GB DDR3-1600 1x 8 GB DDR3-1600 1x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU SSD (128 GB)
WDC WD10JPVX HDD (1.000 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 HDD (500 GB) WDC Scorpio Blue HDD (1.000 GB)
OS Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Windows 10 Windows 10 Windows 10 Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
Asus Notebooks Asus G752VS Asus N551ZU
Mainboard Intel CM236 AMD K15.1
Processor Intel Core i7-6820HK (Skylake) AMD FX-7600P (Kaveri)
Graphics cards Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)
RAM 4x 16 GB DDR4-2400 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 SSD (512 GB) Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB)
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 64 Bit
4K Monitor Nvidia Driver AMD Driver Intel Driver
2x Asus PB287Q ForceWare 375.70 Crimson 16.10.3 15.40.28.4501
Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Farming Simulator 17 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2016-11-17 (Update: 2018-05-15)