Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

The Nvidia GeForce MX110 is an entry-level graphics card for laptops that was launched at the end of 2017. It is a renamed Geforce 920MX and based on the Maxwell GM108 chip with a reduced shader count of 256.  According to our sources the TDP of 5-12 Watt and the support for DDR3 and GDDR5 is also specified.

The performance is on par with the GeForce 920MX and depends on the used graphics memory. Therefore, demanding games from 2015 may not run at all fluently or only in lowest settings. Less demanding games, like The Sims 4, should be playable in medium to high settings.

GeForce MX100 Series

GeForce MX150 compare 384 @ 1.47 - 1.53 GHz64 Bit @ 6008 MHz
GeForce MX130 compare 384 @ 1.12 - 1.24 GHz64 Bit
GeForce MX110 256 @ 0.97 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameN16V-GMR1
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines256 - unified
Core Speed965 - 993 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GameWorks
Date of Announcement01.01.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.8 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 122046     avg: 124037     median: 124036 (14%)     max: 126027 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1600     avg: 1629     median: 1641 (3%)     max: 1647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1666     avg: 1701     median: 1714 (2%)     max: 1722 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
88.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
14.6
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
22.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
37.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
28.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
80.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
15
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
12
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.5 42.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.9 25.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2 23.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
24.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
62.7 64.7 66.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 29.6 41.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.1 14.9 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.3 11.5 12.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
34.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
100.1 112.9 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.2 62.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.2 49.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.5 47.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
105.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
97.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
65.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
57.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
47.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
121.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
46.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
50.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
87 91.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.4 67.9 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 28.1 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5 15.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
65.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
89.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
90.5 95.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.9 82.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2 36.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.4 33.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
27.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
51.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
49.8
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
151.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
100.2 108.1 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.2 56.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48 49.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
123.3 137.4 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.3 71.1 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.1 48.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 21.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
161.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
124.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
84.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
111.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
81.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
284.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
87.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
55.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Horizon Zero Dawn147
F1 2020331713
Gears Tactics5116.611.1
Doom Eternal17.1
Hunt Showdown25.69.8
Red Dead Redemption 215.87.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order13.2
Need for Speed Heat20.810.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201915.19.5
GRID 20193310.8
Ghost Recon Breakpoint178
FIFA 2088.648.843.232.3
Borderlands 324.59.4
Control22.66.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms37.610.86
Rage 2197.2
Anno 180028.511.2
The Division 2259
Dirt Rally 2.040.715.6
Far Cry New Dawn2210
Metro Exodus16.46.7
Apex Legends31.112.810.5
Battlefield V30.914.211.8
Farming Simulator 1980.930.717.512.3
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey199
Forza Horizon 4331612
Shadow of the Tomb Raider258
F1 201830161312
The Crew 228.812.711.410.4
Far Cry 5221098
World of Tanks enCore17136.314.8
X-Plane 11.11422523
Kingdom Come: Deliverance24.510.27.85.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark18.38.74.9
Fortnite65301511
Star Wars Battlefront 244.312.310.59.1
Need for Speed Payback30.115.312.311.9
Call of Duty WWII54.833.116.610.6
Assassin´s Creed Origins22108
Destiny 234.317.716.213.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of War3314107
FIFA 18107595046
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)41.217.916.911.5
Team Fortress 2105.197.472.551
Dirt 465.324.613.68.1
Rocket League99.840.827.4
Prey57.822.117.114.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands27.111.29.73
For Honor47.81716.212.1
Farming Simulator 17121.777.635.424
Battlefield 146.527.813.312.1
Civilization VI50.1259.4
Overwatch89642816
Ashes of the Singularity17.710.59.2
The Division33.421.49.57.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider29.31910.99.1
Rainbow Six Siege65.743.724.120.7
World of Warships89.270.437.525.3
Dota 2 Reborn93793633
The Witcher 327.216.795.3
GTA V8673.419.66.7
Sims 4151.166.43732.1
BioShock Infinite104554918
Tomb Raider130704821
Counter-Strike: GO161.4124.384.244.9
Diablo III111.573.567.540.4
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim81.266.445.724.4
StarCraft 2284.287.555.827.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
25
21
15
6
46
9
11
1
35
10
3
30
7







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 23:37:08

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.071s ... 0.072s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.072s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.072s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8130 +0.032s ... 0.104s

#7 got single benchmarks 8130 +0.023s ... 0.126s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.836s ... 0.962s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.963s

#11 Got 254 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.98s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.98s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.052s ... 1.032s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.067s ... 3.099s

#15 return log +0.045s ... 3.144s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX110 graphics card

HP 250 G7 in review: Scrap recycling done the HP way

HP 250 G7 in review: Scrap recycling done the HP way

The HP 250 G7 offers a current Ice Lake processor, a GeForce graphics core, 8 GB of RAM, and an NVMe SSD for just under 500 Euros (~$596). The built-in display ...
Intel Core i5-1035G1 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110) Laptop Review

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110) Laptop Review

Xiaomi has now built up a proud selection of notebooks alongside its Mi smartphones. Our focus for this review is the Mi Notebook 15.6, which lacks the Pro, Air...
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
HP 15 (i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

HP 15 (i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Display disappointment. Hewlett Packard's 15.6-inch notebook features a Core i5 CPU, a fast NVMe SSD, and a dedicated GeForce MX 110 GPU with GDDR5 video RAM. U...
Intel Core i5-8250U | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Samsung Book X45: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Book X45

Asus F409JB-EK013T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus F409JB-EK013T

Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V15-IWL-81YE008DUK

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IWL-81LG00N0RU

HP 15-da1031tx: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-da1031tx

Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15IWL-81MV00B3GE

Asus X540UB-GQ491T: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus X540UB-GQ491T

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D): Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)

Asus K540UB-GQ066T: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K540UB-GQ066T

HP 15-da1014ns: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-da1014ns

HP 15-da0058ns: Intel Core i5-8250U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-da0058ns

Asus X540UB-DM024T: Intel Core i3-6006U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X540UB-DM024T

HP 250 G7-15S40ES: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » No recommendation for the HP 250 G7, wrong display choice

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce MX110 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-10-12)