Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

The Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 for laptops is a professional high-end graphics card for big and powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU106 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2070 (mobile) but with reduced shaders, clock speeds and memory bandwidth. 

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

VarianteShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile1920809451380
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q1920708701380
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304657651305
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304606001215
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU106 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 3000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM.

The high power consumption of the RTX3000 makes the card most suited for big and heavy laptops. The slower Max-Q variant is intended for thinner laptops.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 compare 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19E-Q1
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1920 - unified
Core Speed945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption80 Watt
Transistor Count10.8 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.6 pt (17%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5566     avg: 5856     median: 5923 (16%)     max: 6080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5503     avg: 5702     median: 5589 (11%)     max: 6014 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
140064 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 32163     avg: 35433     median: 36407 (34%)     max: 37729 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 62730     avg: 86865     median: 91394 (22%)     max: 106470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12693     avg: 13568     median: 13570 (20%)     max: 14442 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 13802     avg: 14842     median: 14841.5 (14%)     max: 15881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
123598 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 15944     avg: 17495     median: 17864 (22%)     max: 18307 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 17569     avg: 19467     median: 19878.5 (15%)     max: 20542 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
50309 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
54830 Points (30%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
37304 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
58.3 fps (18%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
199.4 fps (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 107     avg: 112.1     median: 110.6 (27%)     max: 120.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 99.6     avg: 112.7     median: 113.5 (17%)     max: 124.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 76.9     avg: 81     median: 82 (14%)     max: 83.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.01     avg: 46     median: 46 (12%)     max: 49 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 72.4     avg: 78.2     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 92.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 11.54     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (11%)     max: 12.13 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 113.6     avg: 118.2     median: 119.1 (48%)     max: 121 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 108.8     avg: 117.5     median: 115.5 (19%)     max: 130 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 151     avg: 157.3     median: 158 (24%)     max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 109.6     avg: 120.2     median: 121.6 (33%)     max: 128 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 160.6     avg: 204.3     median: 215.5 (24%)     max: 225.4 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 73.3     avg: 79.3     median: 80.8 (14%)     max: 82.5 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 53.9     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (10%)     max: 65.6 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 155.4     avg: 182.3     median: 189.5 (22%)     max: 194.7 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 25.76     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (9%)     max: 30.55 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 160.6     avg: 182.5     median: 186.5 (27%)     max: 196.2 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 185.8     avg: 199     median: 202.5 (23%)     max: 205.2 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 149.4     avg: 156.7     median: 157.5 (25%)     max: 162.5 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6821 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.2 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 192.4     avg: 203.6     median: 204 (12%)     max: 214 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.8     median: 99.8 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
257.8 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
384.8 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
407.8 fps (17%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1010 fps (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2754 Samples/s (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5769 Samples/s (10%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8716 points (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 135.5     avg: 143.8     median: 143 (31%)     max: 153 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.3523     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (36%)     max: 0.4354 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 30.7     avg: 38.9     median: 41.2 (66%)     max: 44.7 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
226.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1920x1080
219.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
213.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
174.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
88  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
274.9 303.2 ~ 289 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
182.7 202.8 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.3 117 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.9 59 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
325.9 349.5 ~ 338 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
288.2 294.1 ~ 291 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
266.8 275.2 ~ 271 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
140.3 148.4 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2019102928473
Total War: Three Kingdoms226.5107.769.246
Far Cry New Dawn114918677
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey96776239
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1351008879
X-Plane 11.1111410286
Rocket League219.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider213.9174.699.483
Dota 2 Reborn14213013212188
The Witcher 328919310956
BioShock Infinite338291271144
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
6


6
4


8
3

3
4
2





1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 04. 08:37:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:34:58 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9854 +0.032s ... 0.072s

#8 got single benchmarks 9854 +0.018s ... 0.09s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.853s ... 0.943s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.943s

#12 Got 49 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.948s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.948s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.955s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.105s ... 1.06s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.064s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad P73 Laptop Review: Big workstation slowed down by poor heat management

Lenovo ThinkPad P73 Laptop Review: Big workstation slowed down by poor heat management

The highest level of performance – that is what the Lenovo ThinkPad P70 stands for. The recent Lenovo ThinkPad P73 contains Intel "Coffee Lake Refresh" CPUs and...
Intel Core i7-9850H | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) | 17.30" | 3.5 kg
MSI WE75 9TK Workstation Review: Core i7 with Quadro RTX Power

MSI WE75 9TK Workstation Review: Core i7 with Quadro RTX Power

The MSI WE75 workstation is based off of the versatile GE75 chassis and yet it is missing many of the options found on the latter. What's here is great, but we ...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) | 17.30" | 2.6 kg

Getac X600: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Getac X600

Fujitsu Celsius H7510, i9-10885H RTX 3000: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu Celsius H7510, i9-10885H RTX 3000

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-75FQ: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-75FQ

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T-XH99: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T-XH99

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN517-71P-76BZ: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN517-71P-76BZ

HP ZBook 17 G6-6TV00EA: Intel Core i9-9880H, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook 17 G6-6TV00EA

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE: Intel Core i7-9850H, 17.30", 3.5 kg
   » ThinkPad P73 has a problem with the fan control – Lenovo is working on a solution

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-13)