Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T1000

The Nvidia T1000 is a professional desktop graphics card for small entry-level workstations. It is based on the same TU117 Turing chip as the consumer GeForce GTX1650. The number of shader units is also identical at 896. With 8 GB VRAM, the Nvidia T1000 however offers more VRAM, which is still connected via a 128 bit memory bus. The power consumption of the Nvidia T1000 is only rated at 50 watts and therefore does not require an additional power connection.

The professional graphics cards offer certified drivers which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospecting, visualization applications). As a result, the performance in these areas is significantly better compared to consumer graphics cards with the same chip.

In contrast to the more powerful RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), they do not offer ray tracing and tensor cores. The Turing architecture has also seen significant improvements at the CUDA core level. Float and INT operations can now be executed simultaneously, the cache has been standardized and improved and adaptive shading has been introduced. As a result, Nvidia claims up to 50% higher performance per core compared to Pascal.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines896 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs32
Core Speed1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Memory Speed10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption50 Watt
Transistor Count4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
technology12 nm
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a
Date of Announcement06.05.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.2 pt (9%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3534 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3088 Points (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
179865 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
37881 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
50553 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
8124 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8450 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
237130 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
12953 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
11793 Points (9%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
39668 Points (22%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
78565 Points (86%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
39.3 fps (11%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
18.1 fps (3%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
78.1 fps (27%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
37.3 fps (18%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
44 fps (12%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
13.4 fps (9%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
62.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
43.3 fps (19%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
27.4 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6837 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
386 fps (9%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
31.9 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
38611 points (10%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
36031 points (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1987 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6369 points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.9 Watt (14%)
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
156.8 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.1 fps per Watt (0%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
98.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
34
low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
253.6
low 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
63
low 1920x1080
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
77.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
11.7
low 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
75.9
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
108.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
198.6
low 1920x1080
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
139.9
low 1920x1080
125.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
176.5
low 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
77.7
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
68.4
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
90.5
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
226  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
71
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
med. 1920x1080
high 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
246.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
217.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
188.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
113.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
63.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
74.2
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
187.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
187.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
185.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 28. 00:34:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:37:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.032s ... 0.069s

#8 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.01s ... 0.078s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +3.884s ... 3.963s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 3.963s

#12 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 3.974s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 3.974s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 3.989s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.182s ... 4.172s

#16 return log +0.014s ... 4.186s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-12-27)