Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

The Nvidia Quadro P3200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. As the slightly faster Quadro P4000, it is based on the GP104 chip and uses 1792 CUDA cores. The memory bus however is slightly narrower at 192 versus 256 Bit. The clock rate should be similar, as Nvidia also specifies 5.3 TFLOPs of peak performance.

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The performance should be slightly below the older Quadro P4000, due to the same peak performance of the shaders but a slower memory bus. Compared to the old Quadro M3000M, the P3200 should offer a 93% better overall performance in SpecViewPerf 12.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P3200 is 75 Watts TGP (including memory)  and therefore similar to the Quadro P3000.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro P Series
Quadro P5200 (compare) 2560 @ 1316 - 1569 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 (compare) 2304 256 Bit @ 7800 MHz
Quadro P5000 (compare) 2048 @ 1164 - 1506 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q (compare) 2048 @ 1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 (compare) 1792 @ 1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q (compare) 1792 @ 1113 - 1240 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 1792 @ 708 - 1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 (compare) 1280 @ 1088 - 1215 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q (compare) 1280 @ 1075 - 1240 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 (compare) 768 @ 1215 - 1468 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q (compare) 768 @ 1215 - 1468 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 (compare) 512 @ 1493 - 1519 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 (compare) 512 @ 1177 - 1442 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN18E-Q1
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines1792 - unified
Core Speed708 - 1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7008 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory6084 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
technology16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.02.2017

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 3979     avg: 4397.3     median: 4508 (33%)     max: 4593 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 3732     avg: 4155.3     median: 4356 (30%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 109402     avg: 115672     median: 115672 (16%)     max: 121942 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 30100     avg: 33023     median: 34178 (55%)     max: 34702 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 57501     avg: 76643.2     median: 82506 (45%)     max: 84059 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 10128     avg: 10881.2     median: 11058 (41%)     max: 11116 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 11316     avg: 12245.8     median: 12554 (31%)     max: 12558 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 47258     avg: 93497     median: 110415 (15%)     max: 122818 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 14244     avg: 14898.2     median: 15085 (43%)     max: 15178 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 14673     avg: 16233     median: 16619 (33%)     max: 17021 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 57     avg: 60     median: 59 (36%)     max: 63 fps
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1842     avg: 2052.4     median: 2170 (41%)     max: 2206 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 3612     avg: 4038.2     median: 4192 (39%)     max: 4383 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
199  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
98 120 122 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66 79 80 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62 74 74