Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

NVIDIA Quadro P3200

The Nvidia Quadro P3200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. As the slightly faster Quadro P4000, it is based on the GP104 chip and uses 1792 CUDA cores. The memory bus however is slightly narrower at 192 versus 256 Bit. The clock rate should be similar, as Nvidia also specifies 5.3 TFLOPs of peak performance.

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The performance should be slightly below the older Quadro P4000, due to the same peak performance of the shaders but a slower memory bus. Compared to the old Quadro M3000M, the P3200 should offer a 93% better overall performance in SpecViewPerf 12.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P3200 is 75 Watts TGP (including memory)  and therefore similar to the Quadro P3000.

Quadro P Series

Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenameN18E-Q1
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines1792 - unified
Core Speed708 - 1202 - 1228 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7008 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory5.9 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption78 Watt
technology16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.02.2017

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.7 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3979     avg: 4397     median: 4508.5 (13%)     max: 4593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 109402     avg: 115672     median: 115672 (15%)     max: 121942 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 30100     avg: 33023     median: 34178 (37%)     max: 34702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 57501     avg: 76643     median: 82506.5 (22%)     max: 84059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 10128     avg: 10881     median: 11058 (20%)     max: 11116 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 11316     avg: 12246     median: 12554.5 (14%)     max: 12558 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 47258     avg: 93497     median: 110415 (13%)     max: 122818 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 14244     avg: 14898     median: 15085.5 (21%)     max: 15178 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 14673     avg: 16233     median: 16619 (14%)     max: 17021 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 24576     avg: 29207     median: 29206.5 (38%)     max: 33837 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 57.1     avg: 60     median: 59.9 (20%)     max: 63 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 102     avg: 130.4     median: 139.5 (35%)     max: 148.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 108.4     avg: 124.1     median: 126.3 (19%)     max: 134.5 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 58.5     avg: 59.1     median: 59 (13%)     max: 59.9 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.68     avg: 46.2     median: 47.1 (12%)     max: 48.7 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 9.04     avg: 10.2     median: 10.5 (9%)     max: 10.72 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 97.2     avg: 106.4     median: 107.1 (43%)     max: 112.6 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 105.1     avg: 117.3     median: 121.8 (20%)     max: 126.8 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 204.4     avg: 228.8     median: 233.7 (26%)     max: 243.5 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 27.49     avg: 31.6     median: 30.4 (6%)     max: 37.93 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.39     avg: 12.6     median: 8.5 (3%)     max: 25.15 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6739     avg: 6793     median: 6819 (5%)     max: 6822 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 148.3     avg: 167.8     median: 172 (10%)     max: 179.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.7     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1842     avg: 2052     median: 2170 (10%)     max: 2206 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3612     avg: 4038     median: 4192 (7%)     max: 4383 Samples/s
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 86     avg: 118.6     median: 127.1 (28%)     max: 134 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3171     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (36%)     max: 0.536 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 35.7     avg: 41.1     median: 39.5 (63%)     max: 49.5 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
199  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
98 120 122 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66 79 80 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62 74 74 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59 70 70 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100 101 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86 86 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72 73 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
133.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
230.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
172.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
147.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
212.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
143.7 180.9 181.7 182 189 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122.3 139.7 144 146.3 148.7 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.4 84.6 85.2 86 86.3 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.8 71.1 72.1 73 74 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
184.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
226.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
129.6 140 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
121.2 131 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114.7 123 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.8 117 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
187.6 208.9 218.6 219.1 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137.5 141 148.2 149 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.6 82.2 85 86 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.6 45.4 46.1 46.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
284.9 306.9 ~ 296 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
246.5 265.1 ~ 256 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
231.5 246 ~ 239 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112.3 114.2 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey89655640
Forza Horizon 4147958872
Shadow of the Tomb Raider129635749
F1 201819912910366
Far Cry 5113757066
X-Plane 11.111018673
Ghost Recon Wildlands133.7726636.8
For Honor230.5109.6104.784
Battlefield 1172.5147.597.289
The Division212.9152113.686.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider175140847127.6
Rainbow Six Siege184.1226.7145.1111.3
Dota 2 Reborn135126119112
Batman: Arkham Knight140127895929
The Witcher 3209144834528.2
BioShock Infinite296256239113
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
13


7
9

2
12
2

5
10



3


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 22:59:44

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8764 +0.046s ... 0.097s

#7 got single benchmarks 8764 +0.018s ... 0.115s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.758s ... 0.873s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.873s

#11 Got 113 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.883s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.883s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.892s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.613s ... 1.505s

#15 return log +0.04s ... 1.545s

Model (Max-P) Cores TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 2560 8.9
Quadro P4200 2304 7.6
Quadro P3200 1792 5.3
Quadro P2000 768 2.5
Quadro P1000 512 1.6
Quadro P600 384 1.2
Quadro P500 256 0.5
Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter