Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

The AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire (also known as CF or CrossFireX) is a combination of two high-end graphics cards for big and heavy laptops. Usually, each single R9 M290X renders a single frame in an alternating manner. Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low frame rates below 30 FPS due to staggering timespans between two frames (e.g., irregular delays between sequential frames). Compared to the Radeon HD 8970M CF, the R9 M290X CF offers exactly the same amount of shaders and the same clock rates.

The R9 M290X is based on the desktop HD 7870 Pitcairn chip with 1280 1D shaders and 80 texture units. The GCN (graphics core next) architecture supports DirectX 12 (FL 11_1) and OpenGL 4.3. More information on the features of the single R9 M290X can be found on the GPU page.

Performance

The Performance of two R9 M290X GPUs in Crossfire mode is just slightly below the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M SLI, but cannot compete with the GTX 880M SLI. Regardless, modern and demanding games like Battlefield 4 or Metro Last Light are still playable in high resolutions and max. settings with anti-aliasing.

Features

Features of the M290X include the new UVD3 video decoder for decoding MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, Flash, Multi-View Codec (MVC) and MPEG-4 part 2 (DivX, xVid) HD videos directly from the AMD GPU.

The M290 series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, each M290X can directly support up to 6 connected monitors using Eyefinity Technology if Enduro is disabled.

Other features of the M290 series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off. Power Gating, however, is not supported according to AMD. PowerTune allows automatic overclocking and underclocking of the graphics card as long as the GPU is within its TDP range. For example, the chip may be underclocked when running FurMark and OCCT, but will overclock in certain games like Lost Planet, Crysis or Resident Evil 5.

The integrated HD audio processor is able to transmit HD Audio (TrueHD or DTS Master Audio) over HDMI and DisplayPort (e.g., for Blu-Ray videos). Additionally, it now allows audio to output simultaneously and in parallel to multiple devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio (DDMA) feature.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the CF combination is very high (2x 100 Watt) and thus only suited for very large desktop replacement laptops.

Radeon R9 M200 Series

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire 2560 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M295X compare 2048 @ 0.85 GHz256 Bit @ 5448 MHz
Radeon R9 M290X compare 1280 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M280X compare 896 @ 0.9 - 1 GHz128 Bit @ 5500 MHz
Radeon R9 M275 compare 640 @ 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M270 compare 640 @ 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M265X compare 640 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameNeptune CF
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines2560 - unified
Core Speed850 - 900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4800 MHz
Memory Bus Width2x 256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2x 4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption200 Watt
Transistor Count0 Billion
technology28 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2014

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4 pt (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
22183 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
71977 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
8176 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
10551 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
284150 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
11503 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
14147 Points (11%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
32792 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
37644 Points (21%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
122.1 fps (40%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
150 fps (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
51.3 fps (13%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
14.5 fps (2%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
33.8 fps (6%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
17.7 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
41 fps (11%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
2.3 fps (2%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
48.5 fps (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
90.9 fps (30%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100.4 fps (6%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
53.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
152.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
120.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
98  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
67  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
50.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
119.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
116.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
192.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
134  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
97.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
80.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
173.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
145.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
379.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
353.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
295.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
127.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
120.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
86.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
106.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
102.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
73.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
62.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
52.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Thief60.357.35752.1
X-Plane 10.2570.843.121.517
Call of Duty: Ghosts53.250.137.427.1
Battlefield 4152.4132.2120.677.2
F1 2013118989686
Saints Row IV6755.950.248.6
Dota 2119.2116.6109.6
GRID 2192.9134119108.3
Metro: Last Light97.491.980.352.6
BioShock Infinite173.4152.6145.585
Tomb Raider379.1353.2295.9127.2
Crysis 3120.8107.786.638
Far Cry 3106.6102.681.354.1
Hitman: Absolution73.869.762.259.5
Guild Wars 252.236.332.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
8
5

4
6
4
1
4
6
3
2
7
5
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 13. 16:27:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:41:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5445 +0.042s ... 0.09s

#8 got single benchmarks 5445 +0.009s ... 0.099s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.618s ... 0.717s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.717s

#12 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.724s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.724s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.744s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.151s ... 0.895s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 0.901s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter