Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M265X

AMD Radeon R9 M265X

The 28 nm AMD Radeon R9 M265X is an mid-range notebook graphics card based on the GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture. It was introduced in Spring of 2014 and supports up to DirectX 12 (FL 11_1). The underlying "Cape Verde" GPU features 640 unified shaders, a core clock of 625 MHz and a 128-Bit memory interface with 2 or 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 1000 MHz (4000 MHz effective).

Architecture

The "Cape Verde" GPU codename is based on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture and is processed in a 28 nm lithography. The GCN architecture features 10 processing units for a total of 640 stream processors. In addition, the AMD Radeon R9 M265X sports 40 texture units, 64 Z/Stencil ROP units, 16 color ROP units and a 512 KB L2 read/write cache.

The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is compatible with the lastest PCIe  3.0 Standard.

Performance

Depending on the clock rate (and maybe benefits from Boost), the AMD Radeon M265X ranks in the mid-range of mobile graphics cards as of mid 2014. Performance is sligthly above a GeForce 840M and a GeForce 940M. As a result, this AMD GPU can run current titles smoothly up to 900p with medium to high settings. Graphical settings will have to be reduced significantly when playing very demanding titles like Crysis 3 or Far Cry 3.

Features

A well-known feature of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X includes the “Eyefinity“ technology, which allows the user to connect up to 6 displays simultaneously. For notebooks, however, this feature is almost always limited by the number of available display ports.

The mid-range GPU also supports the “Enduro” technology for power efficiency, which is the counterpart to Nvidia's “Optimus”. While idle or in low load scenarios (Office, Internet, etc.), the system will deactivate the dGPU in favor of the more low-power integrated GPU.

The M265X also features the “Mantle” graphics API for gamers. This programming interface has been developed by the manufacturer as an alternative to Direct3D or OpenGL. Example titles with Mantle support include Battlefield 4, Thief, and The Sims 4 with more to come in the future.

With “App Acceleration”, AMD has also equipped the Radeon R9 M265X with technology for improving video quality and increasing application performance. However, support for OpenCL, DirectCompute, or DirectX video acceleration (DXVA) is required in order to use all described functions.

Power Consumption

With a TDP of about 35 to 40 Watt, the power consumption of the AMD Radeon R9 M265X ranges between the 840M (about 30 Watt) and the GTX 850M (~40 to 45 Watt). Thus, the graphics card is best suitable for 15-inch notebooks. Under low loads, automatic underclocking can save energy. When idle, the Enduro software can completely deactivate the card for additional power savings.

Radeon R9 M200 Series

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire compare 2560 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M295X compare 2048 @ 0.85 GHz256 Bit @ 5448 MHz
Radeon R9 M290X compare 1280 @ 0.85 - 0.9 GHz256 Bit @ 4800 MHz
Radeon R9 M280X compare 896 @ 0.9 - 1 GHz128 Bit @ 5500 MHz
Radeon R9 M275 compare 640 @ 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M270 compare 640 @ 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M265X 640 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameVenus Pro
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed625 MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1.5 Billion
technology28 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2014

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.9 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10995     avg: 12639     median: 12510 (3%)     max: 13923 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14953     avg: 15435     median: 15426 (20%)     max: 15926 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
57.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
67.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
80.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
49.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
high 1366x768
76.8 84.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46 46.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
med. 1366x768
81.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.4 47.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3 29.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare