Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M is a high-end laptop graphics card that was announced at Computex 2011. It is based on the new GF116 core as part of the Fermi architecture. Therefore, it supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0. Compared to its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 460M, the 560M offers higher clock speeds without a large increase in power demand.

The GF116 core is essentially an optimized GF106 core with the same features. The chip offers 192 shaders and a 192 Bit memory bus for GDDR5. More details on the GF106 architecture can be found in the GeForce GTX 460M article.

The performance of the GeForce GTX 560M is compareable to the older GeForce GTX 480M. In our tests (see benchmarks below), the GTX 560M was on average 13% faster than the old GTX 460M. As a result, only very demanding games (e.g., Crysis 1, Crysis 2, Dirt 3 and Metro 2033) are not fluently playable at highest settings and Full HD resolution with Anti Aliasing. Most other current and older games can be played with maxed out settings as of 2011. See at the end of this page for detailled gaming benchmarks of many current games.

As the GeForce GTX 460M, the 560M supports Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. Similar to the Radeon HD 5850, the GTX 460M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream-wise without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GTX560M offers PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). The X500 tester was able to decode the VC-1 encoded Elephants Dream video with about 3-6% CPU load (according to the task manager). The H.264 coded Big Buck Bunny video was played back with 1-3% CPU load (both 1080p videos).

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g., Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GTX 560M can be of use in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can encode videos considerably faster than can many modern CPUs. 

3D Vision enables the laptop to send 3D content (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D-enabled screen or an external 3D TV if supported by the laptop manufacturer. 

The power consumption of the GeForce GTX 560M should be about 75 Watt (TDP including the MXM board and memory), which is about the same level of the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 - 5870. If not under load, the chip is clocked at 50/100 MHz (chip/shader) and 200/400 MHz in 2D mode and 3D mode, respectively, to save power. Furthermore, the 500M series supports Optimus to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card from Intel and the Nvidia GPU. However, whether this feature is included or not is dependent on the notebook manufacturer.

The similarly named desktop GeForce GTX 560Ti is based on the GF114 chip and offers more shader cores and significantly higher performance than the GTX 560M. The GTX 550Ti is based on the GF116 and is closer to the 560M in terms of performance, but it still features relatively higher clock speeds. Therefore, the performance of the 560M is more on par with the older desktop GeForce GTS 450.

GeForce GTX 500M Series

GeForce GTX 580M SLI compare 768 @ 0.62 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 560M SLI compare 384 @ 0.78 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 580M compare 384 @ 0.62 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 570M compare 336 @ 0.58 GHz192 Bit @ 1150 MHz
GeForce GTX 560M 192 @ 0.78 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN12E-GS
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed775 MHz
Shader Speed1550 MHz
Memory Speed1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1.2 Billion
technology40 nm
FeaturesCUDA, PhysX, PureVideo HD VP4
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement30.05.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1924     avg: 2052     median: 2031 (3%)     max: 2255 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1777     avg: 1843     median: 1820 (2%)     max: 2009 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 8223     avg: 9230     median: 9300 (3%)     max: 10013 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 7802     avg: 7999     median: 8003.5 (5%)     max: 8096 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 37816     avg: 38532     median: 38157 (20%)     max: 40369 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 21436     avg: 22649     median: 22198 (24%)     max: 24374 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 13838     avg: 15141     median: 15327 (20%)     max: 15844 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 26.9     avg: 27.6     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 29.3 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2.32     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (1%)     max: 2.34 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.81     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.82 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 1.05     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.06 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.47     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 8.17 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 19     avg: 19.3     median: 19.4 (9%)     max: 19.38 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (91%)     max: 7.2 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 5.7     avg: 6.9     median: 7.2 (91%)     max: 7.2 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4971     avg: 5457     median: 5407 (4%)     max: 6028 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 37.6     avg: 40.8     median: 40 (14%)     max: 45.18 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
62.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
67.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
172.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
69.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
64.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
70.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
156.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
208.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
72.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
72 74.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
48.3 49.3 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
37 37.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.5 19.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
129  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
402.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
282.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
208.3 218.2 220.1 ~ 216 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
140.8 143.7 145.5 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
139  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
101  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
76 78 80 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32 32 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
165.9 176.8 ~ 171 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
71.4 71.7 72.8 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27 27.2 27.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
186.6 201.7 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
118.9 124.1 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
81.4 82.3 85 85 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22 22.6 23 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
115.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
79.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
58.2 59.4 60.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.4 20.1 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
123.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
100.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
85.4 90 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.2 64 64.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
369.9 461.7 629 ~ 487 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
281.6 308 320.8 ~ 303 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
227.7 238.7 241 ~ 236 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
132.8 149 151.4 151.9 194.4 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
108.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
83  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
68.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 41.6 41.7 49 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
234.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
86.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
67.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.7 35 35.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
96.6 136 ~ 116 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
58.2 85.2 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
28.2 30.6 35.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9 11 14.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
118.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
66 67.5 69.8 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32 34.3 34.4 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
194.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
95.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
78.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2 51.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
118.6 122.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
65.6 75.8 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.5 50.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.3 31 33.4 34.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
143.5 147.7 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
102.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.6 57.4 57.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
80.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
68.9 107.7 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.4 81.2 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 49.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
71.6 135.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
65.3 105.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
57.9 68 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.5 47 48.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
137.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
109.2  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
98.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
235.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
157.7  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
127.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
ultra 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
89.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
62.2 64.5 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8 14.9 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
144.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
60.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
70.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
228.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Max Payne 362.158.418.815
Dirt Showdown67.86360.523
Diablo III172.399.961.344.2
Risen 2: Dark Waters69.945.637.917.5
Mass Effect 36059.844
Alan Wake64.942.216.2
Star Wars: The Old Republic70.248.532
Anno 2070156.365.741.220.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim5955.440.821.3
CoD: Modern Warfare 3208.6111.372.144.5
Battlefield 373493717
Batman: Arkham City1291115121
Fifa 12402.3282.6216143
F1 20111391017833
Deus Ex Human Revolution1717227
Dirt 31941228323
Crysis 2115.679.36020
Call of Duty: Black Ops123.4100.18863
Fifa 11487303236156
Mafia 2108.58368.343
StarCraft 2234.986.267.935
Metro 2033116723112
Battlefield: Bad Company 2118.190.76834
CoD Modern Warfare 2194.995.478.352
Risen121714832
Resident Evil 5146102.457
Need for Speed Shift80.1886449
Colin McRae: DIRT 2103856345
Anno 140452
Sims 378
Racedriver: GRID137.1109.298.6
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare235.6157.7127.8
Supreme Commander - FA Bench43.3
Crysis - GPU Benchmark12789.56315
Crysis - CPU Benchmark144.39460.114.1
World in Conflict - Benchmark32
Call of Juarez Benchmark70.7
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark228.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
13
18

5
19
4
1
9
20
4
14
16
1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 03:47:27

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2481 +0.015s ... 0.054s

#7 got single benchmarks 2481 +0.055s ... 0.109s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.477s ... 0.587s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.587s

#11 Got 225 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.604s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.604s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.631s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.137s ... 1.767s

#15 return log +0.039s ... 1.807s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M graphics card

 

Review Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C 3D Notebook

Display Update. The small sister, X770-10J, with a weak HD+ display: dull colors and restricted viewing angles. Has Toshiba built in a first-class panel in the ...
Intel Core i7-2670QM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | 17.30" | 3.6 kg
 

Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7272 Laptop Review

Like A Rock. Toshiba’s Qosmio X775-Q7272 might epitomize everything that comes with its 17.3-inch form factor, but solid build quality and impressive specificat...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | 17.30" | 3 kg
 

Review Update Asus G74SX Notebook

G74 reloaded. After already having taken a closer look at a US variant of the Asus benchmark gaming notebook several months ago, we are now providing a review u...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | 17.30" | 4.6 kg
 

Review Toshiba Qosmio X770-10J Notebook

Bird of Paradise. Never an easy feat for a laptop to stand out of the crowd of gaming notebooks, but Toshiba's Qosmio X770-10J pulls it off. The 17 inch noteboo...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | 17.30" | 3.6 kg
 

Review Asus G74SX-3DE Gaming Notebook

New strengths. The new Asus G74 was already seen at the Cebit this year in Hanover, even if as a mock-up. It also hardened initial suspicions regarding the use ...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | 17.30" | 4.6 kg

SCHENKER XMG P501 PRO: Intel Core i7-2720QM, 15.60", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Schenker XMG P501 PRO Notebook

Asus G74SX-3DE: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  Review » Preview: Asus G74SX 3D Gaming Notebook under Review

MSI GT780R: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  Review » Review MSI GT780R Notebook

Sony Vaio SV-T13114GXX: Intel Core i5-3317U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-T13114GXX

MSI GT683-281PL: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT683-281PL

Asus G74SX-TY321V: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-TY321V

Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7170: Intel Core i5-2450M, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7170

Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7380 : Intel Core i5-2430M, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7380

Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C

Toshiba Qosmio X770-136: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X770-136

Medion Erazer X7813: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X7813

Medion Erazer X6817-MD97891: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X6817-MD97891

Asus G74SX-91013Z: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-91013Z

Clevo P150HM: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Clevo P150HM

Toshiba Qosmio X770-10M: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X770-10M

Asus G74SX-91085V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-91085V

Medion ERAZER X7813-MD97852: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30"
  External Review » Medion ERAZER X7813-MD97852

MSI GT780-203PL: Intel Core i5-2410M, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT780-203PL

Asus G53SX-DH71: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G53SX-DH71

Medion Erazer X7813-MD97895: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X7813-MD97895

Asus G74SX-TY032V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-TY032V

Asus G74SX-BBK8: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-BBK8

Medion Erazer X6817 (MD97892): Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X6817 (MD97892)

Asus G74SX-91020V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-91020V

MSI GT780R-012US: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT780R-012US

Asus G53SX-A1: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G53SX-A1

MSI GT683R-i71691BLW7U: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GT683R-i71691BLW7U

Asus G53SX-SZ064V: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G53SX-SZ064V

Toshiba Qosmio X770-10J: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X770-10J

MSI GT780R-i71215BLW7P: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT780R-i71215BLW7P

Asus G74SX-A1: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-A1

Asus G53SX-SZ019V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G53SX-SZ019V

Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7272: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7272

MSI GT683R-289US: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT683R-289US

Asus G74SX-TZ078V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-TZ078V

Asus G74SX-A2: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-A2

Asus G74SX-91079V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-91079V

Asus G74SX-TZ024V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-TZ024V

Asus G74SX-BBK7: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-BBK7

Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7270: Intel Core i5-2410M, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X775-Q7270

Toshiba Qosmio X775-3DV78: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X775-3DV78

Asus G74SX-3DE: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Asus G74SX-3DE

SCHENKER XMG P501 PRO: Intel Core i7-2720QM, 15.60", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Schenker XMG P501 PRO

MSI GT780R: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT780R

Toshiba Qosmio X770-107: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 4.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X770-107

MSI GT683R-242US: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT683R-242US

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter