Notebookcheck Logo

Review Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C 3D Notebook

Display Update. The small sister, X770-10J, with a weak HD+ display: dull colors and restricted viewing angles. Has Toshiba built in a first-class panel in the more expensive 3D model?
Qosmio X770-11C: Has Toshiba replaced the poor quality HD+ panel of the 10J with a Full HD panel with more contrast?
Qosmio X770-11C: Has Toshiba replaced the poor quality HD+ panel of the 10J with a Full HD panel with more contrast?

In September 2011 we took a look at the Toshiba gaming flagship the X770. At that time we picked the small, "affordable" X770-10J with Core i7 2630QM, GeForce GTX 560M and a HD+ screen (1600x900 pixel resolution) as our test model. The picture quality of the otherwise perfect gaming notebook was disappointing (TruBrite HD+). A low contrast of 205:1 and poor viewing angles - this is not what a 1,300 Euros high-end gaming laptop should offer. 

The X770-10J has been discontinued. The HD+ X770-11D and X770-123 have taken its place and these new models are equipped with a faster CPU: the Core i7 2670QM. We are interested in the Full HD configuration (1920x1080, TruBrite FHD) of the 17.3 inch 3D-ready Qosmio X770-11C. 1,400 Euros is a high price to pay for this model. So does the buyer get a first-class display for his money?

This update covers the display and the processor performance (new Core i7-2670QM - 4x2.20GHz). In addition, we will also cover battery life and emissions. For details about the input devices and the case of the laptop, we refer the reader to the Qosmio X770-10J review.


The new Qosmio has a native resolution of 1920x1080 pixels (X770-10J - 1600x900 pixels). This is a must for all multimedia fans and the in-built Blu-Ray drive is a pleasant bonus. This 17.3 inch test model is reflective but that should not be a problem indoors. The panel is manufactured by Samsung (SEC5044-173HT02-T01) whereas the HD+ panel of last year's X770 test model came from AU Optronics (B173RW01 V3 / AUO139E).

Does the Full HD panel cover the professional sRGB color room? The 3D panel comes close to covering the sRGB color room. On the bright side, the display can show more colors in the yellow region. The HD+ version (X770-10J and other models) beat the FHD panel of our test model clearly: the color grid covers more area (see the third picture). The gaming flagship of Asus, the G74SX-3DE, is slightly better in this area.

X770-11C FHD vs. AdobeRGB
X770-11C FHD vs. AdobeRGB
X770-11C FHD vs. sRGB
X770-11C FHD vs. sRGB
X770-11C FHD vs. X770-10J HD+
X770-11C FHD vs. X770-10J HD+
X770-11C FHD vs. Asus G74SX-3DE FHD
X770-11C FHD vs. Asus G74SX-3DE FHD
Emitter built in for Nvidia 3D Vision
Emitter built in for Nvidia 3D Vision
Nvidia Shutter glasses (2. Generation)
Nvidia Shutter glasses (2. Generation)

We want to take a look at the Shutter glasses and 3D option of the X770-11C. The laptop package includes a pair of active Shutter glasses (second generation). The TFT panel has a frequency of 120 Hz (typically TFTs: 60 Hz). The 3D effect is nothing new thanks to Nvidia 3D Vision, but it does make gaming more enjoyable, especially when running a strong graphics card like the GeForce GTX 560M. The performance of the graphics card is the deciding factor for 3D gaming as it has to process two half pictures (right and left eye). This halves the frame rates of games. 

In our extensive test of Nvidia 3D Vision, we presented the technology and its dis-/advantages. We recommend the readers to take a look at it: Nvidia 3D Vision

Distribution of brightness
Samsung SEC5044-173HT02-T01 tested with Gossen Mavo-Monitor
Maximum: 164 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 155.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 162 cd/m²
Contrast: 736:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
The picture border remains a satisfying black even when looking from the side. This indicates a high contrast.
The picture border remains a satisfying black even when looking from the side. This indicates a high contrast.

We can tell at first glance that the manufacturer did not cut costs with the display and has given the test model a TFT panel with good contrast. The black value of 0.22 cd/m² at the highest brightness level confirms our suspicion: the contrast is 736:1. The screen of our test model displays intense colors whereas the HD+ panel of the X770-10J has dull colors (contrast of 205:1).

The brightness of the panel is lower than that of the HD+ panel (213 cd/m²). The average illumination is 155 cd/m². Thankfully, the illumination has become more balanced. Instead of 74%, we measured 86%. This means that the user will not be able to distinguish patches with different brightness on the panel.

Glare Type (not anti-glare) and low brightness mean that the X770 is confined indoors. The laptop is far too dark even in the shadows. The satisfying colors are not able to have the proper affect. A matte TFT surface would not have been better as the brightness is too low.

Qosmio X770-11C FHD 3D -
Qosmio X770-11C FHD 3D -
The dark panel is not meant for outdoors use.
The dark panel is not meant for outdoors use.
In direct sunlight, the reflections are very clear.
In direct sunlight, the reflections are very clear.

The viewing angles are quite wide and allow the notebook to be used for gaming, watching movies or TV with friends. A second or third viewer can look from the side or from above and does not suffer from ghost images. However, looking at the screen from below, will invert the colors. This is what separates the best notebook TFTs from the ordinary ones. 

Poor viewing angles are the norm for laptops. A high-quality and expensive model should not have such poor viewing angles. Thankfully, the manufacturer made the right decision in picking the Samsung panel.

Viewing angles of the Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C
Viewing angles of the Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C (FHD 3D)


Toshiba has picked a fitting quad-core processor from the latest Intel line-up: the Sandy Bridge generation. The Intel Core i7 2670QM runs all four cores at 2.2 GHz and performs higher than the 2630QM of the X770-10J (first test model). 

The CPU can be boosted from its standard 2.2 GHz to a maximum of 3.1 GHz (2630QM Turbo up to 2.9 GHz.). This much performance needs a lot of power and means shorter battery life. 

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 is deactivated (without a BIOS option), which means that the GeForce GTX 560M is solely responsible for the video output (no Optimus switchable graphics). This is different from the 10J model which uses the 2630QM and employs the IGP graphics. When needed, the laptop switched to the GTX 560M. 

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM SPD
Systeminfo GPUZ GTX 560M
HWinfo Zusammenfassung
DPC Latenzen Idle sporadisch Verzögerungen
System information - Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C


The 2670QM can leave the lower speed 2630QM far behind in processing power. The Cinebench R11.5 64 bit score of the CPU is 5.34 points. This is at the same level as the high-end processor: i7 2820QM (Alienware M17x R3 GTX 580M). The 2630QM of the X770-10J has only 80% of this performance. 

Of all the 2670QM test models (for example, MSI GT780DX-i71691BLW7H or HP Pavilion dv7-6c07eg) the X770-11c performs best in the CPU benchmarks: both in Single-Core benchmarks (SuperPi 32M: 3% better than the Pavilion dv7-6c07eg) and Multi-Core benchmarks (Wprime 1024m: 11% faster than the dv7-6c07eg). The 2670QM test models perform almost identically in the Cinebench R10 Multi (64 bit) benchmark.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4855 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
18076 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
5873 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
41.32 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.34 Points
PCMark 7: 3,217 points
PCMark 7: 3,217 points

System Performance

The extremely expensive Sandy Bridge XM processors offer the highest performance in the laptop world. However, in comparison to our X770 test model, even a 2920XM of the Dell Precision M6600 work station can only perform at 118%.

The high CPU performance is beneficial to the program performance. The performance is further improved by the hybrid hard disk from Seagate with 4 GB NAND flash memory (ST95005620AS). This hard disk can save frequently used files and programs on the flash memory so as to launch them faster. This reduces the start time and the time it takes to load frequently used programs.

The program performance benchmarks are less affected by the CPU performance: PCMark Vantage (8,682 points) and PCMark 7 (3,217 points). SSD DTRs are much fasterHP Pavilion dv7-6b02eg: +186/127%. Even notebooks with an ordinary 7200 RPM hard disk, such as the Asus G74SX-91079V, can achieve 99 points (77% of the performance of our X770 test model which uses a Hybrid HDD). 

The Hybrid HDD can be extremely useful after a program has been run a few times, as shown by program benchmarks we ran multiple times and in the test of Toshiba Satellite P770-10P (same Hybrid HDD).

Windows 7 Experience Index
Calculations per second
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
PCMark Vantage Result
8682 points
PCMark 7 Score
3217 points
Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS
Transfer Rate Minimum: 1.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 108.1 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 79.1 MB/s
Access Time: 17.7 ms
Burst Rate: 76.8 MB/s
CPU Usage: 1 %
3DMark 06 Standard Score
15684 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
10013 points
3DMark 11 Performance
2020 points


System Noise

The noise emissions of the test model are slightly higher than of the X770-10J. In the stress test, the emissions wavered between 43 to 47 dB(A). The fan switched off when the laptop was idle for a long time. The only emission then was the hard disk which emitted 31.4 dB(A).

Unfortunately, the user will have to bear the sudden turning up of the fan even while doing everyday tasks such as copying files, starting programs or surfing on the web. The fan can rise from a low 35 dB(A) to a clearly audible 43 dB(A). Instead of rotating constantly at a fixed medium speed the fan keeps speeding up and slowing down. The fan does not speed up or slow down for fixed times either. While the laptop is under heavy use, the fan acts in a similar fashion but the turned up phase lasts much longer.

Noise Level

31.4 / 34.1 / 34.8 dB(A)
34 dB(A)
38.1 / dB(A)
34.8 / 47.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
30 dB
40 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance)


The surface temperature of the X770 (while the laptop is idle or in office use) remains in a comfortable region, as shown by the blue temperature diagram. While the laptop is in intense use, the situation does not change much. The bottom of the laptop heats up to 40 degrees and the surface heats up to 41 degrees. The X770-10J with the 2630QM processor behaved more or less the same way, although in that test, the room temperatures were different. 

GPU Throttling

During the stress test (Prime95 + Furmark), the multimeter showed wavering power consumption: from 101 to 162 W. This indicates CPU throttling in most cases, but in this test model the graphic card is at fault. A solo Prime95 CPU stress test showed that the power consumption remained constant at 88 watts. The clock frequency in Cinebench Single and Multi-Core benchmarks stays in the Turbo regions of 2.8 and 3.0 GHz. In contrast, the GPU temperature wavered constantly, even when the Furmark stress test was being run alone. See picture four.

Afraid of how this will affect the gaming performance? The GeForce GTX 560M of our test model performs at the same level as other test models with a GTX 560M (in the synthetic benchmarks). So whether it is the 3DMark 06, Heaven 2.1 or 3D Mark 11, the results are all at the expected level of a GTX 560M. In 3DMark Vantage, the GPU actually performs slightly above average. 

This may not be the case with actual games, such as: Battlefield Bad Company 2 (high stress on the CPU). We ran the game on "High" settings and the laptop delivered 70 fps (above average - power consumption constant at 136 W). However, at "Ultra" settings (FHD), the performance drops to 32 FPS. The GTX 560M can deliver 7 to 8% more even with the slower 2630QM (Asus G74SX-3DE). The reason for this drop in performance is that the benchmark simulated explosions near the middle and at that point the power consumption suddenly dropped from 138 to 67 watts (for about 15 seconds), causing the game to stutter significantly. 

The reduction in GPU performance with simultaneous CPU load can be tested with benchmarks. We have narrowed the problem down to multi-core stress scenarios. While Prime95 is running, the Cinebench R10 Shading (64 bit) score drops from 5,873 to 2,290 points. A single core SuperPi test does not drop the performance: even with simultaneous stress testing, the score remains at 5,870 points (identical with the solo test).

Battlefield: BC2: Good fps in High
Battlefield: BC2: Good fps in High
Battlefield: BC2: Drop in fps in Ultra
Battlefield: BC2: Drop in fps in Ultra
Cineb. R10 Single Core @3.0 GHz
Cineb. R10 Single Core @3.0 GHz
Cineb. R11.5 Multi Core @2.8 GHz
Cineb. R11.5 Multi Core @2.8 GHz
Stresstest Furm/Prime95 @2.4 GHz
Stresstest Furm/Prime95 @2.4 GHz
GPU Throttle Furmark Only
GPU Throttle Furmark Only
Max. Load
 40 °C
104 F
34.3 °C
94 F
25.6 °C
78 F
 41.3 °C
106 F
34.1 °C
93 F
24.6 °C
76 F
 31.8 °C
89 F
35.2 °C
95 F
30.6 °C
87 F
Maximum: 41.3 °C = 106 F
Average: 33.1 °C = 92 F
20.6 °C
69 F
29 °C
84 F
36.4 °C
98 F
21.5 °C
71 F
35.4 °C
96 F
37.2 °C
99 F
25.3 °C
78 F
32 °C
90 F
30.2 °C
86 F
Maximum: 37.2 °C = 99 F
Average: 29.7 °C = 85 F
Power Supply (max.)  52.1 °C = 126 F | Room Temperature 18.3 °C = 65 F | Voltcraft IR-360
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.3 °C / -11.4 F).

Battery Life

Power Consumption

The shorter runtimes are caused by the higher power consumption while idle. Unlike the X770-10J (idle -17 W), the X770-11c consumes 26.6 W while idle ("High Performance" mode). The other idle modes behave identically (20/26 instead of 12/16 watts). The main reason for the higher power consumption seems to be the missing switchable graphics provided by Optimus. An Asus G74SX-91079V with the same GPU and no Optimus needs 27/35/37 watts (Idle Min/Med/Max).

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 20.8 / 25.8 / 26.6 Watt
Load midlight 107 / 162.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 960
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

The battery life is a bad surprise. Whereas the X770-10J with Optimus GPU switching can last up to 6 hours while idle (thanks to the Intel IGP), the test model can only last 175 minutes (2:55 hours). The 47 Wh battery is still the same. 

Watching a DVD is only possible for 1:32 hours and surfing the web with a brightness of 150 cd/m² (maximum) means 1:35 hours of use. The X770-10J can last 2:14 and 3:06 hours respectively. Charging the battery requires 97 minutes.

While idle, power saving: 175 minutes
While idle, power saving: 175 minutes
WLAN surfing: 95 minutes
WLAN surfing: 95 minutes
DVD Film: 92 minutes
DVD Film: 92 minutes
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
2h 55min
WiFi Surfing
1h 35min
1h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 36min


The Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C is a well-designed DTR for gamers and multimedia fans. The first-class sound, red-backlight keyboard, and the great gaming performance are still the same and worthy of praise. We compared our test model, the X770-11C, with the X770-10J (first test model).

The nice additional features (Shutter glasses and 3D display) are shadowed by the shorter battery life which is a direct result of the higher power consumption. The display has been improved (contrast, viewing angles), but as the maximum brightness is quite low, we can not give it full points. Program and gaming performance have risen thanks to the new processor, and we measured higher-than-average scores in the benchmarks. The surface temperatures of the case have also risen.

Overall, our test system gives the Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C a rating of 81%. The first test model without 3D reached 79%. This laptop has a 2% lead as the cons do not affect the laptop's rating much (as it is a DTR laptop). The battery life determines only 3% of the final score, whereas the display (13%), the performance in games (14%) and the program performance (13%) make up most of the rating. The Qosmio has scored well and been improved in the areas which matter for DTRs.

Nvidia's 3D Vision is nothing special nowadays. It is a nice feature, but most gamers are not willing to sacrifice half the frame rates for it. On the other hand, real 3D films can be enjoyed thanks to the active Shutter glasses. Toshiba has placed the second generation Nvidia 3D glasses in the packaging of the laptop. These new glasses have 20% larger glass area and let more light in.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
In Review: Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C
In Review: Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C


Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C (Qosmio X770 Series)
Intel Core i7-2670QM 4 x 2.2 - 3.1 GHz (Intel Core i7)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M - 1536 MB VRAM, Core: 775 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, Shader clock speed: 1550 MHz, GDDR5-VRAM, ForceWare 268.51
8 GB 
, 2x 4096 MB DDR3 RAM (1333 MHz)
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Samsung SEC5044-173HT02-T01, LED Backlight, TruBrite, 3D + Nvidia Shutter glasses, glossy: yes
Intel HM65
Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS, 500 GB 
, 7200 rpm, + TOSHIBA MK5061GSYN (500 GB)
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cougar Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
3 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headphones, Microphone, Card Reader: SD, miniSD/microSD (with adapter), SDHC, SDXC, MS, MS Pro, MMC, xD
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros AR9002WB-1NG Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 3.0
height x width x depth (in mm): 58 x 414 x 274 ( = 2.28 x 16.3 x 10.79 in)
47 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
Webcam: 1.3 Megapixel
Additional features
Power adapter: 180 W, Manual, Shutter glasses, Corel WinDVD, Nero Suite, 24 Months Warranty
3.58 kg ( = 126.28 oz / 7.89 pounds), Power Supply: 878 g ( = 30.97 oz / 1.94 pounds)
1499 Euro


Similar Devices

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

Review Toshiba Qosmio X70-A-11R Notebook
GeForce GTX 770M, Core i7 4700MQ, 17.30", 3.418 kg
Review Toshiba Satellite P70-A-104 Notebook
GeForce GT 745M, Core i7 4700MQ, 17.30", 3 kg
Review Toshiba Satellite L875D-10E Notebook
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics, A-Series A8-4500M, 17.30", 2.7 kg
Toshiba Qosmio X870-119 Notebook Review
GeForce GTX 670M, Core i7 3610QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg

Devices from the same Manufacturer

Toshiba Portege X30T-E (i7-8550U, UHD620) Laptop Review
UHD Graphics 620, Kaby Lake Refresh i5-8550U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Core i5-8250U, 256 GB SSD, 8 GB RAM) Laptop Review
UHD Graphics 620, Kaby Lake Refresh i5-8250U, 15.60", 2 kg
Toshiba Tecra X40-E (i5-8250U, SSD, LTE, FHD) Laptop Review
UHD Graphics 620, Kaby Lake Refresh i5-8250U, 14.00", 1.25 kg


Price Comparison


+Great program performance
+Keyboard with backlight
+Strong gaming performance
+Switchable graphics
+3D games running with Shutter glasses
+Strong contrast panel
+Great viewing angles
+Blu-ray drive
+Great sound
+Relatively low temperatures


-Few ports
-GPU throttling under full load
-Thickness / weight
-Loud even while idle
-Wobbly display cover


What we like

A high-quality display which is even suited for work. Two quiet hard disks with 1 TB storage space and low surface temperatures.

What we'd like to see

The fan is always running. The sudden turning off and on of the fan can be annoying. Not everybody will like the soft typing feel of the slippery keys and that the WASD keys are not marked. 

What surprises us

Why is Intel HD off? The power consumption would have been lower and the runtimes would have been longer.

The competition

The alternatives are: the Asus G74SX-3DE/G74SX-91079V gamer, the Samsung 700G7A (GTX 570M), the Schenker XMG P511 (GTX 570M), the HP Pavilion dv7-6b02eg (HD 6770M) and the Medion Erazer X7813-MD97895 - all with the same GPU (unless noted otherwise).


Toshiba Qosmio X770-11C - 03/20/2012 v2 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Pointing Device
Games Performance
Application Performance
Add Points
Gaming - Weighted Average
Sebastian Jentsch, 2012-04- 2 (Update: 2013-06- 6)