Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 2000

The Intel HD Graphics 2000 (or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD 2000 or GMA HD 2000) is an integrated graphics card in the Sandy Bridge codenamed processors. It is included in slower mobile processors (Pentium brand e.g. but called only Intel HD Graphics) and in most desktop processors. The HD Graphics 2000 has no dedicated memory but shares the fast Level 3 Cache with the CPU cores and also part of the main memory. Due to Turbo Boost, the GPU can be overclocked depending on the current CPU load and power consumption. The GMA HD 2000 offers only half of the 12 Execution Units (EUs) of the Intel GMA HD 3000.

Because of the halfed amount of shaders, the gaming performance is only compareable to the old Intel GMA HD (in the Arrandale CPUs). Our tests with a desktop i5-2400 showed a performance level of a Geforce G 105M e.g. which is slightly faster. Therefore, only low demanding games like Sims 3 or World of Warcraft can be played in low detail settings fluently.

Altought 2x Antialiasing (AA) is supported, the chip is as fast as when rendering 4x AA. In the Unigine Valley benchmark a similar HD 3000 i7-2637M for example reached the same score with 2x AA and 4x AA.

In addition to the GPU, the chip also houses some dedicated units for decoding and encoding HD videos. On the IDF Intel demonstrated the encoding of a 3 minute long 1080p video to an iPhone compatible format in 640x360 in only 14s. Another novelty of the Sandy Bridge GPU is the embedded DisplayPort eDP to connect internal Displays.

Due to the integration in the 32nm built CPU and the halfed amount of shaders, the power consumption of the GPU should be quite low and also suited for small and light laptops.

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 compare 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 compare 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameSandy Bridge
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed850/1100 - 1350 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology32 nm
Date of Announcement01.02.2011
CPU in HD Graphics 2000GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-24004 x 3100 MHz, 95 W850 MHz1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1217     avg: 2222     median: 2288 (3%)     max: 3162 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
18.9 21.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
117  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
56  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
68 71 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
34 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
-1 16.9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.2 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
26 48 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
11 15.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
62  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
27.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
17.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
107  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
-1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
31  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
27.9 49 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
13 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
166  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
25 37 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
33.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
78  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
52  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
44.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo III24.1
Mass Effect 311.9
Anno 2070208
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim14
Fifa 12117563721
F1 20113719
Deus Ex Human Revolution25
Dirt 35321.413.3
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings9
Crysis 218
Total War: Shogun 243.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops2617
Fifa 11703721
Mafia 28
StarCraft 2621295
Metro 20332711
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising26.410.38
Battlefield: Bad Company 22213
CoD Modern Warfare 25014
Risen37137.8
Resident Evil 56212.76.1
Need for Speed Shift3012
Colin McRae: DIRT 227.117.912.7
Anno 1404325
Sims 31072413
F.E.A.R. 27320
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto-1
Left 4 Dead31
Far Cry 238135.2
Crysis Warhead304
Trackmania Nations Forever16639.313.7
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare742711
Supreme Commander - FA Bench2716
Crysis - GPU Benchmark3114
Crysis - CPU Benchmark33.313.7
World in Conflict - Benchmark7821104
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark100.6
Quake 444
World of Warcraft144369
Counter-Strike Source21070
Doom 35244.1
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo243
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
14
12
7
3
19
2
1
9
4
2
1
10
2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 12:08:55

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1958 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 1958 +0.039s ... 0.103s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.28s ... 0.384s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.384s

#11 Got 101 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.39s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.39s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.417s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.812s ... 1.229s

#15 return log +0.045s ... 1.273s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics 2000 graphics card

 

Review Acer Aspire One 756-B847X Netbook

Are they still around? We haven't tested a netbook in four months. The small and low-cost notebooks have not prevailed on the market. Nevertheless, Acer sent ...
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | 11.60" | 1.3 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire One 756 Subnotebook

A miniscule Pentium subnotebook. The Acer 7xx series has been upgraded to have the ultra low voltage Intel Pentium processors for the first time instead of the ...
Intel Pentium 987 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | 11.60" | 1.3 kg

Acer Aspire E1-531-B964G50Mnks: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E1-531-B964G50Mnks

Acer TravelMate P253-E-B9604G50Mnks: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P253-E-B9604G50Mnks

Lenovo G580-59371511: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G580-59371511

Sony Vaio SV-F1421E2EW: Intel Pentium 987, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio SV-F1421E2EW

Packard Bell EasyNote TE11HC-B822G32Mnks: Intel Celeron B820, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TE11HC-B822G32Mnks

Samsung ATIV 270E4V-K01HS: Intel Celeron 847, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung ATIV 270E4V-K01HS

Fujitsu LifeBook AH512-MPAB2PL: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu LifeBook AH512-MPAB2PL

Samsung ATIV Smart PC Pro XE700T1C-A01PL: Intel Pentium 987, 11.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung ATIV Smart PC Pro XE700T1C-A01PL

Dell Inspiron 15 3521-4613: Intel Pentium 997, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3521-4613

HP ProBook 4540S-C4Y42EA: Intel Celeron B840, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 4540S-C4Y42EA

Xploretech iX104C5 DMSR-M2: Intel Core i7-620UM, 10.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Xploretech iX104C5 DMSR-M2

Acer Aspire V5-431P-987B4G50Mass: Intel Pentium 987, 14.30", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-431P-987B4G50Mass

Asus VivoBook S200e-CT210h: Intel Celeron 847, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S200e-CT210h

Asus X401A-WX411: Intel Celeron B830, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X401A-WX411

Asus X401A-WX410: Intel Celeron B830, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X401A-WX410

Asus X401A-WX412: Intel Celeron B830, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X401A-WX412

Toshiba Satellite C855-S5231: Intel Pentium B970, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite C855-S5231

HP 2000-2b20NR: Intel Pentium B950, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 2000-2b20NR

Acer Aspire One 756-2623: Intel Celeron 877, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire One 756-2623

Lenovo IdeaPad G570-59-325775: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G570-59-325775

Samsung 300E4A-A01: Intel Pentium B940, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300E4A-A01

Samsung 300E5A-A01RU: Intel Pentium B950, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung 300E5A-A01RU

Toshiba Satellite P755-S5320: Intel Core i3-2330M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P755-S5320

Sony Vaio VPC-EB47GM/BJ: Intel Core i5-480M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VPC-EB47GM/BJ

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter