Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

This is a DirectX 10 graphic card from ATI and direct competitor to the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS graphic card for laptops. This would mean that the card is able to represent all modern DirectX 9 games in medium resolutions and without Antialiasing without motion interruptions. Demanding DirectX 10 games may only run in low settings and resolutions.

Due to the Avivo HD videoengine  the Chip accelerates HD Video like HD DVD, Blu-ray (Video Decoder for H.264/AVC, VC-1, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DivX Video Codecs). Furthermore PowerPlay 7.0 brings longer battery runtimes. Furthermore, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is certified for Windows Vista (for the Aero user interface).

Technically, the chip owns 40 stream processors which are able to manage vertex-, geometric or pixelshader operations. Therefore DirectX 10.0 and Shader Model 4.0 are supported. To be mentioned is also the 256 bit wide ringbus.

Compared to the Destkop HD 2400 Pro the Mobility version has a lower clock speed (450 versus 525 Mhz core speed) and is, therefore, a bit slower.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 Series

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT compare 40 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 40 @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 500 MHz
CodenameM72
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256+ MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistor Count180 Million
technology65 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD Video, PowerPlay 7.0, Programmable Tesselation Unit (meant for Direct X 10.1), OpenGL 2.0
Date of Announcement14.05.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
min: 1367     avg: 1418     median: 1417.5 (2%)     max: 1468 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
166 204 ~ 185 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
22 30 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
7 7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
63.6  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
42.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
185.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
World in Conflict - Benchmark6
F.E.A.R.185267
Doom 363.661.442.826
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo185.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1
2

1
1
1

1
1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 13:56:11

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 87 +0.014s ... 0.06s

#7 got single benchmarks 87 +0.022s ... 0.082s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.211s ... 0.293s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.293s

#11 Got 12 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.296s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.296s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.297s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.079s ... 0.377s

#15 return log +0.038s ... 0.415s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 graphics card

 

Review Toshiba Satellite A200-1O6 Notebook

Consumer Market Notebook. The Toshiba Satellite A200 is one of the reasonable consumer notebooks. Equipped with moderate hardware, these focus on price-consciou...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | 15.40" | 2.7 kg
 

Review Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Notebook

Compact business companion The Samsung X22-Pro Boyar (NP-X22T001) is a modern, silent, and robust 14" notebook for daily office work. It is light, weighing just...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | 14.10" | 2.2 kg

LG E500-K APCAG: Intel Core 2 Duo T5750, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » LG E500-K APCAG

Packard Bell EasyNote MX61: AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell Easynote MX61

MSI Megabook EX610: AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, 15.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook EX610

Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pi2550: Intel Core 2 Duo T5450, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pi2550

Asus F7KR: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56, 17.10", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus F7KR

Asus F8P: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 14.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus F8P

Asus M51SR: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51SR-AP053C

LG R200: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 12.10", 2 kg
  External Review » LG R200

Toshiba Satellite P200-17C: Intel Core 2 Duo T5450, 17.10", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P200-17C

Toshiba Satellite P200-12D: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 17.10", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P200-12D

Toshiba Satellite A200-1O6: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A200-1O6

Samsung X22 Pro: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 14.10", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung X22 Pro

Toshiba Satellite A210-131: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A210-131

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter