Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

Quadro FX Series

Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8M-GLM
Pipelines16 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption17 Watt
Transistor Count210 Million
technology80 nm
FeaturesPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1
Date of Announcement09.05.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (4%)     max: 3379 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
10.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
High 800x600
6.2
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
4.7
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
328  fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
62  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
242.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark10.07
Crysis - CPU Benchmark7.39
F.E.A.R.3286217
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo242.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1
2

1
1


1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 12:56:10

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.012s ... 0.046s

#7 got single benchmarks 513 +0.009s ... 0.055s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.158s ... 0.213s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.213s

#11 Got 6 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.215s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.215s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.217s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.066s ... 0.283s

#15 return log +0.038s ... 0.321s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M graphics card

Dell Precision M4300: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision M4300

Dell Precision M2300: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 14.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision M2300

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter