Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 8210

AMD Radeon HD 8210

The AMD Radeon HD 8210 is an integrated DirectX 11.1 graphics card found in AMD E1-2100 "Kabini" and A4-1250 "Temash" APUs. It offers 128 shader cores and two Compute Units based on the GCN architecture and is clocked at 300 MHz with no support for Turbo. The graphics card does not have dedicated VRAM and will access the main memory of the system (up to single-channel DDR3L-1333).

The HD 8210 integrates both UVD 4.2 and VCE 2.0 video encoders. It supports up to two external monitors via VGA, DVI, HDMI 1.4a and DisplayPort 1.2.

Depending on the benchmark, the performance of the Radeon HD 8210 is similar to the Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). This is on par with a dedicated Radeon HD 6430M, but is still too slow for modern games as of 2013. However, a few older and less demanding games will run fluently, if the limited CPU performance is sufficient.

Radeon HD 8000 Series

Radeon HD 8400 compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz
Radeon HD 8330 compare 128 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 8280 compare 128 @ 0.45 GHz
Radeon HD 8240 compare 128 @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon HD 8250 compare 128 @ 0.3 - 0.4 GHz
Radeon HD 8210 128 @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon HD 8180 compare 128 @ 0.23 GHz
CodenameTemash, Kabini
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines128 - unified
Core Speed300 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
Date of Announcement23.05.2013
CPU in Radeon HD 8210GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A4-13504 x 1000 MHz, 8 W300 MHz? MHz
AMD E1-22002 x 1050 MHz, 9 W? MHz300 MHz
AMD A4-12502 x 1000 MHz, 9 W300 MHz? MHz
AMD E1-21002 x 1000 MHz, 9 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 300 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.1 pt (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 9899     avg: 14467     median: 14467 (2%)     max: 19035 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1097     avg: 1197     median: 1150 (1%)     max: 1506 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 1870     avg: 2333     median: 1904.5 (1%)     max: 4486 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 182     avg: 205.4     median: 209 (0%)     max: 215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 222     avg: 228     median: 227 (0%)     max: 235 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 17396     avg: 20164     median: 20119.5 (2%)     max: 22421 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 369     avg: 372.8     median: 370.5 (1%)     max: 381 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 341     avg: 344.5     median: 343.5 (0%)     max: 350 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 979     avg: 999     median: 984 (0%)     max: 1034 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 2107     avg: 2477     median: 2177.5 (3%)     max: 3446 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1006     avg: 1586     median: 1691 (1%)     max: 1771 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.71     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (3%)     max: 9.1 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 1.28     avg: 6.8     median: 7.7 (0%)     max: 8.08 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 15     avg: 23.5     median: 23.5 (0%)     max: 32 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 31     avg: 45     median: 45 (0%)     max: 59 Samples/s
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
4.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12.7 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
17.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
2.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
2.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
5 (!) 9.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.4 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
5.7 6.8 7.2 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
1.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
4.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
14 15.8 16.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.8 8.8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
4.8 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
2.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.6 21.1 22.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.5 14 14.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.8 12.3 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
20.8 23 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10 10.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.4 23 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10 10.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
21.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
8.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.114.692.862.65
Team Fortress 213
Dota 2 Reborn12.79.654.6
Dirt Rally13.1
Fifa 151
Sims 427.38.4
Risen 3: Titan Lords6.9
GRID: Autosport13
The Elder Scrolls Online17.1
Thief2.2
X-Plane 10.2511.25.5
Need for Speed: Rivals6
Call of Duty: Ghosts2.6
Battlefield 49.9
Batman: Arkham Origins14
F1 2013121212
Fifa 1475
Total War: Rome II107.2
Saints Row IV6
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified9.9
Splinter Cell: Blacklist7.7
Dota 276.44.7
Company of Heroes 232.71.8
GRID 212.6
Metro: Last Light4.74.53
BioShock Infinite16.98.37.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm39.215.49.3
SimCity37.87.9
Tomb Raider1596.1
Crysis 38.8
Dead Space 330.412.9
Hitman: Absolution54.12.6
Medal of Honor: Warfighter9.1
Dishonored11.5
Fifa 138
Borderlands 25.4
Counter-Strike: GO19.3
Sleeping Dogs12.1
Diablo III191311
Mass Effect 311.4
Alan Wake9
Anno 207023101510.6
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim1096.1
Deus Ex Human Revolution20.511.6
StarCraft 23514
Metro 203311.8
Battlefield: Bad Company 210.6
Risen21.610
World of Warcraft46.726.88.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
44
5

22


14


3








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:31:03

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.057s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4601 +0.03s ... 0.088s

#7 got single benchmarks 4601 +0.018s ... 0.106s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.523s ... 0.629s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.629s

#11 Got 110 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.637s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.637s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 0.673s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.864s ... 1.537s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 1.581s

Video Performance

The integrated Avivo HD UVD 4.2 video decoder supports in Windows via DXVA MPEG2, H264, VC1, MPEG4p2, and WMV9 in SD, HD (720p), and FHD (1080p). In our DXVAChecker benchmarks the decoder was able to reach 23-44 fps with about 12% CPU load rendering Big Buck Bunny H264 in 1080p. However the slow CPU cores may not be fast enough for decoding video on its own. E.g. using VLC was dropping frames when playing back Big Buck Bunny (even without running Resource Monitor).

DXVA Decoder Devices for HD 8210
DXVA Decoder Devices for HD 8210
Big Buck Bunny H264 1920x1080
Big Buck Bunny H264 1920x1080
Magic of Flight WMV3 1440x1080
Magic of Flight WMV3 1440x1080
Big Buck Bunny VLC dropping frames
Big Buck Bunny VLC dropping frames

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon HD 8210 graphics card

Review Update Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14D Convertible

Review Update Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14D Convertible

Alternative? Not really. The highlight of the Flex 14 is surely its 300-degree swivel screen alongside the related multimedia and presentation options. Lenovo n...
AMD E1-2100 | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
Review Update HP 255 G2 Notebook

Review Update HP 255 G2 Notebook

Minimal. With the HP 255, HP focuses on private and professional users looking for the cheapest possible work tool. A price of significantly below 400 Euros (~$...
AMD E1-2100 | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
Review HP Compaq 15-h024sg Notebook

Review HP Compaq 15-h024sg Notebook

Quiet and frugal. HP only charges around 260 Euros (~$358) for the Compaq 15-h024sg. For this price you get a simple 15.6-inch notebook with a frugal AMD APU an...
AMD E1-2100 | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
 

Review HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e000sb Notebook

The beauty and the beast? The HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11 looks nice, but can it offer enough performance with the AMD A4-1250?
AMD A4-1250 | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | 11.60" | 1.4 kg

Toshiba Satellite Pro C50D-A-145: AMD E1-2100, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro C50D-A-145

Acer Aspire V5-123-3466: AMD E1-2100, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-123-3466

MSI S12 3M-027XPL: AMD E1-2100, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI S12 3M-027XPL

HP 255 G2: AMD E1-2100, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP 255 G2

HP Pavilion Sleekbook TouchSmart 11-e010sg: AMD A4-1250, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Sleekbook TouchSmart 11-e010sg

HP Pavilion SleekBook TouchSmart 11-E2V74EA: AMD A4-1250, 11.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion SleekBook TouchSmart 11-E2V74EA

HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e030sa: AMD A4-1250, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e030sa

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter