Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X1700

ATI Mobility Radeon X1700

The graphic card ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 for notebooks is the successor of the ATI Mobility Radeon X1600. It achieves a higher performance with same current consumption due to strained Silicon. Due to additional pixel- and vertex-pipelines the performance is clearly above the X1600 and therefore sufficient for all games in 2006 with medium and high settings. The direct competitor ought to be NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 but the performance was compareable to the 7600.

Also a XT variant with a probably higher clock (codename M66-XT) was planned but did never arrive.

The Avivo video engine helps the cpu in decoding (HD) videos.

Mobility Radeon X1000 Series

Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM66-P
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed475 MHz
Memory Speed400 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Transistor Count157 Million
technology90 nm
FeaturesAvivo Video and Display Engine, Powerplay 6.0, PCI-E
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.02.2006
Information90 nm, Windows Vista Premium ready
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 1829     avg: 2076     median: 2139 (3%)     max: 2292 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
112 313 365 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
52 63 65 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19 26 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
41.1 103.7 112.9 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
41 103 111.4 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
40.6 62.1 68.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
38.5 44.8 46.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
60.3 305.6 390.7 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.2636025
Doom 386855743
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1


2
1
1

1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 14:03:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 23 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#7 got single benchmarks 23 +0.018s ... 0.064s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.085s ... 0.15s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.15s

#11 Got 24 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.152s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.152s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.153s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.068s ... 0.221s

#15 return log +0.043s ... 0.264s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 graphics card

 

Review Asus G2Pc Notebook

G2P once again. After first impressions of the Asus G2P at the CeBIT, the opportunity to take a closer look at this notebook in our laboratory and make comprehe...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 | 17.00" | 4.4 kg
 

CeBIT 2007: Review Asus G2P Notebook

Gaming light. Asus copes the high demand for gaming notebooks by offering the Asus G1 and Asus G2 series. We visited the CeBIT in Hannover this year again and r...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 | 17.00" | 4.4 kg
 

Review Samsung X60 Pro Notebook

Quadratic. Handy. Good? The Samsung X60 attracts by its angular and slim design. Especially the magnesium case impresses. What about the rest of the properties ...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 | 15.40" | 2.5 kg
 

Review Asus A8Jp Notebook

Small but powerful. Small, light, yet powerful, these attributes go best with Asus A8Jp. More and more user choose very mobile notebooks, but still they won't f...
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 | 14.00" | 2.5 kg

Asus F3SE: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus F3SE

Asus W2Pb: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 17.10", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus W2Pb

Asus V1JP: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 15.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus V1JP

Asus Z53J: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Z53J

Samsung X60 Pro: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 15.40", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung X60 Pro

Asus W2P: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 17.10", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Asus W2P

Asus G2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 17.10", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus G2

Asus W2PC: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 17.10", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Asus W2PC

Samsung X60 plus: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 15.40", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung X60 plus

Asus A8Jp: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 14.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus A8JP

Asus G2P: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200, 17.10", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus G2P

Asus F3JP: Intel Core 2 Duo T5600, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus F3JP

Please share our article, every link counts!

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.