Samsung X60 plus

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Samsung X60 plus

Samsung NP-X60plus Core 2 Duo Notebook Review
Source: Notebookreview.com Archive.org version
The X60plus should be on the shortlist of anyone looking for a powerful but lightweight 15.4” widescreen computer (subject to the regional availability constraints). Build quality does not appear to be compromised by the low weight. The model reviewed represents, for the UK, very competitive pricing for the overall specification. So far, I have no regrets about my purchase which seems to satisfy my original objectives. At present, my disappointment is that power consumption is slightly higher than the old X60. I think the cause is probably the driver software for the GPU which currently lacks the ATI PowerPlay module. The CPU may also assume more power when idling along.
umfangreicher Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar

Display gut, Verarbeitung gut, Akkulaufzeit schlecht
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/19/2006
Rating: display: 80% workmanship: 80%

Foreign Reviews

90% Leichtfüßige Power
Source: PC Professionell - 3/08 DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% features: 90% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 90%

Wenn das beste gefragt ist
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: performance: 90% features: 90%

90% Leichtfüßige Power
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% features: 90% display: 60% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 90%

90% Leichtfüßige Power
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 90% features: 90% ergonomy: 90%

Aktueller Alleskönner
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/20/2007
performance: 80%

Comment

ATI Mobility Radeon X1700: Successor of the X1600 and because of strained silicium process it can achieve a higher performance with the same current consumption (more shaders). The Avivo video engine helps decoding (HD) videos.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

T7200: Mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.