Asus A8Jp
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus A8Jp
Source: Gamestar
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/05/2007
Rating: performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: c't
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 50% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Gamestar
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/02/2007
Rating: performance: 70% display: 60%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/09/2007
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 83% performance: 90% features: 78% ergonomy: 90%
Source: PC Magazin
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/14/2006
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 91% display: 88% mobility: 71% workmanship: 88% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 79%
Source: PC Go
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/11/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% performance: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: Connect
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/10/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 95% features: 77% ergonomy: 81%
Comment
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700: Successor of the X1600 and because of strained silicium process it can achieve a higher performance with the same current consumption (more shaders). The Avivo video engine helps decoding (HD) videos.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T7200: Mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
