Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 335M (sometimes also called GeForce G335M) is a laptop graphics card for middle class gaming notebooks. It is based on the GT215 core (as the GTS 350M for example) but features only 72 shader cores and 24 Texture Mapping Units. Therefore, the GT 335M offers significantly more shaders than the GT 330M, but due to the low clock speed, the performance is not that much better. Compared to the GTS models, the GT 335M does not support GDDR5.

The 3D performance of the GT335M is on a level with the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in the middle class. Therefore, the GPU is fast enough for all games in 2010. Demanding games like Metro 2033, Battlefield BC2 or Crysis run only in low-medium details fluently. Less demanding games like Call of Duty MW2 or Sims 3 can be played in high detail settings (see Benchmarks below).

As the other GeForce 300M cards, the GT335M offers Purevideo HD (VP4) to accelerate the decoding of HD videos. This means that the GPU offers the complete decoding of MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP, VC-1/WMV9 and H.264 videos.

Furthermore, CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectX Compute allow the usage of the cores for general computing (e.g., encoding of videos).

GeForce GT 300M Series

GeForce GT 335M 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M compare 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M compare 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M compare 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
CodenameN11P-GS1
ArchitectureGT200
Pipelines72 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz
Shader Speed1080 MHz
Memory Speed1066 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX, SLI, Powermizer 8.0, MXM 3.0 Type-B, 72 Shader, 24 Texture Mapping Units, 8 Render Output Units
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2010
Information223 GFlops
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2592     avg: 2624     median: 2633 (1%)     max: 2651 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 17887     avg: 18184     median: 18184 (19%)     max: 18481 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15146     avg: 17170     median: 16836.5 (9%)     max: 19526 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9798     avg: 12228     median: 13115 (14%)     max: 13782 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5958     avg: 6544     median: 6892 (9%)     max: 6950 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 6462     avg: 6995     median: 6973 (9%)     max: 7549 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.2     avg: 5     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 6.5 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2446     avg: 3580     median: 3790.5 (3%)     max: 4294 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 16.12     avg: 17.2     median: 17.6 (6%)     max: 18.47 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
med. 1024x768
high 1360x768
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
med. 1360x768
high 1360x768
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
29.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
55  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.4 34.9 35.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
24.2 24.3 24.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
65.2 123 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
36 38.6 39.4 42 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
30.9 33.2 34.7 35.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
51.6 61.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29 29.4 33.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
21.2 21.2 23.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
23.5 31.2 32.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
28.2 29.5 30.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
42.5 67.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
32.4 34.8 46.8 49.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
26.8 30.2 31.7 33.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
51.7 57.8 107.8 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1280x1024
23.5 24.8 24.8 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
75.5 144.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
46.9 47.2 62.6 63.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1280x1024
36.8 36.9 39.4 39.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
51.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
58.3 73.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
28 34.8 43.4 43.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
22.5 22.7 24.9 25.2 26.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
71 84.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26.9 30 42.6 42.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
20.7 21.3 22.3 22.6 23.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 1130815398.2
StarCraft 216445.430.616.1
Metro 203329.124
Battlefield: Bad Company 2553424
CoD Modern Warfare 2943934
Risen573122
Need for Speed Shift2929
Colin McRae: DIRT 2554130
Anno 14047224
F.E.A.R. 21105538
Far Cry 251.231.1
Crysis - GPU Benchmark663824
Crysis - CPU Benchmark783622
Call of Juarez Benchmark17.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
5
2
2
8

1
6
5
1
2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 12:35:20

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1599 +0.014s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 1599 +0.034s ... 0.089s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.394s ... 0.482s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.482s

#11 Got 114 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.492s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.492s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.502s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.364s ... 0.866s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 0.909s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M graphics card

 

Review Asus N82JQ Notebook

14 + 4. Quad core power in 14 inches, combined with a strong Nvidia GT 335M and USB 3.0. Will power users find the perfect desktop replacement with this? Find o...
Intel Core i7-720QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | 14.00" | 2.4 kg
 

Review mySN QMG6 / Chiligreen Mobilitas NW (Quanta TW9) Notebook

A question of drivers. With the Quanta TW9, Schenker Notebook and Chiligreen have put on the market a fit-for-gaming 15.6-inch laptop (GT335M), which above all ...
Intel Core i7-620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | 15.60" | 2.6 kg
 

Review Alienware M11x R2 Subnotebook

Mini Gamer 2.0. Alienware, up until now better known for its big luxury-gamers, has surprised the notebook branch with a high-performance subnotebook, the M11x,...
Intel Core i5-520UM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | 11.60" | 2 kg
 

Review Asus N82JV Notebook

Performance & Endurance? With the N82JV, Asus has launched a multimedia notebook that is supposed to distinguish itself by a good performance and, at the sa...
Intel Core i7-620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | 14.00" | 2.3 kg
 

Review Alienware M11x Subnotebook

The Midget amongst the Gamers. Until now, Alienware has rather been known for its big and powerful gaming notebooks at a premium price. Now the manufacturer tri...
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | 11.60" | 2 kg

Alienware M11x: Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300, 11.60", 2 kg
  Review » Test Preview – Alienware M11x Performance Check

Asus N53JN-SX031V: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N53JN-SX031V

LG R590-T.ARR7A3: Intel Core i7-820QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » LG R590-T.ARR7A3

Asus NX90JQ-YZ068Z: Intel Core i7-740QM, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus NX90JQ-YZ068Z

Asus N82JQ-VX046V: Intel Core i7-720QM, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus N82JQ-VX046V

Asus NX90JQ-YZ014V: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus NX90JQ-YZ014V

Asus N82JV-VX020V: Intel Core i5-520M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus N82JV-VX020V

Asus N82JV-X1: Intel Core i5-450M, 14.10", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus N82JV-X1

Asus K42JV-X1: Intel Core i5-450M, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K42JV-X1

Asus K42JV-VX054V: Intel Core i5-540M, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K42JV-VX054V

Asus N53JN: Intel Core i5-520M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N53JN

Asus N73JN: Intel Core i5-450M, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus N73JN

SCHENKER QMG6: Intel Core i7-620M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » mySN QMG6

Asus NX90JQ-YZ041V: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus NX90JQ-YZ041V

Asus NX90J: Intel Core i7-720QM, 18.40", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Asus NX90J

Asus N82JQ-A1: Intel Core i7-720QM, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus N82JQ-A1

Alienware M11x R2: Intel Core i5-520UM, 11.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Alienware M11x R2

Asus N82JV: Intel Core i7-620M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus N82JV

Alienware M11x: Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300, 11.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Alienware M11x

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter