Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

This is a middle class graphic chip, which is fabricated in 55nm process and probably can be classified  above the HD 2600 / HD 2700 (due to higher clock speed).

120 Stream processors (48 5-dimensional Shader units) manage the tasks of the Shader and Pixel pipelines.

Due to Avivo video engine the graphic card can support the processor with several video operations (HD video too).

Mobility Radeon 3000 Series

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 compare 120 @ 0.68 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 120 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
CodenameM86
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines120 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption30 Watt
Transistor Count378 Million
technology55 nm
Features Powerplay 7.0, PCI-E 2.0, 2 dual-link-fähige DVI Ausgänge (HDCP fähig), integrierter DisplayPort Ausgänge. bis 2560x1600
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 14861     avg: 22425     median: 23042 (24%)     max: 27281 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 8302     avg: 9596     median: 9268.5 (5%)     max: 11453 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6527     avg: 7539     median: 7295 (8%)     max: 8780 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3321     avg: 3507     median: 3360 (4%)     max: 3890 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
min: 3302     avg: 3607     median: 3667 (5%)     max: 3853 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2575     avg: 3323     median: 3291 (2%)     max: 4556 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
33.8 43.4 48.2 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
18.1 21.5 21.5 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
9.4 10 10 11.2 11.2 13.3 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.1
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
15
19.2
19.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
23
High 1280x800
10.8
High 800x600
14
Low 1920x1200
14
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
14.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
37.5 37.8 43.1 43.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.7 17.8 18.5 19.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 8.1 9 9 9.3 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.8
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
13
16.4
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
22
Low 1920x1200
13
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
9.1
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
8
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
12.1
12
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
33 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
23
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
17
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
5
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
20
High 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
5
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
30 31 165 166 220 309 309 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
28 29 29 84 88 94 101 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19 22 22 24 24 25 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
120 129.7 160.4 173.5 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
119.9 133.8 154.2 169.2 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
104.6 105.5 119.2 135.8 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
70.9 75.3 77.4 93.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
322 335.8 423.5 464.3 ~ 386 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark432111
Crysis - CPU Benchmark40189
World in Conflict - Benchmark339
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion36
F.E.A.R.1766523
Doom 314614411679
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo386
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

2
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
1


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.28
log 06. 18:31:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:29:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 650 +0.012s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 650 +0.039s ... 0.071s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.424s ... 0.495s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.496s

#12 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.5s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.5s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.503s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.148s ... 0.651s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.655s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 graphics card

 

Review Acer Extensa 7630G Notebook

Basics. The model range Extensa 7630G from Acer finds its circle of customers in small and mid-sized businesses, but it is also interesting for private users. I...
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | 17.30" | 3.4 kg
 

Review Lenovo Thinkpad T500 Notebook

One for all. The models of the T-series made by Lenovo were always the solid base of the complete product range. With display sizes of 14.1" and 15.4", equipped...
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | 15.40" | 2.7 kg
 

Review Lenovo Thinkpad W500 Notebook

Pure performance. Until now the Thinkpad T-Model from Lenovo, which was enhanced after the short ending -p, set the standard for professional users with high pe...
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | 15.40" | 2.8 kg
 

Review Dell Studio 17 Notebook

Studio Line. For the present the new Studio series by Dell is available in two sizes. On the one hand there is the Studio 15, which has a compact 15.4 inch wide...
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | 17.10" | 3.5 kg
 

Review Asus M50S Notebook

Multimedia all-rounder. After the Asus M70S and the M51SN, it is now time for the M50S to be tested. The M50S, like the other notebooks made by Asus, belong t...
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | 15.40" | 3.1 kg

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 4 kg
  Review » Review Asus M70S Notebook

Acer Extensa 7630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 7630G

Lenovo ThinkPad W500: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad W500

Sony Vaio VGN-FW390: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW390

Toshiba Satellite A350-205: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350-205

Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944

Toshiba Satellite A350D-202 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-202

Acer Aspire 8530G: AMD Turion X2 RM-72, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 8530G

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ

Gateway MD7826u: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Gateway MD7826u

Acer Extensa 5630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T5800, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 5630G

Lenovo IdeaPad Y730: Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100, 17.00", 4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y730

Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O

Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z

Asus V1V: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus V1V

Asus F8VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 14.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus F8VA

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J

Lenovo Thinkpad W500 2055-51U: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad W500

Asus M51T: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51T

Packard Bell EasyNote SL81 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 17.00", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote SL81

Lenovo Thinkpad T500: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad T500

Dell Studio 1735: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 1735

Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU

Asus M51VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51VA

Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, 17.10", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530

Toshiba Satellite A300D: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300D

Dell Studio 17: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 17

Toshiba Satellite A300: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 4 kg
  External Review » Asus M70SA

Asus X72SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X72SA

Asus M50SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Asus M50SA

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter