Notebookcheck

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

This is a middle class graphic chip, which is fabricated in 55nm process and probably can be classified  above the HD 2600 / HD 2700 (due to higher clock speed).

120 Stream processors (48 5-dimensional Shader units) manage the tasks of the Shader and Pixel pipelines.

Due to Avivo video engine the graphic card can support the processor with several video operations (HD video too).

ManufacturerATI
Mobility Radeon 3000 Series
Mobility Radeon HD 3670 120 @ 680 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 120 @ 600 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
CodenameM86
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines120 - unified
Core Speed *600 MHz
Memory Speed *700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption30 Watt
Transistors378 Million
technology55 nm
Features Powerplay 7.0, PCI-E 2.0, 2 dual-link-fähige DVI Ausgänge (HDCP fähig), integrierter DisplayPort Ausgänge. bis 2560x1600
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/de/products/mobilityr...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
P Result 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 +
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 6527     avg: 7539 (16%)     median: 7295 (16%)     max: 8780 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 8302     avg: 9596.4 (5%)     median: 9268.5 (5%)     max: 11453 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 14861     avg: 22424.8 (23%)     median: 23042 (24%)     max: 27281 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 2991     avg: 2991 (10%)     median: 2991 (10%)     max: 2991 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 11.45     avg: 11.5 (24%)     median: 11.5 (24%)     max: 11.45 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 11.31     avg: 11.3 (24%)     median: 11.3 (24%)     max: 11.31 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 14.13     avg: 14.1 (30%)     median: 14.1 (30%)     max: 14.13 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 19.03     avg: 19 (10%)     median: 19 (10%)     max: 19.03 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 7.9     avg: 7.9 (15%)     median: 7.9 (15%)     max: 7.9 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 17.15     avg: 17.2 (25%)     median: 17.2 (25%)     max: 17.15 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 4.15     avg: 4.2 (11%)     median: 4.2 (11%)     max: 4.15 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 6.9     avg: 6.9 (14%)     median: 6.9 (14%)     max: 6.9 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0%
100%
min: 6.1     avg: 6.1 (77%)     median: 6.1 (77%)     max: 6.1 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0%
100%
min: 5.1     avg: 5.1 (65%)     median: 5.1 (65%)     max: 5.1 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
33.8 43.4 48.2 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
18.1 21.5 21.5 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
9.4 10 10 11.2 11.2 13.3 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.1
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
15
19.2
19.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
23
High 1280x800
10.8
High 800x600
14
Low 1920x1200
14
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
14.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
37.5 37.8 43.1 43.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.7 17.8 18.5 19.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 8.1 9 9 9.3 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.8
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
13
16.4
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
22
Low 1920x1200
13
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
9.1
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
8
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
12.1
12
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
33 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
23
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
17
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
5
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
20
High 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
5
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
30 31 165 166 220 309 309 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
28 29 29 84 88 94 101 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19 22 22 24 24 25 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
120 129.7 160.4 173.5 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
119.9 133.8 154.2 169.2 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
104.6 105.5 119.2 135.8 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
70.9 75.3 77.4 93.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
322 335.8 423.5 464.3 ~ 386 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
outnum took s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 graphics card

Acer Extensa 7630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, 17.3", 3.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer Extensa 7630G Notebook

Asus M50S: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.4", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Asus M50S Notebook

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.1", 4 kg
  Review » Review Asus M70S Notebook

Dell Studio 17: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.1", 3.5 kg
  Review » Review Dell Studio 17 Notebook

Lenovo Thinkpad T500: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo Thinkpad T500 Notebook

Lenovo Thinkpad W500 2055-51U: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.4", 2.8 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo Thinkpad W500 Notebook

Acer Aspire 8530G: AMD Turion X2 RM-72, 18.4", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 8530G

Acer Extensa 5630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T5800, 15.4", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 5630G

Acer Extensa 7630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, 17.3", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 7630G

Asus F8VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 14.1", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus F8VA

Asus M50SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Asus M50SA

Asus M51T: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.4", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51T

Asus M51VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.4", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51VA

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.1", 4 kg
  External Review » Asus M70SA

Asus V1V: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus V1V

Asus X72SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.1", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X72SA

Dell Studio 17: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.1", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 17

Dell Studio 1735: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 1735

Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, 17.1", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530

Gateway MD7826u: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.6", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Gateway MD7826u

Lenovo IdeaPad Y730: Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100, 17", 4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y730

Lenovo Thinkpad T500: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad T500

Lenovo ThinkPad W500: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.4", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad W500

Lenovo Thinkpad W500 2055-51U: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.4", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad W500

Packard Bell EasyNote SL81 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 17", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote SL81

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 16.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU

Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 16.4", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ

Sony Vaio VGN-FW390: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.4", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW390

Toshiba Satellite A300: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300

Toshiba Satellite A300D: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300D

Toshiba Satellite A350-205: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350-205

Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 16", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O

Toshiba Satellite A350D-202 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 16", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-202

Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944

Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1
Radeon RX 580
Class 2
GeForce GTX 580
Radeon HD 6970
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Radeon HD 4850
Class 3
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 430
Class 4
Radeon HD 5570
GeForce GT 220
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Class 5
Radeon HD 4350
GeForce G 107M *
Chrome9HD *
Class 6
unknown *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)