Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

This is a middle class graphic chip, which is fabricated in 55nm process and probably can be classified  above the HD 2600 / HD 2700 (due to higher clock speed).

120 Stream processors (48 5-dimensional Shader units) manage the tasks of the Shader and Pixel pipelines.

Due to Avivo video engine the graphic card can support the processor with several video operations (HD video too).

ManufacturerATI
Mobility Radeon 3000 Series
Mobility Radeon HD 3670 compare 120 @ 0.68 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3650 120 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
CodenameM86
ArchitectureRV6xx
Pipelines120 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Transistor Count378 Million
technology55 nm
Features Powerplay 7.0, PCI-E 2.0, 2 dual-link-fähige DVI Ausgänge (HDCP fähig), integrierter DisplayPort Ausgänge. bis 2560x1600
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement07.01.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/de/products/mobilityr...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 570     avg: 805     median: 855 (1%)     max: 990 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 446     avg: 635     median: 669 (1%)     max: 791 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 14861     avg: 22425     median: 23042 (24%)     max: 27281 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 8302     avg: 9596     median: 9268.5 (5%)     max: 11453 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6527     avg: 7539     median: 7295 (11%)     max: 8780 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
3330 points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3321     avg: 3507     median: 3360 (6%)     max: 3890 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
min: 3302     avg: 3607     median: 3667 (7%)     max: 3853 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
4147 Points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
11.5 points (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
11.3 points (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
14.1 points (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
19 points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
7.9 points (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
17.2 points (25%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
4.2 points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
6.9 points (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.1 Points (77%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
5.1 Points (65%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2575     avg: 3323     median: 3291 (16%)     max: 4556 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
5.7 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
33.8 43.4 48.2 48.5 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
18.1 21.5 21.5 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
9.4 10 10 11.2 11.2 13.3 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.1
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
15
19.2
19.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
23
High 1280x800
10.8
High 800x600
14
Low 1920x1200
14
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
14.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
37.5 37.8 43.1 43.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.7 17.8 18.5 19.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 8.1 9 9 9.3 10.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
31.8
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
13
16.4
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
22
Low 1920x1200
13
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
9.1
Med 0xAF 0xAA 1600x1200
8
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
12.1
12
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
33 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
23
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
17
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
5
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
20
High 0xAF 0xAA 1400x1050
5
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
30 31 165 166 220 309 309 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
28 29 29 84 88 94 101 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
19 22 22 24 24 25 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
120 129.7 160.4 173.5 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
119.9 133.8 154.2 169.2 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
104.6 105.5 119.2 135.8 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
70.9 75.3 77.4 93.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
322 335.8 423.5 464.3 ~ 386 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 18. 04:44:10

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:25:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#3 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 650 +0.012s ... 0.053s

#7 got single benchmarks 650 +0.024s ... 0.077s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.106s ... 0.184s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.184s

#11 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.19s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.19s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.191s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.09s ... 0.281s

#15 return log +0.004s ... 0.285s

Notebook reviews with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 graphics card

Acer Extensa 7630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer Extensa 7630G Notebook

Asus M50S: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.40", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Asus M50S Notebook

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 4 kg
  Review » Review Asus M70S Notebook

Dell Studio 17: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  Review » Review Dell Studio 17 Notebook

Lenovo Thinkpad T500: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo Thinkpad T500 Notebook

Lenovo Thinkpad W500 2055-51U: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo Thinkpad W500 Notebook

Acer Aspire 8530G: AMD Turion X2 RM-72, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 8530G

Acer Extensa 5630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T5800, 15.40", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 5630G

Acer Extensa 7630G: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Extensa 7630G

Asus F8VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 14.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus F8VA

Asus M50SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Asus M50SA

Asus M51T: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51T

Asus M51VA: Intel Core 2 Duo P9500, 15.40", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus M51VA

Asus M70SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 4 kg
  External Review » Asus M70SA

Asus V1V: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus V1V

Asus X72SA: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus X72SA

Dell Studio 17: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.10", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 17

Dell Studio 1735: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Studio 1735

Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, 17.10", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xa3530

Gateway MD7826u: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Gateway MD7826u

Lenovo IdeaPad Y730: Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100, 17.00", 4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y730

Lenovo Thinkpad T500: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad T500

Lenovo ThinkPad W500: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad W500

Lenovo Thinkpad W500 2055-51U: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Thinkpad W500

Packard Bell EasyNote SL81 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 17.00", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote SL81

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11J

Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW11ZU

Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z : Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW21Z

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E: Intel Core 2 Duo T6400, 16.40", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E

Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.40", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW31ZJ

Sony Vaio VGN-FW390: Intel Core 2 Duo T9550, 16.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-FW390

Toshiba Satellite A300: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300

Toshiba Satellite A300D: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A300D

Toshiba Satellite A350-205: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350-205

Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-10O

Toshiba Satellite A350D-202 : AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A350D-202

Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 16.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite A355-S6944

Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D: AMD Turion X2 RM-70, 15.40", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6700M *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6600M *
Radeon RX 6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *

Class 2

GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Radeon Pro 5600M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *

Class 3

Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs *
Vega 8 R5000 *
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 R4000 *
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 5300
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Class 5

Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Radeon R6 (Mullins)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)