Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT is the DirectX 10 capable successor of the GeForce Go 7600 GT for laptops. Depending on the used graphic memory and the clock speed,  the performance is between the 7600 GT and 7900 GS video card. Therefore, games like Company of Heroes, Supreme Commander, or F.E.A.R can be played fluently with high details in a resolution of 1024 or similar. Still, the shader power is not sufficient to display DirectX 10 effects of games like Crysis fluently (Crysis will only run well in low details).  Gamers, who every time expect supreme frame rates, should get at least a 8800M card.

The 8600M series is one of the first-laptop-GPUs, which support DirectX 10 and accelerate the H.264-decoding of HD-movies.

The particularity of this video card are the "Unified Shader". Pixel- and vertex-shaders do not exist any more but 32 of the so called stream processors do the graphic work (which up to now pixel- and vertex shaders did).

The memory clock speed depends on the used memory: 400 MHz for GDDR2 memory and 700 Mhz for GDDR3 (which is noticeable faster).

The integrated PureVideo engine is one of the advantages of the 8600M GT. It supports (HD) encoding of H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, and WMV9 video content. Compared to the slower 8600M GS (and 8400M series) the 8600M GT supports a few more video features (see comparison chart).

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce 8600M Series
GeForce 8600M GT SLI compare 64 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GT 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GS compare 16 @ 600 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
CodenameG84M
ArchitectureG8x
Pipelines32 - unified
Core Speed475 MHz
Shader Speed950 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistor Count289 Million
technology80 nm
FeaturesShader clock frequence 950 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 power management (dynamic switching between performance and energy economizing), HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full screen AA, 16x AF independent of angles, 128-Bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI-D exits for resolutions of TFT up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement09.06.2007
InformationSpeichertakt (Vorgaben): DDR2 - 400 MHz
DDR3 - 700 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_860...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13417     avg: 22071     median: 22231.5 (23%)     max: 28050 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5244     avg: 10215     median: 10151.5 (5%)     max: 13515 Points
+ 26 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 4279     avg: 6175     median: 6024 (11%)     max: 8078 Points
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 +
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
min: 4.5     avg: 4.8     median: 4.7 (69%)     max: 5.9 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
50.8 40.3 43.8 50.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
17.6 18 18.6 19.6 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
7.6 8.7 9.8 10.1 10.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
32.6
36.6
42.4
42
38.7
36.2
37.6
29.6
41.4
21.5
27.8
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
14.2
14.5
15.6
16.5
17.4
15
16.9
11.2
17.2
18.3
10.9
13.2
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
26.6
35.3
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
11.9
13.1
11.8
High 1280x800
9
7.3
6.9
6.1
7
8.5
9.4
6.2
7.5
High 800x600
15
11.3
11.9
11.4
13.7
15.7
8.9
13.6
11.2
High 1680x1050
4.3
Medium 1680x1050
9.5
11
Low 1680x1050
23.9
25.3
Low 1920x1200
21
Medium 1920x1200
5.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
60.5
60.6
53.1
66.5
30
37.8
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
28.2
27.4
27.7
29.8
15.3
18.5
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
34.8 42.9 46.8 51 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
14 15.3 18.3 19 19.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
7.2 8.6 9.4 10.1 10.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
28.2
42.1
32.5
35.9
33.3
38.6
33.3
33.2
36.5
24.5
35.7
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
12.3
16
16.6
13.9
15.2
11.1
17.3
12.6
12.7
14.4
16.2
10
11.8
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
22.2
31.6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
10.3
12.8
12.2
Low 1680x1050
21.2
22.2
Medium 1680x1050
9.2
8.1
High 1680x1050
4.2
Medium 1920x1200
8
Low 1920x1200
13.7
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
7.8
5.9
7
6.7
7.7
8.6
5.8
9.1
Med 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
22
20.9
22.5
25.8
13.9
16.4
Low 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
57.4
54.2
53.2
59.4
29.3
46.8
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
11.3
11
6.5
12.1
14.2
12.6
8.2
10.2
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
27 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
11 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
30
29
25
27
25
20
High 2xAF 2xAA 800x600
14
19
15
19
16
14
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
23
20
18
19
18
25
16
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
9
12
10
11
10
12
10
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
14
17
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
8
8
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
34 102 112 211 222 231 250 270 270 283 284 286 291 299 302 303 306 311 342 383 423 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
med. 800x600
29 29 29 29 30 30 32 32 55 88 96 98 98 101 101 102 109 112 114 127 127 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
13 24 25 25 26 27 28 28 28 29 30 30 31 31 31 36 36 37 43 44 73 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
96.7 106.4 107.1 111.9 115 119.8 132.5 132.5 135.5 141.3 142.3 145.5 149.7 150.2 151.8 153.9 167.3 169 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
97.5 103.8 111.9 113.2 113.8 118.3 121.9 123.2 125.8 126.1 126.4 127.8 130 133.6 143.7 150.2 150.5 170.8 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
84.8 91.7 97.6 98.3 98.5 105 106.3 109.7 114.3 114.4 114.7 115.3 119 119.2 126.5 129.5 142.5 145.4 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
53.9 59.7 60.6 67.8 75.8 76.1 76.1 77 77.1 79.2 81.1 83.4 86.5 86.5 87.9 92.2 99.9 100.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
153.3 236.5 239.3 268.4 345.3 348.4 365.2 422.2 451 453.8 461 474 479.8 ~ 361 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15

Game Performance

The following values are based on different reviews and can actually differ due to low processor power or lower clocked graphics cards. It should only give a general impression, which games should be playable. If not stated otherwise, the benchmarks were recorded without Antialiasing (AA) and Anisotrope Filtering (AF).

Gears of War: 1280x800, default (medium-high): 35 fps -> well playable with seldom stuttering
Call of Juarez : 1280x800, DX10: 20 fps -> barely playable
Company of Heroes: 1440x900, high details-> playable (not completely fluent)
World in Conflict: 1024x768, medium details (DX9), Benchmark: 23 fps -> playable (DX 10 not playable)
F.E.A.R.: 1024x768, CPU max, GPU max: 24-40 fps -> well playable
Command and Conquer 3 (C&C 3): 1024x768, high details: 30 fps well playable
Supreme Commander: 1024x768, high details: 16-44 fps -> playable (large Multiplayer battles may need a faster GPU)
Colin McRae Dirt: 1024x768, high: 20 fps -> barely playable (reduce details)
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: 1024x768, maximum quality: 18 fps not playable -> with reduced details playable
Splinter Cell - Chaos Theory: 1280x800 -> well playable
Oblivion: 1280x800, max details: 40 fps -> well playable
Half Life 2 - Episode 1: 1280x800: 70 fps -> well playable
Prey: 1280x800: 40 fps -> well playable
Anno 1701: 1024x768, high Details: 48 fps -> well playable
Doom 3: 1024x768, Details: Ultra: 67 fps -> well playable
Age of Empires 3: 1024x768, hohe Details (without footprints), Skirmish zu 8t: 30-40 fps -> well playable
Quake 3 Arena: 1024x768, max Details: 236.5 fps -> well playable

The gaming tests show that the 8600M GT is capable of displaying current games fluently. However, DirectX 10 effects should not be enabled to sustain playable framerates.

Framerate in Gears of War with a 8600M GT with 256 MB GDDR3 (MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz)
Framerate in Gears of War with a 8600M GT with 256 MB GDDR3 (MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz)

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT graphics card

Acer Aspire 5920G: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire 5920G Notebook

Apple MacBook Pro 15" 2.2GHz: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.4", 2.4 kg
  Review » Long-term review Apple MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz Notebook with Mac OS X

Apple MacBook Pro 15" 2.4GHz: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700, 15.4", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 15'' Notebook (Santa Rosa)

Apple MacBook Pro 15" 4,1 Penryn: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.4", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Apple MacBook Pro 15" V4.1 (2.5 GHz Penryn)

Asus C90S: Intel Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600, 15.4", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Asus C90S (AK001C) Power-Notebook

Asus G1S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.4", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review Asus G1S Notebook

Asus V1S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 3 kg
  Review » User-Review Asus V1S Notebook

  Review » Review Asus V1S Notebook

Compal FL90: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Compal FL90 Notebook

Dell Inspiron 1720: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 17", 3.9 kg
  Review » Review Dell Inspiron 1720 Notebook

Dell Vostro 1500: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 15.4", 3.3 kg
  Review » Review Dell Vostro 1500 Laptop

Dell XPS M1530: Intel Core 2 Duo T7250, 15.4", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Dell XPS M1530 Notebook

MSI Megabook GX600: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review MSI Megabook GX600 Notebook

MSI Megabook GX700: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 3.5 kg
  Review » Review MSI Megabook GX700 Extreme Gaming Notebook

Samsung R700 Aura T9300 Dillen: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17", 3.1 kg
  Review » Review Samsung R700 Aura T9300 Dillen Notebook

Zepto Znote 3415W: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 15.4", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Zepto Znote 3415W Notebook

Zepto Znote 6224W: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 14.1", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Zepto Znote 6224W

Zepto Znote 6324W: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 14.1", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Zepto Znote 6324W Notebook

Zepto Znote 6625WD: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  Review » User-Review Zepto Znote 6625WD Notebook

Zepto Znote 6625WD T9500: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 15.4", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Zepto Znote 6625WD Notebook (T9500)

Acer Aspire 5920: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5920

Acer Aspire 6920G-594G32Bn : Intel Core 2 Duo T5900, 16", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 6920G-594G32Bn

Acer Aspire 9920G: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 20.1", 6.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 9920G

Apple MacBook Pro 15 Zoll Santa Rosa: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700, 15.4", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Apple Macbook Pro (15 inch Santa Rosa)

Apple Macbook Pro 17“ 2008-12: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Apple Macbook Pro 17“ 2008-12

Asus C90S: Intel Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600, 15.4", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus C90S

Asus G1S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Asus G1S

Asus G2S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Asus G2S

Asus Lamborghini VX2S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.4", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Lamborghini VX2S

Asus V1S: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus V1S

Dell Inspiron 1720: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 17.1", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 1720

Dell Vostro 1500: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 1500

Dell Vostro 1700: Intel Core 2 Duo T7100, 17.1", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 1700

Dell XPS M1530: Intel Core 2 Duo T7250, 15.4", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS M1530

HP Pavilion dv5t: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400, 15.4", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv5t

HP Pavilion dv9500t: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 17.1", 4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv9500t

LG R700: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.1", 3.6 kg
  External Review » LG R700

Maxdata Belinea o.book 5: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Maxdata Belinea o.book 5

MSI Megabook GX600: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 15.4", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX600

MSI Megabook GX700: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Megabook GX700

Packard Bell EasyNote MB89: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 15.4", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote MB89

Sony Vaio VGN-AR51SU: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700, 17.1", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AR51SU

Sony Vaio VGN-AR590E: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 17.1", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AR590E

Sony Vaio VGN-AR61: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.1", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AR61ZU

Sony Vaio VGN-AR71ZU: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.1", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Sony Vaio VGN-AR71ZU

Toshiba Qosmio G40 10E: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 17.1", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G40-10E

Toshiba Qosmio G40 11L: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 17.1", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G40-11L

Toshiba Qosmio G45: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 17.1", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio G45

Toshiba Satellite X200-219: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite X200-219

Toshiba Satellite X200-24V: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.1", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite X200-24V

Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi3: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 17.1", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi3

Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi4: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100, 17.1", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi4

Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi5: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300, 17.1", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite X205-SLi5

Zepto Znote 3415W: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 15.4", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Zepto Znote 3415W

Zepto Znote 6224W: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 14.1", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Zepto Znote 6224W

Zepto Znote 6324W: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, 14.1", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Zepto Znote 6324W

Zepto Znote 6623WD: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700, 15.4", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Zepto Znote 6623WD

Zepto Znote 6625WD: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, 15.4", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Zepto Znote 6625WD

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile *
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q *
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200

Class 2

Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Radeon Pro 5600M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile *
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
GeForce MX450 *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
Iris Xe G7 96EUs *
GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Quadro K5100M
Quadro P1000
GeForce MX350 *
Xe DG1 LP
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
GeForce GTX 870M
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Radeon R9 M390
FirePro M6100
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX150
GeForce MX330 *
Quadro M2000M
Quadro K5000M
Quadro K4100M
Tiger Lake-U Xe G7 80EUs *
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
GeForce GTX 850M
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro K4000M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Radeon R9 M470 *
Quadro K3100M
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5)
FirePro W5130M
Quadro K3000M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
FirePro M6000
FirePro M5100
GeForce MX230

Class 3

Vega 8 R4000 *
Quadro K2100M
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce 845M
Radeon R9 M265X
Radeon R7 M465
FirePro W4170M
GeForce GT 750M
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Quadro K1100M
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) *
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
GeForce 840M
GeForce GT 745M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GeForce GT 740M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 R4000 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce 830M
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
Quadro K2000M
GeForce GT 735M
GeForce 825M
FirePro M4000
GeForce GT 730M
FirePro M4100
Radeon R7 M265
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
GeForce GT 640M
Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics P530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
HD Graphics 5600
Radeon R6 M255DX
Quadro K1000M
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Radeon R5 M255
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
GeForce 820M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *
GeForce GT 720M

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
Quadro K610M
Iris Graphics 5100
HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 5500
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 615
Radeon R5 (Carrizo) *
Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
GeForce 710M
HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 4000
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
HD Graphics 4200
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Class 5

HD Graphics (Haswell)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
GeForce 8600M GT
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)