Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)

The Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 for laptops is a professional high-end graphics card for big and powerful laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 (mobile) but offers more shaders (128 more). Compared to the desktop RTX 5000, the mobile variant offers lower clock speeds. There are different versions available with 110 Watt (1035 - 1545 MHz) and 150 Watt (1350 - 1770 MHz) in addition to the even lower clocked Max-Q variant.

ModelTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 5000 Desktop23016201815
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile15013501770
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile11010351545
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q909301455
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q857651395
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q806001350

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

Depending on the application or game, the Quadro RTX 5000 is even faster than the GeForce RTX 2080 and therefore the fastest mobile graphics card. Especially for some professional apps and workflows that make use of the large VRAM, the Quadro can best the RTX2080 clearly.

The high power consumption of the RTX5000 makes the card most suited for big and heavy laptops. The slower Max-Q variant is intended for thinner laptops.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19E-Q5
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines3072 - unified
Core Speed1035 / 1350 - 1545 / 1770 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption110 / 150 Watt
Transistor Count13.6 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesNVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10.5 pt (32%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 18233     avg: 25897     median: 24620 (21%)     max: 32999 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
413 fps (94%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4973     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (49%)     max: 0.4994 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
234.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
200.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
183.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
180.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
128.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
231.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
77.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
106.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
145.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
112.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
109.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
232.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
96.8
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
34.6
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
186.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
152  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
153.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
149.7
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
239  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
55.9
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
243  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
210  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
146  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
78  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
173 271.6 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132 154.6 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98 113.7 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71.1 83.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
303.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
85.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
119.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
289.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
208.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
200.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
84.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
161  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
63.4
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
143.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
135  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
76.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
187  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
161.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
151.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
84.3
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102 147 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.6 130 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.9 126 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.1 118 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
148
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
128  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
102  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
143
low 1280x720
110  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
329.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
216.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
206.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Extreme Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
57.2
low 1024x768
350.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
296.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
279.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
266.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
138  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
113.8
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
235 375.3 ~ 305 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
217 308.5 ~ 263 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163 198.6 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.4 109.9 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
49
low 1280x720
458  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
396.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
367.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
216.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
757  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
681  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
625  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
319.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom Eternal234.5200.2183.7180.8128.568.6
Hunt Showdown231.1163.8130.487.877.1
Escape from Tarkov121121120.3110.6106.653.8
Red Dead Redemption 2145.6125.987.454.143.728.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order112.8112.1107.589.650.2
Need for Speed Heat109.9104.998.795.98952.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019232.6156.2144.9119.386.648.8
GRID 2019186.6144.5142.5100.780.754.9
Ghost Recon Breakpoint152125118886638
Borderlands 3153.8130.2104.585.559.831.5
Control239123.793.360.530.1
F1 201924321018214414678
Total War: Three Kingdoms2221431067753.325.9
Rage 2303.8160.4137.1133.885.842.2
Anno 1800119.2118.893.151.146.930.3
The Division 2178156131555538
Dirt Rally 2.0289.3208.4200.1115.584.351.2
Metro Exodus161124.495.27759.336.7
Apex Legends144144144143.913576.3
Battlefield V187164.6161.7151.9123.972.7
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey11310494736340
Shadow of the Tomb Raider125104101968747
Far Cry 515012812311510256
X-Plane 11.1111084.576.5
For Honor329.3216.9206.8160.468.4
Rainbow Six Siege350.2296.1279.6266.2138
Dota 2 Reborn14413297.592
The Witcher 330526318110071
BioShock Infinite458396.9367.9216.3
Tomb Raider757681625319.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
25


6
24


13
17

3
15
9

6
13
4
2
16
7
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:58:07

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.075s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.075s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.075s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9852 +0.037s ... 0.113s

#7 got single benchmarks 9852 +0.022s ... 0.135s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.042s ... 1.177s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.177s

#11 Got 177 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 1.194s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.194s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.026s ... 1.219s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.679s ... 2.898s

#15 return log +0.068s ... 2.966s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) graphics card

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T laptop review: Too expensive for a hexa-core workstation

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T laptop review: Too expensive for a hexa-core workstation

For mobile workstations, performance is the top priority. Accordingly, Asus equips its ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T with the Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 but does ...
Intel Xeon E-2276M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) | 17.00" | 2.9 kg
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro in Review: Workstation convertible for creative professionals

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro in Review: Workstation convertible for creative professionals

Acer's 17.3-inch workstation shines with a lot of performance, a 4K touchscreen display with an included Wacom stylus, and a Thunderbolt 3 port. The configurati...
Intel Core i9-9980HK | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) | 17.30" | 4.5 kg

Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel Pro CC715-91P-X92: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel Pro CC715-91P-X92

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8103R: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8103R

Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-73YL: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-73YL

Dell Precision 7540 Xeon E2286M, RTX 5000: unknown, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 7540 Xeon E2286M, RTX 5000

HP ZBook 17 G6, Xeon E-2286, RTX 5000: unknown, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook 17 G6, Xeon E-2286, RTX 5000

Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-75G8: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-75G8

MSI WS65 9TM-857: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI WS65 9TM-857

Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 17.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X-W730G5T, i7-9750H: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X-W730G5T, i7-9750H

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro: Intel Core i9-9980HK, 17.30", 4.5 kg
   » Acer's creative tool has left us with a good impression - Acer ConceptD 9 Pro CN917-71P in review

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Laptop Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-11)