Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)

The Nvidia Quadro T1000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650, the Quadro T1000 features less CUDA cores / shaders (768 versus 896). The Quadro T2000 uses the same TU117 chip, but features all 1024 cores (2x to the T1000) and is therefore significantly faster. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q1
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines768 - unified
Core Speed1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption50 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4 pt (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10407     avg: 11305     median: 11377 (10%)     max: 12132 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 33809     avg: 35034     median: 35033.5 (46%)     max: 36258 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.7     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3684     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (41%)     max: 0.4566 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
190.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
134.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
87.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
67.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
125.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
208  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
171.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
85
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
136.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
118 178 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73 105 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 92 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 79 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
182.3 189 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.4 62.5 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5 39.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.7 25.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
123.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
69.6 94.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.8 73.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.2 45.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 23.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 61 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 48 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 35 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
185.2 232.8 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.7 100.5 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.7 79.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.3 42.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
143.7 144 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.8 92.7 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.8 69 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.9 68.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.5 138.1 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.2 76.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8 66.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35 59.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
182.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
57 82 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40 55 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 50 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
148  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
88 101 111 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46 56.7 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 50 54.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35 45 46 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
93
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
107  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
71
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
491.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
199.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
79.7 91 108 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.2 78 96 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.1 69 80.1 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
93.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
56.1 77.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.9 49.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
246.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
163.4 199.8 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.7 77.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.9 74.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.8 56.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
136.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
190.3 244.3 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159.6 197.9 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.6 139.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.9 117.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
134 141.4 151 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115 124.8 136 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113 113.6 123 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106 106.7 115 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
156.2 189 190.7 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
94.1 114 115.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.7 62.8 62.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.9 35 37.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
170.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
148.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
150.5
low 1280x720
280.4 316.4 ~ 298 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
210 241 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
184.7 216.3 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.9 86.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics190.991.858.443.5
Doom Eternal1507864.3
Hunt Showdown134.15144.4
Escape from Tarkov121.487.967.856
Red Dead Redemption 287.946.729.919.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order67.357.650.4
Need for Speed Heat8660.551.946.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201996.761.250.844
GRID 2019125.476.865.242.8
Ghost Recon Breakpoint93534732
FIFA 20208171.3160.3148.9
Borderlands 3117.958.73828.5
Control136.842.431.2
F1 2019148897764
Total War: Three Kingdoms186613825
Rage 2123.755.245.745.1
Anno 180082634122
The Division 2111504232
Dirt Rally 2.0209917239
Far Cry New Dawn77484643
Metro Exodus93.343.431.925.5
Apex Legends144836362
Battlefield V100605247
Farming Simulator 19182.4106.786.366.5
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey70484329
FIFA 19148119.2113.5110.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider100544842
Far Cry 5107625753
World of Tanks enCore491.9199.377.1
X-Plane 11.11938069
Kingdom Come: Deliverance93.749.340.530.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark674633
Rocket League246.4150.7117
Ghost Recon Wildlands9447.243.924.2
For Honor182726953
Rise of the Tomb Raider136.28653.443.8
Rainbow Six Siege217179125108
Dota 2 Reborn14212511710947.9
The Witcher 31791085935
GTA V170.1153.993.841.7
BioShock Infinite29822620180
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


17
23

14
20
7
1
23
13
3
7
19
8
1




1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 12:48:51

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9860 +0.026s ... 0.075s

#7 got single benchmarks 9860 +0.019s ... 0.094s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.848s ... 0.943s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.943s

#11 Got 233 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.962s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.962s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.029s ... 0.992s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.327s ... 2.318s

#15 return log +0.038s ... 2.357s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) graphics card

Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen 1 laptop review: Mobile workstation with a weak spot in the keyboard

Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen 1 laptop review: Mobile workstation with a weak spot in the keyboard

After we tested the ThinkPad T15g with a GeForce GPU, we now take a look at the Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen 1 model. The entry-level version of the workstation fare...
Intel Core i7-10750H | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 15.60" | 2.7 kg
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P in review: Mobile workstation with space for 3 drives

Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P in review: Mobile workstation with space for 3 drives

Acer's 15.6-inch workstation scores points with powerful hardware, good battery life, extensive upgrade options and a Pantone-certified Full HD display. The dev...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 15.60" | 2.4 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019 Laptop Review: Slim workstation with stronger GPU and weaker CPU

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019 Laptop Review: Slim workstation with stronger GPU and weaker CPU

Lenovo has introduced the second generation of its slim, high-end ThinkPad P1 workstation into the market. Included on board are the newest Nvidia Quadro GPUs b...
Intel Core i7-9850H | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7-2C9X7EA: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 17 G7-2C9X7EA

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC314-72P-75P3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC314-72P-75P3

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G1T-H8004R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G1T-H8004R

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-767Y: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-767Y

Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN002VMX: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN002VMX

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P (i7-9750H, Quadro T1000): Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P (i7-9750H, Quadro T1000)

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 20QT000LMH : Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 20QT000LMH

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QNS00Q00: Intel Core i5-9400H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QNS00Q00

Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
   » Lenovo makes cleaning the fans easier in the ThinkPad P15 Gen 1

Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » No Thunderbolt 3 for Acer's workstation - The Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P in review

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Laptop Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-14)