Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a professional graphics card for workstations. The graphics card is equipped with the AD102 graphics chip, which combines 18,176 shader units in its full configuration. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is also equipped with the AD102. However, this only offers 16,384 shader units. The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada generation also has 128 RT cores, 512 tensor cores and 48 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with error detection (ECC).

Performance

The performance of the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada generation is significantly better than that of the Nvidia GeForce RTX A6000. The differences in performance between the Ampere generation and the current Ada Lovelace generation were already apparent in the consumer sector. As a result, the current top model of the workstation graphics cards can also score with enormously high performance. Thanks to certified drivers, which unfold their full potential in combination with professional applications, even an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 can be outperformed.

Compared to conventional applications, which cannot rely on the performance of specially adapted drivers, the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada generation is clearly inferior to the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. The significantly lower power consumption compared to the consumer flagship makes the difference here.

The Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada generation requires a maximum of 300 watts under load. The graphics card is also designed for stable continuous operation under full load. This is also underpinned by the enormous 48 GB VRAM.

CodenameAda Lovelace
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines18176 - unified
TMUs568
ROPs192
Raytracing Cores142
Tensor / AI Cores568
Core Speed915 - 2505 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance91.06 TFLOPS FP16, 91.06 TFLOPS FP32, 1.423 TFLOPS FP64
CacheL2: 96 MB
Memory Speed20000 effective = 2500 MHz
Memory Bus Width384 bit Bit
Memory Type8.9
Max. Amount of Memory48 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth960 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption300 Watt
Transistor Count76.3 Billion
Die Size 609 mm²
technology5 nm
PCIePCIe 4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4
Date of Announcement03.12.2022

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
13057 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
13239 Points (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
33120 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
36679 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
155052 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
53621 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
74054 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
166355 Points (64%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
45615 Points (55%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
70850 Points (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
126448 Points (37%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
145886 Points (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
52895 Points (69%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
201 fps (61%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
10 Seconds (1%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
7 Seconds (3%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
319 fps (79%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
677 fps (100%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
429 fps (75%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
282 fps (72%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
266 fps (72%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
58.2 fps (52%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
250 fps (100%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
349 fps (58%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
473 fps (71%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
278 fps (75%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
430.2 fps (73%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
331.9 fps (56%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
637 fps (72%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
230.1 fps (74%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
590 fps (86%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
579 fps (64%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
497 fps (78%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
974 fps (100%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
79 fps (51%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
506 fps (73%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
457 fps (64%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
191 fps (86%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
139 fps (91%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
207 fps (70%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6836 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
288.8 fps (95%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
368.7 fps (22%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
315798 points (82%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
306410 points (76%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
11988 Samples/s (43%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
27475 Samples/s (48%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
78676 points (65%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
330.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
215.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
157.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
140.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
140.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
112.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
352.3
low 1920x1080
164.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
162.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
155.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
147.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
131  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
79.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
163.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
93
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
140.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
129  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
112.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
103.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
89.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
144.5
low 1920x1080
287  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
248  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
219  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
210  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
208  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
128.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
280
RT Ultra Preset / On FXAA 1920x1080
86.5
low 1920x1080
183.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
169.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
160.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
94.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
54  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
108.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
177.6
Ultra DLSS Quality 3840x2160
76.3
low 1920x1080
334  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
232  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
219  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
175.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
87.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
359
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
177.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
159.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
143.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
142.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
138.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
109.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
173.3
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
108.4
low 1280x720
238  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
220  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
208  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
199  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
192  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
125  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
173  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
181.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
138.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
87.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
175.5
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
99  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
98  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
167.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
94.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
89.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
76.5
low 1280x720
265  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
250  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
240  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
233  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
219  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
127.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
261
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
118  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
115  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
140
low 1280x720
163.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
100.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
228  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
228  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
201  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
194.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
168.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
153.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
153.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
661  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
579  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
489  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
260  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
219  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
183.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
124
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
545
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh330.6215.3157.5140.9140.7112.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty164.2162.5155.3147.213160.3
Starfield140.5129112.6103.989.162.9
The Witcher 3 v4287248219210208128.1
A Plague Tale Requiem183.6169.3160.613194.254
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands334265232219175.387.3
Far Cry 6177.8159.2143.5142.9138.9109.9
Horizon Zero Dawn238220208199192125
Borderlands 3181.9156.5153.2141138.187.7
Far Cry New Dawn1271131091009998
Metro Exodus167.6125114.4103.694.589.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider265250240233219127.9
Far Cry 5144130126118118115
X-Plane 11.11163.5155.6123.3100.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark228228201194.7124.2
Dota 2 Reborn168.7159164.8153.6153.1
The Witcher 3661579489260219183.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



17


1
16


3
14


4
11


5
10

1
10
6

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 07. 20:21:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:41:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11635 +0.013s ... 0.038s

#8 got single benchmarks 11635 +0.01s ... 0.048s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.124s ... 1.172s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.172s

#12 Got 101 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 1.183s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.183s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 1.216s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.521s ... 1.737s

#16 return log +0.007s ... 1.744s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-02-22)