Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a High-End desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell architecture. It uses the big GM200 chip with 2,816 CUDA cores (versus 2048 of the GTX 980) and is manufactured in 28 nm. Together with the NVidia Titan X (that uses the same chip with more graphics memory), the 980Ti was the fastest single chip graphics card for desktops in 2015. In 2016 the new Pascal based GeForce GTX 1070 and 1080 however were faster while using less energy thanks to the new architecture and the 16 nm process.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 900 Series
GeForce GTX 980 SLI (Laptop) 4096 @ 1126 - 1228 (Boost) MHz2x 256 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 2816 @ 1000 - 1200 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce GTX 980 2048 @ 1126 - 1216 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) 2048 @ 1126 - 1228 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 970 1664 @ 1050 - 1178 (Boost) MHz224 + 32 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 960 1024 @ 1127 - 1178 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 950 768 @ 1024 - 1188 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 3300 MHz
CodenameGM200
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines2816 - unified
Core Speed *1000 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed *7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory6144 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
Power Consumption250 Watt
Transistors8000 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI
Date of Announcement02.06.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/geforce-gtx-...
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
0%
100%
min: 91.1     avg: 91.1 (63%)     median: 91.1 (63%)     max: 91.1 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
0%
100%
min: 481     avg: 481 (88%)     median: 481 (88%)     max: 481 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
0%
100%
min: 60     avg: 60 (26%)     median: 60 (26%)     max: 60 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 5058     avg: 5058 (39%)     median: 5058 (39%)     max: 5058 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
0%
100%
min: 5026     avg: 5026 (49%)     median: 5026 (49%)     max: 5026 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
0%
100%
min: 16961     avg: 16961 (42%)     median: 16961 (42%)     max: 16961 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
0%
100%
min: 14339     avg: 14339 (61%)     median: 14339 (61%)     max: 14339 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 98958     avg: 98958 (61%)     median: 98958 (61%)     max: 98958 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 29684     avg: 29684 (60%)     median: 29684 (60%)     max: 29684 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
0%
100%
min: 443119     avg: 443119 (97%)     median: 443119 (97%)     max: 443119 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
0%
100%
min: 12373     avg: 12373 (56%)     median: 12373 (56%)     max: 12373 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
0%
100%
min: 2490     avg: 2490 (47%)     median: 2490 (47%)     max: 2490 Samples/s
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
0%
100%
min: 3919     avg: 3919 (38%)     median: 3919 (38%)     max: 3919 Samples/s
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 23057     avg: 23057 (45%)     median: 23057 (45%)     max: 23057 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 18303     avg: 18303 (64%)     median: 18303 (64%)     max: 18303 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
P Result 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mass Effect Andromeda
high 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.3  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
32.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ghost Recon Wildlands
low 1280x720
156  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
293  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
158  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
47.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
241
Extreme Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
33.2
Resident Evil 7
3840x2160
46.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Watch Dogs 2
ultra 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
33.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dishonored 2
ultra 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
36.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare
ultra 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra / On T2X SMAA 3840x2160
51.6
Titanfall 2
ultra 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Farming Simulator 17
3840x2160
117  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Battlefield 1
ultra 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
3840x2160
55.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Civilization VI
ultra 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare